Inbound, Inbound Inbound INBOUND INBOUND CONNECTIONS!
Fscking Road Runner SSMs decided that "inbound" meant _all_. It's really
unfortunate for the Austin RR group that I live within stal^H^H^H^Hwalking
distance.
> RECOMMENDATION
> Due to the seriousness of the RPC vulnerability, DHS and Microsoft
m PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ISP/Exchange Question
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, at 10:19am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, at 4:52pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Has anyone heard of the Dept. of Homeland security putting out an
> anouncement to ISP's to block TCP/UDP ports 135, 137, 445?
The DHS advisory doesn't target ISPs in particular.
Many ISPs block 135, 137, 138, 139, and 445. More have
. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: ISP/Exchange Question
>
>
> On Tue
I didn't see anything on whitehouse.gov or ready.gov, but my counterpart in
Facilities just forwarded a BOMA memo mentioning such a warning coming from
DHS.
Hopefully we are all already on alert for this virus, and are already
protected. It's an old issue that should have been eliminated a whil
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, at 9:41am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> One man's outbound is somebody else's inbound.
>
> Right, which is why all firewalls come with default rules set to block all
> inbound and all outbound traffic.
By default, most products on the market are hideously insecure, and shoul
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ISP/Exchange Question
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, at 9:24am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Except that your ISP holds you hostage because it "owns" your DNS
> entries until you can get them moved somewhere else.
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, at 5:44pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Inbound, Inbound Inbound INBOUND INBOUND CONNECTIONS!
>>
>> Fscking Road Runner SSMs decided that "inbound" meant _all_.
>
> One man's outbound is somebody else's inbound.
Right, which is why all firewalls come with default rules set
Over dialup?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ISP/Exchange Question
You're going to try that tired argument in every thread until it sticks?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Interne
notification, no change to the Homeland Security Advisory
System (HSAS) is anticipated; the current HSAS level is YELLOW.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ISP/Exchange Question
I
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, at 8:37am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I also think that most good network citizens should be egress blocking
> those ports anyway - there are precious few reasons a corporate network
> should be allowing egrees traffic on those ports, or for that matter on
> most ports.
Yah.
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, at 9:24am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Except that your ISP holds you hostage because it "owns" your DNS entries
> until you can get them moved somewhere else.
Well, first off, my original point was that Internet access is not the
inalienable right that some people seem to th
> You do not own your ISP's network, your ISP does.
And that makes any arbitrary decision they choose to implement acceptable?
Please sign up here for the Patriot Service Plan comrade.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, at 5:44pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Inbound, Inbound Inbound INBOUND INBOUND CONNECTIONS!
>
> Fscking Road Runner SSMs decided that "inbound" meant _all_.
One man's outbound is somebody else's inbound. Many ISPs are concerned
with stopping existing compromises from spre
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, at 10:19am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> You do not own your ISP's network, your ISP does.
>
> And that makes any arbitrary decision they choose to implement acceptable?
Acceptable? Perhaps not. You can always switch to another ISP. Of
course, if all ISPs are doing the sa
15 matches
Mail list logo