Forgot to mention that: no I have not reached my CAL's either.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;811912
-Original Message-
From: Mark Nold
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOO not working
Forgive if this is a repeat,
That article was created for the one person who still runs the license
logging service.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Nold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:58 PM
Subject: RE: OOO not working
Forgot to mention
Just thought I head off anyone trying to help me by suggesting I look
there :)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OOO not working
That article was created for the one person
Try doing this:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262352
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Forgot to mention that: no I have not
-
From: Chris Tuvell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO not working
Try doing this:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262352
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO not working
Try doing this:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262352
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nold
Yes it's the only onethanks for the advice. I will schedule a
restart of the service for off hours.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Tuvell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO not working
Is the Exchange
Global Settings Internet Message Formats, right-click a domain
(probably *) and select Properties Advanced.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
).
Cheers, Nick.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 19:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our
sales weasels couldn't comprehend that customers
: A park Bench.
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 17:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with
some real world
examples
.
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 17:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with
some real world
examples of someone being
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 March 2003 12:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
But in that case, it is well known that thousand and
thousands of websites
have been hacked in the past, so
One can prove that OOO information has been used in social engineering hacks
though, so doesn't that make the point moot?
On 3/6/03 6:27, Allison M. Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But in that case, it is well known that thousand and thousands of websites
have been hacked in the past, so it
Sure. I'm not absolutley convinced, but I will let this die.
My users still want to use the OOO's even after I explain about more Spam and
the annoyance/inconvenience to the customers, so I can't see them suddenly
not using them because of a 1 in a million chance of a social
Guess that depends on the business you are in. There's no magic argument
which is going to shut down OOO for all businesses, nor (likely) should
there be.
On 3/6/03 8:20, Allison M. Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. I'm not absolutley convinced, but I will let this die.
My users
OWA allows you to set OOO. Why not just use that?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is it possible to create a web app that you can use to set individual
users OOO (exchange 2000)? I
:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO web app
OWA allows you to set OOO. Why not just use that?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is it possible to create a web app that you
and this will be one function as I get
many users who forget to turn it on. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO web app
OWA allows you to set OOO. Why not just use
The ability to set OOO exists in OWA. If you need to separate it from there
you could look at the code of the pages in OWA.
-Patrick R. Sweeney
http://boston.craigslist.org/bos/res/8484283.html
- Original Message -
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Programmatically trying to do something in Exchange.. Have you looked at
www.cdolive.com?
On 3/6/03 8:54, Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to create a web app that you can use to set individual
users OOO (exchange 2000)? I cant find the object(If there is one) that
Didn't think about that, but that's definitely the place to start looking.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 7:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Programmatically trying to do something in Exchange.. Have you looked at
Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allison M.
Wittstock
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OOO
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
This mail loop was again a result of automatic replies/forwards to the
internet being enabled. OOO responses alone would not have cause this loop.
I can envision several ways
- Original Message -
From: Byron Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:23 PM
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Humm... Seems like we could mitigate that risk with verbiage in the
acceptable use policy on what
Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with some real world
examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO message told the
world they were away? I think I am more likely to be burglarized by a
neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone that sees my postbox has
The more substantial risk IMHO is in Human Engineering exploits of your
business. I've certainly gotten more than enough information in OOA
responses to attempt such a thing.
Snopes underestimates the difficulty of matching names to addresses,
especially when working with known domains. (e.g.
: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
The more substantial risk IMHO is in Human Engineering exploits of your
business. I've certainly gotten more than enough information in OOA
responses to attempt such a thing.
Snopes underestimates the difficulty of matching
Allison M. Wittstock wrote:
Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with some
real world examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO
message told the world they were away? I think I am more likely to
be burglarized by a neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone
Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most effective argument
against for me has been spam -- we all know that it's a bad idea to reply to
spammers confirming that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on
somebody's account and I suspect
Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an important point
about mail box limits
cool
thanks
bill
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
I
This mail loop was again a result of automatic replies/forwards to the
internet being enabled. OOO responses alone would not have cause this loop.
I can envision several ways in which an OOO loop alone could be created, all
of them involved poorly written software and the potential of them
]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an important point
about mail box limits
cool
thanks
bill
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an important point
about mail box limits
cool
thanks
bill
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an
important point about mail box limits
cool
thanks
bill
-Original Message
Now that's funny :)
Thx for the feedback all!
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Speaking of mailbox limits...is there a limit to the mailbox limit you
I would imagine the limit is there due to the fact that an OST file is
the same as a PST file in regards to maximum size. Beyond that, would
you really want to have a user synching a 2 GB file over a 56k dial-up
line...
--
Matt Cross, MOS+FLA
SAIC -- Orlando
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ben
Thanks..that definitely makes more sense :-)
-Original Message-
From: Matt Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 3:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Limits [was Re: OOO...]
I would imagine the limit is there due to the fact that an OST file
E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick R.
Sweeney
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
Ok, so
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allison M.
Wittstock
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
Ed, since you use
Possibly an offshoot of the inability to accurately report mailbox sizes
over 2GB in the UI?
On 3/5/03 14:24, Matt Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would imagine the limit is there due to the fact that an OST file is
the same as a PST file in regards to maximum size. Beyond that, would
you
I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most effective argument
against for me has been spam -- we all know that it's a bad idea to reply to
spammers confirming that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on
somebody's account and I suspect that their spam load will significantly
The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small. However, consider the
following:
Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France
until the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house at
123 Any Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever is left. If
you
surely bring that point up.
So far, SPAM sounds like the only real solid ground.
:( byron
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
The risk of a mail loop
have a job.)
-Patrick R. Sweeney
- Original Message -
From: Byron Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:23 PM
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Humm... Seems like we could mitigate that risk with verbiage
-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 3:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Humm... Seems like we could mitigate that risk with verbiage
in the acceptable use policy on what is acceptable content to
put
I have tried saying:
1. Security risk
2. Bad Netiquitte
3. Risk of mail loops
How about saying that you only send out one OoO message full stop, rather than one per
day. If you go away for a fortnight and somebody sends you mail two Mondays in a row,
on the first they'll get the OoO
1. Possibly.
2. Thats debatable.
3. Very low.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hanji [mailto:zinnix;bezeqint.net]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOO
Hi.
I don't allow OOO (Out Of the Office) in my ex5.5 environment, to be used to
the internet.
1+2+3= losing battle
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO
1. Possibly.
2. Thats debatable.
3. Very low.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hanji [mailto:zinnix;bezeqint.net
We allow it here. So far, it has not really been an issue.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone;superioraccess.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO
1+2+3= losing battle
-Original Message-
From: Andy
Yea. Us too.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO
We allow it here. So far, it has not really been an issue.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone
Out of Office data is stored in hidden messages in the user's mailbox.
I wonder if your unified messaging package is affecting this
configuration.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
Subject: Re: OOO reply...
All,
In my experience, there are two ways to set up an OOO reply.
(a) Use the 'Out of Office Assistant' - Tools Out of Office Assistant.
This will only send one reply per instance of the OOO Assistant per person
e-mailing. If you turn it off, then on again, you'll get
Yeah, I know the difference. I also know that OOF has broken in the
past. Q223391 is the resumt of my call to PSS.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: OOO reply
All,
In my experience, there are two ways to set up an OOO reply.
(a) Use the 'Out of Office Assistant' - Tools Out of Office Assistant.
This will only send one reply per instance of the OOO Assistant per person
e-mailing. If you turn it off, then on again, you'll get another message
from the
Okay, I'll bite:
I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please
put me on your A list for resale to other spammers.
I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've
just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax
assessor's web site
Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
Okay, I'll bite:
I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please
put me on your A list for resale to other spammers.
I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've
just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go
Are you going to safe it by locking it up in the save?
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
Oh - very well put! I'm going to safe this for when folks
kick
She's so excited she can't type.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
Are you going to safe it by locking it up in the save
lol
Clip and Safe this for later...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
Are you going to safe it by locking it up in the save?
-Original Message-
From
Yep! Got one right here.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
Are you going to safe it by locking it up in the save?
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams
Nah - not excitement. Lack of caffeine.
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
She's so excited she can't type.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
lol
Clip and Safe this for later...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:07 PM
To: Exchange
If I weren't redesigning networks, I would have beat them all. ;o)
D
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
So far I'm two for three on guessing who would be first
That was a save bet.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
So far I'm two for three on guessing who would be first with the smarta$$
comments about my typo. I thought
Mmmm saved bets
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
That was a save bet.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
I took your new job into account.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
If I weren't redesigning networks, I would have beat them all. ;o)
D
-Original Message
Fixing your broke ass s**t?
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
If I weren't redesigning networks, I would have beat them all. ;o)
D
-Original Message-
From
How sweet of you! :O)
d
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
I took your new job into account.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Not here so much, just making it better...
D
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
Fixing your broke ass s**t?
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don
Try more fibre.
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:17 PM
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
Not here so much, just making it better...
D
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
So far I'm two for three on guessing who would be first with the smarta$$
comments about my typo. I thought Martin Blackstone would beat Barry to it.
Thanks to Chris and Andy for not letting me down. It's so good to know who
you can count on.
Darcy
I had pigs in a blanket for dinner last night.
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
I was in the right place at the right time.
I'm sure 2 seconds later Martin
Funny, I pictured you as the Pig in the blankets... :P
D
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
I had pigs in a blanket for dinner last night.
-Original
Makin bacon?
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
Funny, I pictured you as the Pig in the blankets... :P
D
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto
Makin something anyway... Oh wait, you've already got a bun in the oven!
You'll have to wait 9 or so months... :P
D
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
Has it been that long? My how time flies!
D
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
4 more months
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL
No kidding. I swear it seems just like yesterday I was completely freaked
out about it
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO Messages
Has it been that long? My how time flies
77 matches
Mail list logo
