RE: Anything else after "restore"

Were these 'different' users to those yesterday? If so then it may be their profiles just up-dating themselves, but I would check name resolution\network between client & server & add a 'Host' entry if needed. Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Paul Done [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: Virus Attack ??

Would you kindly gave me some direction on how to check the ip? This msg had been block, which mean that nobody will receive the msg. Thanks -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus

RE: Virus Attack ??

NT FAQ's run fsck? Thought only file systems did that. On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 09:27, Andy David wrote: > Gary is a frog? > > > -Original Message- > From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Virus

RE: Smtp connector gone mad?

You don't need an SMTP connector for sending and receiving email. that might just be what the "SMTP virtual server" is for? -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:43 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Smtp connect

Re: PST files larger than 2GB

They said that just before people starting to throw stuff at them. After the presenters suffered from that ... we don't know if this limit will be implemented by MS ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com --

RE: How about this as an option?

> Well, whether it can or can't is really kind of a moot point because it need > to pass the message to the specified bridgead(s) in its site to be passed > on. >> That clears that up, thanks. > No, I think[1] that they have knowledge of servers outside of their site, > but they also know what p

RE: Smtp connector gone mad?

Most people do. Do you have a question? > -Original Message- > From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 04:43 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Smtp connector gone mad? > Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad? > > > We want to be ab

RE: Smtp connector gone mad?

Don't we all -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad? We want to be able to accept incoming email from the internet. Leo

RE: How about this as an option?

Thanks Gary. I think it has provided a direction, without the narrative ppt presentations are not entirely intuitive but it certainly is useful, thanks again. Will let you know how I get on. Regards Leo > Presentation issue handled offline. > > -Original Message- > From: Leo [mailto:[E

RE: Smtp connector gone mad?

We want to be able to accept incoming email from the internet. Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailt

RE: Calendar Problems

Have you checked age limits on the public info store? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Problems You're not running Mailbox Manager against that calendar by any chance a

RE: Calendar Problems

You're not running Mailbox Manager against that calendar by any chance are you? Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Problems Perhaps an obvious question: hav

RE: Calendar Problems

Perhaps an obvious question: have you checked the default permissions? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Problems All, I have a few admin assistants that are using a publ

RE: Securing Outlook

Hey, they've gotten a *little* better since the NT4 days. But they still a million pointless questions about software RAID for some reason... I'm going to have to start paraphrasing those tests in project meetings: "Based on the information you've provided, the required objectives cannot be achie

Calendar Problems

All, I have a few admin assistants that are using a public folder calendar to book conference rooms. We are having problems with recurring meetings dropping off the calendar. All the admins have "Author" rights. So obviously they can only delete their own items. None of them are saying that t

RE: PST files larger than 2GB

Oh, the yearly MS rumor mill. Well, I'll take my grain of salt. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC

RE: PST files larger than 2GB

I believe the 32TB number was announced in the last MEC. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB 32 TB??? The unlimited version of Exchange w

RE: PST files larger than 2GB

32 TB??? The unlimited version of Exchange will only support 16 TB. Details! Sources! John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without communications irrelevant -- Gen. Al

RE: Custom AD attribute

We are already running exch2k. I guess LDIF is our only answer then. Thanks Chris. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Custom AD attribute Absolutely unless you've already installe

RE: Anything else after "restore"

Okay if I have gotten it done correctly, this morning I come in and get calls about a "locking" Outlook. The description is the same that three or four people claim their screen locks for a minute and then it lets them in. One person it doesn't even let them in. Does this sound familiar to anyone

RE: PST files larger than 2GB

32TB and likely none of the currently shipping versions. > -Original Message- > From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:39 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: PST files larger than 2GB > > > Maybe I am going mad but I am sure somewhere on t

RE: Custom AD attribute

Absolutely unless you've already installed the ADC, in which case the answer is certainly not. Ask the someone who is extending the schema to do the importing, they either know their stuff or... Well, let's just hope they know their stuff. > -Original Message- > From: Woodruff, Michael [

RE: Securing Outlook

Nope, my answers actually map to reality. How often can you say that about an MCSE exam question? > -Original Message- > From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Securing Outlook > > > Chris, are yo

RE: Ex55 -> E2K Migration Using Move Mailbox Upgrade

You moved the mailbox, but I don't see where you remapped the NT account associated with the mailbox. Why are we moving to a clean AD environment again instead of upgrading our existing NT 4.0 domain to AD? Also, no admins have any access to a mailbox by default in E2K. > -Original Message---

Restore process question

I've got a situation where my production server (win2k sp2, exch2k sp1) is complaining of a corrupted drive - i tried to check disk it, but I was forced to cancel the chkdsk after 8 hours(!). I was able to get the server back running succesfully, but obviously something is wrong. I want to brin

RE: Bounce Problem

Hmmm. That's weird. OK, try setting up server custom recipients for the external people, remove them from his contacts folder, and see what happens then. -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Exchange OOOA Problems for some not all

Hmm... I have this answer in my copy of the archives, but am too busy to look Mbclean.exe or clean mailbox or cleansweep or something like that is what you want. PSS probably has a copy. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, Ma

PST files larger than 2GB

Maybe I am going mad but I am sure somewhere on this list someone mentioned Microsoft were developing pst that had unlimited capacity (or certainly more than the current 2GB) is this true? What version of Outlook will support these larger personal folders? Regards, Paul ---

RE: Bounce Problem

I haven't found any. Rob -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bounce Problem Are there any errors in Exchange's event log? -Peter -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mail

Custom AD attribute

We have created a custom AD attribute called Hire Date. I have a spreadsheeet of all the hire dates. I want to import these dates to that field. I don't want to you LDIF because It kind of scares me. Do you see a way to add the hire date in an exch 5.5 field and set that field to map to the Hi

RE: Bounce Problem

Are there any errors in Exchange's event log? -Peter -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bounce Problem Nope, that's not it. (Sorry about posting my "I'll check" message to the whole li

RE: Bounce Problem

Nope, that's not it. (Sorry about posting my "I'll check" message to the whole list. I did it before I thought.) Rob -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bounce Problem Are we sure

RE: Ex55 -> E2K Migration Using Move Mailbox Upgrade

If you go into the account properties and look under Exchange Advanced -> Mailbox Rights, who has the associated external? (should be Self for the AD account) Make sure your Exchange Service Account is a member of the Exchange Domain Servers group. Ali Wilkes Borders Group, Inc. -Original

RE: Virus Attack ??

You think armour would have helped? Did it get eaten by squirrels en route? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Maybe that's the problem. He should have mailed it. > -Original

RE: Virus Attack ??

Maybe that's the problem. He should have mailed it. > -Original Message- > From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:48 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? > > > Last time I asked, he swore the check was in the post. > > -

RE: Securing Outlook

Forgive him, he's from SDSU [1] [1] Now before all the Carebears go flying off the handle, I'm kidding. I'm a SDSU alum myself. [2] [2] And I've got the hangovers to prove it. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:29 PM To:

RE: MS Mail mjgration

yep thanks a lot Mark -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Mail mjgration I'll send them toy your EDS mailbox Simon, if that's OK. They're on TechNet, Articles entitled "Migrating from MS Mail

RE: Access to Exchange Server address book from VB

What have you tried so far? -Original Message- From: Kumara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 04:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Access to Exchange Server address book from VB Please let me know how to Access to Exchange Server address book from VB to take an

RE: Securing Outlook

nope, it sets up connectors, then converts any incoming faxes to an attachment and you need the viewer program installed to see them. It 'does what it says on the box' -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 05:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: Securing Outlook

> -Original Message- > From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 16 May 2002 17:26 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Securing Outlook > > > Sorry, I didn't make myself clear > > This machine is intended for anyone to walk onto to forward > faxes, Zetaf

RE: Securing Outlook

Right, then see my part 2 reply. But Chris's was more thorough - redesign the solution. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 17:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Sorry, Zetafax doesn't need o

Premature Friday Fun

I won't be around tomorrow for Friday Fun, so please ignore this message until it is Friday somewhere :) I have been playing a pretty cool web word game... Actually, my whole department plays every day... The game is very simple. The first day's word was: ___ BERRY You fill in the blank w

RE: Securing Outlook

Sorry, some thought was left as an exercise for the reader: Part 2 - use a different logon account to the PC than the mail needs. -Original Message- From: Steve Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 17:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook

RE: Securing Outlook

Chris, are you the one that's been writing those pesky MCSE tests? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Securing Outlook Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Based on the operational

RE: Securing Outlook

Well then we're talking about stopping people who are making an effort to break into her email, rather than those who are casually glancing around while sitting in front of a computer - which is human nature - and seeing things they shouldn't. And I understood we were talking about casual viewing

RE: Securing Outlook

Thanks :) Actually the... " Tools, email accounts, click "next" on view/change existing accounts, select her exchange session and click "change". More settings, advanced tab, set "logon network security" to "none" solution will work fine When I referred to security, I didn't mean in the st

RE: MS Mail mjgration

Thanks Chris -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on the s

Re: Securing Outlook

Again then OWA is your answer. - Original Message - From: "Niki Blowfield : Exchange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:28 PM Subject: RE: Securing Outlook > Sorry, Zetafax doesn't need outlook, it can use it, but we're usi

Re: MS Mail mjgration

I'll send them toy your EDS mailbox Simon, if that's OK. They're on TechNet, Articles entitled "Migrating from MS Mail for PC Networks" "Migrating to MS Exchange Server 5.5 from Microsoft Mail" Also, TechNet> Products & Technologies > Exchange Server > Product Documentation >Exchange Server 5.5 P

Outlook web access question

Hello Everyone New to the list and hoping to get some help. Having an issue with outlook web access on an Exchange 2000 server in a windows 2000 domain. When users sign in they receive an error message HTTP/1.1 503 Service Unavailable. I looked in IIS and the only thing I can notice that is di

Access to Exchange Server address book from VB

Please let me know how to Access to Exchange Server address book from VB to take an e-mail Address list. Thanks, KE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/s

Ex55 -> E2K Migration Using Move Mailbox Upgrade

I am working in a test environment currently and populated my NT4/Ex55 domain with the current production accounts (directory export then import into test env). In the test env I have also an Active Directory DC and a member server which I've installed E2K and joined it to the 5.5 site. To get t

Exchange OOOA Problems for some not all

Using Exchange 2000 with Outlook 2000. All but three users can use the Out of Office Assistant. Those three, which includes myself, does not reply when enabled. However, Outlook asks to turn the service off when entering Outlook after closing. The service was working up until two months ago t

RE: Securing Outlook

Based on the operational conditions, the desired objective cannot be achieved. Since security is not a concern for the machine or network as a whole, one portion thereof cannot be protected. > -Original Message- > From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursda

RE: Securing Outlook

Sorry, Zetafax doesn't need outlook, it can use it, but we're using the Zetafax client Its just a matter of being logged on with her username so the Zetafax client will pick up all faxes (all incoming faxes go to her username) I want to stop anyone being able to open Outlook which will, by virtu

RE: Virus Attack ??

You might be right. I still haven't had that cheque -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You misheard. He just swore. -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMA

RE: Securing Outlook

Sorry, I didn't make myself clear This machine is intended for anyone to walk onto to forward faxes, Zetafax sends all faxes to a default logon, so this machine needs to be logged on in her username so the faxes go to it -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] S

Re: Securing Outlook

Ditto on the separate PC - Original Message - From: "Robert Moir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:10 PM Subject: RE: Securing Outlook > > -Original Message- > > From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

RE: Virus Attack ??

You misheard. He just swore. -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 May 2002 16:48 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Virus Attack ?? Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Last time I asked, he swore the check was in the post. -Original Mes

RE: Securing Outlook

We use Zetafax, but have all the faxes being received by a public folder. The folder is then seen as a 'virtual' fax machine ie if you are waiting on a fax, look in the folder. If you see faxes for someone else, distribute. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMA

RE: Securing Outlook

Then anyone can go in and change it back. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Set her authentication ty

Re: Securing Outlook

What's wrong with using OWA? I am not familiar with Zetafax. Does it require an Outlook client up and running? - Original Message - From: "Niki Blowfield : Exchange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:06 PM Subject: Securing

RE: Securing Outlook

er, lock the workstation? -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 T

RE: Securing Outlook

Set her authentication type to "None" instead of "Password". -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on und

RE: Securing Outlook

> -Original Message- > From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 16 May 2002 17:06 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Securing Outlook > > > Dear All, > > We have a reception computer that is logged on under the > receptionists name 24/7 > > This is becaus

RE: Securing Outlook

OWA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield : Exchange Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists nam

RE: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and NT4 Sp6a

Upgrade Exchange SP2 to SP4 Upgrade NT SP4 to SP6a Problem should disappear -Original Message- From: Neil Luczynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:52 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and NT4 Sp6a Subject: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and

RE: Virus Attack ??

The Ms Exchange 2000 is a hottie! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I see why!! -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thu

RE: Securing Outlook

CTRL-ALT-DEL > -Original Message- > From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Securing Outlook > > > Dear All, > > We have a reception computer that is logged on under the > receptionists n

RE: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5

Change switches... Check large packet pings... Etc -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:13 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5 Subject: Problems with emails on Excha

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

TINSB [1] [1] There is no Secret Cabal [2] [2] Which does not exist -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

RE: Smtp connector gone mad?

You have an SMTP conenctor why? -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:19 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Smtp connector gone mad? Subject: Smtp connector gone mad? We have an exchange 2000 server that we joined

Securing Outlook

Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on a

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

The proper response to your question is of course, "Why do you assume that managing the character of this list is under your purview? Why do you assume that your advice is wanted or apreciated" It's a very active list and has many members. Obviously your opinion that there is an "atitude pro

RE: Virus Attack ??

Well, 90% of Citi is on Openmail, so I plan to recommend that they call Andy Webb to help them with that! The Exchange sites were all "purchased" through company buyouts and so far (touch my touchstone) they are leaving us alone. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Bounce Problem

Good question. I'll check. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bounce Problem Are we sure he doesn't have those internal folks in his personal or contacts? That would supercede any

RE: Virus Attack ??

Actually most of them are NT. They don't know how to work it, but there it is. It takes them 20 minutes to boot up because of all the errors they have to F1 past, click OK on, etc. Bios errors, driver errors, they don't care. The bulk of the company Citi bought when they bought us (now known

RE: Virus Attack ??

Last time I asked, he swore the check was in the post. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Oh, yeah. I just looked at it. Do you, like uh, get a royalty for every copy sold? P

RE: Virus Attack ??

IF they ever do, would you mind if I dropped in on the day you start your conversion process? I would like to see the things a big corporation has to go through to get their mailboxes over. I only had 200 mailboxes, and just did them by saving them to PST, then reloading them on the server we

RE: Virus Attack ??

-Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I see why!! -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Disc

RE: Bounce Problem

Are we sure he doesn't have those internal folks in his personal or contacts? That would supercede any GAL entries you might have for them. -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bounce Problem

RE: Virus Attack ??

I see why!! -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I especially like the illustration on page 75.. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson

RE: Virus Attack ??

I did not use braindumps for my MCSE. And anyway, I'm Welsh! Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend & Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto

RE: Virus Attack ??

Oh, yeah. I just looked at it. Do you, like uh, get a royalty for every copy sold? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?

RE: Virus Attack ??

> -Original Message- > From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 16 May 2002 16:32 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? > > > Agreed. My autographed copy of Managing Microsoft Exchange > Server is here by my left hand. I don't touch the server without it.

RE: Virus Attack ??

I wish Citi would go Windows 98! ;) -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Citi would go to E2K! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Virus Attack ??

Getting back to the problem, I think you should use Outlook to look at the Internet headers of one of the messages that had its attachment stripped. You should be able to see in there the ip address of the sending PC. -Peter -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Se

RE: Virus Attack ??

Might be on that E2K list, but I haven't heard from him in quite awhile. Especially not on the Secret Cabal List. [1] [1] There is no cabal. [2] [3] [2] If there was, he'd be in it. [3] Is there? -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16,

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

There is no Cabal. Please remember that Erik. I'd hate for something nasty to happen. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We actually do award points over at the Secret

RE: Virus Attack ??

I wish Citi would go to E2K! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for th

RE: Virus Attack ??

I especially like the illustration on page 75.. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend & Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

RE: Virus Attack ??

Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the urgent flag. This triggers an immediate site visit from The Queen of England, who has recently completed her MCSE (some people say she used braindumps). -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 1

RE: Virus Attack ??

Agreed. My autographed copy of Managing Microsoft Exchange Server is here by my left hand. I don't touch the server without it. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 A

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

We actually do award points over at the Secret Cabal [1] for funniest posts. [1] Which does not exist. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Never said I wan

RE: Virus Attack ??

I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for the idiot questions I ask :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter,

RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY

You want it in the usual place? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Ok, but please, not the face. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[E

RE: Virus Attack ??

Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1

RE: Virus Attack ??

Read the FAQ, search technet, read the archives. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To:

Bounce Problem

Hi list: I have a user with this odd situation: He regularly emails people both inside and outside our organization (the organization includes 9 separate sites scattered around the country). He has a personal DL in his Contacts that includes only external addresses. He uses that, then manually a

RE: Virus Attack ??

Can you change it to a haiku passphrase? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? True.. How do you change the service account password again? -Original Message

  1   2   >