Re: Exchange alias naming

Which is why, as a consultant I didn't even bring the subject up, I just implemented it. Micro level discussionsb aren't particularly fruitful with customers, I try to keep them focused on the big picture, the details are what they pay me to worry about. (preaching to the choir I know) On 1/18/03

Re: POP3 IMAP Prohibit Send on E2K

Previous versions bypassed the prohibit send as well IIRC. On 1/18/03 14:09, Fay, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this KB Article still on point, 247126? It's dated 4/11/01 and only refers to E2K with no SP. I am deploying a 3,000 student E2K SP3 server with POP and IMAP only clients with

Re: POP3 IMAP Prohibit Send on E2K

Oh, I see Mr. David has pointed this out as well. Not sure I understand why this would be a critical design flaw in a deployment though. Heck, using AUTH SMTP I can send outbound SMTP mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and that address doesn't even exist, let alone have a mailbox limit associated with it.

Ex2k Priv grows when the Pub grows?

So here is my set up. Exchange 5.5 SP4 Exchange 2000 SP3 on Windows 2000 Advance Server SP3 I have one Storage Group I have two Mailbox Stores Priv1 (3 Users) Priv2 (0 Users) I have one Public Folder Store So I brought up my Ex2k server in my Ex5.5 site and created the second

Re: Email Addresses

Hi. Using outlook XP, I have put two internet address in the bcc field. When they get the email they see nothing in the To: field. So? Mark. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 22:06

Re: Multiple Identities not working (attn:Chris)

Chris, Thank You! - The thought of creating DL's (now called Distribution Groups, or Mail-Enabled Groups in Exchange 2000) crossed my mind, but I never saw the From: field show up inside of the Outlook Client. It also never crossed my mind, that by going to the View menu, that I could force the

RE: POP3 IMAP Prohibit Send on E2K

Thanks for everyone's comments. This is much clearer to me, I ran both clients against an E2K lab server today. The only solution is to use prohibit Send and Receive. The SA then issues a message to the mailbox recipient that their mailbox is closed. They can still send, but senders do get an

Re: Multiple Identities not working (attn:Chris)

In 5.5's OWA, it's probably relatively easy to hack the asp pages to get the effect you desire. In E2K, it's probably a bit tougher, but for the right money it possible too. You /could/ use mailboxes instead of DLs and set an alternate recipient pointing to the real mailbox, but I don't think you

How could adding a Secondary Domain Controller mess things up?

Hello, I just added a Secondary Domain Controller into our Windows 2000 Network environment. After doing this, the weirdest things started to happen. Now whenever I add a new user to the Domain, any mailbox related stuff does not work properly. For example, after adding the user, and then

Recall: X.400 connector problem

Hanumanthappa, Santhosh would like to recall the message, X.400 connector problem. ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not

RE: Recall: X.400 connector problem

Sorry, too late... Already read it -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hanumanthappa, Santhosh Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 02:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recall: X.400 connector problem Hanumanthappa, Santhosh would like to

X.400 connector problem solved

Hi It was basically due to a FQDN problem. the resolution was to add some PTR entry in DNS. but I resorted in entering the Ip addr instead of making entrys in DNS. Now it started working. What is surprising is that the exchange does not log a error event but instead resorts to a warning

RE: Ex2k Priv grows when the Pub grows?

What does the mailbox resources list show? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clemens, Rick Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003

RE: Ex2k Priv grows when the Pub grows?

By the way, I observed exactly the same thing. After things settled down (or we ran out of disk space!) I ran ESEUTIL and it shrank back to near nothingness. I'd be interested in the answer myself. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs

RE: Email Addresses

Duh. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions

GAL / OWA MSX55

MSX55 +SP4 Hi all, Does anybody know a software to allow OWA users to see the GAL? Rgds, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

Disaster recovery in a different city

MSX55+SP4 1MSX Organization 16sites X400 connectors +1 IMC Hi All, We have 15 sites connected to a central hub via X400 connectors the central hub has IMC to send/receive messages to/from Internet. We want to propose a solution to have replace any of the sites in case of disaster in the area

RE: GAL / OWA MSX55

I butchered this (sorry Siggy): http://www.cdolive.com/phonelist.htm This sample Microsoft Active Server Page application displays the Microsoft Exchange Server global address list (GAL) via CDO anonymous access, without using the standard Outlook Web Access interface or ADSI. William