HFS is what I use for similar purposes.
--
ME2
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Marshall
wrote:
> Hi chaps,
>
>
>
> Can anyone recommend a single exe FTP Server for Windows? I saw one once
> that had a good GUI, basic user setups and folder permnissions etc and was
> just one file. It d
http://usb.smithtech.us/apps/servu.php
Serv-U FTP Server Portable
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 1:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Single exe windows ftp server
Hi chaps,
Can anyon
Hi chaps,
Can anyone recommend a single exe FTP Server for Windows? I saw one once that
had a good GUI, basic user setups and folder permnissions etc and was just one
file. It doesn't have to run as a service, just something we can add to the
toolkit to help getting files from/to windows boxes
yup yup... agree that everything is relative to resources and cash for
funding the solution... and the impact of buying yet another BES to house
800-1000 users STILL sends management crying for the hills... :-)
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Barsodi.John wrote:
> So am I, granted my deploym
So am I, granted my deployment isn't as large as yours. I have these remote
users are on their own Mailbox Agent, so they are only impacting each other if
there is any latency issues and not the entire server.
Not every company has the resources to buy BES hardware/ or Virtualize a BES
server
true - and I am in an enterprise situation where the latency of one
mailbox causes issues with latency all around, so it is not tolerated. my
installation has 22K+ BBs on 30+ BES, with an equivalent number of DRP/BCP
servers, so that is were our tolerences come from... failure is not an
option in
One comment:
Where are your Exchange servers located (centralized datacenter or distributed
out at your remote sites)? BB servers will be in reginal Datacenters throughout
the world (5 total) the question is really where are your Exchange servers.
You never want your BES servers to be located
ok - my responses in line:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:52 AM, John Bowles wrote:
> John -
>
> For starters, here are some questions I have for you:
>
> What will the BES environment connect to (e2k, e2k3, e2k7)? E2K3- E2K7 ok
> - e2k3 and e2k7 make much better use of the I/O against an exchange
John -
For starters, here are some questions I have for you:
What will the BES environment connect to (e2k, e2k3, e2k7)? E2K3- E2K7
How many users per Exchange server would be using a BB device? 500 (1500 total
user base)
Do these users also expect to be able to use a WinMobile device at the
Just used Outlook 2003's Group Schedules feature to create an "at a glance"
view of availability data for ~30 or so resource mailboxes (hosted on 4-way
clustered E2k3 SP2).
Adding each and every resource mailbox to the custom group schedule was a
ballache to say the least.
Now I have another user w
10 matches
Mail list logo
