Legitimate yes. Necessary - ummm. Davinda - how much space will you recover?
If you aren't planning to use the recovered space for anything else then I
wouldn't bother going through the pain. Just worrying about whether its all
going to work is enough to question the validity of doing it in the
the history, I was aiming for baby steps Not miracles!
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reinstall OWA
or even to apologize
-Original Message-
From: Stephen
If you try to ping post.demon.co.uk from the new server does the server
resolve the name to an IP address? What IP address do you get?
You may not get any responses to the ping depending on whether your
firewall permits ICMP.
-Original Message-
From: Sabi Kassim-Momodu [mailto:[EMAIL
Check out Q166300.
-Original Message-
From: Pelfrey, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 September 2001 16:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Translating Client Version numbers?!
Trying w/out luck to find anything that tells me what the Client Version
number in the Logon object
Haven't used IIS lockdown (we apply the hot fixes manually) but wouldn't be
surprised if it disables the NETBIOS ports, which means that your IIS server
will not be able to authenticate against the Exchange server. Log on to the
IIS box and make sure that you can establish a MAPI session from
Is Exchange Admin Server Properties Database Paths what you are
looking for?
-Original Message-
From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 09:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Location of Exchange components without stopping services or
runn ing
slightly puzzled
What is CACLS and XCACLS?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ian Midgley
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 6:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT 4 related question.
Probably missing a switch on Robocopy
What installation process did you use to get OWA 5.5 running on IIS5? The
way I have done this is to install a fully functional configuration on NT4
and then upgrade to W2K but this seems very longwinded. Couldn't find
anything relevant on Technet or WWW. Is there an easier method?
-Original
See if you can find out which mailboxes are growing. ExAdmin Server Priv
Mailbox Resources. File Save Window Contents to CSV. Capture hourly for
a few hours and compare. Any ideas of the account the printer was sending
reports to? If the printer is trying to connect using POP3 then it would
: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook web access
What installation process did you use to get OWA 5.5 running on IIS5? The
way I have done this is to install a fully functional configuration on NT4
. What you need to do is copy all of
the files from CD to the local drive and rename the setup file to setup.exe
(rather than srvmax or whatever it is). There is a Q article on it
somewhere.
Tris
-Original Message-
From: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 12
at least. If I find the
article, I'll let you know.
Tris
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe
-Original Message-
From: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 15:41
Is it still growing? You can monitor this by checking the free space on the
drive (Q180011) or toggling the archive bit on the file. How fast is it
growing? When you say it jumped from 5 to 16GB over what period was this?
Where did you get these estimates of store size from? Check your backup
Absolutely terrible. Heartfelt sympathy to everyone involved or close.
However I have to agree with Ben. In the UK we have been living with
terrorism for the last 30 years and while the terrorists are funded and
supplied with arms and bomb making equipment no amount of posturing will
stop them,
Guns, bombs, anger, retaliation don't solve anything. Isn't that what we
teach our children?
-Original Message-
From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 September 2001 17:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent!
Haven't seen it, and I hope that it is not
They already have a life of terror and occupation. If people don't have
hope, they have nothing to lose.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 September 2001 17:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent!
maybe they don't and that is the
Hi JF - I do a lot of work with Exchange for small companies and find that
moving them onto W2K is generally a very simple operation as they usually
are set up as a single domain and don't use DNS. Thus the general procedure
is upgrade a DC to get AD, protect this with another DC, populate the
Crazy. Try telling your IT Director no such product exists. Cna't see anyone
thinking of writing such a product anyway. Then you are into backing up
growing PSTs on multiple remote machines where users may not log out causing
open file problems, and users invariably cannot manage tape rotation.
Agreed. Could the attachments be links or shortcuts, either of would be good
practice except in this environment. Do OSTs really solve the problem though
because they'll still have to wait for everything to synchronise. But I
guess once that's happened Outlook will be much more responsive that it
I think migrating to E2K achieves this doesn't it?
-Original Message-
From: Engels PHAT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 September 2001 11:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: x400 addressing
Okay,
I understand, but is there a way to let Exchange use the smtp addressing
instead
If perfromance is not an issue (I know it's always an issue but for
arguments sake...) what would be the disadvantages of putting the logs and
stores together on the mirror?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 August 2001 19:07
To: Exchange Discussions
21 matches
Mail list logo
