Re: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-09 Thread Tim Gowen
Yeah, but I am running in AVAPI mode and the scan engine and pattern file are current. It's getting some Bugbears but not others. Tim Subject: Re: ScanMail missing tricks? From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:13:31 -0700 X-Message-Number: 17 We had

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-09 Thread Knoch Jr., James W
the new mode since 3.7 (currently on 3.8) and haven't had any problems with corruption or anything. -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ScanMail missing tricks? Sometimes users get sent

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Bowles, John (OIG/OMP)
_ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS W. 202.690.6342 C. 202.359.7159 F. 202.690.7446 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Public Folder: Exchange
I don't know what the deal is with this latest version of BugBear, but it's really a problem. I started having issues with it on the 4th. The remote access and key logger are the scary parts of this worm. I have had it get past two A/V scanners. One on mail and one on workstations. I

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Roger Seielstad
You might want to consider upgrading to Scanmail 3.81. I believe it functions a LOT better. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Paul Hutchings
7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 June 2003 15:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks? You might want to consider upgrading to Scanmail 3.81. I believe

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Ward, Stuart
Why would it need to? -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks? No problems here with 3.81 - one thing I wish it did do was to scan attachments blocked

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Brian Ko
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks? I don't know what the deal is with this latest version of BugBear, but it's really a problem. I started having issues with it on the 4th. The remote access and key logger are the scary parts of this worm. I have had it get past two A/V

Re: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Ray Beckwith
We had this issue a while back when we first started using ScanMail. We found out from Trend that when ScanMail runs in MAPI mode, it doesn't scan the attachments until AFTER the message is in the inbox; which leaves the possibility if the server is extremely busy scanning, the user could see and

Re: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Paul Hutchings
Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 5:06 PM Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks? Why would it need to? -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail missing

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Roger Seielstad
06, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks? No problems here with 3.81 - one thing I wish it did do was to scan attachments blocked by extention blocking - we've had loads of bugbears quarantined for being .exe's , but it doesn't seem to actually scan

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Roger Seielstad
, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ScanMail missing tricks? Sometimes users get sent legitimate executables, they get blocked because of the extention, so I have to copy it to a share for them to retrieve it - I'm then reliant on the AV on my desktop, what I'd prefer

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Ward, Stuart
Have them 'zipped' up... -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ScanMail missing tricks? Sometimes users get sent legitimate executables, they get blocked because of the extention, so I