looks like a bad transaction log ...
this may help
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;301438
also may be a good time for a PSS call to MS if the above looks daunting
to you ...
Mike
850-487-7509
-Original Message-
From: Keith Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I concur with greg ... our server had those settings and we were being
used as a relay ... turned off Allow all computers which successfully
authenticate to relay, regardless of the list above. and that stopped
it ...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is possible that a user account was compromised ... but here is the
scenario I had and what worked to fix it ...
Setup:
Win2K sp4; Exch 2k sp3 ; 5000 pop3/imap/mapi/http users on a closed user
group (noted through ips in the relay tab ...) ; guest account disabled;
SMTP Virtual Server
talking dirty like that just gets me pumped up for the weekend ... yum
...
thanks for all the input (all puns intended that relate to vendor
whores)
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:35 PM
To: Exchange
Before I am chided for my lack of testing an Exchange recovery scenario
(I hope the exchange gods don't curse me with a crash for writing this
...) ... anyway chide away ... here goes ...
Infrastructure:
Windows 2000/sp4 Forest (non-native mode); 7 domains; users in 4 of the
domains; 5000 users
servers to test backup strategies.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:16 AM
To: Exchange
I have one in place ...
it has its issues but for the price it is pretty good; hasn't
crashed; has its own smtp server; handles a heavy load real well ; nice
log files; ...
documentation ; ok, but I think his english language skills make what he
is trying to get across sketchy
bayes
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262054
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Service Account Permissions
Hi All,
I was wondering if
Platform: Win2K/sp4 Exchange 2K/sp3 with 4 Vvirtual SMTP Servers that
currently send email to the internet via DNS ...
Challenge: I want to route all email sent to one specific email address
([EMAIL PROTECTED] ) through my spam server (spam.server.org) ...
It looks like I will do this with an
that doesn't perform any better than direct-attach
storage but costs a lot more.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wohlgemuth,
Mike
Hi all
We are going to be purchasing a low/mid end SAN and plan on moving our
Exchange Back End Server Storage to it ...
Comments? Things to read? Experiences? Choices of SAN?
Thanks in advance ...
Mike Wohlgemuth
To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is
how many domains?
do you have a RUS for each domain?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange 2003 ma!lbox move fa!lure
first xch 2003 server in xch 5.5 site. everything has
suggestion : make a change, go have a cup of coffee, shmooz with some
co-workers, read a journal ..
then check to see if everything is working ...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
turn on message tracking
check the headers also
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Crista Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 - Exchange 2k Error Message
Alright, new problem... now the send/receive
and people don't believe in ghosts ...
this is proof enough for me ...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error associated with deceased employee
The event log of the
why don't you just make another DNS entry so that doamin1.com and domain2.com point to
the same IP on your exchange server (assuming you own both or they are just
subdomains)..
then set up your recipient policy on Exchange to receive for your new domain
then add the SMTP address to your user
anyone else getting weird messages from internet.com concerning this
mailing list ...all in bulk ... a month old?
Mike
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu Nov 06 15:43:20 2003
Subject: internet.com
anyone else getting weird messages from internet.com concerning this
mailing list ...all in bulk ... a month old?
Mike
Asked of me by one of my admins in in a school ...
Is there any way to get a report of the last time someone has checked
their email account?
I know I could look in mailboxes in system manager ... but the mailboxes
are organized administratively and not organizationally ... so, poking
around
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: last checked report
sort by last logon date. Which version of Exchange?
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
do you suggest?
Thanks,
Robert Blomquist
Supervisor of Information Technology
Sabic Americas, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port
We have used Xwall for about a year. It is very good. It is one guy I
think. He is very responsive.
It seems like when you ask if something can be done, it gets put in the
next release ...
I think he is Austrian , so be a little careful with his choice of
good/bad english words ...
We use
The way I read the update (ver 1.1) to this patch (for my scenario,
W2K/SP4, EX2K/SP3) is I do not need to re-apply it, as the updated
version has only made changes to Exchange 5.5 part of the patch ...
(snippet from
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur
was not redone. Just the wording of the alert.
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: patch MS03-046 update clarification
The way I read the update (ver 1.1) to this patch (for my scenario,
W2K
Xwall 3.28 does allow for GAL checking ... Although I haven't tried it
yet
mike
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 5:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help! Mail Queue is all blocked up...
Since Xwall has no
can they see their mail after you append \exchange\username for their
failed login?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange digest: October 14, 2003
Hello Andrey,
system manager/recipient policies
Mike
850-487-7509
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Bulk set of primary smtp address
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov,
the way I do it (I am sure there is a better way ...???)
make the DL
do a find on everyone who is as user with a mailbox on any server
add them to the list
if you need to find ones who are not already in the list
do a find
exchange recipients
users with a mailbox on any server
go to advanced
scenario (ALL the below are done from the same EX2K administration
account on the EX2K machine in the same OU) ... the AD CA, two way
connections are in place for one OU (the OU that the following two users are
in)
Successes :
I can successfully make and use mailboxes on the 2K machine ...
service account as in the account that manages exchange OR service account
in a service that is running without permissions it needs (and if it is the
later, which service?)
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:54 AM
isn't that done in the dns records?
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Tweaking RGCs
Is there any way to tweak the amount of time (or number of retries)a Routing
Group
-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: last try? ex 5.5 ex 2k
We have an exchange 2000 server, that is part of an Ex 5.5/sp4 site .. the
domain structure is roughly (simplified) like this
NT4 domain
: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 7:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: last try? ex 5.5 ex 2k
We have all the trusts already in place (and verified) ... All the
permisiions are verified between the 5.5 servers and the 2000 server ...
Does
We have an exchange 2000 server, that is part of an Ex 5.5/sp4 site .. the
domain structure is roughly (simplified) like this
NT4 domain (NOT a child domain in our ADS forest)
Mail_Server_1(NT4/sp6, ex5.5/sp4) in site 1
Mail_Server_2(NT4/sp6, ex5.5/sp4) in site 1
2000
and it complains, shortly afterwards the
M: drive appears so when you look at it later you can browse the files and
folders.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 February 2002 12:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems
Hi ...
Here is what we have done ...
-run forestprep at the top level of our forest as schema admin, domain admin
-run domainprep in the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000
server as domain admin of the respective domains
-establish 2 way trusts between the NT4 domain and the
... Look in the event log and see if
EXIFS is loading. If not, try to figure out why.
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems
Hi ...
Here is what we
school district ...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: moving mailbox -- help
Who is Leon?
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
we have successfully installed a win2000 server in our Exchange 5.5 site.
Everything is working fine, however when we go to move mailboxes from any
exchange 5.5, the process dies with the error that we need to retart
Information store services (which we have done several times ) we tried
here is the specific error I get when I try to move a mailbox between from
an Ex 5.5 server to an Exchange 2000 server in the same site using AD Users
...
Error: Preparing mailbox to be moved.
CN=cam2\,
quick,OU=users,OU=ARC,DC=schools,DC=dist,DC=leon,DC=k12,DC=fl,DC=us:
An internal processing
We have an Exchange 5.5, SP4, NT4 site that we want to join a WIn2k,
Exchange 2000 server to (from a different domain) We have run forestprep
(successfully), domainprep(successfully), installed ADC (successfully) but
we are not allowed to make a CA.
We have tried with numerous accounts (the
Hi all
I am running an Exchange 5.5 site (sp4) on NT4 (sp6) . My OWA server is a
W2K (sp2) with only OWA (sp4) installed.
After I first install my OWA server, it runs great! Then something happens
(the network goes down, I install a hotfix, or it just breaks ... it has
happened 3 times
Used it a couple of times ... it is basically a mail handler/organizer (not
a virus scanner)
-Original Message-
From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Procmail
Beside being free and running on Unix
there.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 3:58 PM
Subject: Custom Message for Distribution List
I have a distribution list on a Exchange 5.5 (sp4) (NT 4/sp6a) server.
I would like each
I have a distribution list on a Exchange 5.5 (sp4) (NT 4/sp6a) server.
I would like each member to receive the same generic message, but customized
for each individual user ( Dear Tom, message1 Dear Betsy, message1
etc)
Could someone point me in a direction of where to start?
Thanks
45 matches
Mail list logo
