Re: [Evolution] How does Evolution open a URL in a new tab in firefox?

2022-03-13 Thread Pete Biggs
Please don't reply to me, please reply only to the list. On Sat, 2022-03-12 at 11:37 -0800, Van Snyder wrote: > On Sat, 2022-03-12 at 19:08 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Evolution (or the others) don't actually do it themselves. They > > > > use > > > > xdg-open which opens

Re: [Evolution] How does Evolution open a URL in a new tab in firefox?

2022-03-12 Thread Pete Biggs
> > > > > > > Evolution (or the others) don't actually do it themselves. They use > > xdg-open which opens whatever in the users preferred application. > > So > > something like > > > >   xdg-open http://www.gnome.org > > > > > > Thanks for the explanation. That works from my command line, b

Re: [Evolution] How does Evolution open a URL in a new tab in firefox?

2022-03-12 Thread Van Snyder
On Sat, 2022-03-12 at 12:57 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 18:42 -0800, Van Snyder wrote: > > How does Evolution open a URL in a new tab in firefox? > > > > I can't do it from the command line. Online discussion says to use > > the "--new-

Re: [Evolution] How does Evolution open a URL in a new tab in firefox?

2022-03-12 Thread Pete Biggs
On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 18:42 -0800, Van Snyder wrote: > How does Evolution open a URL in a new tab in firefox? > > I can't do it from the command line. Online discussion says to use > the "--new-tab" command-line option, but firefox always puts up a > window sa

[Evolution] How does Evolution open a URL in a new tab in firefox?

2022-03-11 Thread Van Snyder
How does Evolution open a URL in a new tab in firefox? I can't do it from the command line. Online discussion says to use the "--new-tab" command-line option, but firefox always puts up a window saying it's already running, and inviting me to create a new profile. I have ot

Re: [Evolution] Open links in the background? (Firefox)

2021-12-16 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> > by Evolution. IOW this might be a missing feature for Evolution. > > Actually I didn't check if such a feature does already exist for > > Evolution, too. I just haven't seen one. > Hm, if xdg runs the same script for all apps that want to open the > default browser, it would be possible to get

Re: [Evolution] Open links in the background? (Firefox)

2021-12-15 Thread Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:26:16 +0100, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list wrote: >On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 06:18 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> > It only works, if Firefox is already running. >> > To workaround window issues scripts using the command wmctrl and >> > the command xdotool are usually hel

Re: [Evolution] Open links in the background? (Firefox)

2021-12-15 Thread Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 06:18 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > It only works, if Firefox is already running. > > To workaround window issues scripts using the command wmctrl and the > > command xdotool are usually helpful. However, in this case a mailer > > providing an option to chose the exter

Re: [Evolution] Open links in the background? (Firefox)

2021-12-15 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> It only works, if Firefox is already running. > To workaround window issues scripts using the command wmctrl and the > command xdotool are usually helpful. However, in this case a mailer > providing an option to chose the external browser or script would be > helpful. I don't know if Evolution ha

Re: [Evolution] Open links in the background? (Firefox)

2021-12-14 Thread Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 12:27 -0700, Tim Folger via evolution-list wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021, at 5:36 AM, theapple...@differentmail.com wrote: > > > > > Open config window in Firefox: about:config > > there find: browser.tabs.loadDivertedInBackground > > and change to True > > > > Thanks for t

Re: [Evolution] Open links in the background?

2021-12-14 Thread Tim Folger via evolution-list
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021, at 1:16 AM, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 23:28 -0700, Tim Folger via evolution-list wrote: > > But when I click a link in Evolution the desktop focus shifts to the > > browser instead of remaining with Evolution. > > Hi, > I'm also n

Re: [Evolution] Open links in the background? (Firefox)

2021-12-14 Thread Tim Folger via evolution-list
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021, at 5:36 AM, theapple...@differentmail.com wrote: > > When I click a link in an email message I'd like Web (my default > > browser) or Firefox to start loading the link in the background while > > the Evolution window remains in focus on the screen. > > For Firefox, this help

Re: [Evolution] Open links in the background?

2021-12-14 Thread tim via evolution-list
On 12/14/21 9:31 AM, larry wrote: On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 23:28 -0700, Tim Folger via evolution-list wrote: When I click a link in an email message I'd like Web (my default browser) or Firefox to start loading the link in the background while the Evolution window remains in focus on the screen.

Re: [Evolution] Open links in the background?

2021-12-14 Thread larry
On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 23:28 -0700, Tim Folger via evolution-list wrote: > When I click a link in an email message I'd like Web (my default > browser) or Firefox to start loading the link in the background while > the Evolution window remains in focus on the screen. This is the > default behavior in

Re: [Evolution] Open links in the background? (Firefox)

2021-12-14 Thread theapple...@differentmail.com
> When I click a link in an email message I'd like Web (my default > browser) or Firefox to start loading the link in the background while > the Evolution window remains in focus on the screen. For Firefox, this helped me: Open config window in Firefox: about:config there find: browser.tabs.load

Re: [Evolution] Open links in the background?

2021-12-14 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 09:16 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 23:28 -0700, Tim Folger via evolution-list > wrote: > > But when I click a link in Evolution the desktop focus shifts to > > the > > browser instead of remaining with Evolution. > > Hi, > I'm al

Re: [Evolution] Open links in the background?

2021-12-14 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 23:28 -0700, Tim Folger via evolution-list wrote: > But when I click a link in Evolution the desktop focus shifts to the > browser instead of remaining with Evolution. Hi, I'm also not happy with that behavior, though I've been told, long time ago, that it had been re

[Evolution] Open links in the background?

2021-12-13 Thread Tim Folger via evolution-list
When I click a link in an email message I'd like Web (my default browser) or Firefox to start loading the link in the background while the Evolution window remains in focus on the screen. This is the default behavior in Thunderbird, for example. But when I click a link in Evolution the desktop f

Re: [Evolution] open-map service

2020-01-06 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 22:40 -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > Thanks for your help. I have done as you request. Hi, thanks. For the record, it's filled as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/issues/746 Bye, Milan ___ evoluti

Re: [Evolution] open-map service

2020-01-06 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 12:59 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 18:03 -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > The action called for looks like an "open-map:" service, similar > > to"http:"; if so it's no wonder that browsers don't understand. > > Cananyone clarify the sit

Re: [Evolution] open-map service

2020-01-06 Thread Milan Crha via evolution-list
On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 18:03 -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > The action called for looks like an "open-map:" service, similar to > "http:"; if so it's no wonder that browsers don't understand. Can > anyone clarify the situation? Is there any way to make evolution call > on a different service?

[Evolution] open-map service

2020-01-02 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
When I click on an item in the address function and then on the "open- map" line in the text that then appears at the bottom of the screen, I get this message when using either Firefox and Chrome: Could not open the link The specified location is not supported. This behavior may be related to

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-06 Thread Gottfried
Hi all, one last time. I did not believe it, but I tried now several times and it was only confirmed. Once the password is saved in keyrings, evolution works smart. Thank you for all the work you put into this. I look at this thread now from my side as closed. Have a blessed 2018 On 03/0

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Gottfried
But the prompt doesn't show. It does not come up. Okay, thanks for trying it. This might require deep debugging, possibly with changes in the code, which is not easily doable. I'm afraid your only option at the moment is to store the password in the keyring, as a workaround, to avoid the passwo

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 16:00 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > No, I don't store any password. Hi, I see. That's the main difference with my setup. I store all passwords. They are in keyring these days, which means the passwords are stored encrypted and unreadable for others, unless someone uses yo

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Gottfried
keyring" is not checked, right? You probably do not store the password for some reason, which is fine. No, I don't store any password. It looked like the password/credential prompt had been shown before the Evolution window, thus I guess it can, in some cases, be hidden under the Evolution wi

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 14:38:56 +0200, Gottfried wrote: >[schorsch@localhost ~]$ evolution >Error sending IPC message: Broken pipe >[schorsch@localhost ~]$ evolution --force-shutdown >Could not find Evolution's process ID >[schorsch@localhost ~]$ pgrep -a evolution >10079 /usr/libexec/evolution-calenda

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 14:38 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > I started evolution by 'send-to' without sending the email., but I do > get the question for the password. Hi, thanks for the detailed description of the situation. It helps. I suppose, when you are offered with the password prompt, the

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Gottfried
Have a look: [schorsch@localhost ~]$ *evolution* Error sending IPC message: Broken pipe [schorsch@localhost ~]$ *evolution --force-shutdown* Could not find Evolution's process ID [schorsch@localhost ~]$ *pgrep -a evolution* 10079 /usr/libexec/evolution-calendar-factory 10085 /usr/libexec/evolutio

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 12:43 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > so an equivalent to > > evolution --force-shutdown > > while sidestepping usage of "evolution" would be Hi, depending where you distribution installs it: $ /usr/libexec/evolution/killev which is what the 'evolution --force-s

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 12:43 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 12:11 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > well, the --force-shutdown kills the background processes in the > > correct order, which is important at least in GNOME, where > > gnome-shell's calendar-server process (which provides

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Ralf Mardorf
My apologies, for the OP this perhaps was a confusing conversation. Gottfried simply run evolution --force-shutdown evolution &>log.txt or perhaps evolution --force-shutdown pgrep -a evolution evolution &>log.txt No output by running "pgrep -a evolution" means that everything is term

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 12:11 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > well, the --force-shutdown kills the background processes in the > correct order, which is important at least in GNOME, where > gnome-shell's calendar-server process (which provides events in the > clock popup) restarts evolution-calendar-facto

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 11:48 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > I prefer pkill -9 over --force-shutdown to completely sidestep > evolution. Hi, well, the --force-shutdown kills the background processes in the correct order, which is important at least in GNOME, where gnome-shell's calendar-server

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 11:48:55 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 11:13:45 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: >> $ evolution &>log.txt >> $ evolution --force-shutdown > >Hi, > >I'm in favour of > >pkill -9 evolution && evolution > /tmp/evolution.log 2>&1 > >&> vs 2>&1 for portability re

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 11:13:45 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > $ evolution &>log.txt > $ evolution --force-shutdown Hi, I'm in favour of pkill -9 evolution && evolution > /tmp/evolution.log 2>&1 &> vs 2>&1 for portability reasons, just in case the OP should use a shell not providing &>, even while

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-03 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 21:30 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > > I'm unsure of one thing: does Evolution freeze in this state and it > > doesn't repaint, > > ...which lead to full function until I closed it again. Then it was > not opening anymore. Hi, I'm sorry, I'm still confused. "Then it was

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-02 Thread andré via evolution-list
Le 2018-01-02 à 14:30, Gottfried a écrit : [...] You can also tweak some GNOME behaviour with a gnome-tweak-tool (where the most irritating for me is when a modal window movement moves also its parent, which I turn off). what in the world is tweaking? What does that do? gives it a protokoll?

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-02 Thread Gottfried
I'm unsure of one thing: does Evolution freeze in this state and it doesn't repaint, The tree of saved messages is still mobile, and I can look into the folders, look up certain emails. I did a back-up and I can read an older back-up into evolution, which lead to full function until I closed i

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-02 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 19:30 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > I really have no clue, what exactly you mean with theme. If you don't know, then it is not the cause here. :) andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ evolution-

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-02 Thread Gottfried
the underlying issue lies outside of Evolution. Probably in the desktop theme that you are using. I changed my background picture to one of the fedora backgrounds and matched it with the lockscreen. They were different before. I use English (UK) as language, but have a German keyboard, because

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-02 Thread Milan Crha
On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 15:50 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > I attached the list in txt format. Is that OK? Hi, this one is fine for a brief look on what evolution does. It shows that Thread 12 is truly waiting for credentials and Thread 1 is redrawing a tree view. I guess, from the past experien

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-02 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 10:45 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > Happy New Year everyone! > > finally we got done with 2017 and it's a new year. May it be blessed > for > all of you. Thank you for your work. It's invaluable. > > Referring to my problem: > > I clicked once again the wrong button and clicke

Re: [Evolution] open

2018-01-02 Thread Gottfried
Happy New Year everyone! finally we got done with 2017 and it's a new year. May it be blessed for all of you. Thank you for your work. It's invaluable. Referring to my problem: I clicked once again the wrong button and clicked "send to' in my files instead of 'copy to' but the outcome is tha

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-30 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 16:57 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > > A theme is essentially a group of visual settings that affect what your > > desktop and windows look like, including icons, colour schemes, fonts, > > background, etc. > > Yepp, in this case, I changed the background actually every now and >

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-30 Thread Gottfried
A theme is essentially a group of visual settings that affect what your desktop and windows look like, including icons, colour schemes, fonts, background, etc. Yepp, in this case, I changed the background actually every now and then. I find a nice picture taken by my wife as photography or in

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-30 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 15:54 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > > Yes, from the previous email: "Have you changed the theme at all?" > > > > andre > > ??? what do you mean with theme? I used to work with pop but with fedora > I changed to IMAP. Otherwise it's the same emails, and I used the same > back-u

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-30 Thread Gottfried
Yes, from the previous email: "Have you changed the theme at all?" andre ??? what do you mean with theme? I used to work with pop but with fedora I changed to IMAP. Otherwise it's the same emails, and I used the same back-ups. Fedora is of course different, you don't mean that. And I always

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-30 Thread Gottfried
That list is the list of threads currently being run by Evolution along with a backtrace of the calls in each thread. One of the 45 threads is stuck but without seeing them all it is impossible to tell which is causing the issue. The list is long because Evolution is complex. If the file is a r

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-30 Thread Andre Klapper
On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 13:55 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > So I set up my laptop completely with fedora 27 and the only change in > evolution was the update, which didn't change anything that I could > see. Yes, from the previous email: "Have you changed the theme at all?" andre -- Andre Klapper |

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-30 Thread Gottfried
for the emails I use IMAP The system is set up on Gnome I used to work on Linux Mint, but evolution was then only with version 3.22 available and I felt the performance was deteriorating. So I set up my laptop completely with fedora 27 and the only change in evolution was the update, whic

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-30 Thread Pete Biggs
On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 09:18 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > Somehow it counts down from 45 to 1 and then last one mentions some loop: The loop it mentions in this - Thread #1 - is fundamental to how GUI apps work. The program enters a loop which allows other threads or applications to get some time to p

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-30 Thread Pete Biggs
> > and I can now quit or go on like this. what exactly of these lists would > you need? > > That list is the list of threads currently being run by Evolution along with a backtrace of the calls in each thread. One of the 45 threads is stuck but without seeing them all it is impossible to tel

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Gottfried
Somehow it counts down from 45 to 1 and then last one mentions some loop: Thread 1 (Thread 0x77f8af80 (LWP 12519)): #0 0x739e7330 in gtk_css_static_style_get_default () at /lib64/libgtk-3.so.0 #1 0x739d3592 in gtk_css_node_init () at /lib64/libgtk-3.so.0 #2 0x714

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Gottfried
here is what I get now: Thread 45 (Thread 0x7fff289d4700 (LWP 12627)): #0  0x7fffeb4d3b29 in syscall () at /lib64/libc.so.6 #1  0x75e9166a in g_cond_wait_until () at /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2  0x75e20381 in g_async_queue_pop_intern_unlocked ()     at /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Andre Klapper
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 17:34 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote: > I believe they missed the step that after Evolution hangs you have to > type Ctrl-C in the GDB terminal to interrupt the debugger and get > back > to the GDB prompt. THEN you can type "thread apply all bt full" > > At least I think that is what

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Zan Lynx
On 12/29/2017 05:18 PM, Gottfried wrote: > > >> It sounds like Evolution "hangs" (does not respond to anything in >> the user interface anymore) but does not "crash" (the application >> window vanishes unexpectedly). >> >> Please make sure that "gdb" is installed. Then open a Terminal >> window.

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Gottfried
It sounds like Evolution "hangs" (does not respond to anything in the user interface anymore) but does not "crash" (the application window vanishes unexpectedly). Please make sure that "gdb" is installed. Then open a Terminal window. Then enter the command "gdb evolution". At the next prompt,

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Gottfried
Yes sorry, I wrote from my cellphone one of the emails, won't do that again. On 30/12/17 00:22, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Please do NOT post on the list from multiple email accounts. This makes it impossible to keep track of conversations. I fact I've just noticed you used the same account,

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 22:27:07 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >You were asked explicitly to use the gdb debugger with instructions on >what commands to give in order to generate a stack trace, which might >give a clue to what's going on. In a nutshell: On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 16:54:03 +0100, Andre K

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 23:31 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > in Fedora there is a program called Nemiver. I used the function "attach > to running program" while Evolution is still running or hanging. You were asked explicitly to use the gdb debugger with instructions on what commands to give in order t

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 22:20 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 20:23 +0200, jeff...@g123.de wrote: > > OK, got some idea now how to get a debug report. Work on it. Just needs > > time with my not so fast pc. Setup of test user worked. > > Setup of evolution on that user take

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 22:57:52 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 23:31 +0200, Gottfried wrote: >> Nemiver > >The output of Nemiver you posted seemingly is Assembler code, so >perhaps what you used was a disassembler feature. However, I don't >know Nemiver, nor do I program anymore.

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 20:23 +0200, jeff...@g123.de wrote: > OK, got some idea now how to get a debug report. Work on it. Just needs time > with my not so fast pc. Setup of test user worked. > Setup of evolution on that user takes a bit more time, but it is going. In > fedora there is a debugger,

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 23:31 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > Nemiver The output of Nemiver you posted seemingly is Assembler code, so perhaps what you used was a disassembler feature. However, I don't know Nemiver, nor do I program anymore. But actually I programmed Assembler in the 80s. I seriously doub

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Ralf Mardorf
In your case use the already mentioned gdb. In some other cases strace could be very helpful. This are at least the only two programs I ever needed to use for bug reports. I heard that valgrind is used a lot, too, but a developer never asked me to run it. Here's a not that good overview, however,

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Gottfried
Hi All, in Fedora there is a program called Nemiver. I used the function "attach to running program" while Evolution is still running or hanging. I got the following. Does that show anything? To me Chinese would be just as clear. :-) THe program shows the header: (path='/usr/bin/evolution', p

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread jeff...@g123.de
OK, got some idea now how to get a debug report. Work on it. Just needs time with my not so fast pc. Setup of test user worked.Setup of evolution on that user takes a bit more time, but it is going. In fedora there is a debugger, I'll try that and see what it comes up with.Thank you all for your e

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 12:19 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > And THIS IS NOT THE PLACE TO RANT ABOUT SYSTEMD. > > > > Nobody did, right? So why do you shout?  > > Because when ever anyone on any Linux related mailing list mentions > systemd it invariable descends into rants about it. I was att

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Pete Biggs
> > let me make my problem more precise. Evolution works fine. It is in my > setting that something went wrong and all of a sudden it does not open > any more. > You never said if you use IMAP or POP? But in the back of my mind I seem to remember that there was some ISPs that had some strang

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 15:32 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > I am not interested in configuring evolution with a different email. No-one has asked you to do that. My recommendation was to create a new *Linux user* (i.e. a new login on your local machine), then log into that user account and run Evolution

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Andre Klapper
Hi Gottfried, On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 15:32 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > Could it be a problem though, that evolution, thunderbird and clawsmail > in one system don't like each other? or may just two of them. Extremely unlikely, and wild guessing won't help debugging anything. > The worst side of th

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 17:15 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > > Open a terminal and launch evolution from there. > > > >evolution > > > > For posting purpose (at https://pastebin.com/ or similar) you could > > redirect all output to a log file. > > > >evolution > /tmp/evolution.0.log 2>&1 > > O

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 15:32:11 +0200, Gottfried wrote: >Could it be a problem though, that evolution, thunderbird and >clawsmail in one system don't like each other? or may just two of them. Hi, let's ignore the dependency tree and optional dependencies and just take a look at the direct hard depen

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Gottfried
Hi all, let me make my problem more precise. Evolution works fine. It is in my setting that something went wrong and all of a sudden it does not open any more. I installed evolution on a different PC. restored an older back-up and one or two times it loaded fine and then again, it did not wa

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 12:25 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 10:02 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 06:39 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 17:53:03 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > Uninstalled it, reinstalled it. > > > >

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Pete Biggs
> > > And THIS IS NOT THE PLACE TO RANT ABOUT SYSTEMD. > > Nobody did, right? So why do you shout? Because when ever anyone on any Linux related mailing list mentions systemd it invariable descends into rants about it. I was attempting to pre-empt that. Sorry if I offended you with my caps-loc

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 11:47:25 +, Pete Biggs wrote: >This is getting a bit off topic Not my fault, actually I replied to "On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 21:38:46 +0200, Gottfried wrote: You need to run Evolution from the command line and see if any errors are produced there. H

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Pete Biggs
This is getting a bit off topic > > > > No there is not, in times of Wayland instead of X. > > And I'd doubt anyway that this would be any helpful. > > There even necessarily is ~/.xsession-errors when running X, as long as > the user doesn't redirect the output or the user chose a display

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 10:02 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 06:39 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 17:53:03 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > Uninstalled it, reinstalled it. > > > > > > Virtually always a waste of time. Linux isn't Windows. > >

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 11:27 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 06:46 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > FWIW usually there is a file ~/.xsession-errors that contains the > > output > > of all running GUI apps. > > No there is not, in times of Wayland instead of X. > And I'd doubt anyw

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Andre Klapper
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 06:46 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > FWIW usually there is a file ~/.xsession-errors that contains the > output > of all running GUI apps. No there is not, in times of Wayland instead of X. And I'd doubt anyway that this would be any helpful. andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-29 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 06:39 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 17:53:03 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Uninstalled it, reinstalled it. > > > > Virtually always a waste of time. Linux isn't Windows. > > Not necessarily. For example take Ubuntu's apt. > > "Removing a packa

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-28 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 21:38:46 +0200, Gottfried wrote: >> You need to run Evolution from the command line and see if any errors >> are produced there. >How does that work? Open a terminal and run evolution FWIW usually there is a file ~/.xsession-errors that contains the output of all running

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-28 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 17:53:03 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> Uninstalled it, reinstalled it. > >Virtually always a waste of time. Linux isn't Windows. Not necessarily. For example take Ubuntu's apt. "Removing a package removes all packaged data, but leaves usually small (modified) user con

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-28 Thread Gottfried
You need to run Evolution from the command line and see if any errors are produced there. did that and it opens Evloution just until it would ask for the passowrd and then get's hanged up. Doesn't do anything anymore. I did a back-up a few days ago, and with that it runs perfect. You know, r

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-28 Thread Gottfried
Update Fedora, Evolution should be on 3.26.3 on F27. It won't solve your problem, but you should keep a dynamic OS like Fedora up to date. yepp. done. and it doesn't change anything If you the menus still work you can do Edit -> Preferences -> Mail Accounts -> (select account) -> Edit -> Rece

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-28 Thread Pete Biggs
On Thu, 2017-12-28 at 20:33 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > I am on Fedora as OS and use the 3.26.1 version of Evolution. Update Fedora, Evolution should be on 3.26.3 on F27. It won't solve your problem, but you should keep a dynamic OS like Fedora up to date. (And don't top post on this mailing list -

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-28 Thread Gottfried
I am on Fedora as OS and use the 3.26.1 version of Evolution. I used the back-up on a different PC and it worked out the same way. By my comments you know that I don't know much. I suspect, that I unintentionally saved a wrong password. I never save passwords but then again, I type sometimes f

Re: [Evolution] open

2017-12-28 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2017-12-28 at 16:50 +0200, Gottfried wrote: > Hi all, > > I cannot open evolution anymore. Got the newest version. Which version exactly? > when I try to > open it, it comes up until it generates the maillist and then it gets > stuck. Doesn't even ask for password. > > Uninstalled it,

[Evolution] open

2017-12-28 Thread Gottfried
Hi all, I cannot open evolution anymore. Got the newest version. when I try to open it, it comes up until it generates the maillist and then it gets stuck. Doesn't even ask for password. Uninstalled it, reinstalled it. Even the opening of the back-up file on another computer doesn't work, bu

Re: [Evolution] Open attached mails in separate window?

2014-02-18 Thread Emre Erenoglu
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 13:46 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to open attached mails in Evolution (built from master, 1 week > > ago), but Kmail is launched to display this attachment. (this is Kubuntu > > 13.10) > > Did

Re: [Evolution] Open attached mails in separate window?

2014-02-18 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 13:46 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to open attached mails in Evolution (built from master, 1 week > ago), but Kmail is launched to display this attachment. (this is Kubuntu > 13.10) Did you try changing the default application handler for that MIME type i

[Evolution] Open attached mails in seperate window?

2014-02-18 Thread Emre Erenoglu
Hi, I'm trying to open attached mails in Evolution (built from master, 1 week ago), but Kmail is launched to display this attachment. (this is Kubuntu 13.10) I know evolution displays the attached mails in a widget box below the mail itself in the same reading window, but i don't want that since

[Evolution] Open attached mails in separate window?

2014-02-18 Thread Emre Erenoglu
Hi, I'm trying to open attached mails in Evolution (built from master, 1 week ago), but Kmail is launched to display this attachment. (this is Kubuntu 13.10) I know evolution displays the attached mails in a widget box below the mail itself in the same reading window, but i don't want that since

Re: [Evolution] "Open Web Page" on task does nothing

2010-10-06 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 11:31 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > I have a CalDAV to-do list. The tasks all have a URL property that > appears in Open Task -> Details: "Web Page". And I can click on the > 'go' button next to that field in the dialog and go to the web page. > But right-clicking on a

[Evolution] "Open Web Page" on task does nothing

2010-10-05 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
I have a CalDAV to-do list. The tasks all have a URL property that appears in Open Task -> Details: "Web Page". And I can click on the 'go' button next to that field in the dialog and go to the web page. But right-clicking on a task in the task list view and selecting "Open Web Page" does nothing

Re: [Evolution] Open .dat files

2010-08-10 Thread Pete Biggs
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 12:12 +0200, Chris Blake wrote: > Greetings community, > > I need to open .dat files in Evolution. > > I searched the archives for a solution to this and only found this : > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2002-November/thread.html > > Reading all the mails

[Evolution] Open .dat files

2010-08-10 Thread Chris Blake
Greetings community, I need to open .dat files in Evolution. I searched the archives for a solution to this and only found this : http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2002-November/thread.html Reading all the mails that came up about this topic leaves me to believe that Evolution can n

[Evolution] open a single e-mail from a file

2009-02-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
If I had a single e-mail in mbox format in a file, is there any way to get evolution (2.4.24) to simply open that message in a message reading window? I am aware that I can use File->Import to read it into an existing folder, but that's a bit cumbersome to simply open a message, say, to be able to

  1   2   >