I'm not sure what client you are using, but it works fine for me (OL 2002).
The top of the store isn't listed in the list you describe - it is above
that in the two lines of folder size and folder+subfolder size (it is the
folder size, BTW). The one below is the entire mailbox size.
Tris
-Or
> Hi,
>
> While working with CDO for Exchange 2000 , I am facing small problem
> with Outlook.
> Here's what I do,
>
> a) I use CDO methods to save the message into a local file, delete the
> bodyparts of the
>Message and add my text.
>
> b) Then after a while, I try to read the Me
My meaning of breakdown is, when you go into the properties of the Outlook
Today - [Mailbox -
your name] and click on folder size, you see a breakdown of every folder
listed under it. The top of Information store is not one of them. A quick
test will prove my point. Verify the folder size of yo
Im not sure what you mean by breakdown. The "Folder Size" *is* the size of
the folder in the question. So if you are looking at the properties of
"Outlook Today" folder (i.e. The top of the Information Store) , that is its
size. Unchecking that box should remove the "Outlook Today" pane and restor
True, but it will not show a breakdown of that Top of Information Store
folder. It only shows a total of everything. Unchecking the "Show Home
Page" did nothing for me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2
Actually, it does show the folder size.
Its listed above the subfolders dialog box: Folder Size: nk
Total Size (Fld + SubFldr) : nnnK
Another way to easily get to it is to uncheck the "Show Home Page" box under
the Properties/Home Page tab for the "Outlook Today" folder.
-Original Messag
Check "Top of Information Store", people always seem to put mail in here for
some reason. It won't show up when you check folder size, you have to do an
advanced find. Try dragging a message to your Outlook Today - [Mailbox -
your name], and then do an advanced find for this message and you'll s
In our current NT/Exchange 5.5 system, user display names are formatted as
'lastname, firstname'. In testing Win2k/Exch2k upgrades I noticed, using
ADSI Edit, that the LDAP distinguished name for users ends up 'lastname\,
firstname', with the slash thrown in to escape the comma character.
There ar
Ahh, I had the CR setup with my inbound address, but forgot that I send out
with a different address with Outlook. Tried it through webmail and it
worked.
Ben Parrnelli
Network Administrator
Comm & Data Directorate
MAGTF Training Command
Twentynine Palms, CA 92278
-Original Message-
Fr
Come on. Tell us
- Original Message -
From: "Parrnelli GS11 Ben T" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 5:13 PM
Subject: RE: Error sending to DL
> Doh!
>
> I'm not even going to say what was wrong.
>
> Thanks for all the inp
Doh!
I'm not even going to say what was wrong.
Thanks for all the input.
Ben Parrnelli
Network Administrator
Comm & Data Directorate
MAGTF Training Command
Twentynine Palms, CA 92278
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:23 PM
To
Yes, I've seen this here at the San Diego Community College District, I
looked at the internet headers and here is what I find.
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 07:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
> > > X-Authentication-Warning: intergate.sdccd.cc.ca.us:
> > > [203.106.238.32] didn't
> > > use HELO protocol
I' ve al
No remote connection with ExOLEDB and file://./backofficestorage. It
only works on the local Exchange 2000 Server.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hilary Cotter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:08 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Doc bugs in Exchange
I think I found my answer, \\ if filepath, // is ExOleDb path.
If you can stand one more question on this topic of URL binding
I can do
file://./backofficestorage/domain.mydomain.com/MBX/inbox/
file://LocalHost/backofficestorage/domain.mydomain.com/MBX/inbox/
file://ServerName/backofficestorage
Oops, my fault. You're right. You even can't do a dir on
file://./backofficestorage/mydomain.
As for the question why either file:\\.\ or file://./ works I believe
it's because even IE can handle that ;-)
I think this is just a doc bug as you mentioned. You can send your
feedback to: [EMAIL PROT
1) I will try point one out at home.
2) But if you are claiming I can do a simple dir
file://./backofficestorage/DomainName this won't work from the command
prompt either. It only works if you try to programmatically access it
through ADO (or someother access method) which is smart enough in mos
Sorry, my mistake I meant SDK!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List adm
If that's true, then he should check his custom recipient to ensure that
the address exactly matches the address he's sending from.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECT
Yeah PIX.
NAT to DMZ
Thanks I will check it out.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Relay SMTP
So you're not going through the firewall. Turn off Mailguard on the
Pix. There's a go
Wait a minute. That's not right. I do this too - I have a DL that only ONE
person can send to, and they are external to my org. I created a CR and put
that on the Allowed list. I know that it works because I have had
complaints from other chuckleheads trying to use the list, and it's HUGE, so
So you're not going through the firewall. Turn off Mailguard on the
Pix. There's a good reason that's in the FAQ.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
If I recall correctly (and it seems you are corroborating my
recollection), custom recipients won't work because they aren't really
security objects. If you think about it, it makes lots of sense.
Anybody who knows anything can send an e-mail that looks like it's from
your home account.
Ed Crowl
Hmmm
Strange that is the only SMTP server we have. Try 208.216.254.13. Maybe
resolution is incorrect. It looks okay from my end, but I am inside so...
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Yes, the CR is the one I'm trying to send from (My home account).
So are you saying that I cannot send to a Distribution List from my home
account even if I've created a Custom Recipient and added it to the
'allowed' list?
If this is the case, what options do I have for allowing someone not with
Check for journaling set to "on". Turn it off and show the user how to
clear all the previous entries out by hand. They'll leave you alone for a
while and will be happy to send mail again.
Barry J. Horner
NT Server/Exchange/WWW Administrator
Central Community College - Grand Island, NE
(V) 3
Is the account you're sending from in the list shown? CRs don't work
for this, by the way.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Then go run the folder size thingy on the whole mailbox (start with Outlook
Today) and it will tell you where the Large Sized Mail is.
It only takes one big item you know.
Did they close their mail client fully and then open it again? You've
oversnipped again jazzy.
-Original Message-
Do you have a recipient update service defined for the AD domain? Did
you force application of the policy to be sure it ran? It isn't
instantaneous, you know.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Mess
Accept Messages FromReject Messages From
*List *None
29Palms Exchange Admins (DL)
Parrnelli Mr Ben (CR)
Ben Parrnelli
Network Administrator
Comm & Data Directorate
MAGTF Training Command
Twentynine Palms, CA 92278
-Original Mes
If you have your IMC set to not allow any relaying, it doesn't give you the relaying
prohibited response as you'd expect, but goes much further into the process before it
stops you. This is covered in
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696
But I see from Chris and Ed's
All,
I'm trying to update my default recipient policy to add another SMTP
address. But when I create new users it doesn't seem to apply the
policy and create the SMTP address that I want. I'm using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Any ideas? Am I missing something here?
TIA,
___
Jo
Since we are academic and we have a large number of Asians, I don't believe
that is an option for us.
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: APNIC Spam imitating internal users.
I know
Did you check the 'view' setting yet?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
Hi
I have checked the deleted items in his inbox and there is nothing
there, i
As Chris says, when I enter:
telnet mail.stainsafe.com 25
I receive:
220
***2*
That is NOT an Exchange server responding.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the wor
This wouldn't happen to be a mixed Exchange environment is it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR I
I know not everyone can, but I block all Asian IP ranges. Keeps both my spam and hack
attempts way down.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: APNIC Spam imitating interna
I hAvE 1 mEsSaGe In My InBoX wHiCh Is 57Mb, WhAt DoEs BaReLy AnY mAiL MeAn?
AnD wHaT dOeS tHiS "sToRaGe ErRoR" sAy ExAcTlY?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: MailBox LIMIT
I was wondering if anyone else is seeing some new type of Spam coming in
from APNIC? This Spam is forging the return address to internal users and
they all have the same subject/content, so they seem to be related.
Save up to 70% on Your Current Term Life Insurance
Hi
I have checked the deleted items in his inbox and there is nothing
there, including all other folders
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/s
You said you checked the server side. Assuming you mean, information store
defaults. Did you check the limits on the actual mailboxes themselves?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: M
Argle! #$^%&*(ing Pix.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Relay SMTP
>
> Mail.stainsafe.com
>
> I tested with rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and it didn't give me
> the
> relay p
They have files in their deleted items or sent items, probably with huge attachments.
Make them set their options to "Empty deleted items upon exiting," and get them to
delete those big attachments out of their sent items.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
All folders are subject to quotas in Exchange, not just InBox. Check
Sent Items and Deleted Items as these tend to not get cleaned out
regularly.
Clients can also get folder sizes by viewing the properties of
their mailbox in Outlook and clicking on Folder Size. That'll
clue them in on where t
The VIEW is probably set incorrectly. Usually it is set to Unviewed
messages when indeed it should be
all messages.
Good luck and have fun.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 June, 2002 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MailB
TURN DOWN THE VOLUME!! I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR INBOX, AND YET
WHEN
What's in their Deleted Items area? :)
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MailBox
I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR INBOX, AND YET
WHEN THEY TRY TO SEND IT GIVES THE A MAILBOX STORAGE ERROR, AND THEY CAN'T
SEND. I HAVE CHECKED THE SERVER SIDE OF IT AND THIER ARE NO LIMITATIONS.I
went to the mailbox resources and it read total k is 47,111. How can this
b
Mail.stainsafe.com
I tested with rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and it didn't give me the
relay prohibited 550 error. Like it should.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Relay SMTP
How do you know it allows relay? Post the hostname of the server and I
can test it for you.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behal
Nice,
Thanks Brett
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Relay SMTP
Several links for you to follow up with
http://ordb.org/
http://ordb.org/faq/#how_to_close
http://www.exch
Several links for you to follow up with
http://ordb.org/
http://ordb.org/faq/#how_to_close
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696
-Original Message-
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Heck, nothing offends me!
I would have the admin of the external site check his/her queues/DNS/Have
them telnet into your mail server etc...
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Why
Yes. I checked for filters and rules and there are none.
I also had the outside user send the messages to me with the same delays...
Seemed liked days, even
though it was only hours.
Thanks for the help.
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
Well I have a YAHOO account as well, sometimes a delay happens but as you
mentioned, it works. I hate to ask but you did ensure (since it is only "1"
person) that there is no filtering rule on the client, sending e-mail from
this outside user to oblivion?
-Original Message-
From: Mitchel
MX record pointing to your mail server possibly. I had this exact problem
only I was trying to send to an organization. Some mail would go through,
some mail would fail. Turned out my ISP DNS servers had two MX records for
the recipient and one of them was wrong. It only happened on this one
parti
Thanks Andy.. I appreciate all the moral support that you can give me. I
am really trying
and hopefully someday this list will forgive me my tirades. I sometimes get
frustrated like
all of you do and just can't control myself. I have apologized before and
will do so again.
I am sorry if I offe
I know an excellent administrator in Indiana who could solve all of your
problems.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why would an email?
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4
Hello,
I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. The server is primarily the connector
server in my site. It has no mailboxes on it. I have the server setup to not
relay smtp message. The option "DO NOT REROUTE INCOMING SMTP MAIL" is
selected. However it is still allowing SMTP relay messages. I have
re-
Have a look at the times in the headers to see where the delay is occurring.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why would an email?
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4
Because the universe is not in synch??
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why would an email?
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4
I have a user that claims they are not
If you happen to have message archiving turned on at the IMC you could always do a
regular Windows text search through \exchsrvr\imcdata\out\archive.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mark Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 14:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subj
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4
I have a user that claims they are not receiving eMAILs from one person
outside the organization. I emailed that
outside person and asked for a reply. I cc: my Yahoo account so I could see
if I was having networking problems.
I have checked this
In-line typo corrections. Other than that, this is just a repeat, primarily
for the sake of having a clean copy in the archives.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging & Collaboration II
This is Data Dum
Neil,
thanks you cleared alot up for me. im going to go with one group and backup
will be every night (got an autoloader) and see what happens.. thanksit
isnt going ot be 2000 users on at once ever. i think at most on any given
day the maximum concurrent users on the system will be 500 max
sorry... ex 5.5 sp4 nt4 sp6a
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 17 June 2002 07:06
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Outlook 97 Journal
>
> which version of EX
> - Original Message -
> From: "Darren Ash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
I would, otherwise you'll have another set of transaction log files.
Also, if a user on database A in storage group A sends a message to a
user on database B in storage group B, then you've got copies of the
message in two databases and two sets of log files. With 2000 users on
a single server,
You might as well remove it. It'd be easy enough to reinstall it if
necessary later.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ce
When I was an Installation Tech with AT&T in the late '80s,
we replaced those old step switches (dial clicks)with ESS equipment
in alot of small town offices.
I would imagine some are still in use somewhere, although
you probably don't have to ask Thelma Lou for dialing assistance now.
-
You should never have the logs for more than one storage group on a
single physical drive. You can use the same RAID set for multiple
stores' databases, but because storage groups have separate sets of log
files, you could take a performance hit by sharing a physical drive
between two or more sto
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, at 8:15am, Ed Crowley wrote:
> I was shocked that when I arrived there in 1973 they still had five-digit
> dialing for in-town phones ...
In 1985 or so, my home town still had five-digit in-town dialing, and
touch-tone dialing was a special service you had to order from the
Alan,
In my opinion, the best resource for CDO programming is MSDN.
If you're attempting to modify your Auto Registration application, you
should find c++ examples which will do everything you require, from
creating mailboxes to setting permissions on MSDN.
I know it sounds like a cop out, but I
Stop the IMS service.
Thanks,
Cesar
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 10:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Connector Question
How would you disable it?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultan
Ed,
would you recommend having just one storage group with the equipment i have
to work with? thanks for your insights..
BOb C.
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:09 AM
Subject: RE: N
Yup, even in that little backward town. It had four radio stations and
a Tee Vee station even!
I was shocked that when I arrived there in 1973 they still had
five-digit dialing for in-town phones, and if you wanted to call
Guadalupe or Los Alamos you had to dial the operator and ask for the
numb
I wouldn't characterize that advantage as a "performance benefit".
Creating two or more storage groups with that configuration could
actually reduce performance since the two would be competing for the
same log drive.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the
and that is totally their loss.
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Unwanted OOO auto replies to the list members
I'm not going to start another discussion about turning OOO replies
That's not entirely true I think. Even if all databases have the same
recoverability requirements there is potential savings of restoration time
in using multiple databases or storage groups if just one edb fails. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
With only one set of spindles for information store, there is no performance
benefit to be had from multiple storage groups or databases.
If you have a set of mailboxes that have differing recoverability
requirements, you might consider making them a separate storage group.
-Original Message
I agree, and their server software is decent to install and reliable. You can have my
RIM when you take it from my cold dead hands. These have saved our
company a bundle by having faster communications on everything from network outages to
new sales leads. I can't recommend them enough.
One thi
no
> -Original Message-
> From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:14 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Temp.edb ??
>
> That online defragmetation has created a temp.edb file?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto
thanks i already have that article printed out. thanks for the info ..and
yes i am going to be running advanced server with exchange enterprise...any
insight on the breakdown of storage groups (how many mailboxes per) etc.
thanks,
BOb C.
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Cornetet" <[EMAIL
Yes, but then you essentially loose 1GB of RAM since win2k will only
allocate 2GB of virtual address space to applications.
-Original Message-
From: HANNA, Keith (TSL Shirley) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchang
You don't need the /3GB if you aren't running advanced server. Normal server
will work fine with 3Gb.
But then you knew that :)
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 June 2002 15:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install
I t
I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, add more
RAM.
BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which requires
windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will only get
2GB
See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;
That online defragmetation has created a temp.edb file?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Temp.edb ??
An indication of what?
> -Original Message-
> From: Davinder Gupta [m
An indication of what?
> -Original Message-
> From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Temp.edb ??
>
> Shouldn't I expect an indication of that in the application log?
>
> -Original Message-
Shouldn't I expect an indication of that in the application log?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Temp.edb ??
>From the DR paper:
Question 15: What is the TEMP.EDB file and why is
>From the DR paper:
Question 15: What is the TEMP.EDB file and why is it created?
Answer: This stores in-progress long-term transactions and is sometimes
used for temporary storage during online compaction.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted
Yes, however I have not done that...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Temp.edb ??
I think temp.edb is a file created by doing an offline defrag of the
information store.
-Original
I think temp.edb is a file created by doing an offline defrag of the
information store.
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Temp.edb ??
I am running MS Exchange 5.5 SP3 on Windows 2000
I am running MS Exchange 5.5 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2. All of a sudden I
started seeing a file temp.edb in \exchsrvr\mdbdata folder.
Any ideas??
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
But it only works with Blackberry. But hey, I think the BB is the best PDA
ever.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Looking for something like MIS 2002
Blackberry
- Original Mes
Blackberry
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Ko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:20 AM
Subject: Looking for something like MIS 2002
>
> Hello!
>
> Can anyone recommend a software to allow wireless PDAs to access
> Exch
Was the message sent in (shudder) HTML format? If so, then you need to
replace MLANG.DLL from the original Win98/Win2000 install... There's a Q
article about this somewhere on MS's site, but I don't know the number off
the top of my head.. MLANG.DLL from IE6 "beta" causes problems with HTML
mes
Hello!
Can anyone recommend a software to allow wireless PDAs to access
Exchange mailbox? I know there is MIS 2002, but it requires a AD which
I don't have. I also looked at the Infowave software, but it's taking a
over week to talk to Pre sales people.
I am looking for a software that will
Dangit. I don't know what key I hit.
Anyway,
dumpel -f c:\scratch\fred.txt -l system|application -m /youreventsource/ -e
/youreventnumber/
grep /youreventnumber/ c:\scratch\fred.txt
if not errorlevel 1 /your command-line mailer commands/
del c:\scratch\fred.txt
I've only tested it a little, but
That was fun.
You will need:
The NT Resource Kit
Scissors (ask your parents!)
A cookie (optional)
A command-line mailer (blat, wsendmail, what have you).
Using the at facility, schedule a regular dump of the Event Log using the
dumpel utility, then grep for the string you want.
dumpel -f c:\scr
Three people at my office recieved a message from our other office in
florida but for some reason only the people in the cc line got half the
message and the person in the TO line recieved the whole message. Does
anyone know what would cause this.
Thanks
___
I can't install it in another site, they all are remote sites. I understand
relaying the mail to the 2k server, but what would happen when I need to
remove the only 5.5 server (IMC) in the local site? How then would the
remote 5.5 sites send internet mail? Thanks.
-Original Message-
Fr
They had radio back then?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
I hope you realize that's a joke and that you should keep open files
agent away from t
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
