What are the timings on these events?
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 July 2002 22:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DS Export Complete??
Windows 2000 SP2, Exchange 5.5 SP 4(organization has 31 sites).
The server has been running
every minute for the past 6 hours
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DS Export Complete??
What are the timings on these events?
-Original Message-
From:
What they take exactly one minute every time? Unlikely! I'm wondering if
anything is being done with the export - the timings may give us a clue.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 July 2002 07:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DS
I see.
How long between the event 41 and event 38?
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DS Export Complete??
What they take exactly one minute every time? Unlikely!
hi all,
it's migration time again .
ok, i need to migrate 90 odd mailboxes and public folder resources from an
exchange 5.5 server in Site A to an exchange 5.5 server in Site B (that
exists in a different organisation and domain).
is this possible? if so, what is the 'cleanest' way to
Can the messages that are sitting in the Outbound messages awaiting
delivery Queue be retrieved? None of them originated from our host name or
are set to be delivered to us. I just recently secured the server against
SMTP relaying, I had to leave it open do to an old program that required MS
Problem Solve. How many of you know about this? Sounds very interesting almost like a
SQL database.
** Microsoft Gives Glimpse Of New Exchange
Microsoft has begun to share details of updates to its Exchange
E-mail system and Outlook E-mail client, and company officials
say the
I'd bet a great many of us know about it and have known about it for some
time now...
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server !!SOLVED!!
Problem Solve. How many of
Here's a solution to checkout http://www.stratus.com
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 8:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server
What if it is with the database? I want to be able to fire up the spare
We just upgraded our network from nt4/exch5.5 to 2KAD/Exch2K. Quite
often when someone opens Outlook on their desktop, they will get the
Microsoft Exchange Server is Unavailable message. Upon clicking
Retry the almost always get in, but this problem is quite annoying.
Anyone have any
That is very cool!! I just forwarded the link to my manager.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server
Here's a solution to checkout http://www.stratus.com
Has anyone experienced the synchronization problem w/Outlook 2000 and
Cisco's VPN client V 3.5.2 C? It is hanging up attempting to synchronize
with our Exchange 5.5 Servers. Cisco delivered a fix; add OutlookNotify=1
to VPNClient.ini file in the program installation directory, but I tried it
and
Title: RE: IT staff behavior
I got my start in IT on helpdesk. I started out in the IT dept as the Administrative Assistant, only back then it was known as being a secretary. I was totally bored and the LAN manager knew it so he started giving me technically challenging tasks to do to help me
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Okay, I'll have to accept the label of Foof Queen. Well at least I have some official letters to put behind my name now...
Sherry Abercrombie - FQ
Data Center Administration Team
Information Technology
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.
Mm...
Not so much. Just about any large corporation would have a trouble ticket
system.
Besides this one persons issues, you've also seen what can happen when the
problem is ignored. The loss of confidence in the messaging system by the
rest of the department has a tremendous impact on the
Environment:
(1) Exchange 2000 server running on my internal network with OWA
I want users from the internet to be able to access my OWA server by
entering in the URL of outlook.mydomain.com rather than
myserver.mydomain.com/exchange. This is how I had it configured when I
was running Exchange
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
LOL!!!
great foof.
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:04
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
server HACKED!
Okay, I'll have to accept the label
Article: The Different Categories Of Junk Email Filters
http://www.w2knews.com/index.cfm?id=380
Warm regards,
Stu
***
Stu Sjouwerman - Founder, Chief Operating Off.
Sunbelt Software, # 409 in the Inc. 500 List ~
Editor W2Knews: 500,000 readers every
Isn't 3.5.2 a beta? I was told by my rep to use 3.5.1. I have been using it
for all clients, and have had no problems.
- Original Message -
From: David Elebute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:17 AM
Subject: MS Outlook
Title: Message
:) I even changed the colorsI didn't want to
continue to blind others..;)
Sherry Abercrombie -
FQ Data Center Administration Team Information
Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
-Original Message-From: Eldridge, Dave
Exchange has been scheduled to use SQL for the backend for many years,
but they are way behind.
Thanks,
-Chris-
IT Director
Sundowner Interiors
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Your answer is well documented in the following Q Article. You can increase
the time out value or suppress the message completely.
PSS ID Number: Q293650
-Original Message-
From: Frey, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: Message
Now I
don't have an excuse to wear my sunglasses when I read my
email.
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:43
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
server HACKED!
:) I
Transporter Beams have been planned as well, but they are way behind.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server !!SOLVED!!
Exchange has been scheduled to use SQL for
My WAN consultant suggested it, come to think of it V 3.5.1 was working at
times as well. I will try to setup the older version and see what happens.
Thanks for the advice.
David Elebute
Director of MIS
SuperClubs
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Title: Message
I'm
always thinking of others so, here's a little reason for you to wear your
sunglasses ;)
Sherry
Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just
fine."
-Original Message-From:
Eldridge, Dave
Title: Message
"Blinded by the Light!!"
Thanks
all is right in the world.
Joe
Sunglasses
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:03
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
server HACKED!
I'm
Title: Message
Looking cool isn't enough of an excuse?
-Original
Message-From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server
HACKED!
Now I don't have an excuse
Title: Message
This resource is not for showing off, please keep the comments
relevant to the issues and do not "pad-out" the thread by trying to be clever
!
Thank you for your corporation in this
matter
MS-Exchange Admin Staff
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie,
Sherry
I'm using 3.5.2b and getting the same results. Mine will not find the server
first time around, so I retry the server and then it takes several minutes
to sync. It is worse depending on the amount of email as well. On Cisco's
networking pro forum there are several messages concerning this issue.
Title: Message
I
don't have to try to be clever - I have a proven track
record.
-Original Message-From: Szalkiewicz, Toni
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 17 July 2002
16:08To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange
5.5 server HACKED!
This resource is not for
On the Cisco site the bug is: CSCdu36579, I am going to try 3.5.1 again. I
actually can work in Outlook if I stay out of the inbox and do not try to
sync; great choices heh?
-Original Message-
From: Harty, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:09 AM
To:
Title: Message
Sherry,
I've
wondered how much thrust does it require?
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:03
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
server HACKED!
I'm
always thinking
Title: Message
I have never seen this guy before. How are we to
know that they are "MS-Exchange Admin" staff? I thought this list was self
moderated? I feel like I am in Romper Room sometimes, and have been told to
'settle down'.
- Original Message -
From:
Snook, Kevin S
Title: Message
Can
you open my milk, mommy?
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17,
2002 11:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re:
Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
I have never seen this guy before. How are we to
David,
Thanks for Cisco bug ref. I'm talking to them now about this but since the
CSE hasn't even mentioned the info in this thread, I'd better not get my
hopes up.
--
From: David Elebute
Reply To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:14 AM
Title: Message
Found the problem - 'twas a corrupt Contact entry. It look like
both users added a contact list from a colleague that contained the corrupted
item. Once I removedthe item restarted
Outlook,everything was fine.
Eric
-Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric
Title: Message
Stop
pissing on yourself then.
-Original Message-From: Matthew
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17,
2002 11:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re:
Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
I have never seen this guy before. How are we
Is the remote user using DSL? If so I think you'll need to decrease the MTU
on the PPPoE connection (I used 1400 instead of 1492). There is some packet
fragmentation that occurs during Outlook sync (and other processes) that
causes it to fail. I'm not an expert in the area but the change
unfortunatly-- I have to do both. Our agency is in between sizes where it's too small
to have 2 seperate departments, but it's growing and becoming a pain in the ass
sometimes for us 2 people who have to help everyone, administer the network,
troubleshoot the phone system, etc.. I'm not
Title: RE: IT staff behavior
nice
example-- bravo ;)
-Original Message-From: Smith, JulieAnn
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:35
PMPosted To: Exchange 2000 ServerConversation: IT staff
behaviorSubject: RE: IT staff behavior
This thread is very
how is everyone running their trouble ticket program? is it a web based solution? I
have created one in the past, but never really deployed it, and am thinking about
re-creating one from the ground up. Is that how you all are doing your trouble
tickets? Like I said in an earlier thread, we
I think that would be a great idea..
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
We currently use Trackit, which sucks. We are in the Kick off mode of
implementing SalesLogix company wide, which should (allegedly) integrate
every facet of the business.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I feel for you, we have the same situation here.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IT staff behavior
unfortunatly-- I have to do both. Our agency is in between sizes where
1. Redirect to /exchange, just like you did it in 5.5. Better yet,
since you have SSL, redirect it to https:// etc.
2. Yes, apply it to the default website.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 09:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange
We actually use track-it here and it has been working pretty well for us. We upgraded
to 5.0 just recently... and aside from some unstability with the web-front end... the
added features have really come in handy. We're actually in the process of
implementing the inventory and purchasing
Oh, I feel your pain Paul. I have to do both too. I was not implying that I
have moved out of tha tmode. The worst thing is when you are deep in thought
on a project, and have to get up every ten minutes because some freak wants
to change their email stationery or something...
- Original
I'm thinking that this is the part where I am glad that I toss all that
non-plain-text crapola into the latrine where it belongs?
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 09:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
HEAT from FrontRange Solutions,here.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:37
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IT staff behavior
We currently use Trackit, which sucks. We are in the Kick off mode of
I don't know that I'd use the word scheduled. That implies DrLaura
a ring and a date /DrLaura.
God, I hate Dr. Laura.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 09:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server
Well, it is not that Trackit itself sucks, but all client related Help Desk
items must have notes added in ACT, which makes the entire process a joke.
SalesLogix allegedly will integrate everything.
We have never used the web front end. I guess we should read the manual, I
am not sure what else
hahaha niiice.. yeah exactly. I'll be sitting here coding asp for the new inhouse
website and employee database front end, and then my phone rings because they don't
know how to put their outlook toolbars back into the window that they accidently drug
out into floating mode.
at this point
Then, if you get asked that question more than a few times (this is really
where tracking trouble calls is useful) you should create and publish
documentation on how the user can correct their problem. Do you have a list
of your top ten trouble calls related to messaging? If you do, you can
And we asked for a syrup warmer for our waffles, but have yet to hear
anything about that.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Server !!SOLVED!!
I don't know that I'd
Title: Message
Well that of course is directly related to the weight
of the pig, the more weight the more thrust is
required
Sherry Abercrombie - FQ
Data Center
Administration Team Information Technology
"With sufficient thrust,
pigs fly just fine."
-Original
I decided to change the support hours. From 9:00 am to 9:05 am and from 4:00
pm to 4:01 pm.
(I only wish it would work)
-Original Message-
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IT staff behavior
They give you waffles?
That is not as bad as the Krispy Kreme providers on the list but COME ON!!
- Original Message -
From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: Backup Server !!SOLVED!!
Yes, they do. If they haven't followed the steps outlined in the published
documentation, then I have to walk them through the same steps. That wastes
my time and theirs. Senior managers don't like that.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
yeah it doesn't matter if it's written or spoken to them over and over. I just
checked my voicemail this morning and a user left a message saying that their computer
locked up again. This is the same person who called about this 4 times previously,
and I found out every time that the
That puts them on-par with way too many techs I've encountered. With the
advent of GUIs and now electronic documentation this syndrome is only
getting worse.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange
Then remove the mouse as a standard and make her use a normal one. She
doesn't want to move, you don't have to support her.
I've had to do that a number of times for people that want to user their
stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
Replace the mouse with a standard mouse. Tell her the other one must be
defective if the steps that you provided her previously don't work and that
you can no longer support 'non-standard' equipment like that as it is a
drain on company resources (not to mention your time).
That or write the
Hopefully this is just a simple question.
Most of my migration is complete. Now Im trying to
get the Resources from 5.5 moved to 2000, but they are all disabled accounts in
2000 AD, disabled because they all share the same primary account in 5.5. MS
says to change the mailbox rights to
Title: Message
Humm ... You call
yourself an Exchange Admin ... believe you have a right to attempt to
correct a group like this ... and you obviously lake a sense of humor.
Nah, you must be kidding.
:-D
BTW This resource is for
assistance and usually on topic ... but almost
D N D !
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IT staff behavior
Both of those are very doable. Just as they were in 5.5.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA 2000 - few q's
Environment:
(1) Exchange 2000 server running on my internal
Folks,
I've just killed a few threads and another one is in
my sights. Unless you want us to really police this
forum, I'd suggest you keep the noise down.
Do not reply.
Regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Title: Message
Almost? It's only Precht that falls under "Never Clever" and at
that rate we should be at least 5 9's if not 6. :P
-Original Message-From: Purviance, Chad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17,
2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
William,
I have found there are quite a few inherited permissions, but I still can't
figure out where they come from. Here is what is on the mailbox now:
Domain\administrator - read (inherited)
domain\domain admins - delete,read,change,take ownership,full (all inherited)
(and did you notice how when I reply to the 16k email it turns into a 2k
email?)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:35 AM
To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
I personally think nobody who calls themselves
I personally think nobody who calls themselves an email administrator
(platform-independent statement) should use all that foofoo background
and font crap. They should include in their signature line Please see
my glow-in-the-dark dancing signature and Hallmark Store Reject
background at my web
Done and done. Everything is working great. Had to contact Veritas to
determine how to migrate my SSL cert from IIS4 to IIS5 but they provided a
tech article. Only other thing I had to do was change a statement in my
firewall to direct traffic to the new OWA box running Exchange 2000 for
that
If you use Flash in your HTML email, you can get the size down, too.
Wasted bandwidth: That which is not used.
After reading the evils of HTML email:
http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml
I still like it.
William
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL
You don't have people sending the junk to your text pager or cell phone,
then. I like powerpoint presentations, too, I just don't want my
electric company deciding that it's a good medium for my monthly bill.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Powerpoint is so last millenium.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
You don't have people sending the junk to your text pager or cell phone,
I'm trying to get a straight answer on this one. My MS reseller seems to be
confused on this. Currently have Exchange 5.5 Standard and would like to
move to 5.5 Enterprise. I've searched the list archives. I thought I read
here that 5.5 Enterprise comes on the E2K Standard CD. Is this fact or
Would you suggest they flash him instead?
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Fiction.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 5.5 upgrade to
I believe that is fiction.
5.5 Enterprise comes on the E2K Enterprise CD, though.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
I'm trying to get a
Thank you. So for the Interim, I can buy the Enterprise E2K license and
media, upgrade my 5.5 Standard to 5.5 Enterprise from the E2K CD, then have
E2K waiting in the wings for a thoroughly relaxed and enjoyable deployment?
Life is good.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
I believe that is how you have to do it.
thoroughly relaxed and enjoyable deployment
LOL!!
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
Thank you. So
Perhaps. It does suck to have HTML sent to a pager, especially when it
only captures the first 150 characters or so. Though it does assist
with vendor screening. Send HTML to my pager, you don't get to be my
vendor.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Trying to make sense of this...
My newly built Exchange 2000 box is running OWA.
From the inside network, when I go to the OWA page (outlook.mycompany.com)
I get prompted for a username, password, and domain box. I have IE5 on
NT4.
From the inside network, when my coworker goes to the OWA
Disable integrated windows authentication from that virtual directory. Only
use plain text.
Jesse Rink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:275585@exchangelist...
Trying to make sense of this...
My newly built Exchange 2000 box is running OWA.
From the inside network, when I go to the
Does this imply that one MUST be on 5.5 ENTERPRISE to upgrade to E2K, or am
I reading improperly between the lines.
Also, how does one ascertain if their 5.5 installation is Enterprise or
Standard...
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Oh, no. That is incorrect. Mirosoft no longer sells the 5.5 media. To
get 5.5, you have to buy the E2K media which comes with 5.5.
For the latter:
Section 3.53:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm
-Original Message-
From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Title: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
After a reboot of Exchange server look for either a 1216 Event ID in the application log or a 1217. 1216 = limited storage capacity, 1217 = unlimited storage capacity.
Sherry Abercrombie - FQ
Data Center Administration Team
Information Technology
With
Doing this will force everyone to enter in a username and password instead
of it being passed through, right? Any idea why MY username and password
does not pass thru would my coworkers do? Very strange.. I suppose I can
just turn it off like you mentioned.
How about the authentication box
5.5 Enterprise comes on a CD of its own... :P
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
I believe that is fiction.
5.5 Enterprise comes on the E2K
Do you allow instant messaging on your network?
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Don would you please clarify. Does 5.5 Enterprise come on its own CD as part
of the media pack of E2K or are you stating that you can still purchase 5.5
Enterprise independently of E2K. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002
NO
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: IM
Do you allow instant messaging on your network?
List Charter and FAQ at:
It comes as its own cd as part of the media pack of E2K.
Jeremiah
(Sorry Don Couldn't help myself)
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
Don
No.. although I'd be more willing to allow it for internal-internal
messaging. Internal-external messaging - I wouldn't consider it in our
environment.
Do you allow instant messaging on your network?
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
E5.5 Enterprise only is available by purchasing E2K Enterprise. They come
on separate CD's in the same box... Clear enough for ya? :o)
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
Allow it? I host it.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: IM
Do you allow instant messaging on your network?
List Charter and FAQ at:
Quite alright... I'm actually working today and don't have that much time
to pay attention...
-Original Message-
From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
It comes as its
Title: RE: IM
Yes.
Sherry Abercrombie - FQ
Data Center Administration Team
Information Technology
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.
-Original Message-
From: Desai Jatin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
LES
Mutter.
/LES
Thanks, Don.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
E5.5 Enterprise only is available by purchasing E2K Enterprise. They
come on
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
