Re: A previous subject on environmentalism that echoes JC's view

NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) it's bad enough but environmentalists have gone Bananas (Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anyone). John K ClarkSee what's on my new list at Extropolis 7vo On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 9:39 PM wrote: >

A previous subject on environmentalism that echoes JC's view

https://twitter.com/Yrouel86/status/1664306350577397760 This is Twitter. Author: MasssimoAtheist, allergic to BS and lover of science and technology. Interested in retrocomputing and electronics I also like to watch animes and tv seriesPisaJoined February 2015498 Following544 FollowersFollowed

[no subject]

Why Many Researchers Now See the Brain as a Quantum System | Mind Matters The battle between physicist, Max Tegmark, and physicist Penrose and anesthesiologist, Hameroff is recalled, before their truce of 20 years ago. The difference was in semantics. For the brain's microtubules, Penrose and

[no subject]

obal Marxist paganism) general_the...@googlegroups.com<mailto:general_the...@googlegroups.com> Cc: Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com<mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com> Subject: An Ululation. Who Stole the Sabbath? WHAMP-the-Ingrate An Ululation on Stolen Sabbat

[no subject]

Question for you Bruno:. You say (with help from Theaetetus) that 1p experience is given by Bp p. Yet, our experience is often deluded, as in optical illusions, or in various kinds of emotional psychological denial. Can we ever really say that our knowledge, even 1p experience, refers to

[no subject]

Is it a coincidence that: -During the cold war the image of the universe and the theory that explained it was an inmense nuclear explosion? -In the world dominated by the multicultural ideology and computers, it is a multiverse and/or a computer simulation the preferred paradigm? That is not

That hateful subject, metaphysics

That hateful subject, metaphysics To deal with consciousness and experiences, which are mental, not physical, you have to go to that hateful subject, metaphysics, and only Leibniz has a good account of the perceiver, which is the experiencer not available to materialism. If you still believe

Re: That hateful subject, metaphysics

I wanna get metaphysicsal. On 12 December 2013 00:37, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote: That hateful subject, metaphysics To deal with consciousness and experiences, which are mental, not physical, you have to go to that hateful subject, metaphysics, and only Leibniz has a good

[no subject]

Leibniz and Piccinini versus Jerry Fodor - Is there a language of thought ? 1. Jerry Fodor argues that thoughts have representations, namely that there is a language of thought: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_of_thought In which, as I understand it, computations are made by the brain

Re: Why do you folks keep having conferences about consciousness ? Because you have erased the subject, And Cs. = subject + object

-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Sun, Jun 23, 2013 8:39 am Subject: Re: Why do you folks keep having conferences about consciousness ? Because you have erased the subject, And Cs. = subject + object On 23 Jun 2013, at 04:29, spudboy...@aol.com wrote: I read Sarfatti's website, Stardrive.org, too

Re: Why do you folks keep having conferences about consciousness ? Because you have erased the subject, And Cs. = subject + object

Much thanks, Dr. Marchal. Mitch -Original Message- From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Wed, Jun 26, 2013 9:30 am Subject: Re: Why do you folks keep having conferences about consciousness ? Because you have erased

Re: Why do you folks keep having conferences about consciousness ? Because you have erased the subject, And Cs. = subject + object

there. Bruno Mitch -Original Message- From: Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net To: JACK SARFATTI adast...@me.com Sent: Sat, Jun 22, 2013 6:31 am Subject: Why do you folks keep having conferences about consciousness ? Because you have erased the subject, And Cs. = subject + object Hi JACK

Re: Why do you folks keep having conferences about consciousness ? Because you have erased the subject, And Cs. = subject + object

That last phrase, Dr. Marchal is very difficult to grasp. Others are there, but out there is not out there. Bruno -Original Message- From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Sun, Jun 23, 2013 8:39 am Subject: Re: Why do you

Why do you folks keep having conferences about consciousness ? Because you have erased the subject, And Cs. = subject + object

Hi JACK SARFATTI Consciousness = subject + object = subjective world + objective world Nice physics, very erudite, but If there's no subject, then there's no consciousness. But if you include a subject, the consciousness problem is trivial. You don't to keep having conferences about

Re: Why do you folks keep having conferences about consciousness ? Because you have erased the subject, And Cs. = subject + object

adast...@me.com Sent: Sat, Jun 22, 2013 6:31 am Subject: Why do you folks keep having conferences about consciousness ? Because you have erased the subject, And Cs. = subject + object Hi JACK SARFATTI Consciousness = subject + object = subjective world + objective world Nice physics, very

[no subject]

Hi, is this the admin for everything list? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

[no subject]

Nature decrees that man must seek out and find, and gather up all that is good in the world... all that is good about the world... all the good moments and stories and people and events and ideas and creations of the world... and keep them in sight and promote them throughout the realms of time

[no subject]

, especially near the end. - Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Telmo Menezes Receiver: everything-list Time: 2013-01-04, 16:57:26 Subject: Re: Re: Rupert Sheldrake - The Morphogenetic Universe Hi Roger, On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net

it takes two to tango. awareness = subject + object

Hi meekerdb This is not rocket science. To be aware you must have both subject and object: awareness = subject + object Neither materialism nor science can provide a subject, since a subject must be subjective. So neither one will permit awareness. Start studying the mnonadology. Roger

The categories of subject, object, physical, nonphysical, nonlocal

Hi William R. Buckley Hwere's how I see it: 1. The object is the object of a subject, so is mostly a grammatical term. 2. The subject is the observer or doer and so is grammatical term. 3 The object can be either physical (such as metter) where it has extension in space or nonphysical

Re: One subject

equality of all subjects (not in the 'royal subject' sense!), with each person knowing their actions are received by none other than themselves. The best moral action would be the selfish action, seen from the perspective of the entire self rather than the fragmentary self. Imagine you share

Re: One subject

topic. It seems to me an obvious corollary of comp that there is in reality (3p) only one observer, a single subject that undergoes all possible experiences. In a blog post I wrote a while back (before I learned about comp) I put forward this 'one observer' notion as the only solution

Re: One subject

'QTI and eternal torment', where this idea came up, because it's really a new topic. It seems to me an obvious corollary of comp that there is in reality (3p) only one observer, a single subject that undergoes all possible experiences. In a blog post I wrote a while back (before

Re: One subject

and eternal torment', where this idea came up, because it's really a new topic. It seems to me an obvious corollary of comp that there is in reality (3p) only one observer, a single subject that undergoes all possible experiences. In a blog post I wrote a while back (before I

Re: One subject

On 6/12/2012 4:40 PM, Pierz wrote: I didn't say that we would all turn into self-deniers concerned only to help others. I said we would achieve an optimal moral society. Such a society would always bear in mind the absolute equality of all subjects (not in the 'royal subject' sense!), with each

Re: One subject

that there is in reality (3p) only one observer, a single subject that undergoes all possible experiences. In a blog post I wrote a while back (before I learned about comp) I put forward this 'one observer' notion as the only solution to a paradox that occurred to me when thinking about

Re: One subject

an obvious corollary of comp that there is in reality (3p) only one observer, a single subject that undergoes all possible experiences. In a blog post I wrote a while back (before I learned about comp) I put forward this 'one observer' notion as the only solution to a paradox

One subject

I'm starting this as a new thread rather than continuing under 'QTI and eternal torment', where this idea came up, because it's really a new topic. It seems to me an obvious corollary of comp that there is in reality (3p) only one observer, a single subject that undergoes all possible

[no subject]

unsubscribe --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

[no subject]

-Ursprungligt meddelande- Fr=E5n: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] F=F6r Bruno Marchal Skickat: den 20 februari 2008 15:21 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] =C4mne: Re: UDA paper It arises from the fact that my classical state is duplicable... And of course your quantumstate is

No Subject

My name is Lloyd David Raub. I'm a retired executive from Ohio State University. I have a Ph.D. in Public Administration from Penn. State and my interests now include TOE's, alternate universes, MWI, inflationary other cosmologies {cyclic universes, quasi steady state, plasma,etc.} I am

Unidentified subject!

Oh, I forgot to mention Julian Barbour's 'the end of time' - seehttp://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0195117298/qid=3D981890976/sr=3D1-=1/ref=3Dsc_b_1/103-1683623-4661404Vic Stenger's book is called, 'Timeless Reality : Symmetry, Simplicity, =and Multiple Universes 'Now, George, you can't

Unidentified subject!

It seems that most of the people on this mailing list have read a lot more about the topics of discussion thal I have. Where can I read about such things as the Dovetail Argument, conciousness with comp, Church's thesis, etc. There's a lot of stuff I don't understand, and I want to read up