That's a great question. I don't know the answer, though. It'd be nice to
hear what happens - please report back when you complete your testing!
- Original Message -
From: Miller, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:21 PM
The move mailbox method would be my recommendation. No extended downtime,
no risk to the current environment.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 9:43 AM
Subject: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Gosh, Greg, it's so nice to know that we can rely on you to stir up this
conversation every six months or so so that the new folks will get to know a
little history of the list.
Anyway, this whole diatribe was started because Ed admitted that he's a
vendor whore. What I'm not understanding is
That's what transaction logs are for. If you lost the edb, you can still
recover to the latest mail with the logs. if you lose the logs, you have
the current copy of the priv.
- Original Message -
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I sent the Exchange 4 client offline.
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:28 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi
Tried profman2. doesn't create a profile. I do NOT want outlook.
I believe that is how it works.
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:18 PM
Subject: Degrag (ESEUTIL) and retention time
Hi
My customer ex 55 has reached the 16 Gb Limit
If now
Full backups daily. Anything else is a PITA to restore. If you don't have
the tape (or the time) to do this, a full on a weekly basis and a daily
incremental is the least sucky alternative.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Full backups daily. Anything else is a PITA to restore. If you don't have
the tape (or the time) to do this, a full on a weekly basis and a daily
differential is the least sucky alternative. Make sure you have the disk
space available to support a week's worth of transaction log files.
Missy
yes
- Original Message -
From: Guy Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:13 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IS has reached the 16GB limit
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=185457
I want to do an eseutil to defragment the IS,
What size disks are you using? Sounds like they must be pretty small.
The only way to make these files smaller is to take them offline and run
eseutil on them - there should be 1221 events in your application event logs
that will tell you how much white space you can reclaim by running the
Full? Do you mean near their limit?
I'd imagine that Message Stats from Quest could help you do this quite
nicely.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Scribner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:31 AM
Subject: Finding full
This is by design. I don't believe that there's a fix.
Have you tried IMAP instead of POP? That should resolve this issue, kinda -
any messages that aren't marked as read in the IMAP client should remain
marked as unread.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Sean Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I sent him a copy offline.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 8:55 PM
Subject: RE: need Exchange client
You still need it? I can send it to tomorrow when I get to work let me know
offline.
My understanding is that an open session remains open and that disabling the
account will not impact that session.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Force [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 9:11 AM
Subject: Permission Issue?
Windows
his workstation though.
Scott...the only thing I can think of, is that you have changed the default
refresh value for the DC's from 15 minutes to over an hour.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Search TechNet for hijack dhcp and you should find some interesting stuff.
BTW, The Key School is an excellent school. Good gig - and I'd maim to be
able to have that commute (assuming you live near/in Annapolis!)
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Dickenson, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
problem with other users' calendars
Subject: Re: Time sync problem with other users' calendars
No, these are all set to GMT which is correct.
Subject: Re: Time sync problem with other users' calendars
From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:43:01 -0400
X-Message-Number
Yup. While you might consider a separate array for the second SG for better
performance, it will run without having one.
missy
- Original Message -
From: Pham, Tuan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:12 AM
Subject: Second Storage
Daylight savings time settings on the machines.
- Original Message -
From: Tim Gowen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:44 AM
Subject: Time sync problem with other users' calendars
When one of our PAs puts an appointment into
Do users have log on locally permissions on the OWA server? If not, they
need them.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Johnny Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: OWA permissions
Hi all,
I just reinstalled
That was the problem. Thanks guys!
Johnny
PS. Wow, Missy you are still on this list? What's it been 3 years? :)
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA permissions
Do users have log on locally
Also, a simple thing to do is to take offline backups of the IS (priv and
pub) and the transaction log files so that you can easily restore them
(without losing any data), should the database move fail.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Think smtp address instead of UPN and it isn't.
- Original Message -
From: Woods, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: OWA Error
Hi,
I've tried that as well and still no go. Isn't UPN just for 2000?
Cheers,
I would not do a defrag without a backup. Restart the store, take a full
backup, and wait to see what happens.
What's your online maintenance schedule look like?
- Original Message -
From: Joe Haines [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22,
Well, internet.com bought them, then they RIF'ed Stephen Wynkoop (the
swynk in swynk), and then they pretty much botched the list entirely. I
think it's still running only because they've forgotten about its existence!
- Original Message -
From: Shotton Jolyon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
5.5. I know what you're
saying but can this be setup for 5.5? I hadn't read anything that said it
could...
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA Error
Think smtp address
.
Where do people go now instead? I particularly used to use swynk for their
SMS coverage and I may soon be getting back into this area.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 July 2003 17:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Routine Maintenance
Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:
80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASPNoWebContent=1 documents this
- Original Message -
From: Rosales, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and
mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow? What other points can be
brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information
store or Mailboxes?
Any help is appreciated!
Thanks,
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Missy
points can be
brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information
store or Mailboxes?
Any help is appreciated!
Thanks,
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re
Why bother with them?
- Original Message -
From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:35 PM
Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance
You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them.
They take a long time.
LOL. I think it's hysterical.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:16 PM
Subject: FW: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
I know we discussed this at length before - I
It's been a while since I've seen a good mail loop. :)
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
No need to 'bump' someone
Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from
the desktop?
- Original Message -
From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Just started this
]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic
logging to maximum.
Yes I can rpcping the server.
- Original Message -
From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
exception 0x6ba. The server is
unavailable.
- Original Message -
From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach
The store is designed to use DBA, which will consume all of the memory
available.
What's in your event logs when the IMS shuts down?
- Original Message -
From: Mark Pouncey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 2:32 PM
Subject: Store.exe
2000? hmmm...
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: MS Purchase
Exchange 2000 RTM.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Users should be able to connect from any site. This assumes a normal
configuration.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Chakravarty, Sakti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 9:24 PM
Subject: OWA config (revisited)
Hi all,
I know this
How could you not know this? I think there are some details missing.
Simple answer: Open the profile you used and see what's there.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Manner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:46 AM
Subject:
an issue with the rule
working
thx
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange Rules
How could you not know this? I think there are some details missing.
Simple answer: Open
This is by design. LOL.
- Original Message -
From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:15 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item
We just remove an old exchange 5.5 box and when we
Use cleansweep from the Back Office Resource Kit (I forget which one...)
- Original Message -
From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:32 PM
Subject: Now I get this error. Inbox Assistant.
Now I get this
What's the encoding look like on the client?
That's a WAG, BTW.
- Original Message -
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:40 PM
Subject: SMTP connector issue
Exchange 2k SP3
Finally, I got an event on this.
Don't bother keeping the same server name. Really. Trust me. Check out
the Exchange FAQs at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm for more
info.
Missy Koslosky
Exchange MVP
- Original Message -
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
The best workaround is to remove as much stuff as possible from the profile.
But that also means that you won't have all the stuff your users want.
Seriously, there's no good workaround.
Missy Koslosky
Exchange MVP
- Original Message -
From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Are you sure you're doing a NORMAL or FULL backup, instead of a COPY?
And you're checking the dates on the logs, right?
- Original Message -
From: Ashraph, Elizabeth A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:15 AM
Subject: RE: Trans
The simplest way to do this, IIRC, is to add email addresses as a column
when you're viewing the Recipients container (or the GAL) from Admin. You
can do a File | Save Window Contents As... (or something like that - I don't
have Admin here) and dump that to a csv.
Missy
- Original Message
Do you mean change the delivery point in Outlook from a PST to the mailbox
itself?
If so, no, I do not know of a way to change this programmatically. Would be
nice, though.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I've never seen a reason to set these to anything but the defaults.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Tim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:28 PM
Subject: Undeliverable Reattempt Period at SMTP Gateway
A survey:
How many
Yup. That or Outlook rules are about your only choices, Samir.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: Alternative to UNIX procmail in Exchange
write your own
And the yellow bar worries you? Exchange can handle a huge queue quite
nicely. Ignore the queues unless nothing (and I do mean nothing) is moving.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22,
It is silently dropped.
- Original Message -
From: Morgan, Joshua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:20 PM
Subject: DL Question
What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members?
TIA,
Joshua
Joshua
MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
What permissions do you have? You need at least view only on the site
configuration containers on the 5.5 side.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Callan, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:11 PM
Subject: Joining Site
There's no allowed number of connections, per se, but IIS starts crapping
out after about 200 concurrent OWA sessions.
I don't have a specific reference for this, but I did some extensive testing
on this a couple years ago, and this was what we found.
Missy
- Original Message -
From:
You cannot.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Weatherly, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:03 PM
Subject: OWA and Apache
Ok sorry if this is an ignorant question but,
Situation:
1 public IP
1 Windows 2000 server in DMZ
Use the track message tool in Admin (if 5.5) or the Message Tracking Center
in ESM (if E2K).
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Alex Alborzfard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:57 PM
Subject: RE: Weird bounced message
I
Use Deleted Items retention to restore it. Make sure that the
DumpsterAlwaysOn registry key (search TechNet for info) has been applied
to her workstation so you can restore it from there - and show her how to
recover it so you needn't visit next time she screws up.
Missy
- Original Message
, cool,
collected type). This leads me to two questions:
Isn't this a migration issue?
How have other people dealt with this?
- Original Message -
From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8
-
From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL
It is indeed a migration issue. It's dealt with by going through the 5.5
directory and identifying mailboxes that are owned
You cannot.
- Original Message -
From: CHRIS H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:32 AM
Subject: Exchange 2000 Features
Does anyone know if in Exchange 2000 you can turn on/off OOO
replies/autoresponders to the internet on
There's no way to do this without rewriting code. Good request, though.
Have you tried sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Chris Levis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: Exch2000
I promise that posting the same question using two different accounts will
not make the answer to your question show up twice as fast.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:02 AM
Subject: Meeting
There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it
nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Karen McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM
: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA
Missy, when you say doesn't do it nicely, does that imply that
it does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost?
- Karen
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote:
There aren't any real best practices
Just one.
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:30 PM
Subject: RE: sp3 revisited
Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :)
-Original Message-
From:
of money they are asking for it.
Cheers,
Karen
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote:
I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange works with its
transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing this
simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems
Google.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:26 PM
Subject: RE: recommendation please
Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper.
-Original Message-
From: Leo
of money they are asking for it.
Cheers,
Karen
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote:
I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange
works with
its transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing
this simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems
Before? It's posted daily.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:35 AM
Subject: filtering e-mail
Exchange5.5
WinNT4 sp6
Inoculate IT
I know this have been posted before but can someone
The white space will be available after an online defrag is run, it simply
won't show up as space on the disk itself.
- Original Message -
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange
for this answer.
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: filtering e-mail
Before? It's posted daily.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
You need to lock down top-level PF creation. Q256131
- Original Message -
From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:33 AM
Subject: Public Folders
Here's a nasty one. Employing E2K turns on public folders. We had
Recover deleted items should work if you have it enabled. There's a Q
article on how to do this for a PF.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Aamir Hanif [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:33 AM
Subject: Recovering Deleted
you are backing up mailboxes, not the information stores. Check your
documentation, or see the FAQ.
- Original Message -
From: paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: backup failure
Hi,
My backup have failed
What is the domain name that's having issues? That's the simplest way to
get this sorted out!
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 5:56 PM
Subject: MS Exchange 5.5
I'm having problems with my
I'd export the directory, gather the names of users that have HR in the
appropriate field, and import those names appropriately to remove them from
the DL's.
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002
Standard does not allow for multiple private information stores.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel L. Miller
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:09 PM
Subject: RE: Stores
Correct
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
There's a basic article on telnet use in TechNet. Have you looked there?
- Original Message -
From: Daniel L. Miller
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:32 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP
nslookup
set q=mx
amfes.com
finds mx records and ip address
How do I
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fw: Stores
Standard does not allow for multiple private information stores.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel L. Miller
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday
What do you see in the smtp logs?
- Original Message -
From: Daniel L. Miller
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:17 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP
The problem is that it's not just this address. I'm sending to my own
amfes.com address because it's easy to test
Standard will do it, but if you have a lot of RAM in the box, Advanced
Server plays more nicely with E2K (both standard enterprise).
- Original Message -
From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:24 PM
Subject: FW:
Ignore them. They'll eventually time out and disappear from the queues -
they're NDR messages. If you cannot cannot cannot make yourself ignore
them, whack 'em.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
a... Deckler's back. It's been a long time...
- Original Message -
From: Rob Hackney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:49 AM
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email
snip Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers.
I'd leave well enough alone and leave 'em all in one SG. Your server's
going to be hurting no matter what, but the KISS principle comes into play
here.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Bob Chyka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002
What's your number?
- Original Message -
From: Stevens, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:45 PM
Subject: The infamous Invalid data in message
This subject has reared it's ugly head once again. There is very little
data in message
missy..what number do you speak of?
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: The infamous Invalid data in message
What's your number?
- Original Message -
From
net stop msexchangesa
- Original Message -
From: Albert Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:35 PM
Subject: Stop System attendant
Hi there. I'm running Exchange 2000 and I have a question.
For maintenance purpose, I need
Exmerge.
- Original Message -
From: Tiresias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:46 PM
Subject: Need to scan a backup for specific information
What's the best way to scan a restored backup for specific text (that might
be present
Or not. Dain bread here.
- Original Message -
From: missy koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: Need to scan a backup for specific information
Exmerge.
- Original Message -
From: Tiresias [EMAIL
groupshield sucks. sybari doesn't. simple.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:06 PM
Subject: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari
I see one big differnce in the apps on paper. Sybari utilizies 4
IIRC, you need to manually create it.
M
- Original Message -
From: RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 5:20 PM
Subject: RE: Turf directory
That makes a lot of sense. Thanks. However, I have noticed that despite
setting the
Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Turf directory
IIRC, you need to manually create it.
M
- Original Message -
From: RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED
For 25 users? How much disk space do you have? 9 GB?
Really... if there's no absolute need for quotas, bag the idea.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 9:18 AM
Subject: Unlimited
Silly thought: Why not just change the display names for the ORG and
SITE instead of jumping though hoops?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Kulwinder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 5:13 AM
Subject: RE: Change site and
Per 1, I'm completely acronym impaired. And that was what, four years
ago?
Talk about dead dogs.
Just call me short and mousey, why don'tcha?
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:23 AM
They go into the air. Boom. Gone. :)
- Original Message -
From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:10 AM
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
Now to get that Woodruff guy really pissed
it to illustrate a point. I think the fact that you're
acronym impaired, yet otherwise so knowledgeable about Exchange (and
many,
many other things) was quite illustrative.
Re: Short and mousey.. that was what, 3 years ago? Talk about intensely
funny.
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky
Will Robinson, silly.
- Original Message -
From: Baker, Jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: Email Problems
Danger will roger!
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
1 - 100 of 378 matches
Mail list logo