[Evolution] Signatures?

2002-07-02 Thread Langsley T Russell
Hi all. I'm new to the list, new to Evolution, and new to Linux. When I was using Windows and Outlook express there was a method of adding preformatted signatures to an email. I could simply click on an icon and select which signature I wanted to use. I value this feature quite highly as I use a

[Evolution] Signatures

2002-11-14 Thread Mark Lowes
Am I missing something or is there no way of configuring 1.2 to use an external file for it's sig. It appears to be "import into the editor and save" or "script" as the only options. Mark -- Mark Lowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ evolution maillist

Re: [Evolution] Signatures?

2002-07-02 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
I forget if this is doable in 1.0.x, but the development versions (1.1.x) can. Jeff On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 13:41, Langsley T Russell wrote: > Hi all. > > I'm new to the list, new to Evolution, and new to Linux. > > When I was using Windows and Outlook express there was a method of > adding pref

Re: [Evolution] Signatures?

2002-07-02 Thread Ben FrantzDale
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 13:41, Langsley T Russell wrote: > Hi all. > > I'm new to the list, new to Evolution, and new to Linux. > > When I was using Windows and Outlook express there was a method of > adding preformatted signatures to an email. I could simply click on an > icon and select which si

Re: [Evolution] Signatures?

2002-07-03 Thread Philippe Chartier
Le mar 02/07/2002 à 20:26, Ben FrantzDale a écrit : > On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 13:41, Langsley T Russell wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > I'm new to the list, new to Evolution, and new to Linux. > > > > When I was using Windows and Outlook express there was a method of > > adding preformatted signatures

[Evolution] Signatures & whitespaces

2002-10-09 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
Hi all, I've noticed that when I change my mail-account, and thus changing my signature, the signature moves up one line, until there are no more whitespaces available. I presume this is not as a result of my settings? It is very annoying because I don't like my signature glued to my text and I a

Re: [Evolution] Signatures

2002-11-14 Thread Enver ALTIN
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 16:17, Mark Lowes wrote: > Am I missing something or is there no way of configuring 1.2 to use an > external file for it's sig. It appears to be "import into the editor > and save" or "script" as the only options. Seems so :) Interestingly I never needed to add a new signat

Re: [Evolution] Signatures

2002-11-14 Thread Barry Grundy
--- Mark Lowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I missing something or is there no way of > configuring 1.2 to use an > external file for it's sig. It appears to be > "import into the editor > and save" or "script" as the only options. This is not a real answer... but how about selecting "Insert

Re: [Evolution] Signatures

2002-11-14 Thread Mark Lowes
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 17:56, Barry Grundy wrote: > This is not a real answer... but how about selecting "Insert -> Text > File..." or "Insert -> HTML File..." from the edit signatures window > under "composer preferences? I prefer to have my sigs as separate files as I use the same sig for usenet

Re: [Evolution] Signatures

2002-11-14 Thread Philippe Chartier
volution is storing the signatures in different places. New signatures are kept in ~/evolution/signatures. But because I updated from 1.0.8, the old signatures associated to existing mail accounts are still pointing to my previous signature directory... So there is two places to keep track of. :-

Re: [Evolution] Signatures

2002-11-14 Thread Mark Lowes
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 18:39, Philippe Chartier wrote: > Even Evolution is storing the signatures in different places. > New signatures are kept in ~/evolution/signatures. But because I updated Ahh *bing* Quick and dirty fix for me is to create the sigs I need evo to have from with

Re: [Evolution] signatures

2002-11-19 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 18:21, Henry Meyerding wrote: > When I compose or reply to mail, Evolution automatically picks > "Augtogenerated" as the signature. I always have to pick ".signature" > > How can I convince Evolution to change the default signature? > > -- > Henry Meyerding > [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Evolution] signatures again

2002-07-21 Thread Not Zed
The signature option is on the editor, its pretty hard to miss. On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 16:08, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: > Hi, useing teh 1.1.x snapshots evolution is makking up it's own > signatures as seen below, my .signature file is: > > -- > > * > * Rob Brown-Bayliss > * > > Also, the pr

Re: [Evolution] signatures again

2002-07-21 Thread Rob Brown-Bayliss
On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 01:11, Not Zed wrote: > The signature option is on the editor, its pretty hard to miss. What do you mean, is there an option to turn of this autogenerated signature? I have used teh evolution editor to create a simple text sig, but evolution is adding something totaly diffe

Re: [Evolution] signatures again

2002-07-21 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 01:13, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: > On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 01:11, Not Zed wrote: > > The signature option is on the editor, its pretty hard to miss. > > What do you mean, is there an option to turn of this autogenerated > signature? I have used teh evolution editor to create a

Re: [Evolution] signatures again

2002-07-21 Thread Not Zed
On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 14:43, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: > On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 01:11, Not Zed wrote: > > The signature option is on the editor, its pretty hard to miss. > > What do you mean, is there an option to turn of this autogenerated > signature? I have used teh evolution editor to create a

[Evolution] Signatures in Evolution

2002-08-09 Thread Carlos 'Fjrb' Almeida
> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.0.99 (Preview Release) > even after this it's pretty big. Of course, on my machine with all my > folders open, evolution-mail takes up ~75M. *That's* big :-) > > Jeff > > -- > Jeffrey Stedfast > Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximia

Re: [Evolution] Signatures & whitespaces

2002-10-09 Thread Tony Earnshaw
ons, 2002-10-09 kl. 11:59 skrev Mathy Vanvoorden: > I've noticed that when I change my mail-account, and thus changing my > signature, the signature moves up one line, until there are no more > whitespaces available. I presume this is not as a result of my settings? > It is very annoying because

Re: [Evolution] Signatures & whitespaces

2002-10-09 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 13:29, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > Surely it's not too much trouble to hit twice at the end of a > message? That's what I do :-) Of course it isn't too much trouble, but I consider it to be a "bug". People wouldn't appreciate it either if a line went missing when printing a doc

Re: [Evolution] Signatures & whitespaces

2002-10-10 Thread Radek Doulík
On St, 2002-10-09 at 05:59, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote: > Hi all, > > I've noticed that when I change my mail-account, and thus changing my > signature, the signature moves up one line, until there are no more > whitespaces available. I presume this is not as a result of my settings? I guess you use

Re: [Evolution] Signatures & whitespaces

2002-10-10 Thread Lonnie Borntreger
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 09:32, Radek Doulík wrote: > On St, 2002-10-09 at 05:59, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote: > > I've noticed that when I change my mail-account, and thus changing my > > signature, the signature moves up one line, until there are no more > > whitespaces available. I presume this is not

Re: [Evolution] Signatures & whitespaces

2002-10-10 Thread Chief Gadgeteer
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 08:32, Radek Doulík wrote: > These -- are a standard way to split signature from mail content. Someone with better memory than I can probably cite the RFC. As I remember it the specified way of indicating the beginning of a signature is dash dash space. Microsoft los^H^H^H

Re: [Evolution] Signatures & whitespaces

2002-10-10 Thread Guenter Heck
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 15.50 Chief Gadgeteer wrote: > On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 08:32, Radek Doulík wrote: > > These -- are a standard way to split signature from mail content. > > Someone with better memory than I can probably cite the RFC. As I > remember it the specified way of indicating the begi

Re: [Evolution] Signatures & whitespaces

2002-10-11 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 16:32, Radek Doulík wrote: > On St, 2002-10-09 at 05:59, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've noticed that when I change my mail-account, and thus changing my > > signature, the signature moves up one line, until there are no more > > whitespaces available. I pres

[Evolution] Signatures and HTML

2002-11-18 Thread Greg Macek
In search of trying to understand why text wasn't being properly wrapped from a script, I accidentally came upon an email saying that signatures need to be formatted as HTML. Can someone explain why it is that way? I've gotten it work, but when trying to take input from other programs in that scrip

Re: [Evolution] Signatures in Evolution

2002-08-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 05:56, Carlos 'Fjrb' Almeida wrote: > > X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.0.99 (Preview Release) > > > > > even after this it's pretty big. Of course, on my machine with all my > > folders open, evolution-mail takes up ~75M. *That's* big :-) > > > > Jeff > > > > -- > > Jef

[Evolution] Signatures in reply/forward

2002-09-22 Thread Ted Pibil
Is there a way to place the signature above the quoted message in a reply? Likewise with an inline forwarded message. Thank you in advance. Ted Pibil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/li

Re: [Evolution] Signatures and HTML

2002-11-19 Thread Not Zed
I think its basically because evolution's editor always processes mail as html. Its just easier that way, because you can represent any plain text in html, but not the other way around. You just have to wrap progs like fortune with a script that adds a block. On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 09:53, Greg M

Re: [Evolution] Signatures in reply/forward

2002-09-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
No, and this has been requested before but will likely never be implemented as most mail client software has been written to expect signatures at the END of messages so that they may strip off the signature when replying. It is also a "standard" that it be at the end. Jeff On Sun, 2002-09-22 at

Re: [Evolution] Signatures in reply/forward

2002-09-22 Thread Rev. wRy
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 15:09, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > No, and this has been requested before but will likely never be > implemented as most mail client software has been written to expect > signatures at the END of messages so that they may strip off the > signature when replying. It is also a "s

[Evolution] Signatures: how to turn off

2002-11-12 Thread John Schmidt
How can I permanently turn off Signatures? In my Tools -> Settings menu, I've got nothing in the Composer Preferences -> Signatures box, yet it keeps sticking one in. The only way I can turn off Signatures is to click on the "Autogenerated" button and switch it to none. Thanks, John ___

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters

2002-11-14 Thread Philippe Chartier
Le jeu 14/11/2002 à 15:30, Enver ALTIN a écrit : > On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 16:17, Mark Lowes wrote: > > Am I missing something or is there no way of configuring 1.2 to use an > > external file for it's sig. It appears to be "import into the editor > > and save" or "script" as the only options. > >

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters

2002-11-14 Thread Enver ALTIN
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 17:03, Philippe Chartier wrote: > But I've noticed a problem. If I edit a signature in the new signature > editor, everything seems fine, but afterwards, in the preview signature > pane and in a new message, all the accented characters are unreadable... Got a problem like thi

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters

2002-11-14 Thread Mertens Bram
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 16:03, Philippe Chartier wrote: [snip] > But I've noticed a problem. If I edit a signature in the new signature > editor, everything seems fine, but afterwards, in the preview signature > pane and in a new message, all the accented characters are unreadable... [snip] > I suppo

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters

2002-11-14 Thread Eric Lambart
character set thing. But how can I solve this? I have > no idea... I had the same problem with "extended" characters... but I never reported the bug (I am very bad!). I think my solution was to edit the text file in another editor (vim!), and then Evo can use it just fine (see sig be

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters

2002-12-16 Thread Philippe Chartier
lve this? I have > no idea... > > I use KDE, if that can help... > > Thanks in advance! Hi, I just want to say that the signature problem I mentioned in November seems to be totally resolved with the new Evolution 1.2.1 upgrade. I've noticed the change because, curiously, mo

Re: [Evolution] Signatures: how to turn off

2002-11-12 Thread David Hoover
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 13:47, John Schmidt wrote: > How can I permanently turn off Signatures? > > In my Tools -> Settings menu, I've got nothing > in the Composer Preferences -> Signatures box, > yet it keeps sticking one in. > > The only way I can turn off Signatures is to > click on the "Autoge

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters (follow-up)

2002-11-14 Thread Philippe Chartier
Le jeu 14/11/2002 à 16:03, Philippe Chartier a écrit : > Le jeu 14/11/2002 à 15:30, Enver ALTIN a écrit : > > On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 16:17, Mark Lowes wrote: > > > Am I missing something or is there no way of configuring 1.2 to use an > > > external file for it's sig. It appears to be "import into

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters (follow-up)

2002-11-14 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le jeu 14/11/2002 à 16:32, Philippe Chartier a écrit : > > Example : > > ... croient être un "dysfonctionnement" de notre système : elles > > reçoivent le Bulletin après avoir tenté de se désabonner ou > > reçoivent le Bulletin en double. La source du problème est > > invariablement la mêm

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters (follow-up)

2002-11-14 Thread Cormac Long
Its your character coding.. when I view the message normally (in ISO-8859-1 "Latin-1"), they come up incorrectly.. but if I change the format to UTF-8, they display OK. Normally, European charsets should view fine in Latin-1... you need to check where your source the characters and possibly re

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters (follow-up)

2002-11-14 Thread Philippe Chartier
Le jeu 14/11/2002 à 17:51, Cormac Long a écrit : > Its your character coding.. when I view the message normally (in > ISO-8859-1 "Latin-1"), they come up incorrectly.. but if I change the > format to UTF-8, they display OK. Yes during my attempts to solve the problem, I temporarily switch to UTF-8

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters (follow-up)

2002-11-14 Thread Jean-Marc V. Liotier
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 16:58, Xavier Bestel wrote: > Le jeu 14/11/2002 à 16:32, Philippe Chartier a écrit : > > > Example : > > > ... croient être un "dysfonctionnement" de notre système : elles > > > reçoivent le Bulletin après avoir tenté de se désabonner ou > > > reçoivent le Bulletin en d

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters (follow-up)

2002-11-14 Thread Philippe Chartier
Le jeu 14/11/2002 à 16:58, Xavier Bestel a écrit : > Le jeu 14/11/2002 à 16:32, Philippe Chartier a écrit : > > > Example : > > > ... croient être un "dysfonctionnement" de notre système : elles > > > reçoivent le Bulletin après avoir tenté de se désabonner ou > > > reçoivent le Bulletin en

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters (follow-up)

2002-11-15 Thread Philippe Chartier
le. La source du problème est > > > > > invariablement la même :... > > > Well, if you can see my signature well formed with the cedilla, I may > help you > > I was in the same shit as you but was too lazy to have a look. Never > mind, your mail got me on

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters (follow-up)

2002-11-15 Thread Alessio Bragadini
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 16:50, Philippe Chartier wrote: > ~/evolution/signatures/ with a text editor and the accents are OK when > the signature is included in the message. > > I've notice something though. When I first tried to edit my signature > with Kedit 1.0.3, it was

Re: [Evolution] Signatures vs accented characters (follow-up)

2002-11-15 Thread Philippe Chartier
Le ven 15/11/2002 à 16:03, Alessio Bragadini a écrit : > On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 16:50, Philippe Chartier wrote: > > > ~/evolution/signatures/ with a text editor and the accents are OK when > > the signature is included in the message. > > > > I've notice some