On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 8:23:10 PM UTC-5, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:34:56PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Unless, indeed, or just in part, but he acknowledged my work in some
draft he sent me, then they disappeared in the public version,
making him
is fixed by nature.
The substitution level seems to be fixed by mathematics.
They both may be the same: nature and math, that is.
Richard
Bruno
Richard
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Bruno Marchal
mar...@ulb.ac.bejavascript:
wrote:
On 24 Mar 2014, at 00:43, Joseph Knight
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:52:25 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 3/25/2014 6:52 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:
It is trivially a theorem of COMP, since the existence of such a
substitution level is the COMP axiom itself. If COMP is true, then the
substitution level is unknowable (although it can
So is physics best understood as a computer program with access to a random
oracle? (Coming from 1-indeterminacy.)
On Mar 31, 2013 8:13 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 31 Mar 2013, at 01:15, Joseph Knight wrote:
Sorry for the vagueness of my question; I would not count pi
True or False: COMP implies that any fundamental physical constant is non
computable?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
=noncomputability of physics but I'm wondering what exactly this
would mean in practice.
On Mar 30, 2013 6:53 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 04:15:54PM -0700, Joseph Knight wrote:
True or False: COMP implies that any fundamental physical constant is non
It's a good discussion. In fact I've been independently thinking about the
matter of Dedekind's original argument as it's discussed in Webb's book
Mechanism, Mentalism, and Metamathematics (a book Bruno has referred to
multiple times on this list).
Does anyone know of other attempts to prove
have to
offer).
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:56 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 2/21/2013 7:10 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:
Question: Why is the derivation* of the Born Rule in (Everett, 1957) not
considered satisfactory**?
*Everett shows that the amplitude-squared rule for subjective
probability
from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group
to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received
...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 5/22/2012 10:56 AM, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 5/21/2012 6:26 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
snip
Hi Russell,
I once thought
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 4, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/4 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 04 Apr 2012, at 18:26, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
You confuse consciousness of
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 3/23/2012 3:44 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 3/21/2012 8:16 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Stephen P
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
No, my critique is that you seem to not see a problem with the fact
that COMP shows that the physical world is epiphenomena and thus
unnecessary. I see this as denying the mere possibility of observational
. It is just
a crazy idea at this point.)
Yes, I understand what the constructs are, and I see how Pratt is making an
interesting analogy, but I don't see the justification for his conclusions
about the mind-body problem. But I haven't finished grokking the article.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 3/18/2012 11:49 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Stephen P. King
stephe...@charter.netwrote:
Dear Joseph,
Could you elaborate exactly where this is covered in the COMP
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 3/19/2012 3:16 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Stephen P. King
stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 3/18/2012 11:49 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:38 PM
://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr
@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
everything-list%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
group/everything-list?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Feb 27, 3:15 pm, Joseph Knight joseph.9...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM, ronaldheld ronaldh...@gmail.com
wrote:
What observations or measurements can I perform that would falsify
COMP
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:26 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 2/27/2012 2:15 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Feb 27, 3:15 pm, Joseph Knight joseph.9...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM
from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 2/14/2012 10:25 AM, Joseph Knight wrote:
[SPK]
The flaw is the entire structure of UDA+MGA, it assumes the existence
of the very thing that is claims cannot exist. It is a theory that predicts
...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:24 AM, David Nyman da...@davidnyman.com wrote:
On 13 February 2012 01:18, Joseph Knight joseph.9...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes it is, with the Movie Graph Argument. The MGA shows that assuming
COMP,
consciousness cannot be explained by appealing to any physical system
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 2/13/2012 12:11 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:
I think you should probably read Maudlin's
paperhttp://www.finney.org/%7Ehal/maudlin.pdffor specifics. I don't think
thermodynamics will have much to do
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 2/11/2012 5:09 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Stephen P. King
stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 2/11/2012 6:29 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Feb 2012, at 07:32, Stephen P
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 11 Feb 2012, at 23:09, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Stephen P. King
stephe...@charter.netwrote:
The diagram is strictly 3p. It would be helpful if you wrote up an
informal
at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 1/31/2012 12:48 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/1/31 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
On Jan 31, 11:46 am, Quentin Anciaux
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jan 31, 1:18 pm, Joseph Knight joseph.9...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with your point about thinking outside the box, but barring some
astronomically improbable stroke of luck, it would be necessary for Craig
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jan 31, 2:33 pm, Joseph Knight joseph.9...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jan 31, 1:18 pm, Joseph Knight joseph.9...@gmail.com wrote:
I
://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 20 Jan 2012, at 07:17, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Stephen, Ronald,
The paper is very interesting, on physics, but succumbs directly from
, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe@
**googlegroups.com everything-list%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
group/everything-list?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You
.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 26 Dec 2011, at 05:47, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 23 Dec 2011, at 20:16, Joseph Knight wrote:
The same problem arises in *Part 2*. Bruno
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Dec 2011, at 23:27, Joseph Knight wrote:
Hello everyone and everything,
I have pompously made my own thread for this, even though we have another
MGA thread going, because the other one (sigh, I created that one
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.auwrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:27:28PM -0600, Joseph Knight wrote:
Regarding Maudlin’s argument: Russell has recently stated that Maudlin’s
argument doesn’t work in a multiverse, and that consciousness is thus
.) Intelligence is tricky, as it has the notion
of counterfactual bound up within its definition. But there is no *a priori
*reason to assume this to be the case for consciousness.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Joseph,
I found your post very interesting. While I agree with your conclusion,
how I get there is a little different.
I think that at the time all of Alice's neuronal firings are triggered by
random particles she is
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Joseph Knight joseph.9...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.comwrote:
Joseph,
I found your post very interesting. While I agree
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Joseph Knight joseph.9...@gmail.comwrote:
I am truly agnostic. I really have no earthly idea. But assuming
computationalism, as in the MGA, I have to say yes. With this assumption
If Maudlin’s argument is a foundation of the UDA, then it seems to me
the UDA is on shaky ground, though I have yet to investigate the MGA
in depth. People talk about the Movie Graph Argument, but the links
provided refer to Alice and a distant supernova with lucky rays that
substitute for
, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:51 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/14/2011 10:40 AM, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.auwrote:
Any chance someone might précis for me/us dummies out here in maybe 3
sentences what Tim Maudlin's
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:11 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/14/2011 2:09 PM, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:51 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/14/2011 10:40 AM, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Kim Jones kimjo
no argument, so there is no reason to take
you seriously.
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Dec 2011, at 19:47, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Dec 2011, at 06:30, Joseph Knight wrote:
Hi Bruno
I was cruising the web when I stumbled
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Dec 2011, at 06:30, Joseph Knight wrote:
Hi Bruno
I was cruising the web when I stumbled upon a couple of PDFs by Jean-Paul
Delahaye criticizing your work. (PDF
1http://www2.lifl.fr/~delahaye/dnalor/UDA2010.pdf
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.auwrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:47:32PM -0600, Joseph Knight wrote (to Bruno):
Could you elaborate on the 323 principle? It sounds like a qualm that I
also have had, to an extent, with the MGA and also with Tim
, which to me
seemed to be an illegitimate analogy, but I would like to hear your take...
Thanks
--
Joseph Knight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
Hello Everything List,
My name is Joseph Knight. This is my first post. Like most of you, I am
interested in math, philosophy, science I've been lurking on this list
for around 6 months now, absorbing what the people here have to say about
life, the universe, and everything. My view
59 matches
Mail list logo
