]
Subject: Server hardware specs for E2K3 (WAS: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Wi
n2003 Domain?)
I guess the question about is it worth the money was more hypothetical.
I've since gotten an updated price of $370, which IS worth it to me.
As far as hardware goes, I'm looking for a general should
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server hardware specs for E2K3 (WAS: E2K
Forest/Domain-prep on Wi n2003 Domain?)
Gosh, some companies are truly humorless, aren't they...
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:14
Hi guys,
I'm getting ready to add a Windows 2003 DC to my Win2k AD network,
which will eventually be an all Win2k3 AD domain. However, I'm also
planning an Exchange 2000 upgrade in a matter of weeks. My question is,
will I be able to run Forestprep and Domainprep against the Win2k3 AD?
Discussions
Subject: Re: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain?
IMNSHO upgrading to W2K at this point is a waste of time. If you're going to
upgrade, upgrade to E2K3. It greatly simplifies the upgrade process from
Exchange 5.5 and offers a number of significant enhancement which make it a
much more
Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server hardware specs for E2K3 (WAS: E2K
Forest/Domain-prep on Wi n2003 Domain?)
No SearchBastard for me
for E2K3 (WAS: E2K Forest/Domain-prep
on Wi n2003 Domain?)
Hmm... I'm all distracted trying to figure out this google thing. Who
knew
there was any other search engine on the planet beyond
www.searchbastard.com? Why would anyone bother?
Dual proc would help, but bumping up the RAM would probably help
, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain?
The hardware requirements for E2K3 vs E2K are generally equivalent, whether
that hardware is sufficient for you org is not really something I can say
with any degree of certainty. It meets the minimum
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:29:31 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain?
Hi guys,
I'm getting ready to add a Windows 2003 DC to my Win2k AD network,
which
Gosh, some companies are truly humorless, aren't they...
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server hardware specs for E2K3 (WAS: E2K Forest/Domain-prep
on Wi n2003 Domain
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain?
I have considered that, however we have Exchange 2000 EE free as part of an
upgrade advantage purchased with Exchange 5.5 EE. Upgrading to E2K3 EE
would cost me upwards of $1000. Is it worth
Im My Not So Humble Opinion.
- Original Message -
From: Dickenson, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM
Subject: RE: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain?
I have considered that, however we have Exchange 2000 EE
I'm reading the Six step Case Scenario from Microsoft dated June 2002, and
in it they mention that it is important to install the ADC before I run
Forest Prep for coexistence with 5.5. Now I was told by a 3rd party vendor
to run forest prep first and also this is the only place that I've seen
( )
( ) ) /
\ ( (_/
\_)
Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation
we are all Downwinder's...
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
I'm reading the Six
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Strongosky
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
Ignore this questionsorry found answer in another book
So you do have to run ADC first before forest prep?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March/06/2003 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
And that answer is that you must run ADC, no choice here, if you
: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
So you do have to run ADC first before forest prep?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March/06/2003 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
And that answer is that you
Thank you. That's what I thought. Someone here doesn't believe that.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March/06/2003 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
Isn't that what I said? Let me rephrase:
You
Tell Hanji he's wrong.
- Original Message -
From: Fabrig, Amado [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:24 PM
Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
Thank you. That's what I thought. Someone here doesn't believe
] On Behalf Of Fabrig, Amado
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
Thank you. That's what I thought. Someone here doesn't believe that.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March/06
It was mentioned on this list but I do not remember. When you use setup to
use ForestPrep and DomainPrep option, it was mentioned that you use the
version from the latest SP for Exchange 2000. Is this true? If so is more
for the Forest Prep or Domain Prep
I always use the Exchange CD for the preps and then install the SP. No
troubles.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forestprep Domain Prep
, and reboot.
Order shall return.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forestprep Domain Prep
I always use the Exchange CD for the preps
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forestprep Domain Prep
It was mentioned on this list but I do not remember. When you use setup to
use ForestPrep and DomainPrep option, it was mentioned that you use the
version from the latest SP for Exchange 2000
]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 6:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forestprep Domain Prep
It was mentioned on this list but I do not remember. When you use setup
to
use ForestPrep and DomainPrep option, it was mentioned that you use the
version from the latest SP
Prep
It was mentioned on this list but I do not remember. When you use setup
to
use ForestPrep and DomainPrep option, it was mentioned that you use the
version from the latest SP for Exchange 2000. Is this true? If so is
more
for the Forest Prep or Domain Prep
: Forestprep Domain Prep
It was mentioned on this list but I do not remember. When you use setup
to
use ForestPrep and DomainPrep option, it was mentioned that you use the
version from the latest SP for Exchange 2000. Is this true? If so is
more
for the Forest Prep or Domain Prep
reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and reboot.
Order shall return.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forestprep Domain Prep
Ed
19, 2003 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forestprep Domain Prep
Sorry if this shows twice.
Ed,
Where is this documented. Working withj a consultant with MS. He never
heard
of this and could find anything on the Knowledge base. Also looked on
the
release notes for the SP's
, February 19, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forestprep Domain Prep
Ed
Can you point to a article on that. I am working with a consultant from
MS
and he says he never heard of that. He looked for a reference to that
procedure, but could not find anything.
You should
continuing.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forestprep Domain Prep
That's just it. He couldn't find any reference to it. Just wondering where
Ed got the info?
Um
.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forestprep Domain Prep
That's just it. He couldn't find any reference to it. Just wondering
where
Ed got the info?
Um
: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forestprep Domain Prep
That's just it. He couldn't find any reference to it. Just wondering
where
Ed got the info?
Um...if your consultant works for MS, shouldn't he have the resources
to find out
, January 07, 2003 11:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Right, the one from the SP3 CD. And also from the same CD
later you'll
want to run:
update.exe /ForestPrep
and
update.exe /DomainPrep
as opposed from running it from the RTM CD.
Ed
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 08 January 2003 12:01
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Subject: RE: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
So there are updates to the schema in SP3?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr
As step one of a 5.5 to E2K upgrade I'm looking to install the ADC. From
what I've read the ADC I want to use is the Exchange ADC, not the windows
ADC. Just to clarify though, it's the ADC that came with E2K being installed
on 5.5, right? I can find no ADC on the 5.5 CD, and that makes sense since
Use the ADC on the latest SP for E2K.
- Original Message -
From: Walden H. Leverich III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 10:47 AM
Subject: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
As step one of a 5.5 to E2K upgrade I'm looking to install
in Latin seems profound.)
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Before you setup any connection agreements, read, re-read and then
re-re-read
problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Use the ADC on the latest SP for E2K.
- Original Message -
From
Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:07 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Subject: Re: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Use the ADC on the latest SP for E2K.
- Original Message -
From: Walden H
!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Newell
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forest prep question.
Hello,
I am running forestprep on a test domain and I am wondering when to use
the new site or join
Hello,
I am running forestprep on a test domain and I am wondering when to use the
new site or join an existing site. I have an exchange 5.5 server in place
that I am doing an in place upgrade on to E2K so I already have an existing
site but this site is not in the Active Directory. I'm not sure
Subject: Forest prep question.
Hello,
I am running forestprep on a test domain and I am wondering when to use
the
new site or join an existing site. I have an exchange 5.5 server in place
that I am doing an in place upgrade on to E2K so I already have an
existing
site but this site
Do you have an ADC in place yet?
On 1/2/03 17:48, Mike Newell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am running forestprep on a test domain and I am wondering when to use the
new site or join an existing site. I have an exchange 5.5 server in place
that I am doing an in place upgrade on to E2K
Yes, a two way connection is setup and seems to be working.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Re: Forest prep question.
Do you have an ADC in place yet?
On 1/2
Explain what you are doing to view this object, e.g. what are you using?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 11 July 2002 01:01
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Forest Prep and Schema Object
Subject: Forest Prep and Schema Object
I
I have one forest and one domain.
I have run ForestPrep waited and then run DomainPrep, with no errors.
However when I try to manually look at the below object
cn=ms-Exch-Schema-Version-Pt, cn=schema, cn=configuration, dc= my domain
to see that replication has occurred on any of the DCs
miss another security setting some where. If I get this resolved looks
like we are set!!!
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 4:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep
Well, whadja go deleting the GAL
Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
No, can't install exchange until these are run in your AD forest/domain.
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forests prep domain prep
Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed
Sure.
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forests prep domain prep
Can these be run after exchange 2k is installed
OK so if I successfully installed exchange these ran automatically!!
-Original Message-
From: Schneider, Bryan D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep
No, can't install exchange until
Thanks Chris can I email you off list?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep
Sure.
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
are
replicated to all DCs and then run domainprep and Exchange server setup.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep
OK so if I successfully installed
Sure.
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep
Thanks Chris can I email you off list?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
there are no names in
address global list for each OU??? What did I miss or screw up?!!
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep
If you don't run them prior
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, May 09, 2002 01:05 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Forests prep domain prep
Subject: RE: Forests prep domain prep
OK, here's what I'm trying to do. Installed win 2k advance
server sp2. Exchange ENT 2k sp2. Went through
I was thinking more about Coyote's 100 reasons not to upgrade to E2k.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
I think he said if Exchange 5.5 was cruel, E2K was downright
--
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:42 AM
Subject: RE: Prep
I was thinking more about Coyote's 100 reasons not to upgrade to E2k.
-Original Message-
From
Chung Tonight
Where the heck is Ed?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 3:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Prep
I think I have saved that one somewhere. Some of the issues where solved in
released Service Packs
I concur...
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 4:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Kids are sick, so I am up all night and now I am at work ;(
Yea, I know some of things have been resolved, but I'm just kind
Me no worky now
Me go Palm Springs today bitch
Yes you are my bitch
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 4:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Kids are sick, so I am up all night and now I am at work ;(
Yea, I know
OOh
Tough crowd today.
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
list suicide.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Today?
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
OOh
Tough crowd today.
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
So how the hell was I supposed to know that this guy didn't
have something against me for just being a newbie?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ray Zorz
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:14 AM
Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:25 PM
Subject: RE: Prep
The same way everybody else figures it out -- by reading the list and
seeing
how people post. This list is one of the single best sources of
information
about Exchange. Lurk here long enough and take the time
Coyote Jones?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Prep
Is there a FAQ? Be glad Andy answered instead of a raging CJ :P
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:01 PM
Subject: RE: Prep
Coyote Jones?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Prep
Is there a FAQ? Be glad Andy answered
I suspect he is...
Nonetheless, the more I work with E2k, the more I think Mr. Jones was
correct in his initial assessment of it.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Prep
Cthulhu
Which was?
(Sorry...I'm pre-Mr. Jones)
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
I suspect he is...
Nonetheless, the more I work with E2k, the more I think Mr. Jones
Mmmm raging BJ
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Prep
Is there a FAQ? Be glad Andy answered instead of a raging CJ :P
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Ok...let's try that again...I'm POST-Mr. Jones. :o)
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Which was?
(Sorry...I'm pre-Mr. Jones)
Jim Blunt
-Original
I think he said if Exchange 5.5 was cruel, E2K was downright sadistic.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Ok...let's try that again...I'm POST-Mr. Jones. :o)
Jim
Mailing List
Conversation: Prep
Subject: RE: Prep
I think he said if Exchange 5.5 was cruel, E2K was downright sadistic.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
That's why I am waiting one more version
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
I think he said if Exchange 5.5 was cruel, E2K was downright sadistic.
-Original Message
Why do people keep saying that? It is *SO* the opposite.
William
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
I think he said if Exchange 5.5 was cruel, E2K was downright sadistic
I plan to hold out if I can as well.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
That's why I am waiting one more version
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori
Its bound to be more kindRight
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
That's why I am waiting one more version
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto
You must be very patient.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
That's why I am waiting one more version
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL
When it comes to this stuff. But when I decide I want something, I want it
NOW!!!
Veruca Salt
I WANT IT NOW!!!
/Veruca Salt
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
You must
Some of us are just ahead of the curve I guess... ;)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
I think of E2K as the Exch 4.0 of the new millennium. (William is going
I like to sit back and watchthen join in.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Some of us are just ahead of the curve I guess... ;)
-Original Message-
From
Damn you
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Sometimes observing and being cautious is the better approach.
But at least I can right-click in my exchange admin mmc
Subject: RE: Prep
I like to sit back and watchthen join in.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Some of us are just ahead of the curve I guess... ;)
-Original
LMAO!!!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Damn you
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2
LMAO But what about that one button? ;o)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Sometimes observing and being cautious is the better approach.
But at least I can
Not just anybody. CJ.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Why do people keep saying that? It is *SO* the opposite.
William
-Original
]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:55 PM
Subject: RE: Prep
Ok...let's try that again...I'm POST-Mr. Jones. :o)
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Your reading is as good as your English... The linked wrapped idjit...
D
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Page not found
-Original Message-
From
How very Teneracious of you.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
com·ic Pronunciation Key (kmk)
A comedian.
A person whose behavior elicits laughter
Teneracious?
Isn't in my dictionary
http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/search?config=drdictwords=Teneracious
Where's Les when you need him?
G
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 March 2002 13:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
How very
Sorry, I meant Tener-licious. ;)
-Original Message-
From: HANNA, Keith (TSL Shirley) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
Teneracious?
Isn't in my dictionary
http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/search
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel
Chenault
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Prep
My thoughts exactly, but I'll hold back on the plonk. It's always
amusing to watch newbies flounder in the waves.
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Di Nardo
?
Quit yer whining for cryin out loud! I know toddlers with thicker skin than
you!
D
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
You know it would be one thing if he did
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
You know it would be one thing if he did this only once in
awhile.but every single time I post a question to the list I always
get shit from him..what's his problem? Does he get off on attacking
people he'll never meet?
-Chris
-Original Message
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
You know it would be one thing if he did this only once in
awhile.but every single time I post a question to the list I always
get shit from him..what's his problem? Does he get off on attacking
people he'll never meet?
-Chris
-Original Message
So how the hell was I supposed to know that this guy didn't have
something against me for just being a newbie?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ray Zorz
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
You send an email directly to him instead of calling him names, distributed
to 5000 people.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
So how the hell was I supposed to know
attacked.
Good luck
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
So how the hell was I supposed to know that this guy didn't have
something against me for just being a newbie
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
So how the hell was I supposed to know that this guy didn't have
something against me for just being a newbie?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I guess neither of the Eds have responded to one of your posts yet...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prep
You know it would be one thing if he did this only
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
