I have an Exchange server (5.5 sp4) which will not let me delete a
particular mailbox (using exchange admin).
It keeps reporting that the information store is not running. However if I
create a new box then delete that one, it works fine. I am sure the problem
is the mb itself. brbrDoes anyone
If there is information store limit, take out of it. If you have more than
one Exchange servers in same site, try to move this mailbox to another
server, then delete it.
--
From: Greg Hamner[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 24
Hi Fred
You will want to look into a Unix Product called Samba which will provide
authentication integration with your domain on the unix machines, but as far
as policies I am not sure.
Hope that gets you started.
Cheers
Simon Taylor
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL
Here!
Here! I supported XCH 4 a MS outsourcer 4 2 years. Ben's
correct.
David
Kopec?
Electronic Messaging Specialist
Technology Services
Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From:
Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday,
October 23, 2001 3:34 PMTo:
No, Dad's Operating System.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:25 PM
Subject: RE: Sending HTML to list (DON'T)
what do you want a denial of service disk for?
Pat
Stephen J.
ARGH!!! He didn't
initially say WHO was doing the coding! If HE coded it, HE should fix it
as he has time to. If he DIDN'T, he should ask those who DID to fix
it! ARGH!
Don't tell me what I
understand what I don't. I *do* understand this situation
would still want it to be "done right".
I have
Exchange 5.5 with 200 mailboxes. Director of the company is asking me if it is
worth to co-locate emails with ISP. I checked with one of the ISP and looks like
its very cheap if the ISP will host our company's email. I think the advantage
will be that there will be less headaches for
As far as internet domains exchange handles it very
well. I currently run about 5 domains off one box.
There of which do not have much traffic. You need to
make sure you do 3 things.
1. Set delivery up of the domains to the inbound que.
2. Make sure you allow only domains you own have the
right
Sorry about the lack of info - Yes it is two internet domains and 1 NT
domain.
-Original Message-
From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hosting Multiple Domians with 1 server
Craig,
Do you mean
Title: Message
you
will not be able to use any of the other features of Exchange. Exchange was
originally designed as more of a Groups ware application. it did not have native
SMTP until 2k. it was still an add on in 5.5 keep that in
mind.
Director : I need to be able to share my contact
I have a customer that is running Exchange 2000 of coarse on a WIndows 2K
server. The server is directly plugged to the internet. The company will
receive email for 5 diferent internet domains with this server. I used a
non interent domain for the local domain. I have configured the SMTP
Title: Message
Another question, does the ISP virus scan email?
Many do not or if they do, it's an added cost option.
Lyle
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 24,
2001 9:02 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Co-locating
I'm thinking the boss may have meant an ASP (application service
provider)Exchange host as opposed to an ISP. Some of them can be found here http://www.crowcanyon.com/ExchangeASP.htm.
Can't imagine thata company would go from a
full featured groupware platform togeneric internet email
The Internet Main Service connector has a way to
stipulate what domains it services There is a feature
to only allow them to send if they are homed on this
server and you can stipulate only allow certain
domains to send.
Chris
--- Terry Belanger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a customer that
Terry
Not 100% sure about this, but could you create multiple Virtual Servers with
the Domain names you want to accept. You can prevent messaging relay not
selecting the Allow Messages To Be relayed to These Domains check box.
Thanks
Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel:
here are the two article that microsoft has on the
topic.
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q196/6/26.ASP
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q199/6/56.ASP
Chris
--- WEAVER, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Terry
Not 100% sure about this, but could you create
multiple
This is for 55 - I assume there is a similar setup for Ex2k - which I think
is what the original post stated?
Simon Weaver
NT Domain Administrator
Ext. 5544
Tel: 02392-705544 (Direct Dial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24
Title: Message
What
you may want to do is have your ISP relay your mail for you. That way if Exch
goes down, they can store and forward when the server comes back
up.
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October
24, 2001 7:02
I'm looking for some advice on configuring OWA. We're running e2k sp1 on
w2k sp2 and would like to set it up so we don't have to make any of the
Exchange boxes accessible to the Internet. From reading the posts on
this list it seems to be possible to setup a server just for OWA, but I
haven't had
OK here is the
scenario.
Windows 2000
advanced server running Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 in USA
Windows NT Server
4.0 SP6a running Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 in Israel
using a VPN
connection, (checkpoint firewall),
this is in a test
environment so no rush.
what is
happening
can't send
What your talking about is having a front end and back end setup and
although this is possible, it can't be done with the standard version of
Exchange. You need the next one up, either Advanced or Enterprise (not
sure what they call it).
Robin.
-Original Message-
From: Randy Lauritzen
The optimizer will allow you to move to a different drive.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
you
couldn't be more wrong... Time has to be the most important commodity. Without
it you can't help everyone as needed. If you don't plan.. you don't accomplish.
Doesn't get any simpler than that.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday,
Do you have any ideas on why an Exchange server would reboot by
itself? There are NO messages in the event log at all. It seems to reboot
when messages are getting stuck in the IMS queue. Is this a feature?
Thanks in advance.
Tom
List Charter and FAQ at:
Versions please...
Sounds like if you're running W2K, you have it set to reboot if services
stop.
-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Server Reboots
Do you have any
Title: RE: Need help moving Exchange database log files
I assume you've used OPTIMZER with the -V option to move the log files to a larger drive?
Also, as part of the initial install of Exchange.. you should always change to another drive from C: drive(as it defaults to C:\exchsrvr) usually
Run Performance Optimizer to move the logs.
For mailbox sizes.. Site Nam, Server, Server name, Private IS, Mailbox
Resources...
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Gaylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Need help
Title: Message
You
couldn't be more wrong... The time you have isa direct reflection on
how well you plan and implement things. If you do it correctly, you have
all the time in the world. If you don't well... I don't think
there's any need for explanation there...
-Original
Sorry. If you don't accomplish, they don't accomplish. That's
why I come in a 2am or the weekend to upgrade the server instead of doing it
during the day. In my organization, I don't sell, interact with customers,
etc. I am a 100% cost center. IT is supposed to be the solution, not the
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 on Win2k
The only item you should be aware of is running the EXCHANGE 2000 AD component on one of the DC's so you have the object in the SCHEMA when you deploy WIN2K at the DOMAIN level. This will make a MUCH smoother movement to XCHG2K when you're ready. I also
Run the Exchange Performance Optimizer to move the log files.
In the Admin program, look at the Mailbox Resource view under the server
where the user is homed to see the size of the mailbox.
*
* Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE *
* Manager, Network Services *
* [EMAIL
What O/S and do you have any Anti Virus Software Running
-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 October 2001 17:04
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Server Reboots
Do you have any ideas on why an Exchange server would reboot by
itself?
Hi,
Prior to moving log files you should stop exchange services, that means that
all users will be kicked off automatically or their outlook client will
hang, so you might want to do this when as few people as possible are using
the system.
If you want to move where the default places for your
Hi Jennifer
The best way of moving things around is to run the performance optimizer, it
will down the Exchange services though.. It will make some suggestions as to
where to put things after running some test, but then you can change them
and tell it to move everything for you.
Cheers
Simon
Hmmm
"For some reason, there are many forms on the web farm that
generate email messages with improper [EMAIL PROTECTED] address
in the from: field. Instead, they
use first name, last name"
I guess this
sentence wouldn't tell you that he DIDN'T write the code if he HAD written
the
I am building an additional exchange server into my site, I am planning on
W2k and Exchange 5.5. Then migrating all users off the old server and
shutting it down. My question is when I go to actually upgrade my PDC's and
BDC to W2k and implement AD will there be any issues with the server
I am
in the process of migrating our dept from NT 4 To W2k and from Ex 5.5 to
E2k.
We are
having a problem connecting to our E2K server using the Outlook client remotely
from outside our organization.
I have
many users (incl myself) that connect to the Exchange server from
Title: RE: Mixed environment
I believe that you will have to use Internet Explorer for proper authentication.
Eugene Pesochin
Systems Manager
ClubMom, Inc.
200 Madison Ave. 6th Fl
New York, New York 10016
tel 646.435.6565
fax 646.435.6600
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.clubmom.com
-Original
Title: RE: Need help moving Exchange database log files
It's all good.. ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Need help moving Exchange database log files
Hi,
I am
in the process of migrating our dept from NT 4 To W2k and from Ex 5.5 to
E2k.
We
are having a problem connecting to our E2K server using the Outlook client
remotely from outside our organization.
I
have many users (incl myself) that connect to the Exchange
No the
firewall is not being used with the FRAME connection
where
can I get more info on RPCPING?
Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax
The contents of this e-mail and any
attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or
You should let the optimizer do it. It will stop the services for you and
make suggested changes to you that you can override. Why would you not let
this service work for you.
dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001
Title: RE: Need help moving Exchange database log files
Hi
Jennifer.
I
guess we are assuming this is Exchange5.5?
Consider doing full backups nightly. (It would be my choice
wherever possible for Exchange.)
You
have 2 hard drives, C: and D:? Perhaps a new drive F:\ is in
order?
As
Thanks everybody for your help, just one more question, this circular
logging, it says in some publications that it is best to disable this, any
general consensus??
Thanks
Jenn
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
"For some reason" could be
taken to mean that he did in fact do it. *Whoever* [1] did it should
clean up their slop, workaround or not.
And your "Free Speach"
mantra is moot - I'm not Congress.
...and if you don't like my
"support", then ask for a refund of your subscription fee. If you
There are always issues.
However, by putting Exchange on Windows2000, you've helped eliminate some of
those issues. It'll be easier with Exchange already on W2K rather than
still on NT.
William
-Original Message-
From: Julie Lienemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
If you're doing full online nightly backups, turn off circular logging.
Other will have more insightI just regurgitate what I learn
Regards,
Sean Martin, MCSE
Network Administrator
Ribelin Lowell Company
Insurance Brokers, Inc.
3111 C Street, Suite 300
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Ph:
Definitely. Circular logging should only be for bridgehead servers/OWA
Servers with no mailboxes.
William
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Gaylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Little bit more Exchange info
Yes,
it should be only in extreme circumstances you use cirkular logging to save
disk space. It is always better to disable it and have the backup software
do the deleting of old log files for you after a succesful backup.
Br.
Patrick Johansson
-Original Message-
From: ext Jennifer
Outlook2k is delivering new mail to the .ost eben when connected to
network. Delivery options are correctly configured, i can't seem to
figure this one out
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
If you want your Online backups to work, disable it.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Gaylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Little bit more Exchange info
Thanks everybody for your help, just one more
Of those of you that are using an antivirus program that utilizes the
Antivirus API, have you seen and or addresses the MAPI issues discussed in
Q264731? Basically we are seeing issues with MAPI clients accessing
unscanned attachments getting errors. After the first attempt everything
seems to
I attended Michèle's wedding. My guess is since your
spare time is used learning XP and MSI, she is 'getting it' more than
you.
In business, time doesn't stand alone. It is a variable
that must also be combined unfortunately with money and
effort.
My recommendation would be to rebuild
Do you mean pst?
SB
-Original Message-
From: Paul Rothschild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: delivery to .ost even when connected to network?
Outlook2k is delivering new mail to the .ost eben when connected to
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q239639
Originally from William posted earlier.
- Original Message -
From: Greg Hamner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:07 AM
Subject: ghost mailboxes
I have
Come on folks, this is getting very old. Let's let it go.
Or take it off line, but stop cluttering the list with bickering.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24,
so where is the problem?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Rothschild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 13:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: delivery to .ost even when connected to network?
Outlook2k is delivering new mail to the .ost eben when connected
YES! Disable it! Most setups do not need circular logging!
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Censorship: The reaction of the ignorant to freedom.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Gaylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
You have your email setup to be accessed offline that is by design...
Turn off the offline access and all will be better.
Carry on
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: Paul Rothschild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:32 AM
To:
And OST doesn't get mail delivered per se; it synchronizes data while
connected to the network.
The behaviour you're seeing is expected and correct.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Paul Rothschild [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October
Title: RE: Little bit more Exchange info
I agree with Drewski.. typically you disable it as most ADMINS have some sort of backup solution. The backup solution manages the logs and in turn your space. Make sure you check the FLUSH LOGS if such a setting exists on your backup solution.
-Rick
We're using NAV in MAPI AVAPI mode and haven't seen that one but do
occasionally get a rash of NDRs for messages going between the servers. I
think someone here had an open call with Trend who pointed the finger at the
AVAPI. From what I've read, the one in 55 is so buggy that I'm thinking of
Title: RE: delivery to .ost even when connected to network?
IS it possible that this client has a rule setup to deliver, copy, or move mail to the OST file?
Todd White
System Administrator
LaserComm Inc.
972-941-0276 Voice
972-941-0223 Fax
The contents of this e-mail and any attachments
Title: RE: delivery to .ost even when connected to network?
mebbe he means no matter what he does, he can't get it stop writing to the OST. What version of OL?
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange
Title: RE: Antivirus API
Our implementation of NAV for EXCHANGE SERVER 5.5 has the exact same issues using the VAPI option.. we switched to MAPI Only and all problems went away.
-Rick
-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
Title: RE: delivery to .ost even when connected to network?
sorry
meant PST
OST is
for offline storage only
Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax
The contents of this e-mail and any
attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its
Title: RE: Antivirus API
We were experiencing problems with our user's Outlook encountering Operation Failed errors. Once we increased the Open Retry Delay setting on the Exchange server, it seemed to alleviate the problem. We do see the error every so often with very large attachments, but
Is
this over a VPN?
William
-Original Message-From: Albert Vasquez
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:49
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Remote
connectivity problem Using the Outlook client.
I am
in the process of migrating our dept
So
what's the point in having a go at her, Rick?
Michele is allowed toput forward her own opinions without someone
chastising her!
even
if you dont think she's right.
Stu.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 23 October 2001
22:24To:
You
know.. sometime late last night... I re-thought me sending that email... and in
hindsight probably shouldn't have stopped, dropped and rolled before hitting
that evil SEND button. I was stressed(bad time to reply to emails where you view
someone not getting your points) and was trying
Title: RE: delivery to .ost even when connected to network?
But
that's the nature of OSTs, like Missy said!
Version would be good...
-- DrewVisit
http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!There are seldom good
technological solutions to behavioral
*Hug*
-MichèleImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our
new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
- "We write the
way we do for several reasons. One, we're capable of
I realize you're talking about 5.5, however Exchange 2000 supports VSAPI
2.0 which doesn't require MAPI to scan emails. Any and all emails are
scanned before entering the information store. Since switching from
Exchange 5.5 to 2000 SP1 w/ Norton AV for MSE Version 2.5 (build 11) I
haven't had
William, this leads me to believe he is not using VPN, but allowing people
to logon remotely from the Public Internet. Very bad!!
Note: Our firewall is not blocking port 135 and there is not a problem
connecting to our 5.5 server using the Outlook client remotely.
This is a multi-part
Here's the deal. I'm using webtrends to create reports for our website. The
log files are emailed to me inline (not as attachments but as the body of
the email). Webtrends can't read the email directly so I save them to .txt
files. The solution I would like to work out could go two ways.
1.
Title: RE: (Slightly) Saving Outlook Email to text
We have some parsing software that we've used in the past. It was cheap, and they'll help you set up the template. Of course, it means the e-mail has to have some consistency. I might be able to dig it up again.
Loved you in Men-in-Black
We are having a strange problem. We send to a particular domain and get an
NDR back from our server saying that relaying is prohibited. This same
domain can send to us and we can send to other domains just fine. We were
able to send to them before. Has anyone else seen anything like this? We
Title: RE: (Slightly) Saving Outlook Email to text
Message parse from Cypress - http://www.cypressnet.com/.
IIRC,
you say "between here and here, move it to this field".
-Original Message-From: William Smith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:47
PMTo:
Normally, I'd check orbz.org first to see if you're listed as an open
relay. You are NOT.
ORBZ Database Information
IP: 216.77.121.3
IP not found in database
=
Direct DNS Lookups
inputs.orbz.org: clean
outputs.orbz.org: clean
These 2 articles are talking about Exchange 5.5. I am very familiar with
how to do it with exchange 5.5 I just don't know how to do it with
Exchange 2000
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Michèle! Where's your quip?
Terry, please include the previous posts. Some of us don't really want to
dig back through all the posts and figure out which 2 articles you are
referring to. You are wanting to open up relaying in Ex2000? Or prevent
it? If prevent it, Exchange 2000 is
I send it offline now! :-) avoids cluttering the list with it, since it
happens ALOT.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
All you need to do is add the multiple domains into the recipent update
service and it will host those 5 domains. On the SMTP connector you
simply need to add that users must first authenticate before they can
send mail. Then let the remote users know that they must turn on that
option in either
Yes, you may have to run either VMware or Terminal services on the Unix
clients to be able to use OWA/Exchange.
Matt Bullock
-Original Message-
From: Eugene Pesochin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mixed
Title: RE: Relay
I also use this as a check as well.. it comes in handy at times.. use both options. The first one does the deeper check.
http://www.zmailer.org/mxverify.html
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:52
Hi all
Somewhat relating to this issue, I have compiled a list of URLs on this subject, and
particular to w2k clustering. As I didn't get a response for this list, I'd assume
that no one is doing this...
Installing E5.5 on a W2K Server
Sometimes I am guilty of assuming people might actually have looked at
www.microsoft.com for information on their Microsoft applications running on
their Microsoft operating system.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Yarrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:04 PM
This is true however at the time I was looking for this information... bugger all
was on the website... So yeah... not having a go at the level of understanding on the
list... I just thought it might save someone else some time...
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William
I did this and using SAlive made an SMTP connection to the IP address. It
connected just fine. What seems strange is that it is coming from our IMS
saying MSEXCH:IMS:HoneyBaked:Site:Server 3550 (000B09AA) 550 5.7.1 Unable to
relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] To test the GroupShield scenario I
I wasn't being sarcastic. I was being realistic. It takes same time to search
these links, whether it is for you or to others. So your whining was uncalled
for. Sorry if I am being wrong.
Mal
-Original Message-
From: Dan Yarrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October
Are you doing Brick Level Backups?
I have an Exchange server (5.5 sp4) which will not let me delete a
particular mailbox (using exchange admin).
It keeps reporting that the information store is not running. However if I
create a new box then delete that one, it works fine. I am sure the
It is
cheaper if the ISP hosts your email. You can host it for a lot less than
Exchange, too. If you are just using Exchange for basicemail you
paid too much!
I
think the headaches will still be there.They'll just be different
ones. You are entrusting the service provider to have full
actually, I thought he was providing resources he'd found so other people
woulndn't have to go through the same amount of hassle...
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
TEN THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT U.S. POLICY IN THE MIDDLE EAST
John,
If you are wanting to use your own in-house CA for self signing, then check
out the following Q articles from MS:
For setting up the CA, obtaining the certificate, and installation:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q290/6/25.asp?id=290625SD=
MSKB
How to force SSL and have
Server is online all the time, DSL is sketchy. The primary MX is set to my
firewall. However, if the DSL service is down or I reboot the router, mail
will not be delivered. In the past, I had the ISP deliver the mail to my
primary MX when it is avail. If it is not avail, it is delivered to the
Sounds like a lot of effort. Why not just run one MX for your DSL? If its
not up the messages will queue on the originating end anyway...
Cheers,
Marty
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
96 matches
Mail list logo
