On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 3:24 PM Brent Meeker wrote:
> On 4/26/2022 5:32 PM, smitra wrote:
>
> On 27-04-2022 01:37, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> Changing the weights of the components in the superposition does not
> change the conclusion of most observers that the actual probabilities
> are 0.5 for ea
On 4/26/2022 5:32 PM, smitra wrote:
On 27-04-2022 01:37, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:03 AM smitra wrote:
On 24-04-2022 03:16, Bruce Kellett wrote:
A moment's thought should make it clear to you that this is not
possible. If both possibilities are realized, it cannot be
On 4/27/2022 10:38 AM, smitra wrote:
On 27-04-2022 04:08, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 4/26/2022 5:32 PM, smitra wrote:
On 27-04-2022 01:37, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:03 AM smitra wrote:
On 24-04-2022 03:16, Bruce Kellett wrote:
A moment's thought should make it clear to y
On 4/27/2022 6:09 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 10:14 AM Brent Meeker
wrote:
On 4/27/2022 2:00 PM, smitra wrote:
If you agree, and are prepared,
with me, to throw out Everett, then we agree, and there is nothing
more to be argued about (at least, until you
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 10:14 AM Brent Meeker wrote:
> On 4/27/2022 2:00 PM, smitra wrote:
>
> If you agree, and are prepared,
> with me, to throw out Everett, then we agree, and there is nothing
> more to be argued about (at least, until you present some different
> complete theory).
>
> I'm ope
On 4/27/2022 2:00 PM, smitra wrote:
If you agree, and are prepared,
with me, to throw out Everett, then we agree, and there is nothing
more to be argued about (at least, until you present some different
complete theory).
I'm open to the idea that QM itself may only be an approximation to a
mo
Terahertz implies wavelengths less than a millimeter. Computers will
have to adopt some kind of asynchronous architecture to take advantage
of that. I wonder if there are any proposed designs for such computers?
Brent
On 4/27/2022 12:26 PM, John Clark wrote:
In today's issue of the journal N
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 5:17 AM George Kahrimanis
wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 4:12:12 AM UTC+3 Bruce wrote:
>
> [...] I spelled out the sequences that Everett implies in my earlier
>> response. These clearly must have equal probability -- that is what the
>> theory requires. It is n
I found some stuff about you. Not very interesting, but somewhat
explanatory. I gather you're subliminally jealous of my relationship with
Carl Sagan, but for me it's not a big deal. I have a major regret that he
didn't go through and publish what would have been my third citation during
that p
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 2:55:37 PM UTC+3 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:
> It's not perfect, no analogy is, but classical thermodynamics can provide
> a pretty good analogy.[...] but that world is *VASTLY* outnumbered by
> worlds in which other things happen.
>
You mean, statistical mechanics
On 27-04-2022 04:01, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:35 AM smitra wrote:
On 27-04-2022 03:11, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:32 AM smitra wrote:
On 27-04-2022 01:37, Bruce Kellett wrote:
I think you
should pay more attention to the mathematics of the bino
In today's issue of the journal Nature researchers report they have
developed a material that is superconducting in one direction but is a
normal conductor in the other direction, a superconducting diode, something
that had previously been thought to be impossible. They used a 2D layer of
a compoun
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 4:12:12 AM UTC+3 Bruce wrote:
> The distinctive feature of Everettian Many worlds theory is that every
> possible outcome is realized on every trial. I don't think that you have
> absorbed the full significance of this revolutionary idea. There is no
> classical
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 5:57:03 AM UTC+3 Bruce wrote:
> If one wants to persist with unitary evolution, one cannot avoid the
Schrodinger equation. This has a number of consequences for the theory. One
is that the theory is deterministic -- there are no probabilities, and all
outcomes of
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 9:12 PM Bruce Kellett wrote:
*> The distinctive feature of Everettian Many worlds theory is that every
> possible outcome is realized on every trial. I don't think that you have
> absorbed the full significance of this revolutionary idea. There is no
> classical analogue o
15 matches
Mail list logo
