Re: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??

2001-11-08 Thread Martin Tuip
>From one lady on this list you could get the following response: "Those are 9 inch high heels buddy ... those could do some serious damage" Martin - Original Message - From: "Denis Baldwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 08,

NDR and Relaying Problems

2001-11-08 Thread Nizar El-Assaad
Hello Ever since I installed Exchange 5.5 sp4, my server can longer send NDRs. Whenever a message reaches the server with a bad address, and the server tries to send back an NDR, I get the following error message: "The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed wit

Re: Preferred setup of Exchange?

2001-11-08 Thread Daniel Chenault
Too much is unknown about the environment and the intended end result to give any advice other than: 1. Buy and read anything by Robichaux or Redmond 2. Hire a consultant (I'm available for $250 + T&E) - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROT

RE: Better alternative than Move Server Wizard?

2001-11-08 Thread Scott Perley-TM
The first one we did was merging one org/site (1500 mailboxes) into an existing site (1500 mailboxes) in another org (20,000 mailboxes) and it went ok. The one we are doing now is merging 7 sites (1500 mailboxes) in one org into another org (30,000 mailboxes) and so far all has been fine. As for

RE: Preferred setup of Exchange?

2001-11-08 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I use my Firewall as a smart host, my MX points there as well. My Firewall rules take care of the rest. My understanding of a DMZ is that no machine in it can initiate a connection, so I than fail to understand how a multihomed server in the DMZ is going to help you at all. I further believe you

RE: Attachments

2001-11-08 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Yes, depending on what Thomas exactly wants to achieve, he would have to tinkle with only the IMS or the IMS and registry. Oh yeah, now it's Friday! Sander -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions

Preferred setup of Exchange?

2001-11-08 Thread bens
What is the preferred way to setup Exchange? I was thinking about multihoming my server but have read that there can be problems in doing so. What about installing a multihomed SMTP relay to receive in the DMZ and forward to Exchange on the LAN and vise versa outbound? I was thinking of forwarding

Re: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu

2001-11-08 Thread Daniel Chenault
Most likely, yes. How about I instruct you on how to remove the accelerator from your car so you can't get in trouble there either? - Original Message - From: "Walden H. Leverich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:47 PM

RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe

2001-11-08 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Dude, if you are so swamped with 50 systems, of which you are only responsible for 6, and you can't find an hour to test a patch before rolling it into production, you might want to look for a new gig. Have you considered a career with WalMart. I hear they're hiring greeters. I think that might be

RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??

2001-11-08 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
I know some women that line might work on: http://k2.netaddress.com/tpl/Info/Popup?hidden___url=http%3A%2F%2Fgoppor tal.com%2Femailoftheday%2Ftalibansingles.html (Watch the line wrap) -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001

Re: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe

2001-11-08 Thread Eric Cooper
At my last job we proposed a security policy whereby any user who executed a virus and infected the system would have to wear a dunce cap and a T-Shirt that says "I'm the idiot who opened the virus" for a week. It was almost made policy. Damn hippies shot it down... - Original Message -

RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe

2001-11-08 Thread Mike Carlson
Exactly why MS has to create patches like this particular one. Morons. What would be cool is if you could put a lock on their mail box so that when they open up Outlook there is an administrative message staring them in the face. Before they could open any email they would have to click OK and t

RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe

2001-11-08 Thread Martin Blackstone
Users will open anything regardless of what you say. I remember ILOVEYOU, and a user. I had sent out emails all day long warning about this virus that had penetrated to a few machines before we had the DAT file for it. Anyhow, after an email an hour all day, I was talking to this guy about it at h

RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu

2001-11-08 Thread Andy David
You must be using it wrong then. Uncheck "View as Web Page". Works Fine. Respectfully leering Andy -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut Down' from shutdown menu

RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe

2001-11-08 Thread Mike Carlson
I thought I saw on the web somewhere a hack so that you could change the Outlook start up logo to reflect whatever you wanted. Kinda like changing the NT/2k login in screen. H... Mike -Original Message- From: Eric Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2

RE: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe

2001-11-08 Thread Mike Carlson
Yes you should and you do. Edit the registry. No reason to blame MS for stupid people that open every "clickmetof*ckupyourcomputer.exe" they get in an email. When are people going to take responsibility for stupid stuff they do and their own incompetence. If you don't know how to drive are you

Re: Outlook blocked access to the following potentially unsafe

2001-11-08 Thread Eric Cooper
I always thought calling the patch an "Outlook Security Patch" was what caused the problems in the first place. They should have called it exactly what it was - a patch that allowed Outlook to compensate for shortcomings on poorly protected messaging systems. Everyone in the industry is getting