And after a reboot , you are still seeing these?
If so, try removing and readding the IMS.
I would also (re)-apply SP4, and (re)-run the optimizer.
Failing that, you may want to consider a rebuild. Be sure to take good backups before
hand.
-- Original Message
Chris,
Thank you so much for that reply. Yes, you hit it on the head as to what I
am trying to do - this person needs multiple from addresses, and he needs
the ability to select them from the drop down inside of Outlook.
I am not familiar with the method you talked about. Can you walk me
This list isn't too bad for that, what kind of questions do you have. I can
also point you to a couple of folks who also run campus networks that you
could interface with...
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:25 PM
To:
It's amazing how anal-retentive customers can be about naming standards.
Certainly you recall the many discussions about how the Exchange 5.5
directory name had to be such-and-such even though nobody can see this
attribute and it could never be changed. Many idiotic organizations
forced mailboxes
Define pre-made.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT)
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:04 AM
To: Exchange
If the database isn't corrupt (and there are tools that will tell you
that), then a message therein is. I hate suggesting how to repair
databases in this kind of forum because the risks are so great, so I
recommend you call PSS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
I believe YRC.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:43 AM
To: Exchange
Exactly.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Pity.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
So you could give it away?
Ed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Free Mailing List Software
Sensitivity: Private
Makes me wish I had time to
In 23-plus years of programming and computer infrastructure experience
I've never seen a software product that was completely free of bugs.
Period.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
It happens to many of us occasionally for no apparent reason. I'm
suspicious it is some subscriber's POP3 remailer, but I don't have the
time to prove it.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original
Read the POP3 RFC and you'll understand that using POP3 for anything
other than a single mail client pulling received mail from a single POP3
mailbox is a great big kludge. This kind of product has no purpose on
an e-mail server.
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_smtp_diatribe.htm
Hi Bill,
didn't want to mention names :-) and make anyon elook bad because Faxination
is a great product.I didn't get a positive repsonse from Symantec but last
time I asked they hadn't released the new Version that I am using now, so I
might give them a try because theire support is usually quite
Yeah we had to set it on manually, on one server before we made the
change we were actually getting prompted for each graphic coming from
the Virtual Directory (just seemed to be an oddity) however setting it
the same as the other servers seemed to cure it. We didn't modify any
NTFS permissions
RMCs campus is 1500 (1000 belong to students) machines in 40+ buildings
wired with fiber and copper. There is 1 main distribution point where
the servers and routers are. When I took over a year ago the entire
campus was 3Com. A 3Com layer3 switch for routing and 3Com layer 2
switches and hubs for
A friend of mine works at a college up in Binghamton, NY and gets some
pretty good deals from Cisco. I can get in touch with him if you like and
see if he has any ideas for you.
I do know that he gets to play with a lot of cool toys from Cisco...
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff
Ya, but Jamie is on top of those things. ;o)
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Very true...
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse
That he is! ;o)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anyone recomend a good networking list
Ya, but Jamie is on top of those things. ;o)
William
-Original
Maybe the best is to get all new gear that will support IPv6. Let the fun
begin.
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 2:16 PM
Subject: RE: Can anyone recomend a good networking list
That he
You mean you don't have that now? ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Can anyone recomend a good networking list
Maybe the best is to get all new gear that will support IPv6.
I just got on 'Out of Office' that went 'Boing'.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
You mean you don't have that now? ;o)
-Original
From Mr. Dupler? ;o) I got one too... I was rather shocked to see it, but
it is Craig and I can't fault him for it... :P
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anyone
Is this KB Article still on point, 247126? It's dated 4/11/01 and only
refers to E2K with no SP. I am deploying a 3,000 student E2K SP3 server
with POP and IMAP only clients with MB limits. Obviously this will go BUST
on me and I need to change the design for OWA only, MAPI won't be supported.
As far as I know, its still true for E2k - as it was for 5.5.
-- Original Message --
From: Fay, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:09:50 -0500
Is this KB Article still on point, 247126?
Your message implies that this feature did NOT work on 5.5 for POP IMAP
clients?
They used the IS for their protocols, please explain your answer.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I cant.
Im just not aware of any mechanism in any version of Exchange that would prevent a
pop3 or imap user from sending email if they were over their sending limit.
-- Original Message --
From: Fay, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions
Let me clarify. Prior to E2K the Information Store was responsible for
MAPI, POP3, IMAP, etc. In Exchange 2000 Microsoft has broken out POP3 and
IMAP4 protocols away from the Information Store. They now run as separate
services. If you chose to you could stop and disable whichever one you
In Exchange 2000, IMAP and POP is handled by IIS. Nevertheless, all
messages are processed by the PHATCAT.DLL (Fat cat)which is the
categorizer. All messages in Exchange 2000 must be categorized which
includes checking for mailbox restrictions, etc. Even though MAPI
clients still communicate
Yes, Exchange 5.5 supports these protocols natively. I dont know if I would quite say
the Information Store was responsible for
MAPI, POP3, IMAP, etc. as you phrase it.
But nonetheless, why should it have worked in 5.5?
Both Pop3 and imap use SMTP to send mail yes?
What mechanism is in the IMS
It's his employer that allows such things. My employer allows them to
the Internet as well, and that's one reason I never turn mine on.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
31 matches
Mail list logo
