It's an ISPand stop calling me Shirley.
(Sorry, couldn't resist the Airplane reference)
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues
Who is Shirley
Are you dealing with Spam received in the Inbox of your users or 4000
NDRs per hour? The answer to this question will really tell you what
you need to do. If you are receiving 4000 messages per hour in your
user's mailboxes then you REALLY need a Spam filtering solution (we use
SurfControl's
This is slightly off-topic but I have several users who complain that
signatures are mis-formated when they leave our servers. There are
extra line breaks in them. I have been trying to track this down but
can't put my finger on it. I can't provide an example because of the
posting rules.
Any
Well said...this has gone on way too long and is making everybody
involved look bad.
Happy Holidays all,
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 6:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise
Well, some day I'd like to be a dentist. - Hermey
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
When I grow up I want to be a
If you publish OWA through ISA, all you need to open outbound to the
internet is 80 and/or 443 for OWA to function.
If you place a FE server in the DMZ you still have to open 80 and/or 443
outbound to the Internet and open 389, 3268, 88, 53, 135, 1024+ back to
your BE Exchange servers.
At least
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Posted At: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:28 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion
Conversation: OWA Design Question
Subject: RE: OWA Design Question
If you publish OWA through ISA, all you need to open outbound
I have an odd request from a user, unfortunately he is our CIO.
He would like to see OWA open messages and replies to message in a
maximized IE window. I haven't been able to find anything in the KB or
via a Google search. Has anybody tried this or know how I might be able
to do this?
Thanks,
I setup an Exchange 2003 server at home to play around with in
anticipation that we will upgrade at work. I am having a weird problem
that I can't seem to figure out.
From my computer at work (XPSP1 and IE6SP1), I am unable to reply or
forward an email. The body of the e-mail appears as a
Were you using IM on EX2000? Is there a migration tool?
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging
We are using Live Comm. Server here in a pilot
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( 425.254.4845
) 425.681.4190
2 425.793.6000
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Friday
I am wrestling with a little problem that somebody on the list might know a solution
for.
I would like to setup an Exchange 2003 server at home to play around with but my ISP
blocks port 25 inbound/outbound for everything but their mail server. I found a
couple of products that will download
another ISP.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!(tm)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( 425.254.4845
) 425.681.4190
2 425.793.6000
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Exchange
This is probably a shot in the dark but I had a user report a similar
problem. He had Outlook set to mark a message read after 2 seconds
(Tools, Options, Other, Preview Pane Options) AND had a filter on to
only show unread messages.
This cause a message to appear in his Inbox briefly then to
From the F-Secure article.
F-Secure has been able to break into this system and crack the
encryption, but currently the web address sent by the servers doesn't go
anywhere. The developers of the virus know that we could download the
program beforehand, analyse it and come up with countermeasures,
We have reached a point where we must upgrade from Backup Exec 8.6 to
Backup Exec 9.0 for the entire organization. Backup Exec 8.6 doesn't
support Windows 2003. We have 2 backup servers that perform backups.
The backup agent must be upgrade on all our servers. Sadly, this
requires the 8.6
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey,
Matthew
Sent: 13 August 2003 17:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Paperless workflow and digital signatures
I have been asked to research the possibility to use Exchange
2000/Outlook to setup a paperless workflow for certain
I have been asked to research the possibility to use Exchange
2000/Outlook to setup a paperless workflow for certain internal forms
(PO's, RFCE's, etc.). We currently have the forms saved (Word Doc) on a
common share. It is filled out, printed, and hand delivered to the
approving parties.
My
: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures
Digital Signature means key. Public key.
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
Ditto.
- Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax: 602.294.7486
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus
We do, and hourly.
: 602.294.7486
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Disable POP on multiple accounts
It can be scripted. How depends on the Exchange version in use.
On 07/10/03 17:35, Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL
I am looking for a way to disable the POP protocol on a large number of
accounts. Is there a way to do this in bulk?
- Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax: 602.294.7486
_
List posting FAQ:
Does anybody have any experience with the AutoAccept Script?
I am having a weird problem. I have about 12 conference rooms setup as
resources. 5 of the 12 conference rooms return confirmations when the
conference room is booked as a resources. The other 7 do not but will
work if you add them
Sorry, it is an Exchange 2000 server will all the latest updates and the
latest version of the AutoAccept script.
- Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax: 602.294.7486
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:28 AM
] Are all of the conference rooms on the same server?
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 1:28 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: AutoAccept Script
Subject: AutoAccept Script
Does anybody have any experience
tend to do all
software updates during an outage window if at all possible just because
one never knows when something simple will go pear shaped.
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 3:10 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation
We use the Surf Control product and have great success with it. It
(along with a lot of other products) allows us to use Reverse DNS
lookups and RBL lookups against incomming e-mail to block a lot of spam
before it even gets through the door. After it makes it through those
checks they have a
Here is my setup:
2 Exchange 2000 SP3 servers that send outbound e-mail via an SMTP relay
(SurfControl SMTP E-Mail Filter).
The Internet Mail Connector is setup to forward all outbound e-mail to
the SMTP relay server.
I am seeing messages with large attachements (1MB and larger) slow down
Here is my setup:
2 Exchange 2000 SP3 servers that send outbound e-mail via an SMTP relay
(SurfControl SMTP E-Mail Filter).
The Internet Mail Connector is setup to forward all outbound e-mail to
the SMTP relay server.
I am seeing messages with large attachements (1MB and larger) slow down
, or that it just can't
keep up with
the Exchange boxes rate of delivery.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
You have any opening there? This sounds like the kind of boss I would
*love* to work for. :-)
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
I was
Have tried deleting the computer account then trying joining the domain?
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Warren Mr DAC 5 SIG CMD
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help...exchange down
I have a 5.5
We are thinking of adding an additional Information Store to both of our
Exchange 2k SP3 servers. From what I can tell, I can either add a
second Storage Group or an addition Mailbox Store in the existing
Storage Group. What I can't find is what the pro's and con's of each
option are. Can
You don't say anything about why you think you need another
database, so
there's not much more to recommend.
Because my boss wants it. :-)
The thought was to move the VIP users (read - the accounts that are
exceptions to the rules - mailbox size, mailbox cleanup, etc.) to the
second
it. Just stating facts.
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:11 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store
Subject: RE: Second Storage Group or Additional
differentiation, so that might be the
argument there.
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:55 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store
Subject: RE: Second Storage Group
Is the other mail server having a problem?
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot send mailstuck in Que
Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
We had workstation behave like this and re-installing the TCP/IP stack
fixed the problem.
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Name could not be resolved Error
I am
Is it possible to configure OWA to open a .pdf attachment without having
to save it to the local hard drive?
- Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Look behind you.
(sorry, couldn't resist)
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TechEd
I'm here, but I don't see you anywhere!? :-)
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA,
We are in the process of planning a move of the server farm to a new
IP subnet which includes 2 Exchange 2000 servers. Aside from the
obvious issue with receiving Internet e-mail, does anybody know of any
issue with this? Has anybody successfully pulled it off?
Any advice would be appreciated,
The user can setup a Rule Wizard using the option Move messages I send
to somebody then uncheck the box to specify a user or distribution
list. Lastly, chose the folder to move it to.
Not an elegant solution but it will get the job done.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL
I also saw this during my conversion and it turned out the public folder
was either missing or had an incorrect HomeMDB attribute.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns
On the Office 2000 CD there is a separate installer for only Outlook on
the root of the CD.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and reboot.
setup. g
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:08 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 and Exchange 5.5
There is?
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
We use SurfControl's SMTP product and it works very well.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and reboot.
Order shall return.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPAM blocking software recommendations.
We are seeing more and more SPAM coming through as HTML, which eManager
will
not pick up, do these other products work at stopping HTML encoded
emails
too?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto
I ran into a bunch of this when we moved mailboxes from a 5.5 server to
an E2K server.
The most common symptom we saw was an extremely long hour class followed
by an error message when the user clicked on the other user's
mailbox/calendar/contacts. Our case was more of Admin Assistant's who
The odd thing is that those that have been hazed and complained
mightily about it, frequently appear a year or two later as some of the
harshest slammers of newbies.
This is true in a variety of settings where hazing occurs.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How long have you waited since you moved the mailbox? In our migration,
I saw similar symptoms but they would resolve themselves after
replication had the time to do its thing.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
This knowledge base article should help you out.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;256862
The key is to be patient and let replication do its work.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
When I do a NSLOOKUP on that address I get Non-existent domain.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and reboot.
Order shall return.
Otherwise known as, not your problem :-)
Unless of course you are responsible for that domain.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and
I am in the process of removing an Exchange 2000 server from my site.
This server was used to during a swing method upgrade to temporarily
hold users while we upgraded the production servers to 2000. It hasn't
had a user's mailbox on it for several weeks and currently only has 3
mailboxes that
, and reboot.
Order shall return.
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing an Exchange 2000 server
I am in the process of removing an Exchange 2000 server from my site
I would check the firewalls on both ends of the connection.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and reboot.
Order shall return.
Sign me up for the trusted web of domains.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and reboot.
Order shall return.
You will also want to use the latest service pack CD to install the ADC
service (if you have to).
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and
Our corporate policy is to disable an employee's account for 30 days
after they are no longer employed. This seems to be giving my Exchange
2000 SP3 servers a headache. The disabled accounts are causing Event Id
9548 in the application log.
Is there a best practice for how to handle accounts
I guess the questions I am asking are:
Should I be concerned with the 9548's?
Is there a better method to disable the accounts?
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns
Um...if your consultant works for MS, shouldn't he have the resources to
find out? And shouldn't that be his responsibility and not yours?
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos
In ESM, make the permission changes on the properties page of the top
folder in the hierarchy you would like modify and close the properties
page. Right-click on the public folder and choose Propagate Settings
under All Tasks, choose which setting you would like to force down the
hierarchy (in
I decide I would try searching the KB for update /forestprep then
further refined it to update.exe /forestprep and came across the
following exert from Q325316
Download the latest Exchange 2000 Service Pack. From a command prompt
at the I386\Setup folder of the service pack, run the update.exe
My Exchange servers developed an interesting problem over the weekend.
When I got to work this morning the Exchange Administrator account was
locked out. The following events are logged around the time when the
account gets locked out and I am unable to find any information in the
Knowledge Base
Sign me up. ;-)
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and reboot.
Order shall return.
-Original
My CIO would like Internet Messaging (more correctly Intranet Messaging)
setup. When I did a test install in our lab environment I got a number
of file copy errors when installing the service on an Exchange 2000 SP3
server. I am assuming that the errors are a result of SP3 being
installed. I
The workstation will let me resolve to another mailbox on system.
Is the mailbox you cannot resolve and the mailbox you can resolve on the
same servers? If they are on different servers, you could still have a
DNS issue.
- Matt Bailey
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Take it from somebody who tried it, find ANY way to upgrade your 5.5
servers to 2000 besides an in-place upgrade.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect,
domain or
address list. From another pc I can log into this box with outlook 2000
2002 etc.
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help FREE linksys wireless router
: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: martedì 4 febbraio 2003 19.03
A: Exchange Discussions
Oggetto: Global Address List problem
I recently used the swing method to upgrade 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to
Exchange 2000 SP3. The Global Address List is now displaying users
email addresses
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address List problem
Yes, the detail templates are set correctly.
The one thing I found is the recipient policy for my site is:
((mailNickname=*)(legacyExchangeDN=/O
Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address List problem
When a user opens the GAL the Email address field is populated with
/o=orgname/ou=sitename/cn=Recipients/cn=username.
I don't have any 5.5 servers in the site but I
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address List problem
I have the default config_CA agreement created when I installed my first
2000 sever into the site. The 5.5 ADC
Are you using Exchange 2000 or 5.5? Just curious because since we went
to 2000 we have had some strange problems with PST's on mapped drives.
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Global Address List problem
When a user opens the GAL the Email address field is populated with
/o=orgname/ou=sitename/cn=Recipients
: RE: Global Address List problem
That is by design.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday
I recently used the swing method to upgrade 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to
Exchange 2000 SP3. The Global Address List is now displaying users
email addresses as an x.400 address rather than the SMTP address. Users
have both a x.400 address and an SMTP address. When I go into System
Manager and
I cannot seem to find specific documentation on how you upgrade a webserver
that is only running OWA from 5.5 to 2000. Common sense tells me to pop the
Exchange 2000 CD in and run setup (followed by SP3) but I would like to see
some documentation.
Has anybody done this? Are there any pitfalls
Discussions
Subject: Re: Upgrading OWA from 5.5 to 2000
There is nothing quite analogous to 'only running OWA' in E2K, you'll want
to spend some time researching the requirements for and implications of
implementing a FE/BE topology.
On 1/17/03 12:50, Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Upgrading OWA from 5.5 to 2000
yes but not the other way around.
- Original Message -
From: Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
however install
only the OWA component for E2K, there is no 'only OWA component' for E2K.
You need to install and configure an E2K FE server.. Which means it needs to
be E2K enterprise and communicates on a variety of ports different than
5.5's OWA did.
On 1/17/03 14:27, Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL
Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Upgrading OWA from 5.5 to 2000
And between the FE server and a GC. I think the E2K FAQ lists some of those
ports.
On 1/17/03 15:06, Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL
We are currently running Surf Control's Email Filter for SMTP. It has a
robust spam filter, does virus scanning, has content filtering, and does
have the option to log messages to a SQL Database.
- Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
(602) 631-7486
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
85 matches
Mail list logo
