We do not use wireless at all to avoid regulatory issues that are not worth
it. That said, PCI standards require that we use a wireless analyzer to
ensure that no rogue WAP is set up on our network. Makes sense. I have
looked at several and the price ranges all over the place. Since all we need
to
Found this, may help.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb684892.aspx
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes
I believe that the totals in ESM
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Jonathan Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok I've removed the 2 PTD DNS servers, but my DNS checks still show them
> listed and mail is still
> failing. I removed them Wednesday 5/28, I figured 24 hours the propagate but
> this morning their still showing up for
Hello everyone,
Do you know if MS provides a log to IMF filtered mail? We have
Exchange 2003 sp2.
Thanks,
Bob
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook,
We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting
mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB
more than outlook reports the mailbox size.
It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running
e
I believe that the totals in ESM include the DIR, while the Outlook totals
do not...however I could be wrong.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Davies,Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yes we do.
>
>
>
> *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 03 June 2008 15:53
> *To:* MS-Exchange A
I have an external IP/company that keeps getting blocked by our SRF. I know
I can manually allow it, but I'd rather figure out why it's getting blocked,
or what part of the check is failing - if possible.
(already referenced
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124512(EXCHG.80).aspx)
We
Do you use deleted item retention?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Davies,Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook,
>
>
>
> We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting
> mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more
Yes we do.
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 June 2008 15:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes
Do you use deleted item retention?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Davies,Matt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook,
W
Love you too, dill-weed.
Shook
From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Mailbox sizes
Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook,
We have a problem where either Exchange 2003
Don't be hatein' ShookiePoo.
From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes
Love you too, dill-weed.
Shook
From: Davies,Ma
This might help...
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/IMF-Managers.html
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Bao, Gang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Can I see IMF filtered log file?
Hello everyone,
Do you know if MS p
No ideas how to change this back to premium?
-Original Message-
From: Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 2:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA - Basic and Premium
System - Server 2K, E2K3
The server was bounced a week ago (after having MS updates
ASSUMING that all clients are using a supported IE browser, did anything/anyone
mess with segmentation options either in the Exchange server's registry, on
user attributes in AD, or on a DC's attributes?
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=833340
-Bonnie
-Original Message-
From: Cameron
Hi,
I have several users that are getting this error when sending using our
exchange 2007 server in outlook, thunderbird Eudora, windows mail etc. Ive
done a lot of research on this and got the subject of this message from the
receive logs on the server
"550 5.7.1 Client does not have permiss
I can't seem to find anything on this particular subject. We are going
to implement a few CCR clusters and as a result we will need to bring up
dedicated Public folder servers. We will still have OLK2003 clients and
a lot of PF's that are in use, so we can't get away from them.
Does anyone h
A PF is just a really big mailbox.
How big is your PF store? Go from there.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 5:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange
Thanks!
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 2:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Sp1 Public folder disk guidance?
A PF is just a really big mailbox.
How big is your PF store? Go from there.
Regards,
Michael B.
18 matches
Mail list logo