Aruplabs.com... huh. Now we know where the odd message with subject "X" and
body "ABC1234567890DEF" came from. Wasn't real ethical of ya, Eric,
masquerading as someone else.
- Original Message -
From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent
A more cogent question:
What does the archive of the outbound message show? MS-TNEF mayhaps? (IMS
Properties:Diagnostics:Message Archiving: Maximum, will be stored in
\imcdata\out\archive)
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
"I swear I read the FAQ" (followed immediately by someone posting the exact
location in the FAQ)
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Schorr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:18 PM
Subject: RE: Top Ten Statements or Phrases -
There is a KB article on removing the first server in the site. Read it and
follow it.
- Original Message -
From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM
Subject: home server?
>
> Hi
>
> HAPPY NEW YEAR!
>
The last one in the site as in the last one installed into the site has no
significance. The last one in the site as in there are no other servers in
the site makes it special.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Bouzan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent
Why bother with web-based?
>From any machine who's IP address is not an allowed relayer in IMS
Properties:
telnet
MAIL FROM:
RCPT TO:
DATA
blah-blah-blah, yadda-yadda
. (that's a period on a line by itself)
Check both the MAIL and RCPT address to see if the message relayed or it
bounced. Missio
The costs of monitors have really come down to the point that repairing
costs more than a new one. Plus there is a lot of high voltage inside, even
with the monitor unplugged. This is not a job for the weekend parts-swapper.
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
However, note Chris will pipe down if I correct him. ;)
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: recipients
> He knows more Chit then a good number of us combined.
The party line is N-1
- Original Message -
From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:24 PM
Subject: RE: life cycle of Exchange
> I believe MS supports the current version and the previous version of
every
Your surmise that it is not possible in <2K is correct.
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Smits" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:52 AM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 - POP & IMAP banners?
> Is it possible to change the default ba
First thing you do is disable the file-level scanning on the \exchsrvr
directories.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Peoples" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:00 AM
Subject: e2k recovery
> Hi,
>
> This afternoon my e2k
1) The RFC states that a given mailer must properly handle up to 100
recipients in a single mail. The destination server to which you are sending
does not support more then 100
2) The destination server has an inbound limit of 5M and you are sending an
attachment of 12M
My bill will be in the mai
After 5.5 SP2 the Received headers were counted. The limit is set to 512 I
believe (don't know if this can be changed).
Does the RFC say what constitutes a trivial loop?
Not really.
- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That'll get ya a 5% discount.
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:16 PM
Subject: RE: Question from a troll to a Yoda
> U da man
>
Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
> You didnt answer my last question. ;)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re:
Run, don't walk, to http://www.microsoft.com/exchange and get the disaster
recovery document. Read it. Let us know if you need any help understanding
it.
- Original Message -
From: "Lewis Kapell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 03
> Is there a Mensa discount?
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Separate the saucer.
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Ault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 8:14 AM
Subject: Some Problem Someplace, I think
> hi list..
>
> i have a problem with either the server or the client..
> how d
ley MCSE+I MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
> Sent: Thursday, January
s to behavioral problems."
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
You asked t
I'm available for consulting of this nature. Where is aruplabs located?
- Original Message -
From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:08 AM
Subject: Consultant Security/System Audit??
>
>
> Does anyone here
ir. This will change due to altitude.
> v = velocity of a flat bird expressed in feet per second
> s = the wing area of the bird in square feet
> CL = Coefficient of lift
>
> Looks like you have left out L, d, s and cl. Therefore it's a trick
> question.
>
> -Origi
Would that be the new and improved STiCK?
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:19 AM
Subject: RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think
>
> Sure, with this !
>
>
http://www.airborne.net/eready/janette/s
? Opinions?
> What about .net?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:40 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Consultant Security/System Audit??
>
> I'm available for consulting of this na
hange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:44 AM
Subject: RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think
>
> I have upgraded my STiCK 2.0 with the 9" nail add-on. It's much more
> efficient now.
>
> S>
>
> -Original Message-
>
use to mop up the mess, which
> answers your first question.
>
> S.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Some Problem Someplace, I think
>
>
Put 'em all in one container. Use other containers to create DL's and CR's.
- Original Message -
From: "Sparrow, Teresa (GOT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:49 PM
Subject: Containers
> Wanting to gather information.
>
The queue "Inbound messages awaiting delivery" are messages that have
already been read from the file system, converted and placed in the store.
Deleting queue.dat won't help a bit. If the delete button in the UI doens't
work you'll need to use mdbvu32.exe to delete them There is an article on
usi
he Q article said to delete queue.dat so whoever wrote it doesn't know
what
> they were doing. I thought I may have to use mdbvu32.exe but have never
used
> it before. I'm moving everything to Exchange 2000 soon so maybe I'll just
> leave them out there for now.
>
> Thanks,
Oh, my. You mean the truth is out there for those willing to seek it? Will
wonders never cease...
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Schorr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:54 PM
Subject: RE: changing port
> Actually a qui
Joe Smith hires on and goes to work for Mike Bloggs in Engineering. So you
create his mailbox in Engineering. A few years later he moves to Marketing
to be a technical rep. How do you move his mailbox from the Engineering
container to the Marketing containter?
You don't. Not without deleting and
Well, sorta. The directories talk to each other, er... directly.
- Original Message -
From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site
> Exchange 5.5 servers commu
ous doctrine.
Believe
> it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:06 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5
It doesn't unless you run offline defrag.
- Original Message -
From: "John Navara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:35 PM
Subject: RE: Mailbox Resources Questions
> Missy,
>
> I have just dumped several MB of info from m
It's a description of how to do Norton's job.
- Original Message -
From: "Jennifer Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:35 PM
Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
> What does this have to do with
Lends a whole new meaning to the phrase, "Good s***".
- Original Message -
From: "Jennifer Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:44 AM
Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
> I think Ed Norton was
According to RFC-977, the LIST command is supported by an NNTP server (i.e.
is not optional). All you need to do is use telnet to open a connection to
119 and issue "list" capturing to a text file. There's your active file.
- Original Message -
From: "Shields, Anthony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ng Win2k Telnet - I can't find the logging feature
that was part of the WinNT4 Telnet. Is it gone?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange Active File for NNTP
Acco
Opinions: everyone has one...
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
> You've got to be kidding...
> The excessive sarcasm is what ruins t
The top of the Exchange world _created_ this list.
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:24 AM
Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
That is what makes this list great. W
Bog dogs? Would they be anything like Hounds of the Baskervilles?
- Original Message -
From: "Don Ely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:22 AM
Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Did we hurt your wittle fee
I dunno. Sometimes I do it just to piss you off.
- Original Message -
From: "Bowles, John L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:32 AM
Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Excactly, after I got bombarded I to
Which is a reference to the Hounds of Baskervilles
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Di Nardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:01 AM
Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
> A dog the lives in a bog.
>
> bo
Oh no! A test! And I didn't study!!
The dog ate my textbook!
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:33 AM
Subject: test
> just testing please ignore
>
> _
You could start with the readme on the CD.
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:46 AM
Subject: Install trouble
> I have just been given the task of setting up the companies exchange
s
Uh... yeah. Have just one IMS. The MTA does not send out SMTP mail.
- Original Message -
From: "John Q" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: Mail relay w/ E 5.5
> If you are using 2 EX 5.5 servers in one
Kelly barefoot... bellydance...
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:34 PM
Subject: RE: fix monitor
>
> Who, me? I belly dance, and that is generally done barefoot.
> ~~
Question was asked and answered already. We're just beating on the dead
corpse.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Lagase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
>
Experience
- Original Message -
From: "Morgan, Joshua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
> Question:
> I'm probably one of the newest people on this list, and I thin
ds
>
> Mr Louis Joyce
> Computer Support Analyst
> Network Administrator
> BT Ignite eSolutions
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 08 January 2002 17:24
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject
Only if the owner's name is Suessereaux...
NB: for the uninformed - Louisianna is home to a particular group of folks
called Cajuns. The vast majority of them have names ending in -eaux.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL P
: fix monitor
> Daniel, you can see many photos of Kelly on her Website. The link is in
the
> archives.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:28 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
&g
Not quite. Outlook does close the connection after a period of time. If new
mail is present the server informs the client via UDP (we've had this
discussion before). I forget what the default value was; maybe 15 minutes
like everything else. But it is a clean disconnection and reconnect is
seamles
That would be her...
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry W. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 4:01 AM
Subject: RE: fix monitor
> Is this pictures of you Kelly?
> http://kellyborndale.homestead.com/photo.html
>
> Jer
fix monitor
> Anyone ever wondered what Ed Crowley looks like?
>
> Regards
>
> Mr Louis Joyce
> Computer Support Analyst
> Network Administrator
> BT Ignite eSolutions
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
That is your server NDRing the attempted relays back to the spammers. Since
spammers tend to use bogus addresses those messages will likely timeout
after three days as undeliverable.
- Original Message -
From: "Siegel, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTEC
d to Louisiana three years ago I quickly discovered that
> nothing here is pronounced as it is spelled. They also like to think the
> word go is spell geaux.
>
> Geaux figure.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent:
of the country doesn't take off work for Mardi Gras!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:43 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
>
>
> You
Whenever I go there folks look at my name and I get a slew of cajun thrown
in my face.
- Original Message -
From: "K. Triona Guidry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:17 PM
Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not
other problem?
> I have followed all the suggested reccomendations regarding relaying.
>
> Rich
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:41 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: IMC origina
ge-
> From: Siegel, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:42 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IMC originator <>
>
>
> So I should ignore those if they are not causing any other problem?
> I have followed all the sugges
y (quickly) when trying to send an NDR to a bad address.
>
> Tom
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:11 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: IMC originator <>
>
>
> Th
Without Verify turned on, no, Exchange will not give up your internal
addresses. Verify is off by default.
- Original Message -
From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:46 PM
Subject: Solicitation
> Hi
>
Ah... I spoke too soon. Had forgotten about LDAP. That's what I get for
replying to a message at 0245. ;)
- Original Message -
From: "Durkee, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:52 PM
Subject: RE: Solicitation
> A
Does she have an assistant?
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Rink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: Old mail messages keep coming back
> She does not have a PDA. I have also deleted her Outlook pro
Supposed to happen every 24 hours at midnight EST. Give it 24 hours after
that to propogate.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:58 AM
Subject: DNS Changes take how long
>
> Well we
ing DNS server in the world clears its cache at midnight EST?
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:43 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: DNS Changes take how long
> Subject
If memory serves me those paths are for the log files for the respective
databases.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Brennan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:50 AM
Subject: Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 Question
> SYSTEM:
>
Sounds like a captive audience. Do they qualify as lusers?
- Original Message -
From: "Jennifer Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:46 PM
Subject: RE: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gig
ger.
RE: In Washington State (Was: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gig
ger. A@mm Virus)
> Mary Kay Letourneau says hi and wants to know how old you are.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:29 PM
> To: Excha
:
> >Mary Kay Letourneau says hi and wants to know how old you are.
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:29 PM
> >To: Exchange Discussions
> >Subject: Re: In Washington Stat
Too much has been snipped. Include all the X- headers up to and including
the first MIME reference.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom.Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:33 AM
Subject: Receiving email that isn't decoded
It needs to join the domain in order to have access to AD.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:59 PM
Subject: VERY Quick Question
> Hello,
>
> My Boss wants another Exchange 2
IANAL (I Am Not A Lawyer) nor do I play one on TV.
Have the customer put in writing that you, the consultant, are being tasked
with this job and that the company assumes full responsibility for, well,
everything. Reduce it down to where you are only performing a function and
nothing more. It's a
manpower.com refuses to accept mail from you. Most likely you are failing a
reverse DNS lookup.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:34 AM
Subject: 553 error
> A user is trying to send an email t
Sturgis, South Dakota. And it's been rescheduled to coincide with the annaul
Harley motorcycle run.
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Hampshire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:43 AM
Subject: MEC next year
> Okay, I mis
You had the wheel when you were young? Gee... all we had was the square.
Took five guys to move it anywhere and if someone didn't move fast enough
it'd crush him and then we didn't have enough guys to get it off him. And we
LIKED IT 'cuz we didn't know any better!
- Original Message -
Fro
Oooh... how I would LOVE to catch my manager's workstation unlocked!!
- Original Message -
From: "Darcy Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:18 PM
Subject: RE: Investigating a Forged Message
> In our office, if your w
Put down the mouse and step away from the keyboard. Get a copy of anything
by Robichaux or Redmond pertinent to your version and read it before even
thinking about administering this server beyond the UI.
- Original Message -
From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discus
restest /?
It's a really simple little app. All it does is a DNS MX/A record lookup
just like the SMTP mailer does.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Roussel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:37 AM
Subject: RE: 3499 (
Configure your antivirus to not scan any of the \exchsrvr directories, most
notably the \mtadata and \imcdata directories.
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Vesneski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:37 PM
Subject: No Mail
Yes, this scenario is one that calls for running offline defragmentation.
- Original Message -
From: "Davinder Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:09 PM
Subject: Fragmentation in mail database
> We just setup a new
FAQ
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:32 AM
Subject: pop with xchange5.5
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm not sure but I guess that this item already 've been answered before,
> but I can not find the s
Configure your file-based AV to not scan the \exchsrvr directory structure.
- Original Message -
From: "Niki Blowfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 8:07 AM
Subject: IMC Errors
> Dear All,
>
> We have been getting the
Most likely, yes. How about I instruct you on how to remove the accelerator
from your car so you can't get in trouble there either?
- Original Message -
From: "Walden H. Leverich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:47 PM
Too much is unknown about the environment and the intended end result to
give any advice other than:
1. Buy and read anything by Robichaux or Redmond
2. Hire a consultant (I'm available for $250 + T&E)
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROT
Reputation, yes. Reality, no.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Helfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
>
> "A reputation I've cultivated in earnest"
>
> That's
I remember Bravehearts. That was back when ... oh, never
mind. I'll just get off on another rant.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:18 PM
Subject: RE: Hi
> Sure.[1] Because I w
Elaine moved to Australia when her husband moved there. She left MS about
two years ago and, as far as I know, is still down there.
- Original Message -
From: "Dupler, Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:28 PM
Subject
Run, don't walk, to your nearest bookstore and pick up a version-appropriate
book by either Robichaux or Redmond. Read it. Then ask questions.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10
Peter Bowyer
- Original Message -
From: "John Matteson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:58 PM
Subject: RE: Hi
> Yes to Bravehearts and No to Elaine.
>
> Another old timer question, Who was the original Sponser of the
Circular logging should really only be used on a connector-only server where
all data is transitory anyway. This does lessen the ability for an
Enterprise-level DR, however.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Omilian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Last Saturday the local (Dallas, TX) Vietnam Vets motorcycle club organized
the 13th annual Ride to the Wall. This was my first time to participate. The
gathering spot was the parking lot of the Ballpark in Arlington (where the
Rangers play). By the time we were ready to hit the road we had an est
He is too. He has joined ... the choir invisible.
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 6:34 PM
Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
> You are not dead.
>
> (Testing fi
x27;m thinking that it was sometime around December 1, 1995 that
> Peter went live.
>
> The Bravehearts group was pre-web, pre list server. It mainly existed in
> the form of a weekly telecon and a forum on Compuserve.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:
Create a custom recipient representing his home account. Allow auto-forward
under the IMC.
This is not recommended, by the way: the potential for mail loops is large.
Better would be to give him external access to his mailbox.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
You're sending out mail with RTF codes. This gets encoded into TNEF and very
few (vanishingly few) 3rd-party mail clients can unravel it. The setting is
in the IMC (forget the exact location).
- Original Message -
From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMA
By 1018 do you mean a -1018?
First thing I'd do is check the system log for SCSI errors. Dollar to a
doughnut your RAID controller is heading south.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001
xt Exchange Format.
Thank you,
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
Network Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:00 PM
To: Exchange D
Someone somewhere is running perfmon against this machine.
- Original Message -
From: "Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:56 AM
Subject: Exchange Problem
> I am installing Exchange 5.5. ,
201 - 300 of 835 matches
Mail list logo
