RE: ADC Error

Make sure that the account you are using to connect to 5.5 is active, and also make sure that the port is configured correctly on the 5.5 side. I had this problem last week. Turned out that our 5.5 admin guy had been fiddling with ldap settings on his side, to see who would complain. Try turnin

applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster

Any thoughts/problems/suggestions associated with installing SP2 onto a 2 node exchange 2000 cluster? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster

3. Move all the VS's again (to Node 1). 4. Run update on the inactive node (Node 0), reboot when done. 5. Move all VS's to where you want them. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange

RE: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster

got sufficient permissions to install the service pack, you're good to go. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster Is it best to logon with a

free/busy info

I used to have a mailbox on 5.5, then I moved the box to an ex2000 box in the same site. When on 5.5, I could see f/b info for users on both 5.5 and 2000, now I can't see any, and I keep getting popups about the public folder not being available. The f/b public folder is on one of the 5.5 server

RE: free/busy info

tion All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Ellis Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: free/busy info I used to have a mailbox on 5.5, then I moved the box to an ex2000

RE: free/busy info

mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: free/busy info Sorry, exchange 5.5 site. Both the 5.5 server and the 2000 server in question are in the

RE: free/busy info

mpaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Ellis Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: free/busy info Creating a f/b folder replica on the 2000 se

4-way exchange 2000 clusters

Anyone got a 4-way exchange 2000 cluster? I'm looking at 2, to support worst case, 15,000 users each. 3 active/1 passive, 3 Virtual servers per cluster, therefore 5000 users per VS. 100Mb mailbox limits. Is this realistic thinking? Am also considering putting in some front end servers at some

user bandwidth requirements

I'm trying to put together some bandwidth estimates for exchange 2000, clients will be outlook 2000 and upward. I've read suggestions for light, medium and heavy users, so I averaged them to 6kbps. Is that about right? And how much extra should I add to be on the safe side? 30%? Regards, Rob

RE: user bandwidth requirements

PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Ellis Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: user bandwidth requirements I'm trying to put together some bandwidth estimates for exchange 2000, clients will be outlook 2000 and upward. I've read suggestions for light, medi

exchange 2000 databases

I've just read in a Compaq document that 'There can be only one public folder store in the cluster. After adding additional exchange resource groups, you must delete the public folder store in new groups before you bring the groups online' Reading between the lines, does this mean that I can h

RE: exchange 2000 databases

ge Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 2000 databases That's REALLY reading between the lines! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf O

loadsim for exchange 2000

I'm getting and error: ERROR: LDAP add: (CN=Cwdim0daaa UKI-WI0-SE20,OU=UKI-WI0-SE20,OU=Loadsim Users,DC=uki,DC=private,DC=ntl,DC=com) error: Unwilling To Perform When I try to create the topology. It creates the OU's, it just seems to have a problem creating the user. Any ideas? Regards, Ro

RE: Offline Address Book

I have the same problem, after having moved my mailbox to the second of 2 Exchange 2000 servers in a mixed site. It was fine on the first server, and it was fine when it was on 5.5. The 1st 2000 server is the host for the offline address book for 2000. I've got it replicating that PF to the oth

RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance

we have a 2-node active/passive exchange 2000 cluster running fine. i can fail the exchange group over, and downtime is generally around 60 seconds. We are looking at possibly going with 2 x 4-node datacenter clusters to support 20,000 exchange users. Rob -Original Message- From: "Peña

RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance

nge Fault Tolerance cool and great! At last, I can hear good news :-) Sir Robert, how long has the cluster been running (without downtime)? Did you have some difficulty? (You could share your experience off list since this topic is too general, IMHO). Thanks, -botp -Original Message-

RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster

Have you tried failing over and then installing on the (then) passive node? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-

RE: Trend Scanmail on 2-node cluster

I've installed it once on a 2 node, I don't recall having any problems like that. Could it be a permissions thing? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL

RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance

In our case it would be 10,000 users on a datacenter cluster. Running 3 active/1 passive, we end up with around 3400 users per node. By the way, I don't consider myself any kind of authority on clustering or exchange! Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Program

clustering

Just something I've been thinking about: Assume 20,000 users. Ignoring storage needs for a moment: 8 boxes of Datacenter give you 2 x 4-node clusters, 6 active, 2 passive, hosting roughly 3334 users each. (25% hot standby) 8 boxes of Advanced Server give you 4 x 2-node clusters, 4 active, 4 p

exchange 2000 DL's

Any thoughts? mail enable security groups or separate groups, put separate groups in a single OU, or have a 'DL' OU within our current 'East', 'South', 'Wales & West', 'North & Midlands' and 'Ireland' OU's? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Glob

RE: exchange 2000 DL's

nd separate out the statements a bit. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:exchange 2000 DL's An

RE: exchange 2000 DL's

are at least familiar with E2K (and I might add, several of us are on the E2K list as well), that list is dedicated to E2K issues. You may get more comments there Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailt

RE: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K

Exchange advanced tab on object in AD U&C's, mailbox permissions button. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From

RE: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K #2

ROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K #2 > > > GREAT, thank you! Now if am missing that TAb in AD U&C but have the other > three Xchange tabs any suggestions? > > - Original

RE: Suspicious files

I really hope people don't stumble on this thread and take you guys seriously! :-) Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message

RE: Suspicious files

How's luton this evening? I'm down in Hampshire. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[

RE: Suspicious files

s to be stable thank goodness. I am about to retire to the safety of my car and head home! -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College "Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings" > -Original Message- > From: Robert Ellis [mailto:

RE: Attachment Nazi

CSV? I guess XLS will do. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] S

RE: Changing service account passwords

And is also the wrong word here. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Messages with an Unreachable Destination

I've got 2 exchange 2000 servers, in 2 different physical locations, but members of the same exchange 5.5 site (mixed mode). Mail from 2000 to 5.5 within the site is flowing OK, but anything outgoing for other 5.5 sites or external addresses is sitting in 'Messages with an Unreachable Destination

RE: Messages with an Unreachable Destination

Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Messages with an Unreachable Destinati

moving mailboxes

Moving mailboxes between 2 exchange 2000 servers across the WAN, does it use SMTP or what? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The content

RE: Exchange 5.5 DL's

By public address book, if you mean an external address, you can create a custom recipient for it, and add that to the DL? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email:

RE: Exchange 2K Clustering

If you are running active/active, you should have 3 groups: In our case - 'Cluster' group, which should contain the quorum disk resource, cluster network name resource, and cluster ip address resource. 2 Exchange Virtual Server groups, (EVS1 and EVS2 in our case). Each contains a disk resource

RE: Receipts

You can turn off receipt sending at the client end using outlook XP, but its all or nothing, not recipient specific. There may be something in the rules wizard, but I've not looked. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 0125

RE: Utility that allows users manage/maintain a DL through Outloo k

You can add change the membership of a DL using the outlook client if you are set as the manager of that DL. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Internet Explorer

Saves poking around network drives trying to remember where you left it! Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From

ambiguous smtp proxy

Title: ambiguous smtp proxy An ambiguous SMTP proxy was found on 0x2 mailboxes in the DS.  The store cannot map this SMTP proxy to a unique Mailbox GUID. Anyone know how to determine which 2 mailboxes it means? Also, has anyone had any problems with users sending from 5.5 accounts to 2000

delegate access to 2000 mailbox by 5.5 mailbox

Title: delegate access to 2000 mailbox by 5.5 mailbox We have 2 users on exchange 2000, both of whom have given inbox delegate access to a 5.5 user in another site within the exchange org. The 5.5 user can open 1 users inbox, but not the other. The 2000 users have the same permissions set on

RE: delegate access to 2000 mailbox by 5.5 mailbox

ght way around but i hope you see the point.   Mark H x50668 -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 09:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: delegate access to 2000 mailbox by 5.5 mailbox We have 2 users on exchange 2000, both of w

decommissioning E2K cluster

Title: decommissioning E2K cluster Any gotcha's, etc, for turning off an E2K cluster in a mixed site? All mailboxes except system and smtp have been moved, and there are no public folders homed on the server. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes

RE: Moving 45 users between sites

Exmerge. Or there are a few 3rd party tools available. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mai

RE: Outlook Today problem

And maybe IE as well? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,

RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE

I'm here, in the UK. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: F

RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE

ouis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 November 2001 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE I'm here, in the UK. Regards, Rob Ellis

RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE

Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE Im here in the states... for some damn reason. -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WHER

RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE

sage- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE Shhh. Don't tempt the users!!! -Original Message----- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 November 2001 14:58 To:

RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE

m: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE Ditto. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message----- Fro

RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE

Nothing up. Everything normal, except my boss has just left, telling me to go home too, so I'm off til Monday Have a good weekend all! Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 7

RE: Offline Folders Unavailable

Registry - HKCU\software\microsoft\office\9.0\outlook\ost The NoOST value has to be changed. I can't remember what it needs to be. Can someone else? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fa

RE: Offline Folders Unavailable

top of my head. Do a TechNet search on NoOst to find the value... >>>-Original Message----- >>>From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:09 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Offline Folders Una

RE: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores

We have specified multiple stores in storage groups for our 2000 deployment, but as yet, we haven't decided who will go where. If you put all the payroll users on one store, you may get quite a good single instance ratio, and can set policies for those users, etc, which is good. However, if you

RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.

ADC in place? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wedne

RE: Mailbox

Ol2002 does the following, not sure about other clients: Right click outlook today, select properties. Select the home page tab, and remove the tick from the box. Then the folder displays as a normal folder. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM G