Failover in such a scenario is likely a bit more complicated than simply
tossing out a new host entry or two. What are you using now to specify the
target server in your x.400 connections? Are users going to be testing this
failover too by connecting to the alternate Exchange server? The failover
s
e-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery
You should take a domain controller off your production network and move
it to your isolated lab network and then promote it to PDC. Build
Exchange agai
You should take a domain controller off your production network and move
it to your isolated lab network and then promote it to PDC. Build
Exchange against that domain controller.
If you want a lab that's connected to your production network, build
your Exchange server using the exact same organ
I prefer beer.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery
Also, in a happy coincidence, it's American Beer Month !
> -Original Message-
> From:
Also, in a happy coincidence, it's American Beer Month !
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 4:05 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery
>
>
> Ju
July is Disaster Recovery Month.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster Recovery
Exchange 5.5, NT 4.0, Veritas 8.5.
I'm trying to build a Test lab for Exchange and test
lorida and Guam sites, with Hurricane weather, were
really pushing for it.
[1] pick one {looked at/ had/ have}.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Cen
http://www.sungardthenetbeneathyou.com/
Comdisco is in Chapter 11 and sold off the disaster recovery part of
their business to SunGuard Systems.
I have been a part of a disaster recovery and business continuity
project using comdisco, now SunGard. They are quite expensive, but also
full feature
I know of a financial company in SF that uses off-site data storage. They
told me while I was there that they have tested their DR procedures and can
be 80-90% operational within 24 hours of a complete disaster (i.e. their SF
offices being completely destroyed).
Contact me offlist if you'd like m
Or Richard Tener.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March 2002 15:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Center
I would avoid Arthur Anderson
And Loni.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Center
I would avoid Arthur Anderson.
-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL
I would avoid Arthur Anderson.
-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster Recovery Center
We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some
questions.
Does any
S.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
That's what you get for buying your hardware at KMart.
(c)2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MV
But it was on clearance! We thought we were getting a good deal!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
That's what you get for b
Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
That's what you get for buying your hardware at KMart.
(c)2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I(r)
Protecting the world from PST
12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
We have a set of 18 production servers that are specifically designed to
crash utterly and completely every 3-4 months. These are multi-purpose
servers so I get to DR Exchange on the average 3-5 times
sions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
I did lot's of testing and DR's for clients this year... I plan on having
to do more next year and the years to come. :o)
D
"A TV can insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like a computer."
-O
nt: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
May 31st isn't a good day for me...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Disc
Me either.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
May 31st isn't a good day for me...
-Original Message-
From:
What's Disaster Recovery planning?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
I did lot's of testing and DR's for clients this yea
I did lot's of testing and DR's for clients this year... I plan on having
to do more next year and the years to come. :o)
D
"A TV can insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like a computer."
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, Dec
May 31st isn't a good day for me...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster recovery planning for the new year.
How many of you did a test restore of your Exchange environment
We have a DR plan in place. We test recovery every six months. We fly out of
state to a Sungard facility with only our backup tapes, our documentation
(which we keep off site) and restore our system. For exchange, use the FAQ
of course and the DR one and two whitepapers off technet.
We restore ev
: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test 2
... as long as your were at W2K SP1 and Ex5.5 SP4 in April. If not,
then you will have to re-install to the exact versions you were at in
April.
Linton
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Olson
Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test 2
Just completed what you would like to do, you do not need to reinstall
exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster Recovery
this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test -Failure to
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test -Failure to start the IS service
Yeah! The server needed new double A batteries.
No actually the Recovery servers was running Win2k SP1 and the
Production server was Sp2. Once I upgraded to sp2 on the recovery I was
able to perform the isin
HaHa
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test -Failure to start the IS service
The server was unplugged
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
computer.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test -Failure to start the IS service
The server was unplugged
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test 2
Just completed what you would like to do, you do not need to reinstall
exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster Recovery Test 2
The server was unplugged
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stevens, Dave
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test -Failure to start the IS service
what ended up being the
what ended up being the problem?
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test -Failure to start the IS service
I was able to resolve this issue. Thanks for everyone
Just completed what you would like to do, you do not need to reinstall
exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster Recovery Test 2
Hello All,
Note:
Exchange Server 5.5 SP4
you should be able to proceed from the steps starting after you install
Exchange...
Drew
If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each
other. (Mother Theresa)
KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/
Well, I haven't done this myself, but I think you will need to find out
what SP level your Exch SW was at during the time you wish to restore
from.
There were some big changes to the schema in SP4, so an SP3 IS may not
run correctly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Test -Failure to start the IS service
Have you read the MSExchange Disaster Recovery whitepaper yet?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sethi, Ali
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Sounds like the recovery server has a different operating system and/or OS
service pack than the original Exchange server. Given the fact that you
installed Exchange 5.0 on it first, I am assuming that it is an NT 4.0
server. The dif't OS's and service packs handle the secondary indexes
differen
Have you read the MSExchange Disaster Recovery whitepaper yet?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sethi, Ali
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster Recovery Test -Failure to start the IS service
You clever little nimrod... As I read this, I howled with unholy glee as I
thought, "Sounds like he had the recovery server on the network! HAW!"
Then came your last line. Whatta gem.
Anyway, Dave, no, you're not supposed to have the backup server on the
network when you do a recovery if the mai
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Morrison
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster recovery practice?
I have restor
ubject: Re: disaster recovery practice?
Since two machines on a network can't have the same name, it would seem
obvious that the recovery server has to be on a separate network, eh?
- Original Message -
From: "Stevens, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange D
x27;s Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: disaster recovery practice?
You restored all of pub.edb to a different server on the network?
M
- Original Mess
I should also add that we use Veritas to backup but I used NTBackup to do
the recovery.
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: disaster recovery practice?
You restored all of
2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: disaster recovery practice?
You restored all of pub.edb to a different server on the network?
M
- Original Message -
From: "Chinnery Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
r 17, 2001 12:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: disaster recovery practice?
>
>
> You restored all of pub.edb to a different server on the network?
>
> M
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chinnery Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "E
1:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: disaster recovery practice?
Someone failed to tell you...
It is my experience that you cannot have the recovery server on the same
network as the original server if you're doing this type of restore. The
backup programs I've dealt with in the past
I checked and double checked to ensure that I had the restore destination
set to the recovery server and not anything else
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster
: disaster recovery practice?
Since two machines on a network can't have the same name, it would seem
obvious that the recovery server has to be on a separate network, eh?
- Original Message -
From: "Stevens, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions
I think that is what I did wrong...I chose both, directory and info store.
thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster recovery practice?
Make sure you specify the
You restored all of pub.edb to a different server on the network?
M
- Original Message -
From: "Chinnery Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:57 AM
Subject: RE: disaster recovery pr
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: disaster recovery practice?
Unfortunately, that doesn't work. An admin I once worked with found this
out the hard way... The recovery server needs to be on a different network
than th
hange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:38 AM
Subject: RE: disaster recovery practice?
Did you redirect your restore to the restore server and not the "real"
Exchange server?
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and
Someone failed to tell you...
It is my experience that you cannot have the recovery server on the same
network as the original server if you're doing this type of restore. The
backup programs I've dealt with in the past will always redirect the restore
to the original server if they can find it.
Did you redirect your restore to the restore server and not the "real"
Exchange server?
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there
are none so blind as those who wi
Since two machines on a network can't have the same name, it would seem
obvious that the recovery server has to be on a separate network, eh?
- Original Message -
From: "Stevens, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:2
Make sure you specify the recovery server as the destination server and
select only the Information Store to restore.
Andy David
J Muller International
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussio
56 matches
Mail list logo
