RE: RBL's

2002-11-06 Thread Ed Crowley
You're one to talk. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Monday, November

RE: RBL's

2002-11-06 Thread Ed Crowley
You're one to talk. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Monday, November

RE: RBL's

2002-11-06 Thread Ed Crowley
Must be pretty effective at blocking Spam! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H

RE: RBL's

2002-11-06 Thread Ed Crowley
It's just as likely that a dept. with predominant females could sue for fifteen million for sexual harassment in the fact the company with the ten million dollar deal didn't take reasonable steps to protect them from this spam. This is even greater nonsense than the argument you don't buy. Ed

RE: Exchange 2000 and GC

2002-11-06 Thread Ed Crowley
Yikes! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of kanee Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 5:09 PM To:

RE: mssdmn.exe using high cpu

2002-11-06 Thread Ed Crowley
I'm bummed. I used to be the RUDE GUY. Guess I'm going to have to work harder. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Associate a Public Folder to a specific Mailbox

2002-11-06 Thread Ed Crowley
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent:

RE: Appointments/Personal Folders

2002-11-06 Thread Ed Crowley
It always amazes me that people spend all this money on Exchange Server and the complications of implementing it and then send all the mail to PST files. Any old cheezy system like Netscape Mail can do that! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good

RE: field is empty

2002-11-06 Thread Ed Crowley
Buy an add-on product. But in treating a rather uncommon symptom it would be a rather ineffective Spam filter. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RBL's

2002-11-06 Thread Finch Brett
Can you say 'risk management'. If someone can drive up to a window, order a coffee then take the lid off, drive over a speed bump and sue someone else, anything is possible :) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002

RE: Quick SMTP cluster question

2002-11-06 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Logic would dictate that it can, otherwise you would need a dedicated server for that only. That sounds silly. I have however not tested this in real life. frantically looking in some documentation Sander -Original Message- From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:jwkelley;qualcomm.com] Sent: 06

RE: field is empty

2002-11-06 Thread Exchange List
But at least it contains a header in To: field, what about the mails which does not contain headers. irf -Original Message- From: Stephen Grant [mailto:grant;fsna.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 8:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: field is empty If you block BCC: ( I

RE: Scripting Exchange 2000

2002-11-06 Thread Webb, Andy
No, cluster installs are not scriptable if I remember correctly. Standalone installs are scriptable - there's an option on the setup program to cause it to simulate the install and capture the setup information. === Andy Webb[EMAIL

RE: Outlook 2002 contacts

2002-11-06 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Thanks for that info, Greg -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com] Sent: 05 November 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 2002 contacts If you are talking about looking at the public folder, switch to Address Card view OR use View |

Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned this phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user mailboxes became full I didn't dwell on this as we were talking about something else, but can anyone suggest what he may have meant? We are now enforcing stricter

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their mailbox sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure. Sander -Original

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Busby, Jacob
I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned this phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user mailboxes became full Probably auto-archiving, though it possible he menat using File/Export to a .pst, then deleting the contents of the account. I didn't

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread David N. Precht
No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy. I don't back up PSTs. Period. Either its in their mailbox or it is not that important. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, November

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Busby, Jacob
No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy. I don't back up PSTs. Period. Either its in their mailbox or it is not that important. Q258277 describes a way to turn off export to .pst files. It's a reg hack called DisablePst

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Why the hard line approach? I never said I made the backup of the PST, that's why one has a facilities department...I also didn't say that I found that mail particularly important, the user wants to keep it, so why not let him/her? They know not to come to me regarding items in PST files. Give

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Couch, Nate
I know several people who use autoarchiving to handle stuff they no longer use. Much better than keeping email from three and four years ago. Talk about packrats. You'd think the world was going to end if they had to actually delete email that old. Nate -Original Message- From: Niki

RE: RBL's

2002-11-06 Thread B. van Ouwerkerk
IMHO filtering should be done server-side. All mail send to my own company has to pass through several filters before it hits any real mailbox. About 98% of all spam and virusses are caught. The mail that didn't make it is inspected manually. Blocking based on domainname is a bad idea. Wouldn't

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread David N. Precht
I do. They don't know they can save them up on their home folder. They know I don't back up the workstations, but most think that you only can save PSTs on local drives ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van

RE: Quick SMTP cluster question

2002-11-06 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
Exchange 2000 SMTP connector is not a physical entity, it does not physically reside anywhere. -Original Message- From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:jwkelley;qualcomm.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick SMTP cluster question Can an exchange

RE: Instant Messaging Troubleshooting

2002-11-06 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
Some people insist on using e-mail as IM and get very p-off when their message does not get to its destination within a millisecond. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Instant

RE: X.400 issues

2002-11-06 Thread Roger Seielstad
G-d do you need a consulting engagement! I know someone in San Diego who could spend a couple days with you on this if you really need the help. Anyway, let me see if I can sort this out: EC -x400- Irvine (cost 1) EC -x400- SD (cost 1) Irvine -x400- SD (cost 100) EC -IMC (cost 1?) Irvine -IMC

RE: Associate a Public Folder to a specific Mailbox

2002-11-06 Thread Hutchins, Mike
My god that was funny.. LMAO :-) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 12:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Associate a Public Folder to a specific Mailbox Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. Ed Crowley

Import Address list

2002-11-06 Thread Jonathan
I have personal contacts located in my Outlook XP that I would like to import into Exchange 2000. What are the possibe ways of doing this? J _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

Postmaster reply address

2002-11-06 Thread Woodruff, Michael
Exchange2k SP3 I am having trouble trying to figure out how to change the postmaster reply address on NDRs sent to internet users. Is it possible? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
We've been forced into restricting mailboxes as everyones being moved to a central server. Most users are having no problems getting their mailboxes down to 25-50mb, some much lower, a handful much higher. I'm finding it easiest to set some limits on the IS, then override that on individual

RE: Import Address list

2002-11-06 Thread Martin Blackstone
From Outlook. File, Import/Export -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 6:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Import Address list I have personal contacts located in my Outlook XP that I would like to import into Exchange

RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server

2002-11-06 Thread Ken Cornetet
Here's my take: A quick peek a CDW shows SBS at $1277 http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.asp?EDC=274287. Microsoft is offering a $500 rebate if you can read the SBS sales literature and answer 20 some-odd questions. That puts the price at $777. I'm not familiar with the MCSP program, so I

deleting default mailbox store

2002-11-06 Thread Yanek Korff
I'm interested in deleting the default mailbox store that's created as part of the first storage group of a new Exchange 2000 install. Is this not possible? The error message I receive is: A Site Replication Service currently uses this mailbox store. The service must be removed before

Mail Relaying Originator

2002-11-06 Thread Dave Morrow
I recently setup my MS Exchange server such that only people connecting from a specific set of IP addresses (my company's IP range) and connections to an internal IP address are allowed to relay mail. After doing so, I am still noticing mail in the IMC queue that has an originator of David

Logging denied connections on Exchange 2000

2002-11-06 Thread Freddie Soerensen
Hi list I have now been searching the Exchange Help and Google for some time to find out how to do this but I cannot find the answer If I have blocked some IP addresses from connecting in the SMTP Virtual Server Properties, I would like to be able to check if there has been any attempts to

AW: scan Ex2000 for phrases or certain words in emails

2002-11-06 Thread Freddie Soerensen
Clint I have a script running on my Exchange 2000 which checks ALL incoming messages and blocks messages containing specific keywords or phrases. Works like a dream ! Email me off-list if you want me to send it to you Freddie When the printer still won't print after 20 tries, send the job

RE: Import Address list

2002-11-06 Thread Jonathan
Once I Export from Outlook how do I import into Exchange 2000? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:

RE: RBL's

2002-11-06 Thread Chris Scharff
At no time have I said that companies can't choose to implement RBLs; simply that they should be cognizant of the complete ramifications of the technology. Obtaining this level of understanding is a much better example of risk management than some theoretical defense against a risk which appears

RE: field is empty

2002-11-06 Thread Chris Scharff
There are several trillion possible values for the To header in a mail message. Any of them could be present in a spam message. -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:exchangelist;ubl.com.pk] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions But at least

RE: Import Address list

2002-11-06 Thread Chris Scharff
csvde, ldifde, adsi -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have personal contacts located in my Outlook XP that I would like to import into Exchange 2000. What are the possibe ways of

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Webb, Andy
I think you'd benefit more from something like kvault that moved the data out to nearline or offline storage, but left it within the Exchange environment. It will result in far less usage of drive space, is easily backed up and will result in fewer support calls. There are several Exchange

RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server

2002-11-06 Thread Greg Deckler
In order to be fair, I was using Microsoft's posted prices for their software. There are always going to be lower prices out there from places like CDW and so the prices I quoted for W2K and E2K will also available at a similarly lower price from places like CDW. Rebates come and go, and again,

RE: RBL's

2002-11-06 Thread Ken Cornetet
The McDonalds coffee incident is typical of how the media grabs a story and presents only the sensationalized aspect of it ( Insane law system gives awards woman for being burned by hot coffee!). There's quite a bit more to this story than what was ever presented. Short version: 1. McDonalds

Re: Logging denied connections on Exchange 2000

2002-11-06 Thread Greg Deckler
Exchange System Manager | Servers | server | Protocols | SMTP | SMTP virtual server | Properties On the General tab at the bottom you can enable logging and by hitting the properties button, you can include a ton of information. Hi list I have now been searching the Exchange Help and Google

RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server

2002-11-06 Thread tony . mccullough
You mentioned that there is nothing in the Linux world like Exchange. I haven't looked at this but I received this Open Exchange link from a friend of mine the other day. I can't vouch for it, but thought I'd throw it out.

Re: deleting default mailbox store

2002-11-06 Thread Greg Deckler
OK, you mention that this is a new Exchange 2000 install. SRS's are used to replicate information between E2K AG's and E55 sites, so something does not jive here. Is this an E2K server installed into an E55 site? To be picky, this is not a new Exchange 2000 install, this is an E2K upgrade or

Re: Postmaster reply address

2002-11-06 Thread Greg Deckler
From Microsoft docs: For tracking purposes, you can send a copy of all nondelivery reports to a specific e-mail address, such as the organization's postmaster account. The e-mail address specified is also placed in the Reply-To field of the nondelivery report. This allows users to respond to the

RE: deleting default mailbox store

2002-11-06 Thread Hutchins, Mike
Do you still have a need to be in Exchane mixed mode (any Exch 5.5 servers left or plan on adding any)? -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: deleting default mailbox store I'm

RE: deleting default mailbox store

2002-11-06 Thread Webb, Andy
Finish your migration, then remove the store. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === ---Original Message-

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Etts, Russell
Hi there I have the same issue here. People have PST files that are well over a gig, and we had one person go over the 2 gig limit. No matter what we tell them, they insist that they need a mailbox over a gig. I limit them to a max of 300 megs, no matter how much crying they do. I just don't

Re: Quick SMTP cluster question

2002-11-06 Thread Greg Deckler
Short answer, yes SMTP protocol and Exchange SMTP virtual servers are supported on clusters. Long answer, get E55 out of your head. There is no more SMTP connector per se. What you have is an SMTP service as part of your W2K server. You create SMTP Virtual Servers in Exchange to utilize this SMTP

Re: Moving E2k storage group to new Server

2002-11-06 Thread Allison M. Wittstock
SuSE's OpenExchange server product sounds like a close replacement for a Windows e-mail/collabaration server: http://www.suse.com/us/business/products/suse_business/openexchange/index.html On Wednesday 06 November 2002 16:08, you wrote: Here's my take: A quick peek a CDW shows SBS at $1277

RE: Mail Relaying Originator

2002-11-06 Thread Chris Scharff
FAQ -Original Message- From: Dave Morrow [mailto:David.Morrow;autodata.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Poor planning on your part does not necessitate an emergency on my part.

RE: Import Address list

2002-11-06 Thread Martin Blackstone
I just told you -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 7:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Import Address list Once I Export from Outlook how do I import into Exchange 2000?

RE: X.400 issues

2002-11-06 Thread Bennett, Joshua
This is where things get really complicated. These 2 servers are not in the same ORG as all the other servers. They are, however (through some procedure that I am have no knowledge of that was done 2 years before I took this over) faked into thinking that they are in the same ORG. I have no idea

RE: Import Address list

2002-11-06 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
In Outlook, do a File/Import/choose from another program, etc., etc., etc., just as you would have done the export. Also the FAQs are very good for this. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:34 AM To:

RE: Import Address list

2002-11-06 Thread Chris Scharff
You are being a tad vague. One responder has assumed you meant importing the data into an Exchange 2000 mailbox. Another assumed you meant AD. Oversnipping your replies isn't helping to clear up any confusion. -Original Message- From: Jonathan [mailto:jwright;spectore.com] Sent:

RE: Postmaster reply address

2002-11-06 Thread Drew Nicholson
I don't know if you _can_ change it, but you shouldn't. Isn't there an RFC that says a system has to have to have [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Anyway, just configure your profile (or another one) to look at that mailbox. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188

RE: Mail Relaying Originator

2002-11-06 Thread East, Bill
There are tiny evil gremlins in your server that are sending these messages. But unlike in the movie Gremlins, (which was excellent if slightly technically flawed) these ones will shrivel into dust if they are put in water. Submerge your server in 24 degree (celcius) water for one full hour *while

RE: Mail Relaying Originator

2002-11-06 Thread Roger Seielstad
That's fine. Those are NDRs and probably shouldn't be blocked. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Dave Morrow

RE: RBL's

2002-11-06 Thread Andy David
Caution: Thread is hot. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's At no time have I said that companies can't choose to implement RBLs; simply that they should be

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Seitz, Peter
.cshrc short% more .cshrc # @(#)cshrc 1.11 89/11/29 SMI umask 022 if ( $?prompt ) then set history=32 endif # # oracle environment variables setenv ORACLE_HOME /apps/oracle/816 setenv HARVESTDIR /home/user3/harvest5 setenv ORACLE_BASE /apps/oracle/816 setenv ORACLE_SID HARVEST5 setenv

RE: RBL's

2002-11-06 Thread Dflorea
I agree with the facts in your short version. Still gripes me to have somebody recover for their own stupidity, however. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's The

RE: RBL's

2002-11-06 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
Martin, Here's the response I got, from the owner of SamSpade.org, as to their reasoning for leaving ORBZIN and ORBZOUT on their web site. His answers are indented and noted with Response. == Steve, Would you please consider removing the the systems mentioned above, from your

AW: Logging denied connections on Exchange 2000

2002-11-06 Thread Freddie Soerensen
Greg I have activated everything there but it seems it is only logging what happens AFTER the connection was successfully established. What I want to see is if an incoming connection is NOT accepted by my server because the IP address has been blocked Freddie Exchange System Manager |

Distribution List

2002-11-06 Thread Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
I have some users who can't see inside a distrbution list. When they are in outlook and go to the distrbution list, they can se the list ,but not the people in them. any ideas thanks _ List posting FAQ:

Service account password change

2002-11-06 Thread Ashraph, Elizabeth A.
What's the general recommendation on changing service account passwords. Should it be done periodically for security reasons, perhaps when an Admin leaves the company. Is there a good online reference for all the considerations in making the change. Thanks all. Liz Ashraph Messaging Systems

RE: Instant Messaging Troubleshooting

2002-11-06 Thread Dupler, Craig
Hi Greg. This reminds me of the days when Ed C. called you Deckler the heckler. How have you been? I thought that nobody was going to pick-up the bait that I threw out there. I thought it was sort of like throwing a copy of the beatitudes or some Gandhi quotes into a debate about what to do

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Dupler, Craig
I am reminded of the old phrase that was so lovingly attributed to ATT back in the 60's: We're the phone company, we don't care, we don't have to. Perhaps one in the business of providing a service and wanting to be continuously improving the quality of that service with an aim toward keeping

Re: Change to different organization without losing SIS??

2002-11-06 Thread Petri
You can read Q175481. SIS should be still existing in there. From what I understand of the Move Server Wizard and exmerge we would lose SIS (Single Instance Storage) if we used the wizard (or any other method??) to change our organization. (??) We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and our

RE: Quick SMTP cluster question

2002-11-06 Thread Jon Hill
We switched last weekend from E55 IMS on a non-clustered box to an SMTP connector on an E2K active/passive cluster. No troubles. Took ten minutes (plus 7 hours tracking down what turned out to be a MAILsweeper config problem on the non-Exchange e-mail gateway server). -Original

PF access

2002-11-06 Thread Hatley, Ken
I am going to be running some Public Folder assessments for forms, event scripting, and data types, amounts, etc. I have been very happy with MicroEye's script director and have already used it for forms and scripts. How do you guys make sure you have an account that has access to all public

RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server

2002-11-06 Thread Jon Hill
Centrinity is supposed to be coming out with a Linux version of its FirstClass e-mail/UM/collab server within a month or so. It's in beta now. http://www.centrinity.com/platforms/linux/ -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:aw;inubit.com] Sent: Wednesday, November

RE: Exchange 2000 and GC

2002-11-06 Thread Petri
It is great to see the real reasons why I should not do this. I have always got an answer like: ..in my mind its not a good and MS doesn't recommends... Just a few comments about the list: 1. When you have a real problems they are always quite complexity 2. agree 3. if you create a separate site

RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server

2002-11-06 Thread Christopher Hummert
1) That's a benefit to those of us that do Linux consulting. Yea for being able to charge more :) 2) In response to that I would have to say your wrong about being limited for products that do mail filtering, antivirus, web surfing control. There are plenty of open source programs that are

RE: RBL's

2002-11-06 Thread William Lefkovics
There's quite a bit more to this story than what was ever presented. Clearly not the case. I still find it insane. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:11 AM To:

RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server

2002-11-06 Thread Chris Scharff
It's not open and it's certainly not Exchange. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:tony.mccullough;hcs.state.or.us] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions You mentioned that there is nothing in the Linux world like Exchange. I haven't