Hi all,
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows 2000 SP2
PFAdmin 1.3.0
I need some help with PFadmin to rehome public folders. Situation is the
original public folder server has a corrupt database which can't be
repaired, already come to this conclusion with PSS. We need to move all the
PF's homed on this
Hmmm doing some more digging around I notice that the attributes Home-MTA
and Home-MDB are set to the old damaged server. If the folder is already
replicated to the new server can I edit this attributes via ADSI to update
them to the new server?
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From:
We just recently went over this. The short answer was no.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?
Is anyone familiar with a backup package for
Oy.. anybody else down here in loverly Orlando??
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe:
I am moving to Exch 2003. The method is to upgrade 2k AD with adprep,
promote a 2003 member serve to a DC, install Exch 2003 on it and move the
mailboxes from the Exch 2k to the Exch 2003 server. After the upgrading to
Exch 2003 I want to remove the Exch 2k server from the network. My
question is
Then it will not create a duplicate. Instead the new SMTP address will
get bumped up to #2.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:22 PM
To: Exchange
Yes, you will have to follow the procedure for removing the first Exchange
2000 server.
Note that you do NOT have to promote your 2003 member serve to a DC if you
don't need it as a DC. In fact I wouldn't recommend it.
Having said this, we've run the upgrade Win2K to Win2K3 and E2K to E2K3
Hi all,
I have inherited an exchange 5.5 server, and a list server that is running
freebsd and qmail. The problem is when I send to the list server through
exchange it bounces my emails with the message: the recipient name is not
recognized. If I go into exchange and track the message the
Are they both using the same domain name? So when you send a message to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED], is the Exchange server also using that same domain
name?
-Original Message-
From: norbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Tell the management to work on something more important :)
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Yes they are both using the same domain.
--Norbert
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer
Are they both using the same domain name? So when you
That's why it bounces.
The listserve may be [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when you send an email to it
from Exchange, Exchange is looking at the local recipients and not seeing it
as a valid email address.
The best solution would be to have two domain names. Your Exchange should be
@domain.com and the
They actually are using different domains then, sorry about that, one is
lists.mydomain.org and the other mydomain.org. I was thinking that made
them part of the same domain.
--norbert
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04,
I completely cleared out the turftable so it should not reject anything, and
it still rejects this message.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of
Clean out the registry storage of TurfTable.
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Paramete
rs]TurfTable
An empty table is two zero byte values in a row.
QuickFix:
REGEDIT4
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Paramete
rs]
All,
First I would like to thank all who responded to my secure e-mail thread
last week. Looks like we will be looking into Tumbleweed for the possible
solution...
Now for the question. We are to a point now in our upgrade Project from 5.5
to 2000 that we are replacing our current 5.5 outbound
Um... No. Wow, that was simple, wasn't it? It looks good now. Thanks Ed!
Did you remove the replica on the 5.5 server before shutting it down?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
We have being running a single Exchange 2000 server,
hosting its own mail domain, without problems for some time.
It has been the only server in the organisation.
MX records for the mail domain point only to this E2K server.
It relays outbound smtp via a smarthost (UNIX).
We recently installed
Use the Public Folder Assistant:
Create a rule that forwards every new appointment as an attachment to a
list of people.
The receivers can drag the attached appointment item and drop it onto
their personal calendar.
Nikki
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL
I think you may need to create a SMTP connector to the new E2K3 servers
From: Alastair Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Intra Organisation message routing between established E2k server
and new E2K3
We are running Exchange 5.5 with Outlook clients. Some
of them are MAC running OS 9.x and Outlook client
2001. On occasion, when the user receives an email
formatted as html, the html does not show completely
and the parts the shows is not clickable. When he/she
forwardes it to a pc, the email
I'm planning on writing a small script to generate email notifications from schedule
items in a public folder. So I don't have to inrevent the wheel, does anyone have
something similar I can use as a starting point?
Thanks,
Erick
Would using the public folder assistant work for you?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email notifications from public folder
I'm planning on
That might work as part of a solution, but not completely. From what I gather, the
public folder assistant would allow me have an email sent out when a new item is
added, but not x days before it comes due.
The situation is where we have certain deadlines that reoccur every year. A reminder
Sounds like it could be settings on that Mac.
-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: outlook 2001 mac problem with exchange 5.5
We are running Exchange 5.5 with Outlook clients. Some
I never had issues with 2000 queue management. You need to give it time
to grow on you. It is much better than 5.5 queue management.
If you want to see messages going to a particular remote domain - right
click on that queue and Enumerate messages. Then you will be able to
sort them as well.
So far it has not grown on me... :)
I guess I am just accustomed to being able to sort all messages in the queue
- regardless of destination domain (originator, sent time).
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:39 PM
I tried your reg file and that didn't help either. I found (with google's
help) a user on a forum somewhere that ran into the same problem. He had to
restart the IS for the turftable changes to take. I can't restart the IS
right now but will try that later.
Tom
-Original Message-
You might find starting points at http://msdn.microsoft.com,
http://www.slipstick.com or http://www.cdolive.com.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I've run into this problem before, and it's far better if you can do this.
It's uglier when the server gets blown away before the replicas are removed
because Outlook hangs on to the public folder server. If you get to that
point, the easiest way to fix the problem is to refresh the Outlook
Your recipient policies think lists.mydomain.org is owned by Exchange.
Check your policies.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Quit doing brick level backup!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To:
No, the conference is next week!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 AM
To: Exchange
Ask him what kind of budget he has for developers.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Monday, November 03,
Hi,
MSX 5.5 on NT4 SP6a trying to replicate public folder with a server
matching that same description across the Internet. Seperate sites
connected using x400 (opened port x400 on both ends) and seperate NT4
domains.
The folder had stopped updating previously, so we removed the replica from
that
Ed,
I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it
would be the only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion. A
colleague of mine recently saw my posting and mentioned that he had posted
the same question and got the same response that nothing existed today.
Actually it ends tomorrow! g
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Sent: Tuesday,
Sounds like a permissions issue or possible DNS. Try putting the IP address
in the X400 connectors and see if that works.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Public folder incomplete replication
Date: Tue, 4
Hi Tony,
had a look at both servers and both of them are using IP addresses in x400
to point to each other.
You mentioned permissions, what sort of things should I be looking for in
that area?
Thanks again.
_
List posting FAQ:
One approach you might want to consider is educating your
users about the use of Personal Folders.
Then, educate yourself about all the problems you will have with
PST's... Remember, PST = bad.
themolk.
_
List posting FAQ:
40 matches
Mail list logo
