Re: [Evolution] configure with kerb problems

2001-12-05 Thread Niklas Jakobsson
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 07:53, Arren Mund wrote: > here's what i run when i do the configure: > > ./configure --with-db3=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1/ > --with-krb4=/usr/heimdal/ > Heimdal is kerberos 5 not kerberos 4, pick up the the KTH kerberos 4 implementation at http://www.pdc.kth.se/kth-krb/

Re: [Evolution] A newbie question...

2001-12-05 Thread Manuel Streuhofer
just click for writing a new message. fill in your bbc and everything else you want and then click at File -> Save as Draft Manuel On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 21:10, James Harrison wrote: > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 11:01, Manuel Streuhofer wrote: > > imap is what you are looking for. :) > If only I

[Evolution] Bug in 1.0?

2001-12-05 Thread Pavel Lisy
When I try search any phrase (strings with space) I don't receive any result. eg. in folder with message: - ... Pozor!: "martin.metelka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. V dopise, který jste poslal, byl nalezen virus Virus. Antivirový program jej zadržel a zastavil jeho dalš

Re: [Evolution] Bug in 1.0?

2001-12-05 Thread Ben FrantzDale
I get the same behavior. --Ben On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 00:54, Pavel Lisy wrote: > When I try search any phrase (strings with space) I don't receive any > result. > > eg. > > in folder with message: > > - > ... > Pozor!: "martin.metelka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > >

Re: [Evolution] LDAP

2001-12-05 Thread James Ogley
Yes, take a look at http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2001-October/013873.html Maybe this should be put in an FAQ? > Is there anyone out there who has successfully gotten Evo to perform an > LDAP lookup against an Exchange 5.5 server? Ximians bugzilla says that > this has been lo

[Evolution] bug in "next unread message" ?

2001-12-05 Thread Stefan Palme
hi all, maybe this is a bug, or I dont understand the behaviour... when I have a folder with read and unread mails (all visible), I can read one of the unread emails by clicking on it (of course). when I want to read the next unread message, I type "N". when I at first did not clicked on the f

[Evolution] Strange bug in v1.0

2001-12-05 Thread Preston de Guise
Hi all, I'm wondering whether anyone else is able to duplicate the Evolution bug I've now managed to dupe on two systems. I *tried* to create my first HTML email this morning as I needed to create a simple 2 column table and didn't want to have to attach a word document. I got all the table cre

Re: [Evolution] No more macros in CVS?

2001-12-05 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 08:27, Lonnie Borntreger wrote: > Went to update gal, gtkhtml and evolution (my nightly check for updates) > from the HEAD, and all three had all the files under their "macros" > directory removed. That means that autogen.sh fails since it can't find > files. > > Problem? >

Re: [Evolution] Can't Initialize Evolution

2001-12-05 Thread Gil Hauer
Here's my mozilla package list: # rpm -q -a | grep moz mozilla-0.9.5-ximian.1 mozilla-psm-0.9.5-ximian.1 mozilla-xmlterm-0.9.5-ximian.1 mozilla-mail-0.9.5-ximian.1 It looks like it's up-to-date. Also note that the error you received is different from the one I'm currently receiving (Ge

[Evolution] Still no Palm Pilot Notes conduit?

2001-12-05 Thread Brandon Hutchinson
Hello! When searching some of the past threads I was under the impression that Evolution would have the Notes conduit for the Palm Pilot in the 1.0 Release. For me, it is the most useful function of my Palm Pilot, as I have hundreds of system administration notes in an easily accessible format

Re: [Evolution] LDAP

2001-12-05 Thread Dwight Hubbard
That posting is a bit light on content to be put in the FAQ. I couldn't get it working and I find the post leaves me more than a little puzzled as to exactly what goes in the authentication fields, search_base and search scope. It would also help if it showed some way of getting the information

Re: [Evolution] configure with kerb problems

2001-12-05 Thread Arren Mund
i am still getting the same error: configure:11251: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -Wunused -I/usr/local/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/local/lib/glib/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -L/usr/local/krb4/lib -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lkrb4 -lcrypto -lcom_err -lroken conftest.c 1>&5 /tmp/cc1b

Re: [Evolution] LDAP

2001-12-05 Thread Benjamin Kahn
Well... This is the official FAQ entry which covers configuring LDAP with Exchange. I'm curious if people think it needs more detail or even if it works correctly. :^) http://support.ximian.com/cgi-bin/ximian.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_refno=010716-03 On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 09:55, Dwight

Re: [Evolution] LDAP

2001-12-05 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 14:55, Dwight Hubbard wrote: > That posting is a bit light on content to be put in the FAQ. I couldn't > get it working and I find the post leaves me more than a little puzzled > as to exactly what goes in the authentication fields, search_base and > search scope. It would

Re: [Evolution] 1.0 Configuration incompatability help

2001-12-05 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
I just upgraded from RC2 to 1.0 and the executive summary crashes immediately every time. By moving my old evolution directory out of the way and starting fresh, the summary seems to fire up just fine. *But* I would rather not go through the hassle of re-creating ALL of my SPAM/Maiin

Re: [Evolution] bug in "next unread message" ?

2001-12-05 Thread Ben FrantzDale
I'm not seeing that behavior at the moment. Does this happen all the time for you? --Ben On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 02:13, Stefan Palme wrote: > > hi all, > > maybe this is a bug, or I dont understand the behaviour... > > when I have a folder with read and unread mails (all visible), > I can read

Re: [Evolution] 1.0 Configuration incompatability help

2001-12-05 Thread dpeterso
On 5 Dec 2001, Ettore Perazzoli had this to say: >I just upgraded from RC2 to 1.0 and the executive summary crashes >immediately every time. By moving my old evolution directory out of the >way and starting fresh, the summary seems to fire up just fine. *But* I > > It would be u

[Evolution] play sound or execute command upon reception of new message?

2001-12-05 Thread etienne sky
Hi to all, is there a way to play a sound or execute a command when a new message is received (I have found no way myself)? If not, could this feature be implemented soon? Perhaps an option could be added to the filters to execute a command and my problem would be solved. Otherwise adding an o

Re: [Evolution] play sound or execute command upon reception of new message?

2001-12-05 Thread Chris Ball
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:45:24AM -0800, etienne sky wrote: > is there a way to play a sound or execute a command > when a new message is received (I have found no way > myself)? If not, could this feature be implemented > soon? It's in bugzilla, and I think I remember someone submitting a patc

Re: [Evolution] bug in "next unread message" ?

2001-12-05 Thread Stefan Palme
yes. everytime when the very first message in a folder is unread and I start reading unread messages with a later one. (ah, maybe the reason is that my messages are sorted by date (descending) - e.e. newest messages first?) > I'm not seeing that behavior at the moment. Does this happen all the >

Re: [Evolution] Still no Palm Pilot Notes conduit?

2001-12-05 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
When searching some of the past threads I was under the impression that Evolution would have the Notes conduit for the Palm Pilot in the 1.0 Release. For me, it is the most useful function of my Palm Pilot, as I have hundreds of system administration notes in an easily accessible format

Re: [Evolution] Can't Initialize Evolution

2001-12-05 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
It looks like it's up-to-date. Also note that the error you received is different from the one I'm currently receiving (GeneralError vs. InterfaceNotFound).   Is it possible that you have an old version of the Wombat floating around? -- Ettore

[Evolution] Printer settings

2001-12-05 Thread David G. Simmons
I have a minor frustration...my print command is 'lpr -PmyPrinter' yet Evolution insists every time that I try to print that I type in the '-PmyPrinter' portion, as it only seems to remember the lpr part. Any place I can set my default printer selection in Evolution? or do I just keep typing this

[Evolution] using local mailbox format with Evo

2001-12-05 Thread mark
Hi, This question refers to a moan I have about Evolution. What I would like it to do (which pine can very easily) is to be able to read my mail as it comes in rather than waiting for evo to download the whole lot (sometimes 500 msg's a night), then remove from the server and then read my mail.

[Evolution] Ignoring changes with empty subject

2001-12-05 Thread Ben FrantzDale
I find the following 1.0 behavior to be a UI bug: compose an email to someone (like yourself) leave the subject empty write "foo" in the body hit send. You'll get the "empty subject" dialog. erase "foo" in the body and type "bar" instead. Hit the send anyway button in the warning dialog.

[Evolution] Openmail?

2001-12-05 Thread Ian A. Marsman
I know this is early to be asking about this, but Samsung has bought the rights to use, maintain, and enhance Openmail. Is it foreseeable that Ximian might plan to build an Openmail connector? This would allow calendaring and contact support for both Outlook and Evolution clients and the avoidance

Re: [Evolution] Can't Initialize Evolution

2001-12-05 Thread Gil Hauer
Hmmm. I suppose it is possible -- here's what wombat tells me: # wombat --version wombat-Message: Starting wombat Gnome wombat 1.0 # Thanks, Gil On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 15:00, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > It looks like it's up-to-date. Also note that the error you received is > diff

Re: [Evolution] Openmail?

2001-12-05 Thread John Ehrlinger
Then someone else jumps in and asks about GroupWise? Any other proprietary interfaces? Thanks, john On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 13:50, Ian A. Marsman wrote: > I know this is early to be asking about this, but Samsung has bought the > rights to use, maintain, and enhance Openmail. Is it foreseeable th

Re: [Evolution] Printer settings

2001-12-05 Thread Juan Martinez
You can set the PRINTER environment variable and lpr will use that as its default printer. See if that works. Juan On 5 Dec 2001, David G. Simmons wrote: > Date: 05 Dec 2001 12:11:33 -0800 > From: David G. Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Evolution] Printer setti

Re: [Evolution] Printer settings

2001-12-05 Thread etienne sky
You should try setting the PRINTER environment variable to "myPrinter" in your .bashrc or similar. Then you can simply call lpr to print directly to your selected printer. --- "David G. Simmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a minor frustration...my print command is > 'lpr -PmyPrinter'

RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?

2001-12-05 Thread Rob Brown-Bayliss
> How Ximian is percieved is very important to the open source community. > If they fail then noone will put up capital to help open source > companies get going and if they alienate the community by doing things > in ways the seem deceptive they will fail and we will all lose. Good point, My fi

[Evolution] still problem with evolution

2001-12-05 Thread Victor Hadianto
Hi there, I suppose I'm trying to understand (and getting some help would be nice) why my evolution-mail refuse to work. I upgraded to 1.0 via Red-carpet. Nice new splash screen, everything looks find BUT I can't create a new email/forward email. Everytime i want to do something to compose a

[Evolution] Re: configure with kerb problems

2001-12-05 Thread Arren Mund
does anyone have any idea what i can do with this? i don't really understand why the configure script is doing the test that it is doing. it makes sense as to why it fails, but how is it not supposed to fail? Thanks, Arren Mund > > On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 09:27, Arren Mund wrote: > > i am still

Re: [Evolution] Openmail?

2001-12-05 Thread Rob Brown-Bayliss
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 07:50, Ian A. Marsman wrote: > I know this is early to be asking about this, but Samsung has bought the > rights to use, maintain, and enhance Openmail. Is it foreseeable that > Ximian might plan to build an Openmail connector? This would allow Isnt openmail a drop in replac

Re: [Evolution] Openmail?

2001-12-05 Thread Ian A. Marsman
I think you still need to install a driver on each client computer you want to use with OpenMail. On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 14:14, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: > On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 07:50, Ian A. Marsman wrote: > > I know this is early to be asking about this, but Samsung has bought the > > rights to u

Re: [Evolution] LDAP

2001-12-05 Thread Austin Gonyou
I have not been able to do this. I have tried and tried, but nothing works. I ended up creating a contact under "Other Contacts" then I did a search for " "(just a space), and then did ctrl-a and coppied them all to "Local Folders->Contacts"(drag and drop). It also seems that I'm only able to disp

Re: [Evolution] Openmail?

2001-12-05 Thread Mark Neill
On 6 Dec 2001, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: > Isnt openmail a drop in replacement for exchange, by drop in I mean > outlook just works with it? If so then surely the connector ximian are > building will also just work. Openmail's selling point was that it was drop-in compatible with Exchange. We c

[Evolution] Problem sending mail

2001-12-05 Thread Andrew Thiessen
All, I have Linux RedHat 7.1, with the latest rev of Evolution. It has one nic, with an IP of 192.168.0.2, and a nameserver of 192.168.0.1. The .0.1 box is a Windoze machine with Internet Connection Sharing enabled. Everything works fine, as far as web access goes, on my Linux box with the except

Re: [Evolution] still problem with evolution

2001-12-05 Thread Victor Hadianto
> > > > I'm trying to backtrace what could possible cause this problem. Any help? > > > > Ah yes I'm using Red Hat 6.2 > > When Evolution appears to hang, have you looked at the output of 'top' > or 'gtop'? I used to have a problem where the evolution-addressbook > process would spin-lock (peg t

RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?

2001-12-05 Thread Stephen Witkop
Just to clarify my feelings on this matter, I am a big supporter of Ximian and of making money. That's why I am so concerned about Ximian's image. They are the poster child for open source companies looking to make a living by both creating software and at the same time supporting the open source

RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?

2001-12-05 Thread Nat Friedman
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote: > The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector > has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out > along with all the other plans for evolution. It just makes it seem as > though Ximian was afraid they

RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?

2001-12-05 Thread Nat Friedman
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 20:25, Brian wrote: > *isn't* it. If people find their making proprietary software > "distasteful" then they should ante up and buy either their standard or > professional edition of Ximian Gnome (I plan on doing it once 1.0 is on > the CD that I'm buying). If you order n

RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?

2001-12-05 Thread Stephen Witkop
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 22:08, Nat Friedman wrote: > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote: > > The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector > > has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out > > along with all the other plans for evolution.

RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?

2001-12-05 Thread Ujwal S. Sathyam
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 19:08, Nat Friedman wrote: > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote: > > The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector > > has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out > > along with all the other plans for evolution.

RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?

2001-12-05 Thread Mike Strock
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 19:08, Nat Friedman wrote: > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote: > > The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector > > has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out > > along with all the other plans for evolution.

[Evolution] multilingual support

2001-12-05 Thread Gerhard Schuck
Hi, first congratulations for Version 1.0! However, I still find multilingual support in evolution unsatisfactory, which wouldn't be astonishing for older applications, but definitely doesn't fit to a potential killer app like evolution (at least compared to mozilla and star office 6.0). If I wa

[Evolution] Solaris

2001-12-05 Thread Julia A. Case
After updating to the latest evolution now when I try to start red-carpet I get a _libc_register_forkhandler: referenced symbol not found Any idea what is wrong? Julia Solaris 8 UltraSparc -- [ Julia Anne Case ] [Ships are safe inside the harbor, ] [Programmer at large] [

Re: [Evolution] Openmail?

2001-12-05 Thread Dan Winship
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 20:09, Mark Neill wrote: > On 6 Dec 2001, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: > > Isnt openmail a drop in replacement for exchange, by drop in I mean > > outlook just works with it? If so then surely the connector ximian are > > building will also just work. > > Openmail's selling poi

Re: [Evolution] Openmail?

2001-12-05 Thread Dan Winship
> When the real standards for the protocols that are needed for groupware > are done will ximian create a "connector" for that?? Will that be GPLed? Not a "connector". It will just be part of Evolution. (The protocol in question is called CAP [Calendar Access Protocol], btw.) > Will ximian be in

RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?

2001-12-05 Thread Dan Winship
> I see that you are talking about only Exchange 2000. Any chance that > there will be back-porting to the Exchange 5.5 platform, for those of us > in a situation where we can't get upgraded to 2000 in a short timeframe? As mentioned in the press release, we will be releasing a connector for 5.5

RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?

2001-12-05 Thread Mike Strock
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 18:14, Dan Winship wrote: > > I see that you are talking about only Exchange 2000. Any chance that > > there will be back-porting to the Exchange 5.5 platform, for those of us > > in a situation where we can't get upgraded to 2000 in a short timeframe? > > As mentioned in t

Re: [Evolution] No more macros in CVS?

2001-12-05 Thread Dan Hensley
If I'm using the evolution-1-0-branch, I presume I should be using the below branch of gal? If so, is this documented anywhere? The README file says nothing about it. It is also out-of-date regarding gtkhtml. Dan On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 20:02, Christopher James Lahey wrote: > On Wed, 2001-12-05

Re: [Red-carpet] Re: [Evolution] Release 1.0

2001-12-05 Thread Alessio Bragadini
For Debian Potato users: my line in /etc/apt/sources.list said 'potato', changing it to 'stable' i.e. deb http://red-carpet.ximian.com/debian stable main made updates coming in, including Evolution 1.0. Hope it helps. -- Alessio F. Bragadini[EMAIL PROTECTED] APL Financial Services

Re: [Evolution] Re: Integrating Gaim in Evolution [adding jabber]

2001-12-05 Thread Dan Winship
> Once the URL is in a true form, > and not a hack, I can hack Evo's contacts to support IM > identities--click to send an IM, or use the IM fields (AIM, Jabber, MSN) > to match the online list to the protocol to make the URL. Lots of > potential. Before doing too much work, you might want to di

Re: [Evolution] No more macros in CVS?

2001-12-05 Thread Christopher James Lahey
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 08:19, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On the main CVS server this is fixed, so you may need to wait for > anoncvs to update. In the meanwhile, just copy the macros directory from > other CVS module. Alternatively, for gal at least, the branch (gal-evolution-1-0-branch) still has the

Re: [Evolution] Strange bug in v1.0

2001-12-05 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
I'm wondering whether anyone else is able to duplicate the Evolution bug I've now managed to dupe on two systems.   Totally reproducible for me too.  See #16676 on the Bugzilla.  Larry, Radek, please have a look, this is pretty bad. :-) I *tried* to create my first HTML email thi

Re: [Evolution] Openmail?

2001-12-05 Thread Dan Winship
> > I know this is early to be asking about this, but Samsung has bought the > > rights to use, maintain, and enhance Openmail. Is it foreseeable that > > Ximian might plan to build an Openmail connector? > Then someone else jumps in and asks about GroupWise? Any other > proprietary interfaces?

Re: [Evolution] Openmail?

2001-12-05 Thread Erik Bågfors
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 22:59, Dan Winship wrote: > And we're not interested in adding support for proprietary protocols to > Evolution itself (the free, core product); we'd rather perfect the > support for open protocols. > When the real standards for the protocols that are needed for groupware

Re: [Evolution] Strange bug in v1.0

2001-12-05 Thread Dan Berger
For what it's worth - I can reproduce the bug using your steps. Evo 1.0 on RH 7.1 On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 03:09:13PM -0500, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > I'm wondering whether anyone else is able to duplicate the Evolution bug > I've now managed to dupe on two systems. > > Totally reprodu