Re: Mailbox move clarification

2011-01-19 Thread Richard Stovall
Ooh. I think I'll be keeping this post. On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:05 PM, KevinM wrote: > Good to hear. Move mailbox will fix most mailbox corruption, it's like > magic!! .. If you were running Exchange 2010 SP1 you could repair the > mailbox online with the New-RepairMailboxRequest - which do

RE: Outlook Web Co-existence between 2010 and 2003 (Single Sign On)

2011-01-19 Thread Knoch, James W
If you have WindowsAuthentication and BasicAuthentication enabled on your Exchange 2010 CAS, as recommended for the ISA/TMG configuration, it should automatically pass your internal credentials with IE to 2010. 7. If leveraging ISA Pre-Authentication, on Exchange 2010 CAS within the "Internet

RE: Error 554 Denied on replies only

2011-01-19 Thread Kelsey, John
H, ok. I think I'll start with MXLogic in that case! Thanks for the pointer! From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Error 554 Denied on replies only This isn't an Exchange error. It's a

Re: Outlook Web Co-existence between 2010 and 2003 (Single Sign On)

2011-01-19 Thread Mark Milo
Thanks to all for your help! The issue proved to be the listeners needing to be the same for both rules (2010 plus redirect to legacy server) - at least as far as external access goes. Internal clients still require to login twice but since it is only for a couple of days its not a biggie. On Thu,

RE: Mailbox move clarification

2011-01-19 Thread KevinM
Good to hear. Move mailbox will fix most mailbox corruption, it's like magic!! .. If you were running Exchange 2010 SP1 you could repair the mailbox online with the New-RepairMailboxRequest - which does most of the work ESEUTIL and ISINTEG used to do only it does the work at the mailbox level a

RE: Mailbox move clarification

2011-01-19 Thread Kennedy, Jim
Very interesting, I did two mailboxes tonight to test it all. I logged into them first and made notes of the bad appointments for each mailbox. Each was in the recent past and the problem was the reminder would pop and you would go to dismiss it and get the corrupt error message. So I moved the

RE: Expected or not?

2011-01-19 Thread Robert Peterson
Thank you, appreciate being able to bounce this kind of stuff off someone else. All the best, Robert From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Expected or not? So, when you change AD sites (and therefo

RE: Expected or not?

2011-01-19 Thread Michael B. Smith
So, when you change AD sites (and therefore RPC CAAs), re-login isn't surprising. That being said, if you have your RPC CAAs and your autodiscover all set up properly - it should all "just work". I'm sorry to say that there is no "magic bullet" to resolve your specific issue. I recommend you st

RE: Completely Removing Exchange

2011-01-19 Thread KevinM
I say .. ADSI - delete the Exchange node , in ADUC delete the server objects... DONE... From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Completely Removing Exchange >From Add/Remove programs, select Exchang

RE: Expected or not?

2011-01-19 Thread Robert Peterson
For each location... (consisting of two Hyper-V hosts with 1 MB and 1 CAS/HUB each) * Made sure the "Mounted" MB database was not on a MB server residing on a Hyper-V host due for reboot. * Once sure that there were no "mounted"DBs, updated and shutdown Exchange virtual MB & CA

RE: Expected or not?

2011-01-19 Thread Michael B. Smith
Then your activation preferences probably aren't right and the failover didn't happen the way you think it did. How do you "fail over"? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Expected or not?

2011-01-19 Thread Robert Peterson
The two "E-" Hyper-V hosts and their guest "E-" MB & CAS servers are physically in an "East" location (50 miles apart) but all connected via a WAN. All on the same domain and forest. During updates, the "mounted" database stayed within the same location. However, I have seen when prompted to

RE: Completely Removing Exchange

2011-01-19 Thread Michael B. Smith
>From Add/Remove programs, select Exchange and then click Uninstall. AS part of the uninstall process, it will ask for the CD. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, Janu

RE: Expected or not?

2011-01-19 Thread Michael B. Smith
You didn't tell us you had multiple sites. Please describe your topology. Thanks. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

RE: Expected or not?

2011-01-19 Thread Robert Peterson
I'm Google'ing and reading now, it does appear we have two arrays, one for each of our locations. Thanks, happy to hear more... and as I said I'm reading what I can find too. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 3:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issu

RE: Error 554 Denied on replies only

2011-01-19 Thread Michael B. Smith
This isn't an Exchange error. It's almost certainly a DNS/MX misconfiguration. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Erro

RE: Completely Removing Exchange

2011-01-19 Thread Missy Koslosky
Just confirming that Greg is correct; once the schema is extended, it's extended and it ain't going back. Note that I've refrained from any unsavory allusions. From: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:31 PM To: MS-Exchange

RE: Mailbox move clarification

2011-01-19 Thread Michael B. Smith
Any item in Exchange is a message. Sure - try a mailbox at a time though. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 3:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:

RE: Expected or not?

2011-01-19 Thread Michael B. Smith
Do you have a RPC Client Access Array configured? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Expected or not? I was just wo

RE: Mailbox move clarification

2011-01-19 Thread Kennedy, Jim
Mounted and in use. Most of the items are very recent. Lots of corrupt calendar items in the logs with 8206 EXDO's calendaring agent failed. Also repeated 403's Storage Group Consistency errors. From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Ad

RE: Some recipients of a DL not getting mail

2011-01-19 Thread Don Andrews
Rule 1 - users lie. From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Some recipients of a DL not getting mail The funny part was me approaching him and saying: Me-> "I a

RE: Outlook Web Co-existence between 2010 and 2003 (Single Sign On)

2011-01-19 Thread Knoch, James W
I am not sure if this holds true on Forefront TMG or UAG, but it applies to ISA 2006, so I expect it to be the same. In order for FSO to work between the 2003 and 2010 published sites, they MUST be on the same listener. Make sure you have your *.domain.com listed as well in the FSO settings.

RE: Expected or not?

2011-01-19 Thread Neil Hobson
I was just wondering whether it was because of the public folder issue, but that's fixed in UR2 From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu] Sent: 19 January 2011 18:38 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Expected or not? Yes, I have a Public folder, it resides on S-EXCMB-

RE: Mailbox move clarification

2011-01-19 Thread KevinM
Is the store mounted?? Are you calling it corrupt only because some calendar items are not working, or are you seeing all kinds of odd issues? - any event ID's? You might try setting some items to delete / purge all items older then 120 days from the calendar and see if that makes them work bet

RE: Some recipients of a DL not getting mail

2011-01-19 Thread Joseph L. Casale
The funny part was me approaching him and saying: Me-> "I am pretty sure your box received the mail, can we check?" Him-> "No, I swear I didn't get it!" Me-> "Ok, lets go so see who logged onto your pc as with your username and with your password, and received your mail, then moved your mail some

Re: Some recipients of a DL not getting mail

2011-01-19 Thread Jonathan Link
Celebrate[1] the users! [1] The reader may substitte another appropriate or inapproriate verb at their discretion. On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Sigh, > Even worse, `he` moved it and forgot... > Oh well, not like I had anything important to worry about:) > > jlc > >

RE: Some recipients of a DL not getting mail

2011-01-19 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Sigh, Even worse, `he` moved it and forgot... Oh well, not like I had anything important to worry about:) jlc -Original Message- From: TimB [mailto:tim.bosw...@bet365.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: re: Some recipients of a DL not gett

RE: Expected or not?

2011-01-19 Thread Robert Peterson
Yes, I have a Public folder, it resides on S-EXCMB-01 with a replica on S-EXCMB-02. Service Pack 1 with Rollup 2 installed Thank you for any ideas. -Robert From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Expected o

Mailbox move clarification

2011-01-19 Thread Kennedy, Jim
I have a corrupt store, with quite a few corrupt calendar appointments. I am thinking just make a new store and move the mailboxes and set it to delete the corrupt 'messages'. The wizard says messages but it will nuke the bad appointments also, correct? Just want to be sure. Exchange 2007 curre

RE: Expected or not?

2011-01-19 Thread Neil Hobson
Do you use public folders and if so, where are the databases located? Also, what is the service pack and update rollup version of Exchange 2010? From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu] Sent: 19 January 2011 18:08 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Expected or not? We ha

Expected or not?

2011-01-19 Thread Robert Peterson
We have an Exchange 2010 environment all virtualized across 4 Hyper-V hosts. Each host presents 1 MB server and 1 CAS/HUB server. Exchange databases are setup in a DAG with 1 active and 2 replicated copies across 3 of the 4 MB servers... for example: S-Hyper-V-01 S-EXCMB-01 DB1-Active S- EXCCA

Error 554 Denied on replies only

2011-01-19 Thread Kelsey, John
Single Exchange 2003 server, all patched up, hosting emails for multiple domains. When sending a new email from outside the organization to a user in one of the domains we're hosting, no problem. When replying to a message the same user sent to an outside address, the reply fails with an error

RE: Completely Removing Exchange

2011-01-19 Thread greg.sweers
I am assuming that you have performed all operations to ensure nothing is referring or needed on Exchange 2003 before removing of course. RUS is not used in 2007 or 2010 anymore. Removing Exchange 2003 will not affect the existing AD emails. Those are in the proxyaddress field which is what Go

Exchange 2003 & Outlook 2003 Delegates

2011-01-19 Thread Ellis, John P.
When a user has a list of delegates listed against their mailbox (In Outlook, Tools > Options > Delegates) and someone sends a meeting request do all the delegates get the meeting request? Or, does it only happen when the tick box "send meeting requests to my delegates and not to me" is ticked? Th

RE: Report on opened emails

2011-01-19 Thread Chris Blair
Thanks for the replies. I figured there wasn't a way. -Original Message- From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 8:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Report on opened emails Probably not what you want to do but in the futur

RE: Completely Removing Exchange

2011-01-19 Thread Miller Bonnie L .
And after asking him, he hasn't tried the uninstall using the CD yet, just read that he had to move the RUS somewhere and knew he can't do that since it will be the last server. Should he just throw the disk in and run it? Maybe there is an option for removing the last Exchange server? He is

RE: database size vs mailbox size

2011-01-19 Thread Michael B. Smith
Well, to reduce that space you are going to have to do an offline defrag - which isn't normally recommended. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com] Sent: Wednesday, Ja

RE: Outlook Web Co-existence between 2010 and 2003 (Single Sign On)

2011-01-19 Thread Michael B. Smith
Do you have the 2003 server set to FBA _on the server_? Did you apply the AUTH patch that 2003 needs? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Mark Milo [mailto:markmilo2...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2

re: Some recipients of a DL not getting mail

2011-01-19 Thread TimB
99% of the time, this turns out to be a rule on the recipients mailbox moving the 'missing' mail to another folder somewhere. If message tracking shows it was delivered, I'd start there. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email t

RE: database size vs mailbox size

2011-01-19 Thread Neil Hobson
Just a FYI, you won't see 1221s in Exchange 2010 anymore, since the way maintenance runs has changed. The cmdlet you ran is the way to do this now, as you've seen. If you're interested in knowing more about this, the link below is a good read. http://www.shudnow.net/2009/10/25/exchange-2010-24x7