Think about how SMTP works, and you'll get the answer.
In other words, yes. Your primary rejects the message (or the connection in
some cases), so the sending MTA correctly identifies that as a failure, and
tries the next highest MX - in your case, your gateway.
I've got 4 external MX's with
I don't know - we run the exact same configs on all our external relays, so
if one rejects it, all 4 will.
Then again, when you're using 100% open source software on 100% recycled
desktop machines as mail relays, cost isn't much of a factor.
I need to re-install ForestPrep. I chose the wrong option during the setup
and need to re-run to accept the correct setting. When I tried
re-installing it, it just went through the setup and didn't give me the
option to Create a new organization or join an existing 5.5.
Know of a way to
Did you follow Mr. Webb's advice from yesterday and run update.exe
/removeorg from the Exch SP3 media?
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:18 AM
Subject: ForestPrep/Domainprep
I have been reading up on the AD connector for exchange and what I need to
do etc. However I was wondering if I really need it at all. We are doing a
new AD design and trusting back to our 4.0 domain then using the ADMIT tool
to migrate users/computers and passwords over to the new domain
Those were probably Microsoft's original plans but then for some reason
they invented ADC. Must have been a good reason.
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrading thoughts from the
Each front-end server is separate. Each front-end server can figure out
what back-end server is holding the user's mailbox and will know how to
proxy the user to the correct back-end.
You could load-balance the front-end servers and make them respond the
the same IP address and FQDN.
Yes. When I ran the /removeorg, it said:
Setup cannot update your current installation, because there is no Microsoft
Exchange server installed.
Even though it said that, I tried to re-run the ForestPrep and still didn't
get the option to join an existing 5.5.
What am I doing wrong? Please
If you need to co-exist with some users on 5.5 and some on 2003 then the ADC
keeps the Exchange 5.5 directory and your new Active Directory synchronised
and ensures that you can route mail between the two. If you can migrate in a
single hit then you don't need it.
-Original Message-
Did you carefully follow all steps in Q273478 - XADM: How to Completely
Remove Exchange 2000 from Active Directory?
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2003 13:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question -
Is this a test lab? Blow it up and restart or search in Technet on how to
manually remove Exch from AD.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:13 AM
Subject: RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep
It's Friday. I would go with the blow-up version.
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 09:28:09 -0400
Is this a test lab? Blow
They also changed the licensing in W2k3 terminal server, not sure I like
their reason for doing that little change.
I figured their reason was for sites doing an in-place upgrade, but not yet
ready to make the exchange conversion, however I'm doing a parallel
conversion so I was just wondering
Thanks guys! I am going to try a few drastic measures and after that the
blow-up idea sounds good. It is just a testbed
Thanks for all your help. If you come up with any new ideas, send them my
way.
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
We are looking at upgrading from Outlook 98 to Outlook 2002 as well as the rest of the
Office programs from the 97 versions. I have a couple of concerns:
After you activate the software, what procedure do you go through when a hard drive
dies?
Also, does the Save My Settings Wizard work with
Why will you be activating the software? Are these all retail copies?
- Original Message -
From: Bill Kuhl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:41 AM
Subject: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
We are looking at upgrading from Outlook 98
It Worked! Wooo Hooo. Q273478 did the job! Thanks to everyone!
Thank God It Is Friday!
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help
Don't buy retail copies. Get a corp lic and one media and use the same on
all. No activation required.
Plus you will find it is cheaper to buy.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook
Anyone know which city will host MECC this year?
Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in
the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I
see nuthin on MS' site.
_
List
It will be TechEd, and its SD
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MECC 2003 Venue
Anyone know which city will host MECC this year?
Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was
MEC is no more... :-(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MECC 2003 Venue
Anyone know which city will host MECC this year?
Traditionally, the event is located
We received new Dell pc's with the software pre-loaded.
From your comment I assume that there is a method from loading from a server and
bypass activation.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor?
-Original Message-
From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
MEC is no more... :-(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was told by MS that they want the Exchange folks to go to Teched.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
Does this mean that Exchange
I have used windows load-balancing with 2 front-end OWA servers for 3+
years, serving ~3000 users. Never had any problems.
Also I have 3 SMTP gateways that are load-balanced and handle ~1,000,000
messages per day each - load-balancing is performing quite well.
-Original Message-
From:
Perfect Sleeping weather for Martin.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
It will be TechEd, and its SD
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
In that instance, you may have to. We dont typically buy with the Office
software pre-loaded.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Kuhl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:59 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
We received new
I guess they think Exchange folks need to learn something they don't
know yet.
-Original Message-
From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
I was told by MS that they want the Exchange folks
So my prediction--made years ago--came true at last.
Some prediction: a senior exchange project mgmt dude I met at MECC 2001 said
that there would be no more MECCs.. meaning, no MECC 2002. Right.
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor?
-Original Message-
Aye
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
In that instance, you may have to. We dont typically buy with the Office
software pre-loaded.
- Original Message
Madre De Dios!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue
Perfect Sleeping weather for Martin.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Talk nicely to Dell. They may be able to convert them to a volume licensing
agreement for you and issue you a corporate license number. Else your into
reactivating every time you change more than two hardware items at the same
time (or is it three), or rebuilding a machine. Not nice.
You're out of luck
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
We received new Dell pc's with the software pre-loaded.
From your comment I assume that there is a
I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again.
Oh well.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference.
What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact
opposite.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue
I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again.
Oh
I spent most of the week sitting down.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:20 AM
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact
Guess this goes to show the value of researching throughly before making decisions.
So far I am not impressed with the Office part. Tried copying some text from a web
page and it crashed Word 2002 everytime. The recovery did not work. Pasting to Wordpad
worked fine. Another web page pasted
Thanks, our plan is to do a single Saturday migration, however in light of
Murphy I'll probably go ahead and do the connector just as a cma procedure.
-Original Message-
From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Down at OPB?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:15 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: MECC 2003 Venue
Subject: Re: MECC 2003
MEC is dead. Long live MEC.
The Fall 2002 Conference in Anaheim was the last Exchange-centric conference.
MEC content has been rolled into TechEd.
TechEd 2004 will be in San Diego. Whether or not TechEd is a suitable
replacement for MEC is up to the longtime attendees to decide.
Chris,
Thanks for the response. I checked, and no, the user doesn't have mail
delivered to a PST. The only PST in use is ARCHIVE.PST. Mail goes
straight to the users' mailbox on exchange.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25,
MECC was great.
I met a succubus there.
After a long bender.
(double-entendre unavoidable. so sorry.)
Tim.
x3683
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue
I spent most
All of the Exchange sessions were in the teensy tiny rooms in the back ass
end of the basement of the conference center. Seating for 50.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Best and PST don't really belong in the same conversation, unless the
question is What's the best way to make sure that compliance with discovery
requests will cost my company a fortune?
On 07/31/03 20:11, Eric Holtzclaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the best Archiving tool for Exchange
Can't manage a Haiku today, but you might enjoy this one:
NIGHT JOB
(With apologies to W H Auden)
This is the night job, a daily recorder
Making the checksums in batch process order
E-mail (rich-text), attachments galore
Backed up on tape drives, just to restore
Viruses detoxed, servers on-line
Hopefully we all noted that on the wonderful evaluation forms (my evil
coworker got cash for doing one of those things, I've been each year since
97 and on his first trip he gets money). I will be the bad guy, I am very
pleased that they have joined MEC and Tech-Ed together, working for a
I won an Xbox game by filling out a survey at MEC.
Also, I won an Xbox at TechED one year.
:D
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue
Hello All.
I have a server in my Exchange 5.5 Organization that is no longer there.
The server has been rebuilt as something else and is not available anymore.
My question is this. This server shows in the Exchange 5.5 Admin program
and I can't delete the objects under the public folder
Have you deleted the original Exchange server entry using the Exchange
admin tool? That would be the first place to start.
Secondly, there are a few KB articles in TechNet that will help you
remove orphaned folders. Search for Orphan Public folders and select
Exchange 5.5 or all products. That
Because you removed the server without rehoming PF's I think you out of
luck. Most of what I know is that if you do not rehome first then move
everything off that exchange server, you can not remove it. Maybe someone
else on the list has run across this.
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL
A starting point. Although based on what you said happened then the orphan
route is the way to go, as John stated. Your boss must love you.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;259158
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I inherited Exchange. Was like this when I got here. I am dealing with
the problems because I will be doing the Exchange 2000 upgrade.
What do you mean...you boss must love you? Are you making fun of my bad
situation? My boss does love me because I haven't quit yet!
Samantha
Single Exch2K SP3, Win2K AD Domain, several DCs/GCs in place.
I am replacing a Win2K DC which happens to be 1 of 2 GCs and holds all FSMO roles
(among other things). Earlier this week, I set up the replacement server, installed AD
and transferred all FSMO except PDC emulator. Yesterday I set the
When you made the new DC a GC, did wait at least 5 minutes and then
reboot it?
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Several questions on E2k and Active Directory
Single
I actually waited about 18 hours (before I found the KB article that said you had to)
and then rebooted it...
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Several questions on E2k and
Why not share one with us ?
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Original Message -
From: Crumbaker, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL.A
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Already on it and blocked. Thanks Martin.
--
From: Martin Tuip [MVP]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Friday, August 1, 2003 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Heads up on a new virus
Ex5.5
I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from
inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The item does not appear
as available to recover under 'tools'-'recover deleted items'. I have no
backups whilst the item existed.
Thanks
Stu
Confidentiality
Just out of curiosity, who here uses trend and how often do you have it set to update?
Just curious
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Digital Display Systems.
Be excellent to each other
---End of Line---
_
Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange even if
you shift delete. Do a search for dumpsteralwayson on Microsoft website.
This is a reg key that can be added to retrieve items from any folder. It is
retrospective.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Ward,
Found the article it is 178630.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2003 19:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange
Thanks Martin, got the new definition but learned something strange at the
same time
Using Trend 3.52 with Ex5.5 SP4, NT4.0 SP6a and have the update set to every
hour and it has been working great. I just checked to see what version we
were on and all should have been well but we were on 355
We run Trend and automatically update every hour.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2003 19:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus
Just out of curiosity, who here uses trend and how often do you have it set
to
Thanks Martin. We are already seeing this virus hit our file filters.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Heads up on a new virus
We do, and hourly. Works great.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:06 PM
To:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-015.asp
- Original Message -
From: Peter Orlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:23 PM
Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus
Anyone
Hi,
I get asked this all the time and really have never figured it out.
Is there a link on MS about this or in a book somewhere. I have not
been able to find it.
As an Exchange Admin I should know this - argh.
When an email with attachment gets sent to 'N' people does that
attachment stay in
Ditto.
- Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax: 602.294.7486
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus
We do, and hourly.
SIS = only one copy until everyone deletes it.
-Original Message-
From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachments and the Priv
Hi,
I get asked this all the time and really have never figured it out.
It is stored as one file per store. Hence the phrase - single instance
storage.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Erik L. Vesneski
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Friday, August 1, 2003 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachments and
What your referring to is Single Instance Storage...
http://www.storageadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=23819
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik L.
Vesneski
Sent: 01 August 2003 18:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachments
This whole process is covered under Single Instance Storage functionality of
Exchange. Only one instance of a message exists with pointers for each user
that was sent the message. If you had three servers and the message was sent
to mailboxes on each server then you would have three instances in
Anyone know what the IE system vulnerability is that that article describes?
- Peter
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus
Thanks Martin. We are already
I received this earlier today and being the administrator I knew that I had
not sent myself this message. The message included a WinZip attachment which
was rather interesting to take apart. It turned out to be an html document
that directed the browser to go to a website and run a file foveae
Symantec doesn't have the virusdef file that blocks this ready for live
update yet :-(
Aaron Brasslett wrote:
Thanks Martin. We are already seeing this virus hit our file filters.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August
Search Google for DumpsterAlwaysOn
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Ex5.5
I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is
I am not sure if this was simply bad typing but the file name was an
executable called foo (foo.exe)
-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus
I received this
Sure they do. They've had it for a few hours.
http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/defs.download.html
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:42 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Heads up on a new virus
No, but they do have it in their intelligent updater/xdb update if you use
NAV/SAV CE, it should be easy enough to roll out.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2003 19:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus
Thanks for that - following the article and purging from the necessary
folders, it's then unrecoverable, correct?
Would exmerge have removed it from the dumpster too and achieved the same
result?
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August
Does anyone know if there are any list's for the Trend suite?
Notability the Exchange piece 381 and/or IMSS 5x
thx
bill
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
I have submitted this to Trend, however I didn't know if anyone here had
experienced this before. We are running Trend 3.51 and have the autoupdates
set to hourly. They stopped working on the 30th, I can still do the manual
update but it doesn't show up in the log's. The log has 2000 events in
Nick Field wrote:
No, but they do have it in their intelligent updater/xdb update if
you use NAV/SAV CE, it should be easy enough to roll out.
Nick
Well, it wasn't hard, but it also wasn't _automatic_. If I hadn't read
this ML today, I might have missed it.
Jim H
-Original
This has almost always been the first place I learn about new viruses. I
subscribe to numerous virus warning lists and this list has almost always
been first to identify a virus that is a true threat.
Well, it wasn't hard, but it also wasn't _automatic_. If I hadn't read
this ML today, I
Yes purging from deleted item recovery will remove it from the dumpster. I
doubt Exmerge would do this as it just exports from the mailbox so I would
assume it does the same on the dumpster which of course has to be
specifically selected.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Ward,
There is a reghack. I think you may roll out this via a logon script.
Key Name: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Outlook\Preferences
Value Name: FBPublishRange
Data Type: REG_DWORD
Data: 0xc (which is 12)
Cheers,
Phillip
-Original Message-
From: norem0rz [mailto:[EMAIL
On the note of this Virus I think we updated in time. But I see ISSCan was
updated post sp4 for Exchange 5.5. Does anyone have the latest version of
the file?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2003 21:14
To: Exchange Discussions
As far as I know, Dumpster items do not get extracted by Exmerge.
A Mailbox Move loses items in the Dumpster.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
You really ought to learn about the concept of paragrpahs.
Call Veritas and don't accept the answer that the Exchange server should
also be a GC.
Yes, installing Exchange on a DC requires you do to more to get it operating
than if it were a member server. What happens if the DC function on your
I got asked once if it was possible and found that an option had been added
at some point to Exmerge to allow extraction from the Dumpster for mail on
Exchange 5.5 (or later) servers.
Exmege version 3.71 has an option CopyDeletedItemsFromDumpster, which if
set to 1 it will copy the dumpster
Yep, it will place the items into the 'Deleted Items' folder of the PST
file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
I got asked once if
93 matches
Mail list logo
