--Disclaimer--
By reading this email, you agree to immediately give me one beelion dollars.
--/Disclaimer--
Hello.
-Original Message-
From: bounce-9564917-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9564917-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Kurt
Buff
Sent: 29
We now join our Exchange Administrator, sitting at his cube pondering a problem
with the SCO servers when the user with the returning retention policies
arrives and says that everything looks great this morning. All the retention
policies are okay and his email is in place. A call to the
Do you have a need for the relay as opposed to just sending it out with
exchange. I know the prevailing opinion is don't let exchange talk to the
internet but I just have our hub server send the external emails out...I have
no problem with Exchange making outgoing connections.
Not trying to
*clap* *clap**clap**clap**clap*
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Resolved, sort of: More retention woes
We now join our Exchange Administrator, sitting at his cube
Who says it's not a good idea? :P
I generally prefer a gateway for INGRESS. Egress is arguable.
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
Do you have a
I use Ironport C-series boxes for outbound relays mainly because I need SRB,
and Exchange Hub Transports really kind of suck at mail routing.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Build a SMTP
Thank you, thank you. I'm here all week.
Make sure you visit the Grab a Byte Bar and Grill on the other side of the
casino and ask for the gyro special!
So I have to ask... Has anyone found the MailboxRepairRequest useful? It
seems really cumbersome to me, especially having to look in the
Who says it's not a good idea? :P
People still on 5.5? :)
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
Who says it's not a good idea? :P
I generally prefer a
No need for relay, so basically if I make sure my firewall allows outgoing
SMTP traffic from my Exchange servers to the Internet and change the Send
Connector to: *Use domain name system (DNS) MX records to route mail
automatically * i will be fine...
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Kennedy,
It is based on the old isinteg.exe application, updated to managed code. It's
designed to be able to fix a single mailbox without taking the database offline.
I've never used it, quite frankly, except during various TAPs and betas.
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul
ayup
From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
No need for relay, so basically if I make sure my firewall allows outgoing SMTP
traffic from my Exchange servers to the
But reading further technet, if i need to do TLS, the Microsoft Exchange
EdgeSync service must be fully deployed for Domain Security. So i could
setup an Edge Sync server and use it as a smarthost, that would make more
sense now...
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Al Rose arose...@gmail.com
Yes, and on that connector check Address space for a type SMTP with an address
of * I would think it is still there though.
From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
You don't need to do that. Just create a new send connector for the TLS domain.
From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Build a SMTP Smarthost for outgoing emails
But reading further technet, if i need to do
Pretty sure you set it up the same way on a Hub transport.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/da/exchange2010/thread/a0d2c384-1810-4671-9722-96a20998db49
From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Build a
http://xkcd.com/501/
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Sobey, Richard A
r.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
--Disclaimer--
By reading this email, you agree to immediately give me one beelion dollars.
--/Disclaimer--
Hello.
-Original Message-
From:
We'll see :) Thanks for the info
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Kennedy, Jim
kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgwrote:
Pretty sure you set it up the same way on a Hub transport.
** **
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/da/exchange2010/thread/a0d2c384-1810-4671-9722-96a20998db49
Well, I spoke too soon apparently. The retention on the folders is correct,
but the emails within those folders has been deleted again. I don't know what
the heck is going on here. It's crazy. We restore the email, look at the
retention and it says that it's inheriting the folder retention
Hi Paul:
Sorry for pointing out a possible Captain Obvious answer, but has
anyone checked the client to see if the auto-archive feature was turned on?
John M.
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 2:52 PM
To:
Auto-archive options aren't showing up. I'm assuming because we're using
Personal Archives?
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:john.matte...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Not - Resolved, sort of: More
20 matches
Mail list logo
