Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

On 5/25/2017 8:36 PM, Pierz Newton-John wrote: Is something up with Everything List - your reply is not on the site and I’m seeing this business with “reply to David 4” etc…? On 26 May 2017, at 12:29 pm, Brent Meeker wrote: On 5/25/2017 6:30 PM, Pierz wrote:

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

I clicked "reply", but for some reason it only went to you. I'll copy to the list. Brent On 5/25/2017 8:36 PM, Pierz Newton-John wrote: Is something up with Everything List - your reply is not on the site and I’m seeing this business with “reply to David 4” etc…? On 26 May 2017, at 12:29

A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

Recently I've been studying a lot of history, and I've often thought about how, according to special relativity, you can translate time into space and vice versa, and therefore how from a different perspective we can think of the past as distant in space rather than time: my childhood being 40

Re: Answers to David 4

On 26/05/2017 9:11 am, David Nyman wrote: On 25 May 2017 23:18, "Brent Meeker" > wrote: I have told you my theory of virtuous circular explanations. "Invoke" is a pejorative attribution. The physical universe is an */inference

Fwd: Answers to David 4

-- Forwarded message -- From: David Nyman Date: 26 May 2017 at 02:13 Subject: Re: Answers to David 4 To: Brent Meeker , Bruno Marchal < bruno.fernand.marc...@gmail.com> On 26 May 2017 at 01:24, Brent Meeker

Fwd: Answers to David 4

-- Forwarded message -- From: David Nyman Date: 26 May 2017 at 01:53 Subject: Re: Answers to David 4 To: Brent Meeker On 26 May 2017 at 01:24, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > On 5/25/2017 4:11 PM, David Nyman wrote:

Re: Answers to David 4

On 25 May 2017 23:18, "Brent Meeker" wrote: On 5/25/2017 8:25 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Also, "my" theory is believed by almost all scientists. Diderot call it simply "rationalism". If Brent does not believe in mechanism, he should tell us what is his explanation for

Re: Answers to David 4

On 5/25/2017 8:25 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Also, "my" theory is believed by almost all scientists. Diderot call it simply "rationalism". If Brent does not believe in mechanism, he should tell us what is his explanation for consciousness. But here, he clearly dismiss the problem when saying

Answers David 5

For mysterious reason, this one does not seem to go through. New attempt. On 24 May 2017, at 13:58, David Nyman wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: David Nyman Date: 20 May 2017 at 10:29 Subject: Re: ​Movie argument To: everything-list

Answers to David 4

On 24 May 2017, at 13:58, David Nyman wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: David Nyman Date: 20 May 2017 at 10:29 Subject: Re: ​Movie argument To: everything-list On 20 May 2017 02:36, "Brent Meeker"

Answers to David 2

On 24 May 2017, at 13:53, David Nyman wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: David Nyman Date: 22 May 2017 at 10:32 Subject: Re: A case in point To: meekerdb On 22 May 2017 2:44 a.m., "Brent Meeker" wrote:

Answers to David

Hi david, I resend the answers I sent, without success. I might not give them in the right order. I still send them in different posts. === On 24 May 2017, at 13:50, David Nyman wrote: Not sure if you got this: -- Forwarded message -- From: David Nyman

Fwd: Re: Question about physical supervenience

Not sure if you saw this. -- Forwarded message -- From: "David Nyman" Date: 18 May 2017 6:34 p.m. Subject: Re: Question about physical supervenience To: "everything-list" Cc: On 18 May 2017 at 14:56, Bruno Marchal

Re: Sorry for this, but please add my name in cc.

On 25 May 2017, at 15:24, Bruno Marchal wrote: Hi again, OK, I have put my old address as primary in the everything google group. Hope this will work. Sorry again. OK. Apparently it works. But it looks like I will have to sent all my yesterday replies to David. David, please be

Re: Sorry for this, but please add my name in cc.

Hi again, OK, I have put my old address as primary in the everything google group. Hope this will work. Sorry again. Bruno On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 2:58:11 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > Hi, > > I remind you to add my name in cc (temporarily, I hope) if you want me > to see the post.

Sorry for this, but please add my name in cc.

Hi, I remind you to add my name in cc (temporarily, I hope) if you want me to see the post. I can't open the google+ message without crashing my computer. I am still searching where I can make my usual address the principal one. Thanks you and sorry. Bruno On 5/25/17, Bruno Marchal

Re: Movie Argument

On 24 May 2017, at 13:58, David Nyman wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: David Nyman Date: 20 May 2017 at 10:29 Subject: Re: ​Movie argument To: everything-list On 20 May 2017 02:36, "Brent Meeker"

Re: ​Movie argument

On 24 May 2017, at 13:56, David Nyman wrote: Let me know if anything is still unclear. -- Forwarded message -- From: David Nyman Date: 20 May 2017 at 01:30 Subject: Re: ​Movie argument To: everything-list On 19 May

Re: A case in point

On 24 May 2017, at 13:53, David Nyman wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: David Nyman Date: 22 May 2017 at 10:32 Subject: Re: A case in point To: meekerdb On 22 May 2017 2:44 a.m., "Brent Meeker" wrote: