The only disabled accounts in the domain (and forest) are things like :
Guest
krbtgt
And all the System Mailboxes.
Thanks
Rob
- Original Message
From: Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Wednesday, 4 June, 2008 2:01:34 PM
Subject: RE: Strange pair o
Hi all -
We've recently hit this issue in an Exchange 2003 database and I can't find
any specific info about E2k3. The data on E2k7 and these events is pretty
clear; and I did find some input somewhere (maybe Experts Exchange??) that
said the E2k7 info worked fine on E2k3.
We get event 9666 - war
Yes, the same max values are fine.
The easiest way to reset the counter is to move all the mailboxes in a given
store to another store. Drop the old store.
I'm personally of the opinion, although no one admits it, that there was a
bug in Exchange 2003 prior to sp2 that caused the values to
What do you mean “all the system mailboxes”?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 4:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Strange pair of events twice daily
17 OOFs so far :)
Thanks Michael - I think you're right (as usual) - it sure is new to us
& only getting a warning 20 before Kablooey is pretty rank!
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Michael B. Smith <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, the same max values are fine.
>
>
>
> The easiest
All-
Here is another one to chew on. I'm getting ready to redesign
a company's mail routing that is a worldwide company. As of right now they
have SMTP connectors on almost every site (36 sites) w/DNS routing the mail.
My question to those who have worldwide deployements, what is the best way
Need more information.
Generally, it's a balancing act of trying to put enough mail transports as
close to the clients as possible to insure reliability and keeping the number
down to a manageable level for cost and maintenance.
I'd start looking at having a pair of MTA's at each major backbone
Sorry, this is an Exchange 2003 environment. What other information are you
looking for?
TIA,
_
John Bowles
- Original Message
From: "Campbell, Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2008 11:48:20 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange Routing
Need
I don't think the Exchange version matters particularly. This is just a matter
of looking at the connectivity infrastructure, and putting MTA's where the mail
flow volumes between the org and the internet are going to concentrated.
-Original Message-
From: JB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Set the top folder to "Editor with Publishing". This will allow them to
create sub folders, however they will not have permission to delete the
top folder.
Nikki
From: ExchList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public Folder
All-
We are having issues with reverse lookups on one of our client sites.
Basically this is what I've discovered so far, that if you go to one tool on
the internet to do a reverse lookup everything comes back fine. You go to
another reverse lookup tool and it's unable to resolve. So i'm assu
I assume your DNS is authoritative for the IP range or address? (note, this is
not the same as being authoritative for the domain). If not, I believe whoever
"owns" the IP address will have to host the PTR record.
-Original Message-
From: JB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June
Don-
Thanks for the quick response. Since I'm not a DNS guru can you tell me how I
would find out if my DNS is authoratative for that IP range?
Thanks,
_
John Bowles
- Original Message
From: Don Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Monday, June
That's a really good question and I'm not certain I have an answer - would you
care to share the domain and IP either here or off-list - I'll have a look
around.
-Original Message-
From: JB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subje
Your ISP will be definitive, most likely, for your public IP
addresses. Call your circuit provider and ask them to put up a PTR
record. If they can't/won't, you can then ask them who should/will
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:52 AM, JB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don-
> Thanks for the quick response.
Your DNS is authoritative if it is listed in the whois information for the
network at the numbering authority for your country.
To find out, go here: http://www.arin.net/whois/
Type your public IP address in the box and click "Search WHOIS" here if your
location is in the U.S.:
In the second pa
Or if not, that's ok - the arin whois lookup MAY provide clues -
http://ws.arin.net/whois/
-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Reverse Lookup Issues
That's a really good question an
Just to back up a second on this thread. Did you have your ISP recently make a
change to your reverse lookup. If so it might not have propigated yet..
Another one I experienced is my old ISP ran two DNS servers that didn't talk to
each other, they would make a change on one and forget to ma
Do an nslookup and see what the name servers are. I had one client that
was having flaky access problems with their website. I found out that
their DNS hoster had two name servers for them, but only one responded
correctly. I used nslookup and specified their own nameserver and it
gave me th
I'm curious about the "NOT be created in most circumstances" part of the
comment, Michael. Any feeling for what most means there?
We certainly hit this in E2K3, on non-journal servers. Of course, a
thousand users in the same database without moving for a few years can
do that... we wound up
Just saw this come in and I know we have some folks who are fairly new to the
Blackberry Enterprise scene.
http://tinyurl.com/5w56qa
The next BB webcast on June 18th is on troubleshooting BES activation issues.
Something this list seems to see its fair share of.
Hope it helps
-troy
~ Ninja
> I assume your DNS is authoritative for the IP range or
> address? (note, this is not the same as being authoritative
> for the domain). If not, I believe whoever "owns" the IP
> address will have to host the PTR record.
It may also be possible to get the provider to "delegate" the authority
And I'm one of them, thanks for sharing!
-Sam
My 30 Demo of the new Curve ends this week, and I have to ship it back
:( I have grown to love it.
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 4:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blac
Probably a better way to state it. Just trying to point out that it is
separate from the domain.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 2:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Reverse Lookup Issues
> I assume your DNS is auth
If i understand the question you need to create an address list with all the
local users in it. The users will see the GAL by default so you have two
options. Teach them to select that list in the address book or use adsi edit to
assign an address list to your users.
Greg
From: HELP_PC [mailto
What you are going to have to ask for I don't think they will want to do.
It requires a complete reconstruction of the Address Lists for all users
globally.
Two replacement GALs would have to be created. The default GAL would have to be
blocked using permissions.
Then there would be a GAL for th
Why can't they use the complete GAL?
From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 4:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricted GAL
What you are going to have to ask for I don't think they will want to
do.
It re
> Probably a better way to state it. Just trying to point out
> that it is separate from the domain.
Well it could go either way. Per your suggestion, having the upstream
"owner" serve the PTR record(s) may have the advantage of a large ISPs
redundant connectivity and infrastructure reliability
On this note, I've found the tools at www.dnsstuff.com to be useful in
diagnosing this sort of issue. Run off a DNSReport for the domain which is
giving you problems and it will tell you who the authoritative DNS servers
are for it.
You mentioned that you used a 'tool on the internet' - which o
Yes
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: martedì 10 giugno 2008 1.00
A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Restricted GAL
If i understand the question you need to create an address list with all the
local users in it. The users will see the
With 2000 users instead of 45 they have to input the surname to find it, so is
easier to put them in a separate contact list
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: martedì 10 giugno 2008 1.12
A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Restricted GAL
W
31 matches
Mail list logo
