ty
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:35 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
>
>
> Having spent 17 long years in the utility indu
Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
Potentially. However, you're not blessed with Bellsouth. The
deregulation rules specify copper lines have to be deregulated, so they
ran fibre to each neighborhoods. Since most of metro Atlanta is
connected via slicks or significantly backh
e@;pacbell.net]
> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 11:14 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
>
>
> To the contrary, local competition in the telephone service
> has probably
> facilitated availability of DSL much faster than w
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
> get into. Regardless you can argue the fact that more competition only
> creates better products
That's not a hard and fast economics law, Hummert. All one has to do
om: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 5:43 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
>
>
> You can argue yes and no to that. But that's something I'm
> not going to
> g
harff
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
There's plenty of competition today to Exchange which provides
significantly more groupware functionality than "openexchange". Some of
it even runs on *nix.
und to it
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 12:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
>
&g
But when have facts worried a lienux zealot?
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com]
> Sent: 06 November 2002 20:04
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
>
>
> It's not
-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
It's not "open" and it's certainly not Exchange.
> -Original Message-
&
business/openexchange/index.
> ht
> ml
>
> Tony McCullough
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet@;kimball.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 7:09 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group t
's a "best of both worlds"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 7:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
Here's my take
ember 06, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
SuSE's OpenExchange server product sounds like a close replacement for a
Windows e-mail/collabaration server:
http://www.suse.com/us/business/products/suse_business/openexchange/index.
when applied in
> the appropriate environment - that is a small company (5-15 employees)
> needing at least file-sharing and Exchange and with no resident system
> admin.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg@;infonition.com]
>
use_business/openexchange/index.ht
ml
Tony McCullough
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet@;kimball.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 7:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
Here's my take:
A quick peek
th no resident system
> admin.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg@;infonition.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:55 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
>
>
aring and Exchange and with no resident system
admin.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg@;infonition.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
Thought long and hard about letting this go, but wh
erver alone!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg@;infonition.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 1:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
>
>
> Well, the easiest way to do this is to insta
employees) could never afford to buy Win2k, E2K,
> and ISA server, let alone SQLServer. SBS gives them all this for the price
> of Win2K server alone!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg@;infonition.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 1:22 PM
&
hange Discussions
Subject: Re: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
Well, the easiest way to do this is to install another E2K server and simply
move the mailboxes to the new server. Now, the only thing that might throw a
wrench into this for you is running sbs2k. And, I have repeatedly stated
thi
Well, the easiest way to do this is to install another E2K server and
simply move the mailboxes to the new server. Now, the only thing that
might throw a wrench into this for you is running sbs2k. And, I have
repeatedly stated this and let me go on record as stating that SBS is a
terrible product t
Exchange is working fine on the server its just that the raid set on this
dodgy ibm server keeps going critical after a reboot(keep getting the
runaround from ibm) and we want the customer to purchase a better server but
there is a lot of mail stored on it and i was just wondering how easy/hard
wou
Can you start the store on the suspect server.
- Original Message -
From: "Damian Coughlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:42 AM
Subject: Moving E2k storage group to new Server.
>
Can anyone give me some guidance on moving the storage group off a SBS2000
server and moving it to a new install of exchange2k on another server.This
is down to a hardware problem with the server that sbs2k is sitting on.
Any help would be much appreciated.
___
23 matches
Mail list logo
