Does anyone know of any nehatibve effects from Exchange 5.5 Information
Store Patch 2657.74?
We are still using ex 5.4 sp4 and some users will be connecting via outlook
2003
See Exchange 5.5 hangs when using outlook 2003 client...
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=829418
DEFINITELY hire a consultant. I've actually been in this situation
already and it turned into a 3 day nightmare with Microsoft Tech Support.
The most important thing to know is that Microsoft does not recommend an
in place upgrade of Exchange 5.5 and it can potentially be the absolute
worst
If I read the post right he isn't wanting to do an inplace upgrade of
exchange but of the NEW PDC which is NT4. Thus an upgrade from nt4 to win2k
server with AD and leaving the ex5 on the nt4 box. His problem is that he
wants to know if he can rename the domain to domain.com during this
procedure
Hi,
I'm using a small free Exchange EventSink program called ORFilter.
http://martijnjongen.com/eng/orfilter/default.htm
ORFilter only checks the senders IP-adress against DNS-based blacklists
but that seems to get rid of most of the spam for us and it's
free...
The software can be
Bad experiences with dns based blacklists is that we are frequently
refused to send mails because our ISP appears on a number of blacklists.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Renberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 31 oktober 2003 14:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM
I would look into getting a new ISP. Not much you can do about other
people's systems if they are using dnsbl's.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
Bad
Thanks for all your help!
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM filtering on a budget
I would look into getting a new ISP. Not much you can do about other
people's systems
What?? I call BS.. there is nothing at all wrong with an in place
upgrade I do them all the time. While you might not like them, they are
a great option to upgrade.
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I blanked out after the second line.. He can made the AD FQDN domain
name .com no problem and keep the same short NetBIOS domain name. and be
all happy. Other wise a consultant would be a great thing. Or maybe a
fresh start with ADMT all kinds of things he can do here.
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS,
Hi all,
Scott is correct, i'm not upgrading the NT4 box with Exchange 5.5 on it.
This will remain on the NT4 BDC as is, in a mixed mode situation. I have
the new kit as the PCD now and will upgrade it to Win2K. Then install AD
with the new domain name. I believe now the netbios domain name will be
Good luck.. Have fun with the ADC.. the newer the ADC the better..
unless you are going to just Exmerge over night one night?
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 6:30
Could anybody tell me where Exchange puts the logs for the diagnostic
monitoring ? I turned on SMTP Interface monitoring and would like to view
the logs.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
If I'm correct they are logged in the Application log ?
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anybody help with this ?
Could anybody tell me where Exchange puts the logs for the
I have a problem with OWA on Exchange 2000 Server.
Almost client login correctly at OWA, then the page begins
to open and internet explorer 6 crashes.
All the clients are Win2000 Prof SP4 with IE 6 SP1, and
they are updated with the latest patch from WindowsUpdate.
The event log gets the
All,
Two of us recently upgraded to Outlook 2003. I'm fine, but the other user's
mailbox seems to run like a slug. I've personally watched message opens take
40 seconds. We've backed off to Outlook XP and he has the same problem.
I've tried to open his account from my machine and I have the same
I have Exchange sever 5.5., and our naming convention is first name. last
name. There is some one who is emaiing porno to users and is going by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How can he do this with out using our naming
convention ie.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] any help would be
appreciated.
Nehatibve?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wood, Harriet
[CCS]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 3:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I would remove and reinstall IE. If that doesn't fix it, you could reimage
the machine or call Microsoft PSS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
If he sends by SMTP he can specify any return address he wants. Do you
allow relay by SMTP? Even if you have relay disabled, a user can send
from that address just by adding it to the headers of the message. You
should read and understand Internet RFCs 821 and 822, and their successors
2821 and
I am assuming negative
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Patch 2657.74 Exchange 5.5 Information Store
Nehatibve?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Whats to stop anyone from puttin in a forged return address? Nothing. Just
like postal mail I can send something to someone and place someone elses
return address on the package. It's nothing new.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
U...because he's spoofing the e-mail address and not really sending from
your e-mail servers?
The RFC's dictate that your mail server accept e-mail from
anyone...regardless of who they are or what naming convention they use.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
There are several threads dealing with the problems caused by using Outlook
2003 with an Exchange 5.5 system, complete with solutions and links to Q
articles...look them up.
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 7:45 AM
You know I had this problem at a previous company. Everything worked great
for all IE clients until John Deere updated their firewall. Then after that
they could no longer get to OWA via IE, but mozilla worked fine. Everyone
else not behind that location's firewall worked great with any browser.
When you had this problem, did you have your OWA server sitting outside the
FW in the DMZ?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA
You know I had this problem at a
I think you should contact that person and tell him to use the naming
convention like everyone else.:)
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL.C
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
My OWA was in a DMZ outside of their org. At that company we did embedded
design and programming. I had our OWA in OUR dmz not Deere's. All other
clients and facilities we worked with had no problems. Just this one
facility of Deere's was the problem. The work around was not to use IE.
The correct work around would be to not put OWA in the DMZ
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information Technologies
Microsoft Windows Server Systems - Exchange MVP
Superior Access Insurance Services
949.470.2111 x279
-Original Message-
From: Scott Weston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
It's where we put all our web servers and never had any problems until they
updated their firewall. It happened for everyone accessing ANYONE'S OWA not
just ours. So the problem wasn't on my end hence nothing I could do to solve
the issue.
I even setup a test box outside the firewall with
Scott,
The reason I asked was because I thought you worked for John Deere at the
time and that it was their OWA sitting outside the FW, that employees inside
the FW could not get to.
If that had been the case, then it was probably due to a misconfigured FW
rule that blocked on a combination of
They probably closed some of the gazillion holes OWA needs.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Weston
Sent: Friday, October
No and I am sorry for the confusion. We were contractors with onsite offices
and needed access to our exchange from behind their firewall. Deere's
rulesets were not allowing the transactions with IE and they denied any
recent changes. Funny thing is it worked prior to one weekend when they
Exactly, thus causing problems the problems we and other suppliers were
encountering. They wouldn't even allow VPN connections to remote sites
either. So we dialed into our network instead to bypass those limitations.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd love to see a list of them. The ones I've seen refer to problems on the
Server side (store crashes, etc.) which we are not experiencing.
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.TechSoftInc.com
Quiquid
I can't seem to find a 'Q' article on how to invoke this or if possible. In
OL2K and OL2K2(XP) the registry was the same except for versions (9.0 vice
10.0). Registry entries for OL2K3 are no where near what they were for the
previous versions.
Hello,
E2K: 2 Servers, same site/group, SP3+September'03 Rollup+recent
critical security patch, Scanmail 6.1, native
OS: w2K, SP4 + all critical fixes , native
The powers that be would like to move all the Servers into a new OU
Servers container in AD.
They're trying to deploy some policies
You are being Joe Jobbed.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas
Contr 911 SPTG/SC
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Bogus Email
I have Exchange sever 5.5., and our naming convention
Do they still hang people for impersonating military personnel? Can we
get tickets to watch?
--
be - MOS
The older you get, the better you realize you were.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 4:00 PM
To: Exchange
Who is this Joe Job and why won't he leave our man Thomas alone? ;)
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
We've moved all ours to different OU's. No problems at all other than having to
restart the services.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MS Exchange List
Sent: Saturday, 1 November 2003 9:05 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Move E2K
We had a semi-lengthy discussion with PSS regarding the reliability of this
fix. They told us that, given its availability, they would have known of
any problems with it by now, for whatever that's worth. We applied it to a
lab server with no problems and then started easing it into production.
42 matches
Mail list logo
