On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 23:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to have problems too. It seemed to depend on the client used write the
email you were receiving and whether it constructed the message using an
INLINE method or Multipart MIME. I never did find a solution. =(
I think it would be a
Oh ... :) And lastly, why does Evolution still call it PGP? *grin*
because gpg implements the Pretty Good Privacy specification. the name
wasn't chosen by which executable it runs, but rather the specification
it implements.
PGP was a product, is a product, will always be a
Greetings,
I've been using Evolution for a short time now and it seems to be a
great product. I have a problem I would like to solve, though. I use
GPG to sign my emails. I'd like to be able to sign them and have a user
with a windows machine and PGP be able to verify the signature.
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:26, Jason Frisvold wrote:
Greetings,
I've been using Evolution for a short time now and it seems to be a
great product. I have a problem I would like to solve, though. I use
GPG to sign my emails. I'd like to be able to sign them and have a user
with a
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 10:03, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:26, Jason Frisvold wrote:
Greetings,
I've been using Evolution for a short time now and it seems to be a
great product. I have a problem I would like to solve, though. I use
GPG to sign my emails. I'd
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 10:16, Jason Frisvold wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 10:03, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:26, Jason Frisvold wrote:
Greetings,
I've been using Evolution for a short time now and it seems to be a
great product. I have a problem I would like
cheers();
i can place a signature but
when trying to encrypt messages i get i error that the the public key is
not found.
Well, generally such errors can be taken at face value. I find that I
often think I have a key for someone, and indeed I do, but it is for
them at a different email
Hi,
im just switch from Kmail to evolution, i can place a signature but
when trying to encrypt messages i get i error that the the public key is
not found.
Who can help me?
Thank you in advance
--
Patrick Marquetecken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 06:43, Patrick Marquetecken wrote:
i can place a signature but
when trying to encrypt messages i get i error that the the public key is
not found.
Well, generally such errors can be taken at face value. I find that I
often think I have a key for someone, and indeed I do,
Hi - does anyone know how i decrypt gpg encrypted messages automaticly
in evolution 1.2 ?
best regards
--
patrik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ST Business Group
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
It automagically automatically decrypts properly rfc3156 GPG encrypted
messages. If they aren't in the proper format, then obviously they don't
get decrypted automatically.
Jeff
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 04:23, patrik wrote:
Hi - does anyone know how i decrypt gpg encrypted messages automaticly
in
Hi,
Evolution attached the GPG signing information.
- Is there a way to say the it must be done inline (so the mail starts
with -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-).
- Is there a way to let evolution check the inline signed messages, the
same as it can check the mime attached signed?
Greets,
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 17:03, LD Bakker wrote:
Hi,
Evolution attached the GPG signing information.
- Is there a way to say the it must be done inline (so the mail starts
with -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-).
no
- Is there a way to let evolution check the inline signed messages, the
Hi,
Sorry to be a bit late on this one but does this mean that Evolution PGP
will interoperate with Outlook/Outlook Express?
Thanks,
Steve
On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 18:01, Not Zed wrote:
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 16:20, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 05:16,
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 10:40, Not Zed wrote:
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 18:21, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
[...]
signatures not validating half of the time makes pgp/gpg look very
unreliable, which it isn't in my experience (it works basically
everywhere except in evolution...)
On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 17:03, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 10:40, Not Zed wrote:
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 18:21, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
[...]
signatures not validating half of the time makes pgp/gpg look very
unreliable, which it
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 05:16, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
There were some bugs in the 1.0.x PGP/MIME code, these should all be
fixed now in the development CVS. Perhaps you came accros one of these
bugs?
*tongue hanging out*
when will this be in a release? Is it really true? All known gpg bugs
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 16:20, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 05:16, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
There were some bugs in the 1.0.x PGP/MIME code, these should all be
fixed now in the development CVS. Perhaps you came accros one of these
bugs?
*tongue hanging
I'll look into it, i was just playing with that code, i think it should
be fairly easy to fix. Could you create a bug on bugzilla.ximian.com
and assign it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] please?
Yea, this should be easy to do if I haven't fixed it already. If we make
it so that hitting cancel
On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 19:01, Not Zed wrote:
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 05:16, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
There were some bugs in the 1.0.x PGP/MIME code, these should all be
fixed now in the development CVS. Perhaps you came accros one of these
bugs?
[...]
I dunno about all, but some more
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 10:51, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
(It seems building from cvs is a bit too complicated, as some of the
debian ...-dev pkgs are not current enough (libgal). Do I have to
rebuild most gnome libraries? Hmmm. I'll just wait for evo 1.2 release,
I think...)
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 04:40, Not Zed wrote:
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 18:21, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 19:01, Not Zed wrote:
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 05:16, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
There were some bugs in the 1.0.x PGP/MIME code, these should all be
Hello,
Evolution is a great piece of work and I use every day, but there are
IMHO a few small UI problems with the GnuPG passphrase prompt.
If I select Cancel on the passphrase prompt an error prompt pops up
with this message:
Cannot sign this message: no password provided
Is this
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 02:19, Janus Christensen wrote:
Hello,
Evolution is a great piece of work and I use every day, but there are
IMHO a few small UI problems with the GnuPG passphrase prompt.
If I select Cancel on the passphrase prompt an error prompt pops up
with this message:
I finally got around to installing gog but am having problems
decrypting.
when I send an encrypted message to my self I can decrypt it fine.
when I send a signed message to myself it says--
This message is digitally signed but can not be proven to be
authentic.
just for kick I sent a signed
On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 07:12, Not Zed wrote:
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 02:19, Janus Christensen wrote:
Hello,
Evolution is a great piece of work and I use every day, but there are
IMHO a few small UI problems with the GnuPG passphrase prompt.
If I select Cancel on the passphrase prompt
There were some bugs in the 1.0.x PGP/MIME code, these should all be
fixed now in the development CVS. Perhaps you came accros one of these
bugs?
Jeff
On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 22:55, Seth Hollen wrote:
I finally got around to installing gog but am having problems
decrypting.
when I send an
Can someone give me some instruction on how to set up a gpg key to be
able to use it with Evolution? Every time I set one up it says that the
secure key is unavailable.
Chris Tooley
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have just a very short question - all pgp signed messages I receive
(from several sources) check out 'invalid'. Is this an evo problem, or am
I doing something wrong? (just a standard gnupg 1.0.6 install...)
e.g.
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
gpg: armor header:
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 19:19, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 17:53, John Gateley wrote:
I have a GPG signature that works in mutt
but not in Evolution, and it is NOT an
inline signature: it comes in two MIME
parts, one for the body and one for the
signature, just like
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 13:26, John Gateley wrote:
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 19:19, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 17:53, John Gateley wrote:
I have a GPG signature that works in mutt
but not in Evolution, and it is NOT an
inline signature: it comes in two MIME
parts, one
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 12:31, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Uh, I'm pretty sure you are wrong about what evolution is doing in this
case. Evolution *always* converts to CRLF before feeding it to pgp. How
did you go about tracking this down?
Are you just comparing what is in the mbox? because the
I have a GPG signature that works in mutt
but not in Evolution, and it is NOT an
inline signature: it comes in two MIME
parts, one for the body and one for the
signature, just like Evolution does. Are
there any known bugs with Evolution that
would cause this?
I also got mail from CERT today, and
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 17:53, John Gateley wrote:
I have a GPG signature that works in mutt
but not in Evolution, and it is NOT an
inline signature: it comes in two MIME
parts, one for the body and one for the
signature, just like Evolution does. Are
there any known bugs with Evolution that
hi, all
Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
That means that the other mail clients are broken with respect to
PGP/MIME presumably...
right. thats an answer. thanx
| /\
[niels@|www.]ortschmiede.de | \ / ASCII-Ribbon-Campaign
pgp|gpg - mails preferred | X
(1) Don't count PGP-related attachments as attachments for the list
view.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887 suggest displaying a key
or ribbon or something instead. The problem is that our decision about
what is and isn't an attachment is done sort of primitively.
-- Dan
These are known issues so don't bother reporting them.
Jeff
On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 22:14, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
I've just started messing around with GPG; so far so good. I have some
ideas for improvement, though:
(1) Don't count PGP-related attachments as attachments for the list
view.
hi, there.
i have a little problem: if i gpg-sign my mails with evolution (1.0),
other muas (sylpheed, xfmail (both with the possibility to recognize
mime/mutliparted gpg-messages)) don't verify the sig. their gpg-output
ist BAD SIG. evolution verifies the sig.
any suggestions?
niels
--
hi, again.
Am Son, 2001-12-09 um 14.27 schrieb Niels Heinemann:
their gpg-output ist BAD SIG. evolution verifies the sig.
other way round works. pgp-signed messages of other muas are vrified
corectly with evolution. the mime-header (and boundary-def.) of
evolution semm to be correctly. don't
That means that the other mail clients are broken with respect to
PGP/MIME presumably...
I dunno what you can do, probably nothing.
Jeff
On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 08:27, Niels Heinemann wrote:
hi, there.
i have a little problem: if i gpg-sign my mails with evolution (1.0),
other muas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ah! yes! wassa too buzy doing other thangs around here to remem this one!
yes yes. i always sign my stuff when sending. (or i atleast try to sign
everything...some stuff isn't signed...such as bug reports to ms...lol)
On Tuesday 03 July 2001
On 15 Jun 2001 23:35:26 -0500, Matthew Vanecek wrote:
I've done a test mail, and when I use Evolution to sign a message with
GPG, it appears to create my message as an attachment
What version of evolution? The message-building code was rewritten after
0.10, and there was a bug last week that
I've done a test mail, and when I use Evolution to sign a message with
GPG, it appears to create my message as an attachment, with the
signature as part of the attachment, and then sends the message. There
is no body on the message when I receive it--only the attached message.
Is that the
Thanks to you and Manuel for the quick answers.
That fixed it.
Abe
On 08 Jun 2001 15:43:24 -0400, Julian Missig wrote:
Apparently the Ximian people decided no to put in an option for the
GPG/PGP type in the UI... but it's in the config:
~/evolution/config/Mail
Section [PGP]
type should be
Yea, you'll need to reset your PGP configuration. I added an option for
PGP 6.5.x and that screwed up the settings so what is happening is that
your configuration is currently using PGP 6.5.x command-line options with
GnuPG.
Jeff
On 8 Jun 2001, Abe Fettig wrote:
On the latest snapshot, when I
45 matches
Mail list logo
