For those of you who think it can get ugly around here...
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchange-list.html
I'm running Windows 2008 R2 Standard and I'm trying to run Jetstress on it and
it gives me this error message during the install. What the deuce?
You need Windows 2000 Serice Pack 4 (Or Later), Windows Server 2003 (or later),
or Windows Server code name 'Longhorn' to install Jetstress
Thank yo
A quick Google shows that it's not compat with 2k8:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=94b9810b-670e-4
33a-b5ef-b47054595e9c&displaylang=en
Unless, you've got a newer version...
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Gro
OK, that was freaking hilarious, I especially loved the one from Joel
Osborn, October 17, 2001
"He couldn't get a clue if he was in a field full of horny clues in the
middle of clue mating season and had covered himself with clue musk."
I have users like that, I am sure we all do. Sometimes I thi
Thanks.. I have Windows 2008 R2.. It's not compat with that version it seems.
Thank you.
John B.
From: Don Guyer [don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 10:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetstress Install
A quick Google sho
*crawls out from underneath a rock*
I miss the old Swynk list ... maybe this list has a little bit of the same
attitude.
Martin
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 7:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: A blast from the past...
For those of you wh
Awww, Haiku Fridays how I miss thee...
Leslie Hurley
PM-NMCI Engineer
PMW200
SPAWAR Atlantic, Security+, LSS green belt
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men
stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Rooney [mailto:d...@son
Stu keeps us on the opposite end of that spectrum these days... Honestly, I
think he misses it, but won't admit it... hehehehe
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Martin Tuip wrote:
> **crawls out from underneath a rock**
>
>
>
> I miss the old Swynk list … maybe this list has a little bit of the
Wow... you look *BAD* dude... how long you been under there?
-sc
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:mt...@mimosasystems.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A blast from the past...
*crawls out from underneath a rock*
I miss the old Swynk
A few years .. but I resurfaced in case anyone ever wanted to know anything
about archiving and compliance (you know, the words that make anyone shudder).
Martin
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 8:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
I miss those Mimosa cigar parties at Connections.snif
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
From: Martin Tuip [mai
this brings back memories.
Mark G
Bechtel
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Posted At: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 7:21 AM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: A blast from the past...
Subject: A blast from the past...
For those of you who think it
Yup. Tough list if you were a noob, which I was. It was pretty frustrating
sometimes, since all the "exchange experts" seemed to think the purpose of
the list was to just congregate together and embarrass anyone who asked a
question that somebody may have asked within the last 6 months.For som
A fate *WORSE* than dead...
-sc
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:mt...@mimosasystems.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A blast from the past...
A few years .. but I resurfaced in case anyone ever wanted to know
anything about archiving an
I was looking at Microsoft's site for this, and the only real difference I
could find was the number of mailbox databases possible. Is this the case, or
are there other things that I didn't see?
Thanks,
Joe
I'm guessing we are talking about Exchange Server 2010...
For the _SERVER_ license, that and availability of the external connector are
the only differences.
For the _CAL_, there are loads of differences.
Do note that mailbox resiliency requires Windows Server Enterprise, even though
the featu
Michael,
Yes, asking about 2010. I've been trying to poke around Microsoft's website
for this information, but what I have found is kind of vague. Are there any
differences in clustering capabilities between the two versions? Also, do you
know of a spot anywhere that lists the differences in
I can help you stay out of jail though. Sometimes I miss MS-Mail or X.400
...live was so much easier then.
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 9:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A blast from the past...
A fate *WORSE* than dead..
I can relate to those statements.
I joined the NT and Exch list in 1999, during the Y2k craze. The "real
world" IT education I received then and continue to receive from these
lists is still overwhelming.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Gr
Exchange 2003. I have a distribution group set up for receiving email from
outside and delivering to the users in the group. For some reason the email
from outside does not go to one person of the three. Inside it goes to all
three. Any idea why it would not see this third person when delive
Check that persons rules, deleted items etc etc. In a situation like this
it is 99.999% of the time the user
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Didtel, Larry wrote:
> Exchange 2003. I have a distribution group set up for receiving email from
> outside and delivering to the users in the gr
That would have been my thought but I'm looking in the tracking on the exchange
server and it only shows being delivered to the other two, this persons name
does not show. I also checked in the Vipre spam filter logs and it only sees
two users to be delivered to.
Larry
Is the intended recipient receiving mail from other external email
addresses?
Roger Wright
___
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Didtel, Larry wrote:
> That would have been my thought but I'm looking in the tracking on the
> exchange server and it only shows being delivered to the other two, th
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/en/us/licensing.aspx for the CALs.
Not sure what you mean by clustering... if you are referring to mailbox
resiliency (a.k.a. Database Availability Groups), that feature is available on
both Exchange Standard and Exchange Enterprise, albeit for differing nu
And it was those fine fine fine comments that led me to become the conslutant I
am today! :)
I joined the first time, as well, in the 1999 timeframe.
From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A blast from
Yes, the user has no problem with normal email and is not a new employee.
Larry
Classic! Although, I believe my most memorable list quote came from your
good self Don - some doofus started slamming everyone for talking about the
World Trade Center on 9-11.
Your two word response was all that was required - well done J
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: 08
Outstanding! Thanks for posting and reminding of a simpler and kinder
time...
--
ME2
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Don Ely wrote:
> For those of you who think it can get ugly around here...
>
>
> http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchange-list.html
>
>
>
What was the response? You're not saying "well done" was what he said,
are you?
From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A blast from the past...
Classic! Altho
Here you go...
http://www.mail-archive.com/ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com/msg03884.html
No, he didn't say well done.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kim Longenbaugh wrote:
> What was the response? You’re not saying “well done” was what he said,
> are you?
>
>
> -
Thanks. Couldn't agree with him more in that case.
From: Andrew Laya [mailto:andrew.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A blast from the past...
Here you go...
http://www.mail-archive.com/nts
That's what I was guessing it was. I joined the list shortly after that,
can't believe that it's been that long.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Andrew Laya wrote:
> Here you go...
>
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com/msg03884.html
>
> No, he didn't say we
Well retrieved!
From: Andrew Laya [mailto:andrew.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 December 2009 19:45
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A blast from the past...
Here you go...
http://www.mail-archive.com/ntsysad...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com/msg03884.h
tml
No, he didn't say well done.
Yeah it is a bit of a head twister - I started lurking in 98! Just wish I
had more time to spend on list!
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 December 2009 19:52
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A blast from the past...
That's what I was guessing it was.
Simpler? Yes
Kinder? Perhaps not so much.
Funnier? Oh, yes...
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:24, Micheal Espinola Jr
wrote:
> Outstanding! Thanks for posting and reminding of a simpler and kinder
> time...
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Don Ely wrote:
>>
>> For those of you who
Lurker - you be scarey. ;)
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Clayton Doige wrote:
> Yeah it is a bit of a head twister – I started lurking in 98! Just wish I
> had more time to spend on list!
>
>
>
> *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 08 December 2009 19:52
>
> *To:*
Oh, the "kinder" was utterly sarcastic! Every post would get a sarcastic
reply, and it was awesome... There was such a good sense of humor on that
list... but scary as hell for a newcomer back then!
--
ME2
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> Simpler? Yes
>
> Kinder? Perhaps n
Looks aren't everything...
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 December 2009 20:15
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A blast from the past...
Lurker - you be scarey. ;)
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Clayton Doige
wrote:
Yeah it is a bit of a head twi
ApparentlyMrs. Tiger Woods is finding that out it seems
Yes, I just took this wyyy off topic.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Clayton Doige wrote:
> Looks aren’t everything...
>
>
>
> *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 08 December 2009 20:15
Tiger hits into the rough for a challenge...
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Sherry Abercrombie wrote:
> ApparentlyMrs. Tiger Woods is finding that out it seems
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes, I just took this wyyy off topic.
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Clayton Doige wrote:
>
>
I think he wishes he could take a mulligan.
Webster
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: A blast from the past...
Tiger hits into the rough for a challenge...
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Sherry Abercrombie
wrote:
ApparentlyMrs. Tiger Woods is
Right club, wrong ...course.
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 2:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A blast from the past...
Tiger hits into the rough for a challenge...
On Tue, Dec 8, 2
...And some of those "courses" weren't even worth taking a high
risk shot onto the green...
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxr
He's now Tiger Twig.
Bill Lambert
Concuity
Phone 847-941-9206
The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached
files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to re
That's Don. A man of few words...
And I agree with him as well.
From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A blast from the past...
Thanks. Couldn't agree with him more in that case.
No. Well spotted, sir.
2009/12/8 Michael B. Smith
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/2009162
>
>
>
> If your toolbox quits working after you apply Exchange 2007 sp2 ru1, see
> the above article.
>
Rather fittingly, this KB explains:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/211
2009/12/8 Andrew Levicki
> No. Well spotted, sir.
>
> 2009/12/8 Michael B. Smith
>
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/2009162
>>
>>
>>
>> If your toolbox quits working after you apply Exchange 2007 sp2 ru1,
Yeah, but it doesn't tell you that the new system is called beavis...(actually,
it's beamis, but I heard beavis the first time I was told about it - I had to
ask where butthead was hiding...)
HAHAHAHAHA
From: Andrew Levicki [mailto:and...@levicki.me.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:29 PM
Thanks Alex! I am getting closer.
I now have Forefront setup with a File Filter to block certain attachments.
The email still goes through, but the attached file is replaced with a .txt
file with the following message
FILE QUARANTINED
Microsoft Forefront Security for Exchange Server remo
Apparently both Baby Seals and Tiger Woods have now been clubbed by
Scandinavians
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 December 2009 20:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A blast from the past...
ApparentlyMrs. Tiger Woods is finding that out it seems
Larry,
If not already using this configuration, change the group type to a Universal
group. I have seen this fix similar problems on many occasions.
If that does not work or the group is already Universal then this article is
useful for troubleshooting the root cause.
http://support.microsoft
I didn't used to be that way... I used to conjure up some 0's and 1's in an
email that would make EjaculateIT cringe... :)
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Maglinger, Paul wrote:
> That’s Don. A man of few words…
>
> And I agree with him as well.
>
>
>
> *From:* Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@c
Does it consistently not go to that user?
-Original Message-
From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:peter.d...@yum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: outside email to dist group missing 1 person
Larry,
If not already using this configuration, chan
Yes, it is always the same user. I'll try changing the group, it is global now.
Good one Clayton
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Clayton Doige wrote:
> Apparently both Baby Seals and Tiger Woods have now been clubbed by
> Scandinavians
>
>
>
> *From:* Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 08 December 2009 20:39
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Su
Quick question.
I have a few mailboxes in a test environment for our exchange 2007 SP2 to
Exchange 2010 migration. I migrated the mailboxes and now when i go to the owa
url for the 2007 CAS server it says "Use the following link to open this
mailbox with optimal performance:" and lists what ap
I know what you mean. I was in the same boat (except I knew enough to keep my
"mouth" shut most of the times).
Yeah, the two "Ed's" really dumped on someone who suggested BLB.
(But, then again, they really knew Exchange and gave out a lot of good advice
and recommendations.)
From: rz...@qwest.
Yes, they know exchange. I tried to only participate when I had a
problem. The BLB conversations were usually pretty humorous as an outsider.
It was clear that people were clamoring for something more intelligent than
the DR kluge, and also clear the vendors were trying to accommodate that
desi
58 matches
Mail list logo
