RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

2003-12-22 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Why not ban him? Surely there is a anti-spam filter on this list? This person seems to be interested in 'stoking' the fires of a few so confrontation may incur. Erik L. Vesneski Intel Lead - WCDC/ISO www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Greg

RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail

2003-12-13 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
reply. I find it interesting that a more 'OS agnostic' mindset is not held by all technology users. IMO you cannot change anyone but people who limit themselves I don't want to work with or try to manage. Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Intel Lead - WCDC/ISO www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail

2003-12-12 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
. You just have to pro-activly manage it, which is what you are supposed to do with any system. Anyway, just my two cents but I think Sendmail is old school. Qmail and Postfix are much better. Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Intel Lead - WCDC/ISO www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Deleting remotely from another Outlook instance

2003-12-12 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
. Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Intel Lead - WCDC/ISO www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter

SMIME/Encryption and Slow Performance on Client

2003-11-06 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
in advance, Erik L. Vesneski Intel Lead - WCDC/ISO www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter

RE: The New MS Word / VBA vulnerability in Attachments

2003-09-11 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
of an exploit Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:29 AM To: Exchange

M: Drive Removal

2003-09-09 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi, If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to ask the masses. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems

Interesting Bounce Back/NDR

2003-09-02 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
/28/2003 1:37 AM A configuration error in the e-mail system caused the message to bounce between two servers or to be forwarded between two recipients. Contact your administrator. ABV-SFO1-ACMTA6.CNET.COM #5.3.5 Thanks in advance, Erik L

OT - DNS Architecture ?

2003-08-17 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
? That is the architectural question here. Maybe I am missing something too. Anyway, I am obsessed with this. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Slightly OT - Software Management Install on Exchange Servers

2003-08-14 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
interested in what others do/have done. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http

RE: E2K and Trend Micro Server Protect

2003-08-14 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
problem and several others over the past two months. Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:11

Attachments and the Priv

2003-08-01 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
in the store as one file or is it stored as 'N' files? TIA, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http

NTBackup Account and Exchange 2k Rights/Permissions

2003-07-24 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
issue. Thank you in advance, Erik L. Vesneski Intel Lead/Systems Specialist - WCDC ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

RE: Way out in left field (Sorry)

2003-07-08 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
I ran Avvid and Unity - it is solid and no problem with Exchange. The 'Unified Messaging' concept is difficult for most end users however. Remember, the attachments take up storage space in the email mailbox. People could not grasp that for some reason... Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist

Tool For Attachments in Either Pub or Priv Store

2003-06-16 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi, Is there a tool for determining attachments and their size in either the public or private store? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Attachments Doubling in Size ?

2003-06-12 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
run into this issue before and if so what was your resolution? Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ

RE: Mail Marshall users

2003-06-12 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
You who - used it and it was great. Lot of work up front however. Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June

Mailbox Rule - Send on Behalf

2003-06-05 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
question is: Can you create a rule that works even when the email is 'sent on behalf of'? Is there a better way to do this? Perhaps this is a design problem? Has anyone else run into this issue and if so how did you work around it? Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel

RE: IBM's Tivoli Storage Manager

2003-05-27 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
You cannot restore an exchange mailbox individually however only the full store and go from there. Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Exchange Deleted Items and Retention Policy

2003-05-27 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
precedence? If that is true or not true will the server still retain all of that email for users? Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List

Clustering OWA but not IM ?

2003-04-01 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
IM in NLB white papers however I have found it in the Exchange 2k Cluster white paper. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List

Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf

2003-03-26 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
was under the impression users with 'Full Mailbox Rights' actually would be able to send as that mailbox/user. Could someone enlighten me on this one please? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

'Free/Busy' Setting in Outlook

2003-03-26 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
they get are the dreaded hash-marks. Has anyone tried increasing the value through means other than manually changing it, and if so, how did you do it? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

OWA and Timeout For Users

2003-03-26 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi all, I am just full of questions today: Is there a way to set a timeout so connections to OWA breaks? I have the connection timeout set to 900 seconds however it does not seem to be working. Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161

RE: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf

2003-03-26 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi, I am on the phone with PPS now, Premier support - woooh, and will see if they have any info. I will keep us, you, posted. Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: MS

FW: 6396.1 Super Roll-up Officially Released

2003-03-26 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hear yee yee: Here is the fix to the 811853_enu_i386.exe 'full mailbox rights' issue. Upgrade to the lastest post SP3 roll-up. A large roll-up ~24megs. Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

FW: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf

2003-03-26 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hear yee yee: Here is the fix to the 811853_enu_i386.exe 'full mailbox rights' issue. Upgrade to the lastest post SP3 roll-up. A large roll-up ~24megs. Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: 'Free/Busy' Setting in Outlook

2003-03-26 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hey, One last registry question - is there a way to 'disable' the 'send on behalf' prompt that constantly comes up when doing batch emails? If you already have 'send on behalf rights' would that work or is there a reg setting to disable it completely? Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO

RE: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf

2003-03-26 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
you should not install it. Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Full

Free RBL Filter Plugin For E2k - Or Filter

2003-03-26 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi, Anyone else doing this: http://martijnjongen.com/eng/orfilter/default.htm Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http

RE: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf

2003-03-26 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
That is exactly what I did to last week. I installed, on both of our cluster nodes, the post SP3 storage patch/fix. Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: MS Exchange List [mailto

OST Issue

2003-03-17 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
to reimport the email into the server. - What changes can be done to _not_ have this happen? Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist www.pmigroup.com Ph#: 925-685-6161 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List

RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.....

2003-03-17 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Well they should - mail uses it. Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist www.pmigroup.com Ph#: 925-685-6161 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM

Trend Micro 6.1 - OT

2003-03-17 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
' scanning feature. Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist www.pmigroup.com Ph#: 925-685-6161 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com

RE: OST Issue

2003-03-17 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
this is happening. The user, when logging on, gets a message about creating an OST or a PST file. They usually click 'OK' or 'Yes' After that, the user gets their email dumped locally on the host they are logged onto. Is this due to POP? I have never seen this before... Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski

Constant

2003-03-12 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
-- I have followed the following articles: 323728 284204 And all looks well for me however I have users still getting this NDR. Any assistance would be appreciated, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist www.pmigroup.com Ph#: 925-685-6161 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.....

2003-03-12 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
The best one I use was MailMarshall which was picked up by NetIQ. The app was awesome. Very good. Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist www.pmigroup.com Ph#: 925-685-6161 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12

Limiting Amount Of Distribution List Members

2003-02-28 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi, I have found the information for the registry edit specific to limiting the max amount of recipients for Distribution Lists however is there not a setting in Exchange 2k? If so, where is it? I cannot find it at all. Thanks, Erik Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO Intel Systems Phone:

Service Pack 3 and Schema Permissions

2003-02-20 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi, When applying SP3 for Exchange 2000 do you require schema admin permissions? Thanks, Erik Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO Intel Systems Phone: 925-658-6161 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:

Permission Changes in Public Folders

2003-02-19 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi, In ESM on Exchange 2k I want to propagate permission changes to multiple public folders and sub-folders. I thought there was a way to do this and propagate the permissions versus going through each Public Folder and manually changing the permissioning. If this propagation does exist will

Service Pack and Schema Permissions

2003-02-19 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi, When applying SP3 for Exchange 2000 do you require schema admin permissions? Thanks, Erik Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO Intel Systems Phone: 925-658-6161 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL

GAL Lost

2003-01-13 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi, It appears our GAL has been deleted and the file is not locked. In actuality it is not there. With a restore, is there a certain file(s) I need to restore and where would I place them in order to get the GAL relisted? Thanks, Erik

Objects In The Drop Down For Email-Adresses

2002-04-10 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi, When creating a new email message one presses on the 'To' button and there are multiple entries for organizations based on our Active Directory in there. Is there a way to remove all the oprganizations and sub-organizations so there is just 'recipients' or 'company name' instead of: Sales

Log on as a Service and Locally With Exchange

2002-03-12 Thread Erik L. Vesneski
Hi, With regard to the: Log on as a Service Log on Locally account rights, can a user do anything to the domain when enabled with these rights? Knowing this sometimes has to be done for OWA I wanted to find out what users might be able to do. Do these rights pose a risk when granting