That syntax is wrong.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Blowers
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:46 AM
To: Exchange Discu
A good clue is to select File--New. If you don't have the option in
there to add an X.400 connector, you definitely have Standard. If you
do have that option, you could have Standard + Connector, but I'd bet
that's unlikely and you probably have Enterprise.
SMTP and X.400 will work.
Ed Crowley
That would be "NDRs", right? A 554 is invalid command arguments. Are
you sure it's your Exchange Server issuing the NDRs or do you have
anything filtering your SMTP before it gets to Exchange? Time to look
into protocol logging if it's your Exchange Server doing the bouncing.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I
Cape Town - South Africa, here the leased lines change into jungle beat
concerts once you are outside the city. One bang is a 0 and two bangs a
1. You need a keen ear and a fast hand to type.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 June 2002 0
Make two sites.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joel
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 5:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subj
It's not worth the trouble. Spammers don't operate from stationary
locations. Look into add-on content filtering solutions if you want any
success at all.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
If you're going to migrate calendar you might as well migrate mail.
Outlook requires messages (meaning e-mail) to process calendar meeting
requests.
1. No.
2. SMTP, I presume.
3. Create contacts for all Post.Office users, let Exchange handle all
routing.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Te
ProLiants have that, we just don't call it that.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy Grafton
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002
Hi, I'm having an odd / tricky issue that needs resolution ASAP..
My co. has one Exch2000 server in Reston, VA, which I manage from Philly,
PA on a W2K DC (Zoe) via Exchange Service Manager. Only ESM is installed
on Zoe, so it should be only an interface to the exch serv (no exchange
guts to it
Raid 5e AFAIK incorporates a hot spare into the array by striping unused
white space across the disks.
Makes for faster access times than a raid 5 array + hot spare as the
data is on more "live" spindles.
IBM proprietary.
Evil, evil, IBM.
All the best,
Andy
> -Original Message-
> Fro
Some external clients/customers are getting DNR's when sending email to us
saying "Invalid Data 554". I have searched Technet and beyond... Anyone
have an idea how to resolve this? Thanks!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swin
Ed asks;
> Please share what RAID5e is.
More info:
http://www-5.ibm.com/pl/eserver/xseries/ulotki/psref-raidtech.pdf
Mind the wrap, mind the .pdf.
Andy
Creuna Danmark A/S
Snaregade 10
1205 København K
Denmark
Tel : +45 22 68 58 23
Fax : +45 70 20 72 42
_
See Q195412.
Eli
-Original Message-
From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slight OT: Outlook Weirdness
Outlook 2000
Exchange 5.5 Sp4
Go into a public folder were the users in Question have Publishing Editor
rights
How can I determine if I have Exchange (5.0) Standard or Enterprise
Edition? There is a TechNet article (Q173889) for determining this in
Exchange 5.5 but haven't seen anything for 5.0.
Also, what type of connectors will work between Exchange 5.0 & Exchange
2000 (Site...X400...?)?
Thanks!
_
Hi, I'm having an odd / tricky issue that needs resolution ASAP..
My co. has one Exch2000 server in Reston, VA, which I manage from Philly,
PA
on a W2K DC (Zoe) via Exchange Service Manager. Only ESM is installed on
Zoe, so it should be only an interface to the exch serv (no exchange guts
to
it
We only use NAV for Exchange 2.18 build 76, M: drive is neither backed
up
nor scanned for virus.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: calendar appointments not being saved
Tell us a
We have a single exchange organisation with members from two domains. How
can I create an LDAP search filter for address lists, or recipient
policies, based on the domain of the user. I have tried filtering based on
distinguishedname, I was expecting that
distinguishedname=*DC=child1,DC=placeholde
Hello,
One of our users is experiencing a problem with his appointments in
Outlook. When he creates a new appointment, or opens an existing one
(already passed or still to come) no fields are displayed to enter or
choose a location or to select an online meeting service, they are
disappeared.
I
Perhaps configure them into the network with a full set of connectors
identical to the the existing hub, but set the cost on the new connections
to 100 (use when the other connectors are not availalbe)?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 30 Ma
Look in under your ou, go to the connections folder, double click on the IMS
--> Connections tab --> click Message filtering button
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: External Internet E-
Hi Everyone,
I hope I don't bore you all too much with this basic
newbyish type question but I'm trying to keep spam out of my mailboxes.
I notice under the Mailbox>Delivery Restrictions tab that I can deny
mail from existing Exchange users and groups. Is there a way
of rejecting e-mail on an ad
Hmm. Nothing immediately comes to mind. Perhaps a badly formed header. Do
you have one of the headers? Perhaps it's an alias that's working funny?
I've seen it before on a Netscape messaging server. It turned out to be a
badly formed header.
-Christian
-Original Message-
Hi all
SBS ser
Milwauke..the dullest tech place in the world.
And sleep is over rated. After all...I don't find anything so grate
about my three hours a night...or day
chuck
-Original Message-
From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 9:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussio
Aloha all,
We have a system that has about 50 PCs and 50 Sun boxes. We currently use Post.Office
as out email server. We have Win2k Active
Directory as our PC OS. The PC users use Lookout 2000. I would like to convert to
Exchange 2000 for shared calendar and shared
contacts *first*. I would lik
Maui, Hawaii here. It's hot!
Gotta go home now and have a nice swim in the ocean. ;-)
Aloha
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ryan Malayter
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Before posting the original reply I did have a look at all CDO model's.
None of them (as far as I can see) allow you to specify which SMTP server
you want to send your email out from.
Can you tell me which method/property you are using to "hardcode" the SMTP
server name?
TIA
--Felicity
> > T
Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite directions. One
from Americans with Disabilities Act which requires greater richness - ie
text to voice, braille, etc, and at the opposite pole - greater thinness -
ie minimalism for text based phones - which strip away all conten but
text,
Hi all
SBS server running exchange 5.5 sp3
I have a client that when they receive mail from a specific domain all the recipients
receive 2, 3 or 4 copies of the same email. I have checked the following
no rules on any clients
email sent to myself only comes in once.
Logging shows that the excha
I'm not 100% sure but, I don't think teamed adapters are supported in a
cluster.
I'd have two unteamed adapters (+ an additional 1 for the heartbeat) going to
different switches.
Or just don't cluster I firmly believe that this will increase your
availability or at least your saneness.
Also
I will never again touch Groupshield with a 100 FT pole. So if I had to
choose, I guess I would choose NAVMSE, but only in its latest rev.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MacA
Sure, as long as its the not the Workgroup Edition - or whatever they are
calling it now.
And dont forget to download and apply the litany of necessary patches with
that wonderful proprietary CAZIPXP utility,(My personal favorite, the patch
that fixes the issue where the Exch agent install fails i
Even if it can... Can it *restore* it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois
Bourdeau
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ArcServe 2000 exchange agent question
Hi
Again I begin by saying that
Hi
Again I begin by saying that I prefer Bexec but for some reason I have a
customer migrating to Ex 2000 and they already have ArcServe 2000
Do you know if AS2000 installed on a DC(File Server) can backup a remote
Exchange server on the network with the exchange agent ? Or ArcServe must
absolut
If you were force to go with one of those 2 company for an antivurus
solution (exchange ), wich one is not too bad ?
I'm used to antigen and Ihave bad very experiences with NAVMSE. For that
contract the customer must go with one of those solution.
I never had to sue the MacAfee Ex AV. So wich
Thanks Ed,
I forgot RAID5e was a proprietary thing...
Your suggestion has been noted... I'll see what the mgmt have to say I don't like
my chances though.
Judging by the response to this thread - It seems that others have had this problem on
hardware other than that from the suppliers nam
That format string wrapped. It's all one property with no line breaks.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent:
Well, we didn't write the application, I should have said "3rd party app".
Anyway, that's not really the point.. I was just wondering if the Outlook
2002 attachment security could be hacked all the way back to Outlook 98
style, but it doesn't look like it.. What a shame.
-Warren
> Why not chan
Hi all
I have found the site just for your info,
http://microsoft.com/mobile/downloads/mailclient.asp
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:27 PM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: windows CE mail client
Greetings
We use a version of W
http://www.microsoft.com/mobile/downloads/mailclient.asp
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: windows CE mail client
Greetings
We use a version of WindowsCE that require
Greetings
We use a version of WindowsCE that requires a software that creates Web
pages with minimal graphics, no frames, and no client-side scripts to
support the Pocket Internet Explorer...this is a version of simple
OWA..called Windows CE mail client...does anybody know where can I get that
so
That'd be worth reading. I'm _still_ nicking odd quotes from you when I
need to compare messaging to dial-tone availability :)
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 00:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collabora
Do you use outlook?
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Cluster Virtual services pending/offline
Hi,
When network connection become unavailable for an extend period of
Gary's so amusing when he tries to be nice.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
That's the "POLITEST" you could come up with???
-Origin
That's the "POLITEST" you could come up with???
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
The POLITEST response I can think of is "go and us
The POLITEST response I can think of is "go and use Google".
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Iam looking for information on:
1. Messaging &
Hi,
When network connection become unavailable for an extend period of time (like working
on switches, etc...) our clustered Exchanges services goes offline and have a hard
time coming back to reality. Manual procedure does bring it back online, however,
this defeats the purpose of cluster. I
Try using DNS!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussi
I've reverse engineered it for you. The property is Protocol-Settings.
The format is (get ready):
HTTP§1§1§§%IMAP4§1§1§1§ISO-8859-1§0§1§1§0%LDAP§1§1§§%NNTP§1§1§3§
%POP3§1§0§1§ISO-8859-1§1§§§
The substring you're interested in is at the end:
POP3§x§y§z§char_set§a§§§
In order, the p
I found _Mulholland Drive_ pretty darn interesting, although I think
there may be laws about shipping that sort of movie overseas.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:13 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Where is every
hehehehehehehh
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 6:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cable Modems
Mmm Labor ready
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/
For Graphics and WebDes
That was good flick
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Rented K-PAX the other day. I liked it. Can't send it to you though. Had
to return it to Bockbluster.
Ed
-
Rented K-PAX the other day. I liked it. Can't send it to you though.
Had to return it to Bockbluster.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Where is e
Thanks. Interesting question about WINS, but I don't know if Macs know what
it is.
The customers do not get to the point where their name would get underlined.
That's exactly where it fails - resolving their name against their GAL.
the hosts file is something like this:
exchserver IN CNAME exch
Mmm Labor ready
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discu
"Torchering"? Is that English Flashlight tag? I dunno, given 2 "my way
or die" attitudes, I wouldn't want to be there.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: C
B,
freezing my tender portions off here in Australia :(
Send warmthoh and some decent movies to watch :)
Glenn.
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:35 AM
Subject: RE: Where
Why pick on each other when there is so much weaker game about?
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cable Modems
We'd not kill each other. Torchering others... Now that's fun!
-Ori
WHAT!?!??!?! Do it right and sensible!?!?! Noo We'd could "never"
do that... ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 attachment security
Why not change your
We'd not kill each other. Torchering others... Now that's fun!
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cable Modems
If you didn't kill each other first.
-Original Message-
From: [E
Among other things...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cable Modems
Don and I working in the same office would be downright scary. All the other
techs would be crying and shak
Why not change your app to send the URL as plain text, like so:
http://www.malayter.com/
Just as easy for the recipient, and none of the problems of .LNK files.
-Original Message-
From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:21 PM
Posted To: Exchange
If you didn't kill each other first.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cable Modems
Don and I working in the same office would be downright scary.
Don and I working in the same office would be downright scary. All the other
techs would be crying and shaking.
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cable Modems
Dear Martin and
Les?
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cable Modems
Mine neither! How Rude!
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:55 PM
me too LI, NY
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Wonderful Long Island, NY here...
...back to lurking
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mail
Sounds like RPC connectivity problems. Time to whip out RPC Ping and get to
work.
> -Original Message-
> From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups
>
>
> We installed the ADC & t
www.mail-resources.com | weblinks for some vendors... Their propaganda is
staggering on why you need it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Mes
I'd modify the application, since I've never seen a useful implementation of
lnk files via e-mail.[1] And the object model was modified because bad
design decisions are best fixed with worser design decisions.
[1] I suppose there's a first time for everything.
> -Original Message-
> From
The rain in Spain stays mainly on the plain.
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RGC
IIRC, you don't need a Routing group connector in each routing group if your
dns is setup corre
IIRC, you don't need a Routing group connector in each routing group if your
dns is setup correctly, but you may be missing the point of having routing
groups.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussio
We installed the ADC & then joined our exchange 5.5 site with a new
exchange 2000 server from our new domain.
The config_ca appears to work from exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000, we can
see all the exchange 5.5 sites and connectors in ESM.
But we can not see any Exchange 2000 configuration in Excha
Mine neither! How Rude!
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cable Modems
How come there's no Wawa near my house?
> -Original Message-
> From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL
I worked with a couple of implentations of UM... It's great for those whom
travel a lot, or those that would rather not pick up a phone or go to a fax
machine -geeks and high level execs and sales critters are good candidates
for it. I have worked with Octel/Lucent, and also the Mitel version.
I'm a few hours from ya down here in NC. For a nominal fee, myself and my
tech junkies will overhaul your network to perfection.
When can we expect a PO?
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
How come there's no Wawa near my house?
> -Original Message-
> From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:54 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cable Modems
>
>
> Dear Martin and Don,
>
> If you are that good, I could get both o
Mm.. Scrapple.
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cable Modems
Dear Martin and Don,
If you are that good, I could get both of you jobs on the Network
and Comm
Dear Martin and Don,
If you are that good, I could get both of you jobs on the Network
and Communications Team here at Wawa. The VPN Project at Wawa was (and is)
not easy.
Think about it, you could drink all of the Wawa brand drinks for
free, all work day long, and have access to
Sounds to me like you're simply looking in the wrong domain for the service
account. I would assume that you have your resources in one domain and your
users in another?
~Jim Blunt
Disclaimer: Any views expressed in this communication are those of the
individual sender only and are never to be
ahem.. never mind..
http://www.microsoft.com/MSCorp/corpevents/mec2002/default.asp
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
..and concurrent to this thread:
anyone catch
..and concurrent to this thread:
anyone catch any scuttlebutt on the venue for the next conference?
(cue Chris)
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messag
Iam looking for information on:
1. Messaging & Collaboration
2. Unified Messaging
The type of information I am looking for is on:
1. Why it is happening (who it is for)
2. Who is making it happening (vendors)
3. How is it happening (solutions)
Looking for Articles? Consortiums?
Note: I've got
That was where I was screwing up.
I tried looking for this everywhere but the logical place.
IIS admin ->Default SMTPServer->properties ->Delivery->Advanced-> Smarthost
Thanks
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:48
We have a custom application that generates .lnk files. And, no.
-W
>
> Why would anyone need to send around a .lnk file and do you
> understand why the Outlook object model was modified in the
> first place?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Wonderful Long Island, NY here...
...back to lurking
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Or do most Exchange admin's crawl out of bed at 1:40 pm?
-Felicity
> The Win2k CDO object model does NOT allow you to tell CDO what server
to
> use to send mail out.
I'm sorry, but that's not correct. Windows 2000/.NET Server ships with
CDOSYS (CDO for Windows 2000) which is completely SMTP based and can
easily be used to submit a mail to a remote SMTP server.
If you have 2 routing groups that contain a 2k server each, do you need any
connections to each other or does the smtp virtual server know where to send
it if DNS is correct?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/ex
I wasn't mislead. I know what it takes to put a vpn solution in place.
We've implemented a Cisco VPN solution in one of our London offices. Makes
since to do the same here.
Dot
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:35 PM
DUDE - I did read the whole thread. What it appears you are trying to
accomplish is getting IIS to log everything to a mapped drive or UNC path -
if your web sites are so high traffic as you claim, you wouldn't want to
incur the network overhead of doing that. So then YOU SAID, and I quote "I
am
Make sure you got lots of brush flappers and Indian pumps. Burlap bags do
great on grass and low growing brush.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted
dude read thw whole message before answering..not trying to be rude.i know i dont
need a batch file for web trends..if you read my entire problem you would have known
what i was trying to accomplish, if you have any ideas for my problem i will
appreciate it.
thx
-Original Message-
Good afternoon:
Would like to know if anyone knows the proper field(s) to use to set
the POP3 protocol setting via Directory Import?
I have to enable the POP3 protocol for a process that is being currently
used at a trade show, but need to disable it on all the other mailboxes due
to it'
I guess there's not enough information in your post for anyone else to
determine whether they would or would not migrate. The same lack of
information precludes me from offering a suggestion as to how best deal with
an issue which may or may not exist.
My DLs migrated just fine BTW.
> -Origi
Webtrends can simply retrieve the log files, you don't need to write a batch
file.
You might also want to move this discussion over to
http://www.15seconds.com/listserv.htm, an IIS5 list where it is more on
topic. Also, if this is a public website, I would not have them as member
servers of your
Also in win2k iis services can be run with any account it does not have to be the
system account. The system account limitation must be in NT4 only.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re
i cannot take that risk that comes along with the odbc logging i thought about it,
these are highly visible websites in my organisation and a lot of traffic.
I am thinking of just writing them to the local disk and then copy them to the logfile
server every night with a batch file before the we
What I'm asking is what is the best way to set that back up on the E2K
side? I know they won't come over. I'm just asking what is the best
way to manage the permissions on the PF's in E2K. And to get everyone
back to having the same permissions to the same folders once they are
moved over.
Tha
Why can't you log to an ODBC datasource. This is not as performant as
logging to a file.
IIS runs under the local system account. The documentation you are
reading must be incorrect.
A note on IIS Logging. This is a high performance asynchronous process.
So entries are flushed to disk when p
Yup. Way too dry.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanborn, John
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
We've just brought our new volunteer fire dept[1] into operation this
past we
Here is the scenario. i have serverA, serverB and SERVERC(LOG FILE SERVER)
I need to redirect all the websites log files from serverA and ServerB to serverC.
In IIS5.0 when you go into the logfile properties and try to change the patch to a
mapped drive it clearly says mapped drives and UNC pat
It's a VPN Concentrator not the PIX. The PIX takes 10 minutes after fixing
what Cisco enables... :o)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cable Modems
It takes him 5 minutes to
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
