Maximum number of administrative connections

2001-08-14 Thread Olivier de Heer
Hello world, I’m trying to access the Queues tab on the MTA properties of our backbone server (39 X400 Connectors, 1 IMS), but Exchange tells me the following: “The maximum number of administrative connections to the message transfer agent (MTA) has been reached. Try again later. Microsoft Exchan

Re: New mail notification port(s)

2001-08-14 Thread Kevin Derby
Um, no. There's no new mail notify over our Cisco VPN system, but we have another legacy system that allows those packets through. I'm trying to do research so my network guys have something to work with. Kevin - Original Message - From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ex

Re: New mail notification port(s)

2001-08-14 Thread missy koslosky
Lemme guess... You work for an ASP, or a company that wants to at least host some Exchange services... It's completely random, from what MS has said in the past. And there's no way to un-randomize it, and it can't be changed. Apparently the three lines (whatever) of code that control this were

RE: ColdFusion (CFMail) running on Exchange 5.5 SP4

2001-08-14 Thread Michael L. Callahan
What are your current settings in IMS Address Space and your settings in the Routing tab? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ColdFusion (CFMail) running on Exchange 5.5 SP4 SMTP

Re: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails

2001-08-14 Thread fullbrij
You'll need to clean out the corrupt item(s). Then you'll need to update cdo.dll on the OWA server and any server running the event service. > Odd problem... > > Win2K SP1 > Exchange 5.5 SP4 > Outlook 2000 SR1 > User on separate subnet > User behind an internal firewall > > > A user came to m

RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

2001-08-14 Thread Tom Meunier
I think if I had a T1 or frame relay with a good CIR, and that really sweet VPN arrangement you're deploying, I'd have one Exchange server, one OWA server for road warriors (hey, you already own all those licenses, might as well use ONE of them), and a bunch of sites with Outlook deployed in corpo

RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

2001-08-14 Thread john . shi
Hi, Tom The central Exchange server has 200 users and all the romote site servers have less than 25 users. How do you think? Thanks John Shi -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fram

RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

2001-08-14 Thread Tom Meunier
Depends. But yes, in Exchange 2000, technically speaking, you can set up one front-end server and have it handle all of your back-end clients. I don't know whether you have 100 users per server, or 10,000. You really need to go look at the whitepapers at www.microsoft.com/exchange. Nobody here

RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

2001-08-14 Thread Tom Meunier
Then yes, it's a one-to-one relationship. More clients, bigger hardware on the OWA box. You can use SSL. Or if you want to skip the OWA box, just have them VPN in (you ARE implementing the technology, after all) and let them use an IMAP client or Outlook. -Original Message- From: [EMA

RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

2001-08-14 Thread john . shi
Hi, Tom Are you saying I only need to set up a OWA server and have all the remote users share with that? Thanks JOhn -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

2001-08-14 Thread john . shi
Hi, Tom We have Exchange server 5.5 right now. John Shi -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. I'll take the OWA one. :) The only version info I saw in t

RE: New mail notification port(s)

2001-08-14 Thread Tom Meunier
Here's a nice explanation. http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/Topics/86.htm -Original Message- From: Kevin Derby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:24 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: New mail notification port(s) Subject: New mail notification po

RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

2001-08-14 Thread Tom Meunier
I'll take the OWA one. :) The only version info I saw in the email was one reference to one Exchange 2000 server. You'd use a frontend-backend scenario. You'll have to buy Exchange Enterprise for your frontend server. Other than that, you can use Standard version if it suits all your other ne

New mail notification port(s)

2001-08-14 Thread Kevin Derby
Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere between 1024 and 65k. Is that one for each client, picked randomly from what's unused, or is there something else to it? Kevin _

RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

2001-08-14 Thread Andre Toussaint
John, Replication should work fine... Once the VPN is up and running, you should be able to do whatever you want with win2k, and exchange etc. Getting the VPN setup is mainly just getting TCP/IP to work with all the sites together, in a virtually private way. Once that is working, you should be a

RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

2001-08-14 Thread john . shi
Hi, Andre How about Replication between all the W2K DC on different sites? If you change some configuratin on W2K DC on the central stie, how would this replicate to the remote sites through VPN? If I want everyone remoste site to get to the OWA on their sites, how would this work if you have the

RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

2001-08-14 Thread Andre Toussaint
If I understood you correctly: The way each office connects to the internet should not matter for the VPN. And, the router at each office (the main router, one that sits between the office and internet) should handle VPN. Just make sure each router supports each other for VPN. And, you would onl

RE: Help with Undeliverable

2001-08-14 Thread Scharff, Chris
Are these users resolving off of entries in their contacts folder perhaps? Or replying to messages which were sent while on 5.5, but were imported or or otherwise brought over from the old organization into the new one? > -Original Message- > From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

2001-08-14 Thread John Shi
Hi, Everyone The Technology is changing very fast. I was more comfortable with Frame Relay then T1 Internet VPN technology. We have one central site and 4 remotes sites. Originally, I was thinking to keep the frame Relay, but my boss thought the each site has its own T1 line and VPN to our central

Re: Inter organisation and scheduling

2001-08-14 Thread missy koslosky
Actually, there are two InterOrg tools - the InterOrg Directory Synchronization tool, which was in the BORK, and the InterOrg Public Folder Replication tool, which was released with SP2 (maybe 3, but I think 2) for Exchange 5.5. Oh - and if you're looking for DirSynch, LDSU from Compaq works marv

RE: Help with Undeliverable

2001-08-14 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
The new exchange server was installed in our domain. Our Exchange 5.5 server was OFF the network, in a closest. Never brought online during or since the installation of 2000. Our new Org Name is MPDINC on E2K. ForestPrep and DomainPrep was ran on the E2k machine. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MC

RE: Exchange 4.0 to 5.5

2001-08-14 Thread Nick Goodman
I do not have an Internet Mail Service or Connector available to me on 4.0. This is my primary reason to upgrade to exchange 5.5, that and my 4.0 licenses are good for 5.5 due to a technology upgrade promo or whatever MS is calling it now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt

RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails

2001-08-14 Thread David Florea
Mine's not hidden, but I've never had to fiddle with it. -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails Ok thanks. If freebusy supposed to be hidden?

RE: Flag for Followup settings

2001-08-14 Thread John Matteson
Well, FOO! Time to break out the crayons and start doing a logic diagram for a new client. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one. - Bruce Lee -Orig

RE: Flag for Followup settings

2001-08-14 Thread Scharff, Chris
In Outlook 2000? You can't have your cake and eat it too I'm afraid. > -Original Message- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Flag for Followup settings > > > Sue: > > The question st

RE: Exchange-aware restores not writing 'restore in progress' reg key

2001-08-14 Thread LSeltzer
Richard, We replaced the drives and restored from a backup. Old HP LCII machines would require external cages/etc. and all we had was hot-swap disks, RAID5, and 3 slots in a cage. IDR is a function of completely backing up the NT Server and restoring it to identical hardware, even though the disk

RE: Flag for Followup settings

2001-08-14 Thread John Matteson
Sue: The question still remains, can I change the default on the flag without changing the end of my working day? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a diffic

RE: Exchange-aware restores not writing 'restore in progress' reg key

2001-08-14 Thread Richard Dann
Larry, Could you clarify the configuration. By the looks of things this is Exchange 5.5 but how did you implement the disk upgrade? Was this just the database disks and did you have old and new alongside so you could move stores using the performance monitor or did you replace the drives and simp

RE: Help with Undeliverable

2001-08-14 Thread Richard Dann
Ron, Is the domain name specified in a Recipient Policy. Anything so specified will be considered inbound (although you do have to option to forward mail to unresolved addresses). regards, Richard Dann -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 August 2

RE: E-mailing to a group.

2001-08-14 Thread Wesoloski, Brett
Well I have tracked the message and it is getting there. My guess is that it has something to do with reading the SMTP address for forwarding the message on. When you send using an alias the SMTP is correct but when you send using a group you get the group name for the SMTP address. -Origi

RE: attachment size

2001-08-14 Thread msharik
Message size, yes. Attachment size, no. Press the F1 key in XADM. -Michèle Immigration site: Our new 2001 Miata: Tiggercam: - The colde

RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails

2001-08-14 Thread William Smith
Ok thanks. If freebusy supposed to be hidden? If so how? W -Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails See Q197180 for all switches, sometimes I've

RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails

2001-08-14 Thread David Florea
See Q197180 for all switches, sometimes I've had to use both /cleanfreebusy and /cleanreminders, and sometimes more than once, to get it right. You're right, that should have more to do with calendar issues, but I've had Outlook just get so hosed by calendar problems that it declines to run at al

RE: Outlook 2000

2001-08-14 Thread Farquharson, Andrea
Hi, Lori. I did as you suggested, recreated his profile. No error message popped up. Thanks!! > [1] A reinstall of Outlook does not create a new profile. Removing the > mailbox is pretty drastic when a new profile takes a few seconds. Wanna try > that first? > > > [1] I know I'm not Pat. >

RE: Exchange 4.0 to 5.5

2001-08-14 Thread Ed Crowley
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in Exchange 4.0 there isn't a "Routing" tab, is there? In that case, you need not make any configuration changes to the IMS. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [E

RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails

2001-08-14 Thread William Smith
If I remember correctly I tried this on the last user, with no effect. Even so, this would be to take care of the calendar issues, not the bounced emails. Is there a way to clean the freebusy for the whole site? Also should the Freebusy be on a certain Ex Server in the site? It is currently not o

RE: Inter organisation and scheduling

2001-08-14 Thread Ed Crowley
InterOrg will replicate public folder content as well. Actually scheduling will work fine between organizations as long as recipients are both "rich-text". But users in one organization will not be able to view calendars of users in the other organization. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Cons

RE: Ex 5.5 SP4-size of priv.edb

2001-08-14 Thread Ed Crowley
Of course, there's single instance store, and the fact that few users will use their quota, so if you do build a server that big, you'll likely find that you can increase mailbox limits significantly without using all your space. But it's probably best to ease into that rather than depending upon

RE: Outlook Calendar Script

2001-08-14 Thread Ed Crowley
Which is in the FAQ. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randal, Phil Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Su

RE: 36gb Drives in RAID 5 array?

2001-08-14 Thread Ed Crowley
I figured that if there were a whole lot of 36GB drives, then there would be lots of users. For performance reasons, on a large server, I would spring for a dedicated pair of disks for the transaction logs. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base ar

RE: Outlook 2000

2001-08-14 Thread Hunter, Lori
[1] A reinstall of Outlook does not create a new profile. Removing the mailbox is pretty drastic when a new profile takes a few seconds. Wanna try that first? [1] I know I'm not Pat. -Original Message- From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001

RE: Help with Undeliverable

2001-08-14 Thread Scharff, Chris
I really thought the comma was an invalid character for an E2K org name[1]... Did someone use your production AD for testing of E2K betas at any point? The only way I could see that not generating an error during Exchange setup would be if someone had run forestprep and/or domainprep with a versio

RE: OWA Problems

2001-08-14 Thread PRamatowski
Zing! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Problems Actually you type pretty good for a 2yr old. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Help with Undeliverable

2001-08-14 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
The comma was from the old 55 setup. Yes, it happens on all replies of anyone internal to our system. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chri

RE: OWA Problems

2001-08-14 Thread Martin Blackstone
Actually you type pretty good for a 2yr old. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Problems Please disregard my previous email. A two year old childs han

Re: Outlook 2000

2001-08-14 Thread Farquharson, Andrea
Pat, the administrator for the Chesapeake office said this user has had this problem before. Outlook was reinstalled last Friday, his account has been opened on my computer and on the administrator's computer with no problem. Do you think deleting the mailbox and re-creating it would make a diffe

Re: OWA Problems

2001-08-14 Thread Kevin
Please disregard my previous email. A two year old childs hands are quicker than the eye ! - Original Message - From: "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:16 PM Subject: OWA Problems > Apparently there were pieces to the puzzle that I was

RE: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread PRamatowski
since I'm done for the day... http://www.seuss.org/seuss/seuss.purity.html (pg-13) http://www.tcfhe.com/foxkids/downloads/seuss_grneggs.mov (for Matt) -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: OWA Problems

2001-08-14 Thread Bueffel, Scott M - CNF
No matter where I go, there I am. I wanna go somewhere where I am not. That sounds like fun. -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Problems I no longer want my mtv. -Orig

RE: OWA Problems

2001-08-14 Thread Martin Blackstone
And what puzzle would that be Kevin? You message is rather cryptic since there is nothing to go on. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Problems Apparently

RE: OWA Problems

2001-08-14 Thread Byron Kennedy
I no longer want my mtv. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Problems My cat's breath smells like cat food. > -Original Message- > From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: OWA Problems

2001-08-14 Thread Erik Sojka
My cat's breath smells like cat food. > -Original Message- > From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OWA Problems > > > Apparently there were pieces to the puzzle that I was not aware of. > > > ___

RE: OWA Problems

2001-08-14 Thread Byron Kennedy
happens to me too. I just pick myself up, dust myself off, and start it all over again. Hang in there! It's a beautiful California day. byron -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Problem

RE: OWA Problems

2001-08-14 Thread Andy David
Is there a full moon out right now? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Problems Apparently there were pieces to the puzzle that I was not aware of.

OWA Problems

2001-08-14 Thread Kevin
Apparently there were pieces to the puzzle that I was not aware of. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mai

RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails

2001-08-14 Thread David Florea
You've tried starting the client's Outlook with the /cleanfreebusy switch? There are several other switches you might try as well, don't have them at hand at this second. David -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:55 AM To: E

RE: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread Hunter, Lori
Can I do it wearing sox? (We're playing Dr. Seuss today, right?) -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: distribution list Can I do it in a box? - Original Message - From:

RE: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
In a box, with a fox, while eating lox. Green Eggs and Ham are go with lox. >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:52 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: Re: distribution list >>> >>> >>>Can I do it in a b

Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails

2001-08-14 Thread William Smith
Odd problem... Win2K SP1 Exchange 5.5 SP4 Outlook 2000 SR1 User on separate subnet User behind an internal firewall A user came to me complaining that evertime that he tried to accept a meeting request his outlook would freeze.("program not responding"). We let this problem go for a while while

RE: Help with Undeliverable

2001-08-14 Thread Scharff, Chris
I didn't think a comma was a valid character for an org name in E2K Interesting. Is this a server added to an existing organization or a pristine E2K install? How was the original message addressed? Is this happening with all replies? **

Re: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread Daniel Chenault
Boy have I got a surprise for you Mikey! - Original Message - From: "Mike Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:31 PM Subject: RE: distribution list > My, my, Kimmie, but your voice has changed!! :-) > > Mike Morri

Re: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread Daniel Chenault
All I saw was a bottle of Scotch. Hate the stuff. - Original Message - From: "Milt Atkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:36 AM Subject: RE: distribution list > Bottom left hand drawer of my desk ... save me some ..

Re: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread Daniel Chenault
Can I do it in a box? - Original Message - From: "Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:14 PM Subject: RE: distribution list > At work, at home, in the car, on a plane, I guess you could d

RE: Webmail

2001-08-14 Thread Benjamin Winzenz
Huh? What you talkin' bout, Willis? OWA = Outlook Web Access - Web-based version of Outlook. Hence Andy's statement that if she is using Webmail, she can use OWA. You just need a browser. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From

RE: Webmail

2001-08-14 Thread Don Ely
ROFLMFAO!! Too funny! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Cameron Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Webmail you don't know what you're talking about. (not that we expect much from someone wi

RE: Webmail

2001-08-14 Thread Kim Cameron
you don't know what you're talking about. (not that we expect much from someone with no name.) why don't you go read up on Outlook Web Access, or OWA? and perhaps you could use a name when you post to the list? we shall all take it as a kindness. -Original Message- From: Exchange Li

RE: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread Mike Morrison
My, my, Kimmie, but your voice has changed!! :-) Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: distribution list

RE: Webmail

2001-08-14 Thread Exchange List
Microsoft Exchange is similar to Outlook and it needs the Exchange server in order to connect. Since she is on a different network and not on the same network as she will be accessing her mail this will not work. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tues

RE: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
At work, at home, in the car, on a plane, I guess you could do it anywhere you have network connectivity.. Note don't do it in the shower, you may experience undesired results. In Exchange Admin>F1> read the help file. >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[

Re: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes

2001-08-14 Thread Martin Tuip
I think you misspelled Computer Associates -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent:

RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes

2001-08-14 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
ROFL! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes If you swear to abandon your plans to do individual mailbox backup (AKA - Brick

RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes

2001-08-14 Thread Martin Blackstone
If you swear to abandon your plans to do individual mailbox backup (AKA - Brick Level Backup, AKA - BLB), you can make fun of Andy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussi

RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes

2001-08-14 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
When you read the FAQ, and take a look at the Archives, you will understand our comments. T. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange bo

RE: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread Milt Atkinson
Bottom left hand drawer of my desk ... save me some ... >From: Andy David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: distribution list >Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:12:57 -0400 > >I need a drink. Where can

RE: Exchange-aware restores not writing 'restore in progress' reg key

2001-08-14 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
could be a permissions issue? check that your backup exec service account has sufficient rights to modify the registry. try re-installing backup exec. if all else fails, create the key manually - search the KB, there is an article on how to do this. regards, dan. _

RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes

2001-08-14 Thread Mitchell Mike
Cool... Thanks guys.. Please let me know when I have enough tenure on this site so I can to badger people. I think that would be fun... Have a great day. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions

Re: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread Daniel Chenault
What does your Exchange administrator say? - Original Message - From: "Aristotle Zoulas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:06 AM Subject: distribution list > Exchange 5.5. > > I neeed to take someone off a distribution l

RE: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread Bob Sadler
Exchange Administrator if you don't have rights yourself to the list. Make sure you are logged in with Admin Rights. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussio

RE: distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread Andy David
I need a drink. Where can I do This. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: distribution list Exchange 5.5. I neeed to take someone off a dis

distribution list

2001-08-14 Thread Aristotle Zoulas
Exchange 5.5. I neeed to take someone off a distribution list. Where can I do This. TIA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To uns

RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes

2001-08-14 Thread Mike Morrison
Nah! Nobody here would mention that he really ought to upgrade to at least Exchange 5.5, if not 2000. Or that Outlook 98 is totally irrelevant to his backup strategy. And of course, nobody would say how BAD and useless single mailbox backup and restores really are. Nope... nobody here is going t

RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes

2001-08-14 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
This should be fun -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes Buckle up. Oh, and FAQ as well. Did you read our FAQ yet Mike? L

Exchange-aware restores not writing 'restore in progress' reg key

2001-08-14 Thread LSeltzer
Hi all! It's been a while since I've asked for assistance, but this one's got us AND PSS stumped. This past Sunday, we decided to increase disk space on our Exchange server by swapping disk drives out with larger ones. We went from an 8 gig volume to an 18 gig (3 9-gig drives/RAID5). All worked w

RE: 36gb Drives in RAID 5 array?

2001-08-14 Thread Callard, Gavin A.
That's what we use and it works fine. Of course, we have a sixth disk as a spare too though. -Original Message- From: Linton Smith (WBTQ) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 August 2001 4:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 36gb Drives in RAID 5 array? The following arrangement

RE: Webmail

2001-08-14 Thread Andy David
If she uses Webmail, she can use OWA In the meantime, Uninstall all the Goats products and install Microsoft Exchange instead. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Di

RE: Webmail

2001-08-14 Thread Exchange List
She can't use OWA because she is on a different network behind a firewall. Webmail is the only solution for her to access her email. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Webmail So te

RE: 36gb Drives in RAID 5 array?

2001-08-14 Thread Linton Smith (WBTQ)
The following arrangement works well in larger servers and isn't so wasteful of disk: Mirror a pair of 9 GB (or bigger) drives and logically partition them into drives C: (for the OS - 3 or 4 GB) and E: (for logs - remaining disk space). Create a stripe set of whatever size drives and make this d

RE: Webmail

2001-08-14 Thread Andy David
So tell her to use OWA instead of Domino WebMail. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Webmail I have a user that can reply to a message if it i

Help with Undeliverable

2001-08-14 Thread Crumbaker, Ron
I installed a New Exchange 2000 and now when someone replies to an internal email we are getting Undeliverable Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. The following recipients(s) could not reached: /0=MPD, Inc./OU=Domain1/CN=Recipients/CN=User_Name on 8/14/2001

Webmail

2001-08-14 Thread Exchange List
I have a user that can reply to a message if it is sent to her but when she tries to create a new mail message in Webmail she gets the error message"Your message body is too large, webmail only supports up to 100k". When she is sending a new mail message she isn't attaching any files and she is on

RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes

2001-08-14 Thread Hunter, Lori
Buckle up. Oh, and FAQ as well. Did you read our FAQ yet Mike? Look at the link at the bottom. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange box

RE: Exchange and CRM

2001-08-14 Thread Mike Morrison
Thanks for the plug, BridgeBoy! Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and CRM And if you can't find

Re: Outlook 2000

2001-08-14 Thread Pat Richard
I'd copy the profile and see if he gets the same problem. If he does, then create a new profile from scratch. If that still happens, you may need to reload Outlook. - Original Message - From: "Farquharson, Andrea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tu

Re: Outlook 2000

2001-08-14 Thread Farquharson, Andrea
Hi, Pat. He's running NT 4, SP5. He is in our Chesapeake, VA office. I couldn't get to his event log. His assistant sent us the dump file that was created. But, there was nothing helpful, just a bunch of numbers and "State Dump of Thread Id 0xeb" statements. > You have a user with his own ema

What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes

2001-08-14 Thread Mitchell Mike
Good morning all, Wow what a wonderful world. What do you use to backup an Exchange Server 5.0 with Outlook 98? We are interested in being able to backup/restore single mailboxes. Regards, Mike Mitchell System eMAIL Administration Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-780

RE: Outlook Calendar Script

2001-08-14 Thread Randal, Phil
AutoAccept, at www.exchangecode.com Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 14 August 2001 16:01 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subj

RE: Outlook Calendar Script

2001-08-14 Thread Tim . J . Butler
Thanx Bob... -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Calendar Script I believe that script can be found over at www.slipstick.com Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA -O

RE: Outlook Calendar Script

2001-08-14 Thread Bob Sadler
I believe that script can be found over at www.slipstick.com Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Calendar Script We are running Exc

Outlook Calendar Script

2001-08-14 Thread Tim . J . Butler
We are running Exchange 5.5 with a mix of Outlook 97, 98, 2000. Back a few years I found a script thru Technet? That would allow us to setup a conference room and have it manage itself without having to have a delegate monitoring it. I've searched thru Technet and other sources but have been unabl

RE: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster

2001-08-14 Thread Robert Ellis
Thanks for your input. I've now successfully deployed SP2 onto a live cluster (albeit with no mailboxes on it.) No problems so far. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 7548

  1   2   >