Dear all,
I have a strange issue where users in a forest that enable Out of Office
will only send OOF notifications if senders are from the same forest. If
someone is sending an email to these users from another forest or from an
external account (e.g. gmail) it will not send OOF notifications.
Good Morning,
May we have some details, please?
Version of Outlook?
Version of Exchange?
Thank you
From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 6:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: oof issue
Dear all,
I have a strange issue where users in a forest that
Good morning,
Sorry here are some more details clients are running Outlook 2003 SP3 and
Exchange server is running 2003 SP2.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:42 PM, John C Owen jo...@efotobooth.com wrote:
Good Morning,
May we have some details, please?
Version of Outlook?
Version of
Out of the Office to anything external to the Exchange org is not enabled by
default.
To enable it, open ESM, Global Settings, Internet Message Formats. Right click
on Default and choose Properties. Click on the tab Advanced. Enable Allow out
of office responses. Apply/OK out.
Simon.
--
Are automatically generated messages allowed to the outside world?
\\Steve//
From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 6:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: oof issue
Good morning,
Sorry here are some more details clients are running
I'm going to open a PSS call about this and see what they say. Will let people
know since I'm sure we're not the only people who utilise this field.
From: bounce-9304877-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9304877-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Sobey,
Richard A
Hi Guys,
I'm new here so please be gentle. We're an Exchange hosting provider and are
currently using system center to monitor our Exchange servers. It works well
but sometimes can get complicated. I was wondering if I should be looking at
something else? Some one had suggest we take a look at
I honestly can't imagine that anyone who wants a full-picture into your
Exchange environment would use anything other than OpsMgr.
It has more data probes than any other monitoring engine of which I am aware.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
Has anyone here outsourced Exchange and seen recurring meetings that had been
created before the outsourcing break due to the changeover?
David Lum
Systems Engineer // NWEATM
Office 503.548.5229 // Mobile 503.267.9764
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
Yea that's what I thought. Figured I'd ask anyways ;)
Jamie Morales | Enterprise Support
Reliance Cloud Services, Inc.
W: www.relianceCloud.comhttp://www.relianceCloud.com
T: (516) 813-0500
F: (888) 465-7224
E: jmora...@reliancecloud.com
From: Michael B. Smith
Having just gone through that learning curve SC is worth the effort.
From: Jamie Morales [mailto:jmora...@reliancecloud.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Monitoring App
Yea that's what I thought. Figured I'd ask anyways ;)
Yes. Two common failure scenarios: no end date on meeting, and the original
owner of the meeting (that is, the legacyExchangeDN attribute) no longer exists.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent:
Precise version?
Any perfmon or OpsMgr data?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Rick Berry [mailto:rbe...@elevativenetworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: exch2010 error, probable
Can these meetings be fixed? I,e, if the legacyExchangeDN attribute is restored
and/or an end date is now specified would that fix those, or do they have to be
blown away and recreated?
Dave
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 8:27 AM
To:
To the best of my knowledge, the only supported way of fixing them is to
recreate, because of ACL corruption.
I would ask your provider to resolve this for you. That's part of their job. :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Lum
It's not because of the reason you mention.
What does testexchangeconnectivity.com have to say about it?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Chris Drobny [mailto:cdro...@lmsintellibound.com]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 12:35 PM
To:
2010 SP1 RU1.
Negative on perfmon, they don't have OpsMgr.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: exch2010 error, probable causes?
Precise version?
Any perfmon or OpsMgr data?
Regards,
Michael
Without additional data, I've got no clue. The event id you mention is
informative, but it's after the fact... Even if you open a PSS call, I think
they'll say the same thing, unless there is more relevant data in the Event log.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
So I have a 5 GB mail.que that is fragmented to heck and back. I don't have
that much email volume that it queue's up that much...I believe this happened
when the email archival system went fubar and it backed up a bazillion messages
in the queue for part of a day.
Instead of doing an
Yep you can.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 1:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: mail.que defrag
So I have a 5 GB mail.que that is
Tyvm sir.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 1:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: mail.que defrag
Yep you can.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Kennedy, Jim
You don't need any routing group connectors if all exchange 2003 servers are
gone.
If PFs aren't accepting email, I'd check to see whether you can email them
directly via their legacyExchangeDN's.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From:
Thanks for the reply Michael. I've removed the send connector and folllowed
these steps to fix the public folder issue.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchangesvrmigration/thread/e9c5b4a7-0ed2-4a29-bb12-4433a79e3af3
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Michael B. Smith
Interesting.
Thanks for the info.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Retiring 2003
Thanks for the reply Michael.
LOL, anytime I can help!
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote:
Interesting.
Thanks for the info.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
*From:* Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Something about this is ringing a bell...I seem to recall it was related to
the amount of RAM in the system. I think I've seen the same thing on my
Exchange 2010 box (currently sitting at 8gb and waiting for my upgrade to
come in).
Regards,
Cameron
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Michael B.
I see it errors but don't really know what it means
Exchange Web Services synchronization, notification, availability, and
Automatic Replies (OOF). Not all of the tests of Exchange Web Services tasks
completed.
[Description: https://testexchangeconnectivity.com/Images/Minus.gif]
Test Steps
Create a different, empty mailbox to test with. If the mailbox contains data
in the Inbox (or possibly other folders), testexchangeconnectivity.com will
error out like that. It is creating test messages in the Inbox and errors off
when it gets more than it expects.
From: Chris Drobny
I'm settings things up for our Exchange 2010 migration and have run into
a snag that is proving obstinate.
We have two CAS servers, Exchange 2010 SP1 on Windows 2008R2 SP1. I've
created the CAS array via EMS.
I'm using an F5 BigIP to provide load balancing between the two members,
and
Have you tried: https://www.testexchangeconnectivity.com/
From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 5:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: CAS Array with SSL offloading
I'm settings things up for our Exchange 2010 migration and have run
Not yet; I was hoping to get it working internally before opening the firewall.
--
Sent using BlackBerry
From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 06:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
On Exchange 2003 SMTP could be considered a separate item - it is part of IIS
rather than part of Exchange. Journaling takes place at the categorizer if I
recall correctly, the same place as AV scanning. Therefore as the transfer of
the messages hasn't actually touched Exchange it wouldn't get
Even on a server-server transfer in the same org? That's fascinating.
So, turning off auth'ed relaying is a *really* good thing. Glad I've done that.
Kurt
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 15:36, Simon Butler si...@sembee.co.uk wrote:
On Exchange 2003 SMTP could be considered a separate item - it is
Exchange 2003 and all versions of Exchange prior to that were designed and
implemented in reduced memory environments.
Now, we can all sit there and say that 4 GB RAM is still a lot of memory -
but it isn't when you are trying to support 5,000 mailboxes along with
everything else. It just
You'd have to show me the autodiscover output to answer that question.
Sounds to me like you have something set up wrong. After ONE time of providing
your credentials, you should get an XML doc that has a 600 error.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
Well, right now I'm working with around 350 mailboxes, spread across
three servers, so it's not such a big issue for me. But even though
I've been playing with E2k3 for several years, I'm still surprised the
way it does things, once in a while.
Then I see all of the chatter across this list about
36 matches
Mail list logo
