Conduit commands are not recommended or supported in 6.0 and above.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
The tcp and www statement should be in a conduit permit
Upgrade to 6.0 first.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Had to install kiwi enterprise syslog. Did everythin stated but no info
is logged to the syslog server
If you try to delete it from DOS, it still is locked but it doesn't take
EXPLORER.EXE up to 100% utilization.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
That's right, I forgot about that. Haven't had to work on one in a few
months...
D
All progress occurs because people dare to be different. -Harry Millner
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Exchange
Thanks Mark.
Wilson
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: ADC Connector
Easier to rehome them than to recreate. If you bring up your second ADC
whilst the first
I missed something. An mail enabled public folder sent from an internal
address looks like mail but if it sent from and external address it
looks like a post. I want it to look like an email. What did I miss?
_
List posting FAQ:
why dont you stop the services for trend and then delete the file. After
all that just start up the services again.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic:
The opportunity to buy a 3rd party tool to solve the problem. CDOLive will
be releasing one early next year, and slipstick lists another now.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: WebMeister
One more thing. Before you upgrade to 6.0 make sure you have a copy of your
original config. Hopefully you have something like Reflections (vs M$
telnet).
Next type:
show config (enable mode)
Copy and paste the config to a text file for future reference. Some of the
command sets are obsolete
err, stop scanmail services and try. Will be just your luck the latest
melissa will come out during that 5 minute window.
What version of scanmail? Did it move the file based on infection or
attachment blocking? You say the mp3 file is listed as a shortcut, it has a
.lnk extension or just the
Ahhh but the problem here is that I have web applications on 1 web
server and some on another. If I redirect them to the exchange server
my other sites will go down.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:39 PM
To:
I'm going to during non-prime time. It took me a couple of days to track
down why this was occuring.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
why
I have a problem where I used the mailbox move wizard to move one mailbox
from one server to another. After I moved that mailbox I could no longer
get into the mailbox with that user or any user that didn't have admin
rights. The mailbox has been deleted and recreated and so has the LAN
You need more IP addresses. You're trying to do waay too much with
waaay too little.
D
The most satisfying thing in life is to have been able to give a large part
of one's self to others. -Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL
Time to crank out the check book and get you some IP's
Jeffrey R. Waters
Senior Systems Engineer
Information Technology, Hanover County
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Hi,
Is there anyway of telling who accessed an Exchange Server on a site.
Our Exchange server was accessed last nite and we found that the Site
Addressing In Administrator was changed.
Thank you
_
List posting FAQ:
Yeah that's what I figured. Damn
Hey I just noticed theres a bunch of fixup protocol commands in my
config. Aren't there issues with those.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help
Event Viewer, Security
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Server 5.5. sp/3
Hi,
Is there anyway of telling who accessed an Exchange Server on a site.
Oh yea
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yeah that's what I figured. Damn
Hey I just noticed theres a bunch of fixup protocol commands in my config.
Aren't
The SMTP fixup is the most known problem. There are others that you may not
need though...
D
The secret to success is - find out where the people are going and get
there first. (Mark Twain)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December
Magically fixed itself. Hm
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error after mailbox move
I have a problem where I used the mailbox move wizard to move one mailbox
from one
1 ip was all uunet would give us at the time so I was told. I just
contacted them about it and they are a pain in the arse to get ip's from
apparently.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
This is the only thing the syslog server got
.226 looks like a vpn addy. Outside I have no idea.
12-18-2001 12:45:03News.Error 172.16.1.2 Dec 18
2001 09:57:13: %PIX-3-305006: regular translation creation failed for
udp src inside:192.168.5.226/1350 dst
How exactly does the Exchange 2000 CALs work? If all my clients will be using Outlook,
will I need to buy CALs for them also or does Outlook give me the CAL for the user?
Thanks,
Mike
â²Úh²Ø§PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(úÞ²«qïÞÅÈ_j¨m
Ü+Þ²m§ÿðà 0Êy ¢oì׬yªÜû j·!jÊS¢éì¹» ®Þ¨¥¶^j÷ÅÈZ¥²Ì2G(L\
Outlook is essentially free. You get it when you buy Exchange. You need
CALs for Exchange, though.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange CALs
How exactly does
Hmmm... I've never had a problem. Tell all you need at least is a /29
which would give you five IP's. Either way, more IP's will increase the
performance of your network. I'd be willing to be you're running PAT versus
NAT and the performance of PAT is shall I say... Sub-standard.
Check out
What is that 192.x.x.x address for?
D
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - Ed
Crowley
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Hi Walden
How about this as solution??
1.) Remove the valid internet addresses from the users.
2.) Create invalid, from the perspective of the Internet, addresses for the
users who need to get the mail from the AS400. Route this address as
inbound.
3.) Configure the SMTP service on the AS 400
I had developed a simple application using vc++ 6.0 and CDO library. This
application automatically read the inbox folder and save the attachments
of some new messages. But in some messages the name of the attach and the
real name of the file mismatch. I got the name of attach instead the name
of
What is that crud in your sig?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange CALs
How exactly does the Exchange 2000 CALs work? If all my clients will be
using Outlook, will I need
You need to get additional IP addresses. You need one IP bound to the
external interface as your PAT Address only. You need additional IP's for
services with duplicate ports running on different servers. Or, you can do
something sneaky like setup your owa site on a different http port like 100
If I have bought say 25 copies of Outlook for other reasons, will those work for CALs
on Exchange?
Mike
-Original Message-
Outlook is essentially free. You get it when you buy Exchange. You need
CALs for Exchange, though.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson
No, Mike, it doesn't work that way. You need Exchange client licenses
(who happen to use Outlook), so you need Exchange CALs in addition to
the copies of Outlook.
Carol Theis
MCSE
Administrative Technology Director
The Agnes Irwin School
275 S. Ithan Avenue
Rosemont, PA 19010
Voice:
I am going to look for info right now on the port change for owa. My 1
problem is if I add a statement static inside outside with port 90 will
that interfere with my other statement that maps everything to my proxy
server.
It is DMZ capable BUT not set up. Here is a quick and dirty diag of the
Is Exchange Conferencing Server a seperate product or a add on for Exchange 2000?
We are looking to implement Exchange Conferencing but we were unsure if it required a
purchase of Exchange 2000 or if when you bought Conferencing Server it came with a
license for Exchange?
Microsofts
http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/early.alert.for.an.unconfirmed.ne
w.worm.html
BE CAREFUL!
Symantec Security Response is currently investigating reports of a mass
mailing worm spreading via email. The email arrives with the following:
Subject line: HI !!
Body: http://
Bad... very bad...
http://www.ntbugtraq.com/default.asp?pid=36sid=1A2=ind0112L=ntbugtraqF=PS
P=3038
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another
Yeah. You just need to bind your owa server to port 90 or 100 and set your
static command to route port 90 or 100 to the internal IP address
192.168.0.0. The proxy server redirect does not add any additional security
to your existing config and just adds an additional hop.
-Original
Can't get that link to work...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: URL as a malicius code.
Bad... very bad...
I have OWA running over SSL and every once in a while when sending a new mail, and 95%
of the time when replying to an email, I get garbled crap in the message.
I have no problems from Outlook 2002, just OWA.
I have exchange set to only send plain text, I use IE 6 with all the latest
Separate beast all together...
D
The secret to success is - find out where the people are going and get
there first. (Mark Twain)
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange
Hi there...
Sorta OT - but just wanted to pick the brain of a bunch of mail admins.
Our company sent out a Christmas greeting this am that was an html email,
but with nothing more than a link to a flash movie online (self produced) on
our web server...
One of our clients said that as soon as
I doubt it...
Send the link. Ill test it...
-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Is this possible?
Hi there...
Sorta OT - but just wanted to pick the brain of a bunch of mail
Because Kelly's Notes client wrapped it or something.
http://www.ntbugtraq.com/default.asp?pid=36sid=1A2=ind0112L=ntbugtraq
F=PS=P=3038
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:22 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Most likely a spurious happenstance.
-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Is this possible?
Hi there...
Sorta OT - but just wanted to pick the brain of a bunch of
mail
Ok guys heres a few developments. I already have 3 ips available I did
not even know about. According to uunet that is. So now I just need to
come up with a static map statement and re think how exchange is set up
to retrieve mail and I should be in business. Tight now
tahoe.sss-cpa.com dns
Hello, Basicly I have an Exchange server forwarding some mails to
another account in another server, but some times it's forwards the
mails properly and some times not (1/2 experimental probability each one)
Following is the error message:
---
Your message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Running Win2k server, Exchange 2000 sp1 and recently installed the MS
Security Tool Kit. Now OWA will not open attachments and/or some
messages. Outlook opens them all. I can't seem to find why. Permissions
problem? Setting MS nicely changed for my own security? Any help is
appreciated.
Settings MS warns about with regards to using that toolkit on an Exchange
server. There's a Q article written on how to undo the damage. I believe it
is mentioned in the archives.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original
aaa.com has 4 mx records, perhaps one of them is improperly configured.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Wain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:57 PM
Aaah, but that wouldn't be a server side DL, would it?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to create a distributionlist with external members ?
That is wrong. Create a
Aye Caramba!
No se pudo entregar el mensaje!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Odd behaviour forwarding mail with Exchange
aaa.com has 4 mx records, perhaps one of them is
Yeah, we'll let that one go:-)
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to create a distributionlist with external members ?
Aaah, but that wouldn't be a server side DL, would
Another thing that I tried was a simple modification to this script. What
it would do is, it would write all the fields to an external source (a csv
file for example) except the Sender information and then delete the message.
It worked like a charm for many surveys that we've done.
S.
Keep the fixups and disable esmtp on the exchange server. There is a
knowldedge base article on this. Use www.google.com to search for it. I
would not use M$ search site.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:41 PM
To:
And I would not use the M$ indicator... :P
As to why you wouldn't search the MS Site, what are you talking about? One
query, got three responses...
I liked this one for his purpose if he disables ESMTP...
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q194131
D
I only regret that
So if I get Exchange conferencing server, I dont get Exchange in the
workgroup/mail/collaboration sense?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely Subject: RE: Exchange Conferencing Server
Conversation: Exchange Conferencing Server
Separate beast all together...
D
For example, take a look at the end of the email I sent earlier.
Mike
-Original Message-
I have OWA running over SSL and every once in a while when sending a new mail, and 95%
of the time when replying to an email, I get garbled crap in the message.
I have no problems from
This seems like a dumb question (being that I should know the answer) but
here goes.
I have a system in which I have the SMTP Server setup. IIS 5.0. W2k SP2
and so forth.
The system is behind a firewall in a dmz config situation. I have the SMTP
component set to route using DNS for the
I have a E2000 SP1 machine running on W2000 SP2 and also a 5.5 server on
NT at this site which is used as a bridgehead to other sites that are
all 5.5
I recently brought another 5.5 site on line and the ADC connector has
taken care of bringing that sites users into AD without issue. However,
on
Just partial to google. Try and see.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
And I would not use the M$ indicator... :P
As to why you wouldn't search the MS Site, what are
Nope, you get Conferencing server, you buy Exchange2K to get the mail and
collaboration features.
D
Hazards: There is an Island of Opportunity in the middle of every
difficulty, miss that, though, and you're pretty much doomed. -
http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike
I use google all the time unless I already know where I need to look and
what to look for. Since most every answer I have ever needed about an MS
product is in their knowledge base, I'll go there. Especially, with their
new Xpish search area...
D
Delusions: There is no joy greater than
Alrighty guys I have added a dns entry and an ip address for the owa.
Also I added port 90 to the existing exchange owa server. Did the
static commands. All left now is to wait for it to propagate and we'll
see.
This will still work right even though the outside ip static maps to the
inside
Seems to be OWA day so I'll through a question into the mix.
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4.0SP6a, IIS 4 on separate NT4 sp6a box.
Problem with OWA recognizing the alias of one user. User's alias is listed
as greene but OWA will only accept
Green, Edward. This is the only user that is having the
on the dmz smtp server set the remote domain to forward mail to the internal
IP ADDRESS of the internal server. don't use hostnames if at all possible.
is the mail still in queue on the dmx smtp server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
There's probably another users that has a similar alias like greene2 or
something. Just type greene in the To: field and do Alt+K. You'll probably
be prompted with a dialog that asks you which greene you want. The only
thing you can do is to either change the alias or have the user keep using
Ahh, good catch, just as you described it. Thanks for your help
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5
There's probably another users that has a similar alias like
I like using Ctrl+K
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5
Are there any other magical keystrokes like ALT+K?
I have always been frustrated that I dont have an option to
Well the solution I created is nto going to work. You can map inside
out through the proxy to another net. It has no idea where to go..
figured this put because the pix can not ping the exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
Yes. I've been using the internal IP only. No host name for the forward
to:
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS SMTP Server (IIS5)
on the dmz smtp server set the remote
You cannot ping through a pix. You would have to add a ICMP any any to your
ACL.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Well the solution I created is nto going to
Trend has a new pattern out since 05:00 EST this morning. New pattern number
is 185.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original Message-
From: Darryl Harris
Not even when im using the pix itself to ping? I can ping the proxy that
is on the same net as the pix. Prob cant ping through the proxy though
huh. Do I need a route entry ie
Route add inside 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1 1
Internal
Yeah. I specifically stated not to map to your proxy first. Send straight
to the 192.168.x.x of the OWA Box.
ALso, you need to modify a few things on this box.
This box should have one nic. I'm assuming the pix is connected to your
lan. The OWA box needs to point to the pix as it's default
Dear DL Members,
Network Associates
http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99284
Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18,
Dear DL Members,
Network Associates
http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99284
Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001
http://www.ntbugtraq.com/default.asp?pid=36sid=1A2=ind0112L=ntbugtraqF=
PS=P=3038
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: URL as a malicius code.
Can't get that link to work...
I think we are missing something. There is no possible way to not go
through proxy. Hes is the only box that sees pix. Direct cable from
pix internal to proxy external
Proxy --Pix --router/internet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
It sounds like your PIX is configured wrong. Your proxy is configured wrong
for this config too. The center point in this equation should be your PIX.
It does not sound like your using the DMZ so use the following strategy.
Your Proxy is currently multihomed. Disable the external interface
That's a problem. Read previous mail.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I think we are missing something. There is no possible way to not go
through proxy.
Your making this harder then it needs to be.
The PIX is your Firewall...not the proxy. Proxy is basically being used to
Authenticate Internet Access to internal users.
Your Proxy, Exchange Server, and OWA server, etc should be pointing
directly to your PIX Firewall. The PIX Firewall
VBG
I've given up. I feel like charging him now. What he really needs is a
consultant. ;o)
D
Get all over this like a donkey on a waffle.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
mmm. proxy will not have to network cards just one huh. Ok that's
something to think about.
Pix goes straight to lan as an ip. Ok no big deal. But YES I am using
proxy for access control and this is a must. Will this work in this
situation. I don't know. Again I have to think about this.
No shit im sorry guys this has gotten way out of hand. I think I have a
hundred directions to go off in. now I need to put in on paper and
decide what the best way to go is.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:30 PM
To:
Which link? Kelly's or the one that the virus sends out :)
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: David Florea
Have Exchange 5.5 Server on NT 4.0 SP6A, clients are Outlook 98 and also
2000 - problem is occuring with both.
Basically we have users who are trying to send large attachments, in this
example 14mb, to an outside address. The system administrator returns the
message as undeliverable, stating a
It's coming from the remote mail servers. They don't want your big ass 14MB
attachments.
D
The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle
Onassis
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:53 PM
To:
D,
That is what I was thinking. How can our users tell that it is coming
from the remote system?
Thanks,
Rob
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
I would say that whereever you are sending the message has a smaller mailbox
limit than the size of the message that is being sent... but a copy of the
NDR would certainly help with a precise answer...
MP
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19
You could have them read RFC821 and give them a quiz to test for
comprehension.
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
D,
That is
blistex
Can you post that NDR? I could then show you which part of it tells the
tale.
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Have
Edumecate them...
Or Chris's idea was good too! ;o)
Otherwise, it's on you my friend...
D
Idiocy: Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. -
- http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001
Okay, so what part of this contains the info I'm looking for?
(This is a test message to an aol address)
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: TEST
Sent: 12/18/01 3:08 PM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
'[EMAIL
Has anyone seen this one yet:
http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/vbsgrateb.html
Diane
Diane Boehm
SC Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
552 EXCEEDED STORAGE ALLOCATION
-Original Message-
From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 552 Exceeded Local Data Allocation Limit
Okay, so what part of this contains the info I'm looking for?
I would have never guessed...;) Thank you for enlightening me! ;)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
How much space is available at the aol address for e-mails? Is presume
it is NOT unrestricted...
Can you send through smaller attachments to the same or different
addresses? Are you able to break up the attachment into files that are
small enough to not warrant ftp'ing them? (hint)
MP
I was told that to remove the MS Office SP2 and reinstall MS Office SR1 I
need to fdisk the machine...Seems kinda radical. Is this the accepted
procedure? Isn't there a better way?
Note: We need to remove it because we use forms extensively in our Public
Folders and the use of this patch has
I guess the person who told you that didn't know your sarcasm filter was
broken. ;)
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Steve Dallas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001
101 - 200 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
