Dupler, Craig
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Catch me in the right mood and maybe I will do a data dump for you . . .
-Original Message-----
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon
ED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
>
>
> I just heard back from one of my contacts at Microsoft. He
> said that he
> can't comment on it. But he did say that there a
what's a "microsoft"..?
-rdg
Motto: "With Felicity, who misses Tener?"
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging
ns
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Why are giving her such a hard time?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collabora
I believe it falls under something like... "Because he can" :o)
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Why are giving her su
Why are giving her such a hard time?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I just heard back from on
riginal Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Aren't the people who actually know the answer are under some Non-disclosure
type agreement, so any
#x27;t those
be nice things to have?
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I just heard back from one of my contacts at Microsoft. He
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 5:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I know that, I was making a dumb joke about the fact that SQL Server
will be providing the next database engine for the n
You made my day, Ed ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 5:58 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
>
> Gee, thanks for the insight! That c
I just heard back from one of my contacts at the and they said you were a Troll.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I just h
Maybe they will let you borrow one of their gags.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I am still waiting to hear from some o
gt; hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Me
: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
I just heard back from one of my contacts at Microsoft. He said that he
can't comment on it. But he did say that there are some wild theories
out there. "Some are
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Siegfried
Weber
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Sadly enough, true. Conclusion: unless it is a released product there is
nothing you can really rely on, even a pres
e is
> nothing you can really rely on, even a press announcement.
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:38 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Messaging &
gt; Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
>
> At ATE 2 years ago, we spent a lot of time answering questions about
the
> amazing E2K WebDav features in Outlook 2002 based on the presentations
> given
> there eh Sig? I don't exactly trust things I read
Message-
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:25 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
>
>
> From the http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html:
>
>
quot;A Fan of Craig Dupler's famous Data Dumps"
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Catch me in the right mood and maybe I
an we now get back to our daily work and stop feeding the rumor mill?
> -Original Message-
> From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging
2 2:21 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
> >=20
> > I know that, I was making a dumb joke about the fact that SQL Server
> will
> > be providing the next database engine for the next version of
> Excha
But will it warm the syrup for my waffles?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
But,but! The magazine on the plane said that the
But,but! The magazine on the plane said that the next version will be SQL
based and wireless! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messa
.
> -Original Message-
> From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:21 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
>
> I know that, I was making a dumb joke about the fact that SQL S
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:05 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
>
>
> Unified
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite directions.
One from Americans with Di
gt; Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
>
> Unified Messaging is faceing pressures from two opposite directions.
One
> from Americans with Disabilities Act which requires greater richness -
ie
> text to voice, braille, etc, and at the opposite pole - greater
ial-tone availability :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 00:13
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
>
>
> Catch me in th
Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Catch me in the right mood and maybe I will do a data dump for you . . .
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging & collaboration (Unifie
Gary's so amusing when he tries to be nice.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
That's the "POLITEST"
That's the "POLITEST" you could come up with???
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
The POLITEST response I can
The POLITEST response I can think of is "go and use Google".
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Iam looking for information on
www.mail-resources.com | weblinks for some vendors... Their propaganda is
staggering on why you need it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 3:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Messaging & col
|
| cc:
ahem.. never mind..
http://www.microsoft.com/MSCorp/corpevents/mec2002/default.asp
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)
..and concurrent to this thread:
an
..and concurrent to this thread:
anyone catch any scuttlebutt on the venue for the next conference?
(cue Chris)
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging & collaboration (Uni
Iam looking for information on:
1. Messaging & Collaboration
2. Unified Messaging
The type of information I am looking for is on:
1. Why it is happening (who it is for)
2. Who is making it happening (vendors)
3. How is it happening (solutions)
Looking for Articles? Consortiums?
Note: I've got
37 matches
Mail list logo
