Just a FYI, you won't see 1221s in Exchange 2010 anymore, since the way
maintenance runs has changed. The cmdlet you ran is the way to do this now,
as you've seen. If you're interested in knowing more about this, the link
below is a good read.
99% of the time, this turns out to be a rule on the recipients mailbox moving
the 'missing' mail to another folder somewhere. If message tracking shows it
was delivered, I'd start there.
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email
Do you have the 2003 server set to FBA _on the server_? Did you apply the AUTH
patch that 2003 needs?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Mark Milo [mailto:markmilo2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19,
Well, to reduce that space you are going to have to do an offline defrag -
which isn't normally recommended.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
-Original Message-
From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
And after asking him, he hasn't tried the uninstall using the CD yet, just read
that he had to move the RUS somewhere and knew he can't do that since it will
be the last server. Should he just throw the disk in and run it? Maybe there
is an option for removing the last Exchange server? He is
Thanks for the replies. I figured there wasn't a way.
-Original Message-
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 8:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Report on opened emails
Probably not what you want to do but in the
When a user has a list of delegates listed against their mailbox (In
Outlook, Tools Options Delegates) and someone sends a meeting
request do all the delegates get the meeting request? Or, does it only
happen when the tick box send meeting requests to my delegates and not
to me is ticked?
I am assuming that you have performed all operations to ensure nothing is
referring or needed on Exchange 2003 before removing of course. RUS is not
used in 2007 or 2010 anymore.
Removing Exchange 2003 will not affect the existing AD emails. Those are in the
proxyaddress field which is what
Single Exchange 2003 server, all patched up, hosting emails for multiple
domains.
When sending a new email from outside the organization to a user in one
of the domains we're hosting, no problem.
When replying to a message the same user sent to an outside address, the
reply fails with an
We have an Exchange 2010 environment all virtualized across 4 Hyper-V hosts.
Each host presents 1 MB server and 1 CAS/HUB server. Exchange databases are
setup in a DAG with 1 active and 2 replicated copies across 3 of the 4 MB
servers... for example:
S-Hyper-V-01
S-EXCMB-01
DB1-Active
S-
Do you use public folders and if so, where are the databases located? Also,
what is the service pack and update rollup version of Exchange 2010?
From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu]
Sent: 19 January 2011 18:08
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Expected or not?
We
I have a corrupt store, with quite a few corrupt calendar appointments. I am
thinking just make a new store and move the mailboxes and set it to delete the
corrupt 'messages'. The wizard says messages but it will nuke the bad
appointments also, correct? Just want to be sure. Exchange 2007
Yes, I have a Public folder, it resides on S-EXCMB-01 with a replica on
S-EXCMB-02.
Service Pack 1 with Rollup 2 installed
Thank you for any ideas.
-Robert
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Expected
Sigh,
Even worse, `he` moved it and forgot...
Oh well, not like I had anything important to worry about:)
jlc
-Original Message-
From: TimB [mailto:tim.bosw...@bet365.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: re: Some recipients of a DL not
Celebrate[1] the users!
[1] The reader may substitte another appropriate or inapproriate verb at
their discretion.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com
wrote:
Sigh,
Even worse, `he` moved it and forgot...
Oh well, not like I had anything important to
The funny part was me approaching him and saying:
Me- I am pretty sure your box received the mail, can we check?
Him- No, I swear I didn't get it!
Me- Ok, lets go so see who logged onto your pc as with your username and with
your password, and received your mail, then moved your mail somewhere
Is the store mounted?? Are you calling it corrupt only because some calendar
items are not working, or are you seeing all kinds of odd issues? - any event
ID's?
You might try setting some items to delete / purge all items older then 120
days from the calendar and see if that makes them work
I was just wondering whether it was because of the public folder issue, but
that's fixed in UR2
From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu]
Sent: 19 January 2011 18:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Expected or not?
Yes, I have a Public folder, it resides on
I am not sure if this holds true on Forefront TMG or UAG, but it applies to ISA
2006, so I expect it to be the same. In order for FSO to work between the 2003
and 2010 published sites, they MUST be on the same listener. Make sure you
have your *.domain.com listed as well in the FSO settings.
Rule 1 - users lie.
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Some recipients of a DL not getting mail
The funny part was me approaching him and saying:
Me- I am
Mounted and in use. Most of the items are very recent. Lots of corrupt calendar
items in the logs with 8206 EXDO's calendaring agent failed. Also repeated
403's Storage Group Consistency errors.
From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange
Do you have a RPC Client Access Array configured?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:nhob...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 2:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Expected or not?
I was just
Any item in Exchange is a message. Sure - try a mailbox at a time though.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 3:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Just confirming that Greg is correct; once the schema is extended, it's
extended and it ain't going back. Note that I've refrained from any unsavory
allusions.
From: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange
This isn't an Exchange error. It's almost certainly a DNS/MX misconfiguration.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
I'm Google'ing and reading now, it does appear we have two arrays, one for each
of our locations.
Thanks, happy to hear more... and as I said I'm reading what I can find too.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 3:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
You didn't tell us you had multiple sites.
Please describe your topology.
Thanks.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
From Add/Remove programs, select Exchange and then click Uninstall.
AS part of the uninstall process, it will ask for the CD.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu]
Sent: Wednesday,
The two E- Hyper-V hosts and their guest E- MB CAS servers are physically
in an East location (50 miles apart) but all connected via a WAN. All on the
same domain and forest.
During updates, the mounted database stayed within the same location.
However, I have seen when prompted to log back
Then your activation preferences probably aren't right and the failover didn't
happen the way you think it did.
How do you fail over?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Robert Peterson [mailto:robert.peter...@prin.edu]
Sent: Wednesday,
For each location... (consisting of two Hyper-V hosts with 1 MB and 1 CAS/HUB
each)
* Made sure the Mounted MB database was not on a MB server residing
on a Hyper-V host due for reboot.
* Once sure that there were no mountedDBs, updated and shutdown
Exchange virtual MB CAS
I say .. ADSI - delete the Exchange node , in ADUC delete the server objects...
DONE...
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Completely Removing Exchange
From Add/Remove programs, select
So, when you change AD sites (and therefore RPC CAAs), re-login isn't
surprising. That being said, if you have your RPC CAAs and your autodiscover
all set up properly - it should all just work.
I'm sorry to say that there is no magic bullet to resolve your specific
issue. I recommend you start
Thank you, appreciate being able to bounce this kind of stuff off someone else.
All the best,
Robert
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Expected or not?
So, when you change AD sites (and
Very interesting, I did two mailboxes tonight to test it all. I logged into
them first and made notes of the bad appointments for each mailbox. Each was in
the recent past and the problem was the reminder would pop and you would go to
dismiss it and get the corrupt error message. So I moved
Good to hear. Move mailbox will fix most mailbox corruption, it's like magic!!
.. If you were running Exchange 2010 SP1 you could repair the mailbox online
with the New-RepairMailboxRequest - which does most of the work ESEUTIL and
ISINTEG used to do only it does the work at the mailbox level
Thanks to all for your help! The issue proved to be the listeners needing to
be the same for both rules (2010 plus redirect to legacy server) - at least
as far as external access goes. Internal clients still require to login
twice but since it is only for a couple of days its not a biggie.
On
H, ok. I think I'll start with MXLogic in that case! Thanks for
the pointer!
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 554 Denied on replies only
This isn't an Exchange error. It's
If you have WindowsAuthentication and BasicAuthentication enabled on your
Exchange 2010 CAS, as recommended for the ISA/TMG configuration, it should
automatically pass your internal credentials with IE to 2010.
7. If leveraging ISA Pre-Authentication, on Exchange 2010 CAS within the
Internet
Ooh. I think I'll be keeping this post.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:05 PM, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote:
Good to hear. Move mailbox will fix most mailbox corruption, it's like
magic!! .. If you were running Exchange 2010 SP1 you could repair the
mailbox online with the
40 matches
Mail list logo
