chased this down to bitkeeper
changeset 1.262.2.2. Sadly I didn't have time to read the rest of that
changeset to see if the mistake pops up elsewhere as well. Please CC me
with replies, not on linux-kernel.
HTH,
Michael Meeks.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , Pseudo Engineer
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 10:48, Michael Meeks wrote:
I'm still having repeated problems with Gconf / evolution, and it's
interaction with Gconf 2.0. Essentially - after a time of quiescence I
try to compose a message - and it fails to activate the composer.
...
The reason
Hi Hyo-Je,
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 10:51, Hyo-Je Choi wrote:
The result is like below :
GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server (a likely cause of this is
that you have an existing configuration server
Hi Ronald,
I'm dead confused now; it seems in the plain (default) state, without
poking 'test' at runtime we have:
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 15:28, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote:
int test = 0;
...
if(!strcmp(sockpath, tmp-u.usock.sun_path)) {
cnx = test ? tmp : NULL;
Hi Ronald,
Firstly - thanks for looking into this.
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 17:42, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote:
Ok, let's see if I can explain this.
Look at file ORBit-0.5.1[5,6]/src/IIOP/connection.c:(IIOPConnection *
iiop_connection_unix_get:923)
Ok.
In 2.4 all test in the for
Hi Ronald,
I don't know quite what you're seeing, but AFAIR there should be a
client and a server in each direction; so 2x fd's per bi-directional
communication.
Does that make sense ? there's really no firm concept of any
application as 'server' in the CORBA model.
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 10:48, Michael Meeks wrote:
I'm still having repeated problems with Gconf / evolution
...
to no avail. Does anyone have any idea (short of strace
'world', wait for hours) that I could work out who / how that file
gets unlinked ?
Well - in the end I
Hi Ettore,
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 16:08, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
The right value for GNOME_PATH is something like
/opt/evolution:/usr
I don't remember if this ever got fixed; but as I recollect, the
gnome-config script [ highly cunningly ], parsed the 'path' backwards
last time
Hi there,
Just trying to work out exactly why my composer occasionaly decides it
just won't launch [ in the past related to thinking it can't contact
gconf ]. I did:
export ORBIT2_DEBUG=traces:timings
killall -9 gconfd-2
gconftool-2 --spawn
To get gconfd-2 to run with the orbit
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 22:22, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
changed to mimic Outlook's functionality which uses alphebtic keys for
searching which meant that we had to use ',' and '.' or '[' and ']'
Does ',' '.' work again ? Last check only '' and '' worked, which I
believe are also assigned
Hi Ettore,
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 23:42, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 05:22, Michael Meeks wrote:
CORBA_exception_init (ev);
CORBA_Context_set_one_value (
context, display,
DisplayString (gdk_display),
ev
Hi Shahms,
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 16:19, Shahms E. King wrote:
I'd be happy to look into it if you could give me a jumping off point
so to speak.
Ok; there are 2 things you need to do:
a) Ensure that the DISPLAY context parameter passed on each oaf
request is
On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 00:57, Not Zed wrote:
As Miles says, _if_ this is an ORBit bug, and while that wouldn't be
that surprising, it is rather strange that ORBit now seems to be
behaving relatively well on Solaris, and the aforementioned Linux
versions.
So you're saying its
Hi there,
Having spent some considerable time debugging this, and being
moderately plagued by it - I was hoping, that this bug would be dealt
with promptly. Particularly since the patch attached is small,
transparently correct, and the root cause of the problem.
It would be
Hello Mark,
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:17, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
I won't address the problem you're trying to solve, because I
haven't had much experience of it, but the way you plan to implement
the solution is just plain wrong.
It's a real shame that you didn't understand
Hi Jacob,
On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 16:28, jacob berkman wrote:
didn't the bonobo control interfaces change from gnome 1 - gnome 2?
Yes, but that's only half of it we do embedding in a different way at
the Gtk+ level with the arrival of the XEmbed protocol.
and how do you get a reference
Michael,
On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 16:19, Not Zed wrote:
you mean like 'mail foo@blah text', right?
Oh no, I guess you mean to execute a billion lines of mostly pointless
code that does the same thing instead?
But wait, I think you missed a billion lines in the above example,
Hi guys,
I'd really like to help testing HEAD evolution - indeed, some might say
that without testing it's never going to stabilize.
Problem is, the last snapshot I have is dated:
evolution-1.1.0.99-snap.ximian.200205031001
And it's pretty hellishly
Hi Havoc,
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 22:58, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Of course the underengineered, simple solution that works fine most of
the time would be a a cheesy explicitly-async message-passing API. Can
be implemented in a week.
And of course ORBit2 does asynchronous invocations
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 14:17, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
Thus people can invoke methods, no re-entrancy will occur on that
method invoke, and we can queue methods execution until idle. It's
really quite easy to do in the ORB - but needs some IDL extensions /
poking. Possibly some evil
Hi Ettore,
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 18:48, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
BTW, if we want to add extensions to work around the lack of decent
support for threaded apps, something that would be really useful is a
general mechanism for doing async calls.
Ok; this is in
Hi Michael,
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 03:07, Not Zed wrote:
It's not possible to attach gdb to a process that lives for only a few
handfuls of milliseconds, and dies without giving a user visible
message. Bug buddy would help to get this error handled, that is unless
you know something I
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 01:26, Not Zed wrote:
They wont be able to do anythign about it anyway, so it doesn't matter.
If they care enough they can use gdb manually.
It's not possible to attach gdb to a process that lives for only a few
handfuls of milliseconds, and dies
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 01:16, Not Zed wrote:
Despite what others are saying, you can't just use the corba
interfaces for this.
This is presumably, because these interfaces were not designed for
scripting at all.
Despite the fact the mailer just doens't have them, there
Hi there,
I just had another spate of this - and imagine my suprise to find that
gtkhtml-1.1 seems to be using gconf [ and gconf for whatever reason was
screwed ]:
gtkhtml-ERROR **: gconf error: Configuration server couldn't be
contacted:
Adding client to server's list failed, CORBA
Hi Ettore,
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 17:52, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
Last time I looked the estimate was about two man-months. My feeling is
that porting Evolution to use GtkTreeView would take less time, and is
also a more easily parallelizable task.
Two man months was to make all of
Hi Ettore / Jonathan,
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 22:37, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
* 100% accessible. (If we port Evolution to GNOME 2, we have to
add accessibility support to all the widgets, and making ETree
accessible is a very non-trivial task.)
I don't
Hi Larry,
Just chasing down the (evil) composer startup problem, and I notice
that the gtkhtml component activates the spell component before
returning it's factory:
#6 0x40bad80c in oaf_activate_from_id (aid=0x806eea0
OAFIID:GNOME_Spell_Dictionary:0.1, flags=0, ret_aid=0x0,
Hi Guys,
I havn't had time to analyse what's going wrong; but an strace fragment
of the composer creation problem is here:
http://primates.ximian.com/~michael/evo-composer-issue.log
HTH,
Michael.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant
Hi Milan,
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 23:44, Milan Hodoscek wrote:
The problem is a CORBA call to getType with a property of entry_changed.
The final bit of the call (which the debug spits out as being Sending
request getType id ... to ...) is different for this call only - it
appears to be
Hi Jeff,
On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 16:00, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Has anyone been able to reproduce with the current development branch?
I've so far only tried it 4 or 5 times, but so far have not encountered
this problem.
I'm beggining to think it's a sawfish problem, inasmuch that
Hi Jonas,
On Sat, 2002-03-02 at 16:42, Jonas Aaberg wrote:
Thanks alot for answering so quick!
No problem.
It's a general error - it's not necessarily the same sadly.
Yeah, but the probability that it is the same, is quite high I guess.
Nope; your error is unique
On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 20:41, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
Hm, I don't know anything about this bug, but I don't think it's fixed
in the snapshots. Fejj is the one to bug about it...
I'm beggining to think it might be related to the mail being marked
'read' in mid DD,
But that
Hi Guys,
A nasty moan - I have had to kill evolution 3 times today because of
leaked mouse grabs DD mails from evolution-mail to the shell tree view.
The leak appears to be in evolution-mail inasmuch that killing that
process frees up the system.
I'd love to fix it, but it's not
34 matches
Mail list logo
