RE: Microsoft Metadirectory Services 2003

Last I heard it wasn't avilable to end of summer -Original Message- From: Evensen, Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Microsoft Metadirectory Services 2003 I am trying to find MMS 2003, specifically the GAL sync tool. I understand

RE: Need a product to move attachements for the web

Funny thing, it's a while I'm about to code something like that REALLY SOON NOW for internal use. A little bit more complicated since I'll need to traverse some firewalls and use unix based webservers, but basically the idea is exactly the same. Stupid instant poll: how many of you out there have

RE: Need a product to move attachements for the web

I spent a while looking for something similar, maybe without the initial exchange interaction as I think that may be tricky (I'm not a coder, it just sounds tricky, at least with 5.5). Most seem to be geared towards *nix, I didn't find a lot for IIS. I'd be most interested if anyone does find

RE: Need a product to move attachements for the web

Sounds like someworth deploying at some sites. most companies tell users if you need to send something larger that what is allowed they are told to use the FTP site and so on and so forth. I would like to see something like that. Count me as one. From: Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To:

Outlook web access

Have recently set up outlook web access and set the config for a user and the http details, but having trouble loging in via a browser, not sure if I have missed a step. Does the users actual PC have to be set up to log on correctly?. What is the format for the url for the user?. Bit confused with

Re: TechEd

Ya, it felt great. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:21 AM Subject: RE: TechEd Any news on the release yet? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [TX] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: TechEd

TMI my friend. TMI. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [TX] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:31 AM To:

RE: Backing up the M Drive

Yep...that's the one I was talking about. Also there's a site called... http://www.microsoft.com that has some pretty good reads about Exchange. Granted, MS documentation is not as thorough as a Linux man page, but maybe they'll come around in time. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody

RE: Backing up the M Drive

Thanks, yeah I think I already knew about the Microsoft one, im fairly sure that I have even visited once or twice in the past, maybe im getting it mixed up with micr0soft.com? Anyway, are there any others that you know? I prefer the hobbyist sites, they seem to have better read ups than the

RE: IMS Corruption...

Any chance the NTFS permissions got changed on the \exchsrvr\imcdata\ directories? Or that it's corruption of the filesystem, which is reflecting as corruption of the IMC mailbox? Can you appropriate another machine (workstation even) to build as a second IMC and take some, or all, of the load

RE: Backing up the M Drive

LOL... Yah...I'll go through some of my bookmarked pages today and see what I can put together for you. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Thanks, yeah I

RE: IMS Corruption...

No...no NTFS permissions changes. I'm the only Exchange admin in the company and the only person allowed to make changes to the configuration of the machine. As far as the virii issue goes, I'd rather leave it the way it is. We are blocking almost everything in the MBLD (Martin Blackstone's

RE: Backing up the M Drive

Actually, you are using E2k, so my 5.5 bookmarks are probably not going to do you a lot of good. But I can recommend Jim McBee's - Exchange 2000 24/7 book...very informative. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:36 AM

Outlook XP Licensing

When you purchase sufficient Exchange 2000 licensing, you're entitled to install Outlook 2000 on each of the licensed clients, or so im lead to believe? :o Anyway, can you install Outlook XP on these clients without the need for any kind of Office XP license?

RE: Backing up the M Drive

Yah, ill get the boss to buy it me then :) Thanks for the pointers and the help anyway!! -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 15:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive Actually, you are using E2k, so my 5.5

RE: Outlook XP Licensing

AFAIK, yes, since you're using E2k. If you were 5.5, then no. Neil -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 04 June 2003 15:50 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Outlook XP Licensing Subject: Outlook XP Licensing When you purchase sufficient

RE: TechEd

What's all the garbage at the end of your post? Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 02,

RE: Outlook XP Licensing

In general, yes, that is how the Exchange CAL license reads. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June

RE: TechEd

I'm in the middle asleep in them Start snoring next time so I'll know where you are :) A couple, like Andy's, have been really good and very useful A few, like this WMI one, zonked me out quick... Stemy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [TX] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

Be nice Stephen. You don't know how he got the job. I'm sure that your first day in dojo you didn't know Jujitsu from wu-shu pork. At least he's asking questions before something goes boom. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message-

Microsoft Metadirectory Services 2003

I am trying to find MMS 2003, specifically the GAL sync tool. I understand MS has a standard version and an enterprise version. I am looking for the standard version. Have not been able to find information on where to acquire the tools. We are in the process of setting up a test environment

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

Uh oh -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from

RE: IMS Corruption...

What kind of traffic do you get? We're handling 40,000+ messages per day through our primary IMC, running on a 333MHz box with 256MB RAM. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

lol -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Uh oh -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange

RE: Microsoft Metadirectory Services 2003

It's still in beta, You can download the enterprise version from the MMS website. Ken -Original Message- From: Evensen, Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am trying to find MMS 2003, specifically the GAL sync tool. I

RE: Tracking and auditing Exchange administrators

I know that an admin can't read someone elses email by default. But they *can* if they want to, and we simply want a way to audit this. Like I said, this is a law firm and they are very particular about stuff like this. Jason -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

We're here to help, but a lot of people on this list do tease people a little - don't take it personally. And most of us do expect people to make some kind of effort to figure things out themselves and read the help guides, etc, before expecting us to help. It's one thing to be stuck on a

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

Color me crazy then. I picked this life a while ago and would never look back. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: IMS Corruption...

It's a PII 450 with only 64 mb of RAM and a 2gb hard drive, handling an organization of 750 mailboxes. Last month alone, it sent out 180k+ NDR's, blocked 67k+ spam e-mails and delivered another 5,700+ spam e-mails...and that's just the spam people reported. That doesn't count all the legit

Name could not be resolved Error

I am getting an error message when trying to configure Outlook 2k client for one of our users. After I entered Exchange server Mailbox information and click on Check Name tab, the following error message pops up: The name could not be resolved. The Microsoft Exchange Address Book was unable to

RE: Name could not be resolved Error

We had workstation behave like this and re-installing the TCP/IP stack fixed the problem. - Matt -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Name could not be resolved Error I am

RE: Name could not be resolved Error

That machine isn't able to hit the Exchange server, it's a network problem rather than an Outlook problem. Can you ping/tracert to it? Double check your network DNS settings, including the gateway. David -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: Name could not be resolved Error

If you would have typed that error message into the Microsoft Knowledge Base you would have got the solution. Check article 269665. Jeff -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Name

Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

Managing Exchange Server by Paul Robichaux would be my choice, bit of a bible IMHO. It's published by O'Reilly. regards Paul -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 17:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

Try the MS Newsgroup usually an MVP or MS will response to your questions within in 24 hours period. As for reading try the MS web site. -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested

RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

Microsoft's Exchange 5.5 Administrator's Pocket Consultant. Will need more but this is worth looking at. I use it alot. -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

I didn't say it...you did. :) -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Color me crazy then. I picked this life a while ago

Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

Indeed. I have dozens of Exchange books. Literally. If I compare, say, Barry Gerber's Mastering Exchange 5.5 (Sybex) with Paul Robichaux's book, I get more info in fewer pages in Paul's and the text is readable. Maybe it's an author-reader compatability thing. I find the style suitable. No

Re: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

Approaching 110,000,000 exchange seats out there That's a lot of people not in their right minds. Me, I'm left-handed, so I'm an exception. William - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04,

RE: TechEd

No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: RE: TechEd What's all the garbage at the end of your post? Looks

Message filtering

I´m runnning Exchange 5.5 How to prevent all uusers in specific domain from delivering message to my site BUT allow only 2 users from that domain. Thank _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web

Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

and of course http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:46 AM Subject: Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Indeed. I have dozens of

RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

I've got to plug Jim McBee's Exchange 5.5 24/7 book. It's been a tremendous help to me. I don't know if it's still in print, though. John Orban System Administrator The Country School www.countryschool.org -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: IMS Corruption...

It just needs more RAM. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:13 PM To:

RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

Check the books section on: http://www.wiredeuclid.com Specifically the book by Paul Robichaux. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

Actually, with the exception of this week, in which most of us (myself excluded) are at Tech-MEC, this is the largest collection of MVP's helping Exchange users around. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

I beg to differ. And worldwide deployment numbers would certainly back me up, but this isn't the Care Bear List. No Nick at Night here. We don't dance around in a purple dinosaur outfit singing I love you...you love me well... Most of us don't. But I can guarantee that How to build a DR

Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

Thank you, Mr Active Directory MVP. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:57 AM Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Actually, with the exception of this week, in which most

RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

It is...I just ordered it from Amazon.com on Monday for $13.95 + SH...under $18 US total. I ordered it because I really liked the process schematics that McBee includes in the E2K - 24/7 book, so I figured they would be as good in the 5.5 book. -Original Message- From: John Orban

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

And I quote: Exchange is a cruel master [1] Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. [1] Cthulhu Jones, 4 June 1999 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Tracking and auditing Exchange administrators

You can look at the security log and it will tell you. But if that person is smart they will also remove entries in the log too From: Clishe, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tracking and auditing

RE: IMS Corruption...

Agreed. I suggest something in mauve. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Corruption... It just needs more RAM.

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

Actually, in rereading Ms. Bridge's comment, I'd suggest she search the archives for the phrase Exchange is a Cruel Master circa June 1999.[1] I think it dovetails in nicely here. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems

RE: IMS Corruption...

Mauve always has more RAM. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:12 PM To:

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

It wasn't my question. Just helping out the poor new Exchange Admin who asked a question and was attacked. Thanks for your response. Let's try being more patient with new Exchange Admins is all I wanted to get across. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Outlook XP Licensing

Contact MS Licensing. They are the true source. - Original Message - From: Neil Doody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:50 Subject: Outlook XP Licensing When you purchase sufficient Exchange 2000 licensing, you're entitled to

RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

Hey I'm helpful. On tuesdays. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 04/06/2003 17:57 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

Mailbox Rule - Send on Behalf

Hi, I receive multiple emails that are 'sent on behalf' of Data Center. The rule I have created never works. I specifically must state who the email is being sent from, in this case Brian Hale, for the rule to work. This is the from the email: From: Brian Hale On Behalf Of Data Center My

RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?

Only because the AD Lead beat the Exchange lead to it... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday,

Global Exchange Filtering

Is there a way to have all messages with a certain line in the header be moved into a folder of the admins choosing? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:

RE: Name could not be resolved Error

Hi David Matt, Thanks much guys! Yes, re-installing the TCP/IP stack fixed it. -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Name could not be resolved Error We had workstation behave

RE: TechEd

Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List

Re: Mailbox Rule - Send on Behalf

That becuase you have them setup as a deleagte. From: Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailbox Rule - Send on Behalf Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:02:03 -0700 Hi, I receive multiple emails that are

RE: Exchange and AD Question

Set exchange up in a hosting environment. You can keep 100's of companies separate -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and AD Question This question may be a little off the list

RE: TechEd

No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains with properly implemented MS technologies... Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can TS to my box at home...

Re: TechEd

It works absolutely fine at 7:00am. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:10 PM Subject: RE: TechEd No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains with

Re: TechEd

Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed? all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on either box. One here and one in the UK. both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail. both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322

Re: TechEd

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;257679 ? Where are you by the way? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:41 PM Subject: Re: TechEd Anyone care to lend help to a

Re: TechEd

right now I am in the exchange transport lecture in the ultra-crowded D171-175 which has been packed to the gills for every exchange session :( - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:49 PM

Re: Message filtering

I would say with a third party application. - Original Message - From: Diop [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:27 AM Subject: Message filtering I´m runnning Exchange 5.5 How to prevent all uusers in specific domain from

Re: TechEd

unfortunately this is an all 5.5 site . . . no Exchange 2000 yet . . . I have found 3 or 4 Q articles with the exact event id messages, but the resoution doesnt apply. They either say Exchange 2000 or one said DNS is in error, which it is not, etc. Where are you? Chris - Original Message

Re: TechEd

Did you see this one? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q323733 It's really not an exchange error. It's way more likely a networking error or Windows error. An MtaBindBack over RPC has failed The receiving MTA can not authenticate (bind) the sending MTA Can you bump up

RE: TechEd

I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up and move around I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt... Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in

Re: TechEd

These are in the same site. They can ping each other (was that by FQDN?) and have RPC communication confirmed. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: TechEd I just

RE: TechEd

Anyone got a spare pass for the IT Pro party tonight... Got the Developer party pass and forgot to pick up the IT pro party pass... Those SQL people are a bit too weird for me :( -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:40

RE: TechEd

But IF the HOSTS file has been modified, then ping could work and 5.5 routing could fail. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:37 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd

Re: TechEd

What's a HOSTS file? ;o) - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: RE: TechEd But IF the HOSTS file has been modified, then ping could work and 5.5 routing could fail.

Two Unusual Outlook 2002 Problems

Recently I reconfigured my production workstation from scratch to include: - Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition; and - Office XP with sp2 This replaces a Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Office 2000 SR-1. Now I am getting two weird problems (so far) with Outlook 2002. 1.

RE: TechEd

What's this Exchange 5.5 thing that I keep hearing people talk about? stemy -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd What's a HOSTS

RE: TechEd

Q248488 talks to Exch 5.0, but may apply in your situation Hunter -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: TechEd unfortunately this is an all 5.5 site . . . no Exchange 2000 yet . . . I have

Re: TechEd

If I can do a successful rpc ping and normal ping; which I can; I would think routing would be okay; but obviously something is amiss . . . - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:44 PM

Re: TechEd

you can have mine but I am at my hotel now. If youre near the Wyndham Market Center feel free to grab it. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM Subject: RE: TechEd Anyone got a

Re: Two Unusual Outlook 2002 Problems

in server 2003 a lot of IE is disabled by default. Could that have something to do with it? I know IE and Outlook share a lot of components. - Original Message - From: Martin, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:59 PM Subject:

RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.

Data this old I wouldn't even have around. We rotate our backup tapes frequently and destroy old tapes that we're not going to use anymore. I'll grant that some specific industries may require longer e-mail retention, but thankfully ours isn't one of them. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA,

Exchange 5.5

What would be the best option if I had a person at work who works part time brings in her laptop and wants to access her email from home via outlook. We have our own domain and mail server now and she cant use a webmail type program gaining her email through our old ISP, is outlook web access

RE: Sending-Receiving Limit

No restriction applied on smtp virtual server. Only applied on Global Setting. -Original Message- From: Scott Pease [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Sending-Receiving Limit Check the size limit on

RE: Sending-Receiving Limit

Thanks for the article. Here is my scenario. Example 2 In this example, the following size limits have been configured: * The global setting is set to 2 MB. * * * The user mailbox setting is set to 3 MB. But incoming mails greater than 2 MB never come to mailbox whose incoming limit is 3 MB.