Replace the mouse with a standard mouse. Tell her the other one must be
defective if the steps that you provided her previously don't work and that
you can no longer support 'non-standard' equipment like that as it is a
drain on company resources (not to mention your time).
That or write the
Greetings,
I was wondering if someone on this list has had experience with KVM storage
vault. If so, would you be willing to answer a few questions about it off
list? I am fresh from their sales presentation and would like some comments
from someone with first hand experience before I decide
S... It's for virus propagation then. Good to know. Ick!
From the website
quote
Express ClickYes is a tiny program that sits in the System Tray and clicks
the Yes button on behalf of you, when Outlook's Security Guard opens prompt
dialog saying that a program is trying to send an email
information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
I call upon you all to witness the effect and impact of a D'oh!
Furthermore, please note that the auto-d'oh has a faster and less
recoverable impact. :)
Imagine, if you will a man, a normal man arriving to work after a pleasant
night. Totally unaware what fate has bestowed upon him. As he
And it shall continue untill the next person 'oops' all over the place as
well. :)
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log
That means so much to me. Thanks all
That would be Klez
http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_KLEZ.HV
Sect=T
Though you may be getting spam. I would ask your upstream providr to block
net.tw or ethome.net.tw and see what happens
-Original Message-
From: William Colucci [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
If you
ever have to do disaster recovery and 'break' SIS for WHATEVER reason, then you
will have a massive growth of your database.
If any
one makes a SINGLE change to the received file, then that is a separate instance
of 100MB
It's
bad practice and results in poor mail
You mean 4 boxes right? Two boxes gets you one cluster and no test
environment :)
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Clustering
Just get good hardware, do good backups, and
I have noticed that XP is real picky about that.
Recent one, a vender laptop setup and as his domain was not the same as
mine, for the exchange server he had to enter'exchange.company.com'
instead of just 'exchange'.
(We have a DNS entry aliasing 'exchange' to our bridgehead server)
See if
Have you run the IISLockdown tool? That has some restrictions and if the
URLScan that will catch and disable a lot of stuff as well.
-sp
-Original Message-
From: Carey, Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA
Off the top of my head, unless you can get your hands on some of the
origianl messages and look at the message headers, I suspect you are kind of
screwed. :(
You might want to come up with some verbage on a standard email indicating
this as a problem and how to locate and read message headers.
and SP?
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oh man you are kidding...
Why do you use OE?
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: Message
AFLAC!! :P
'nuff
said :)
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002
12:44 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: For
Kevin Miller
how
did a thread with my name end up talking about little
Title: Message
Maybe
this should be in the list FAQ.
-sp
-Original Message-From: Kevin Miller
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002
10:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: For
Kevin Miller
UCC+WCA that would the Urban Computer Commando +
Title: Message
You
might price out NEMX
http://www.nemx.com/products/powerpac/index.html
I
haven't used in a few years, but it was fairly inexpensive 3 years ago when we
implemented it at a former site. We used the atachment blocking
features.
-sp
-Original Message-From:
Title: Message
I
believe that this is a Klez.h behavior
http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_KLEZ.HVSect=T
One of
the subject variables is Klez.e, which is fairly humorous as long as you don't
get infected. ;/
I see
a few of them.
-sp
-Original
And once again the convenience vs. security debate is launched.
The downside of Outlook was it's ability to execute some script attacks from
the preview pane. This is solved somewhat in later versions and patches.
And is defeated through a percentage of end-users inability to control their
Perhaps I should have included a little smiley face after the first
'debating' line? :)
That's not a lot of typing, perhaps you ought to see someone about the
carpal tunnel syndrome you seem to be experiencing? And no, I don't feel
dumber but then I rarely follow the crowd. :P
Nope, not
rn Filter list, buts its too
disgusting to post publicly.
-Original
Message-From:
Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30,
2002 1:02
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE:
filtering spam
Title: Message
We use
a third party product but it's manual entry too.If we get porn spam,
then I will block the domain. We're up to about 60 and that seems to have
reduced it to very small trickle. A lot of cz domains.
-sp
-Original Message-From: William
Lefkovics
-Original Message-
From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Meeting requests accepted replied as text
Any event IDs ?
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
Title: Message
Use
your anti-virus sw to block ppt attachments. Have an internal web page
with instructions on how to use Winzip. That would solve the user able to
send large annoying ppt files.
Of
course, I wish I could do that. sigh :)
I just
have to content myself with blocking
There was once some code I found from a link on slipstick. It was a
customized page you loaded on the Outlook client that would query and
display mulitple calanders from a preset list on one page. It was pretty
neat and worked well, but it was also last year, January (2 jobs ago), that
I
I had this exact same issue two weeks ago.
Technet Q163576 turned out to be it for me.
Found it with a Technet Search; Address Book was unable to log on
-sp
-Original Message-
From: Dan Phan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Ya know, the last time this happened to me, I stopped and restarted the
anti-virus on the Exchange server and that cleared it up. Don't ask me why,
it just did.
-sp
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 2:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange
That would probably be
XIMS: How to Stop Spam Mail Messages from Using IMS Relay Agent [Q199656]
-sp
-Original Message-
From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Disabling Relay Function
Hi all,
Can some
grumble stupid cut'n'paste/grumble
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q199656
That would probably be
XIMS: How to Stop Spam Mail Messages from Using IMS Relay Agent [Q199656]
-sp
-Original Message-
From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May
Check to make sure his OS regional settings are correct for the time zone
he/she is in.
-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook Calendar issues
I know I've seen this with a
Title: Message
http://www.techrepublic.com/search/result.jhtml?_DARGS=%2Fsearch%2Fquery.jhtml
-Original Message-From: Stefan Jafs
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:26
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail
policy
Seriously guys why
Title: Message
On
that note: I arrived after the Server leasereturn migrations were
done and the Exchange 5.5 server was migrated to the new server. Of
course, they left the OS as NT4.0. Has anyone done an in place upgrade
from NT4 to win2000 with an exchange 5.5 server? Theoritically
Because it irritates the hell out of people on email lists?
-sp
-Original Message-
From: Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: A Despised Subject
I need to make an argument to management about
To sum up
User1 sends email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: attachment not recieved
User2 sends email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: attachment received.
Now, here's some random senerios.
1. Recipient1 is blocking by Attachment type? (I know we do).
2. User1 is infected by a virus and the email is being striped
Title: Message
Why
not add the second domain to your existing Exchange server (different container)
and do the redirects from there? Otherwise, Sendmail and qMail will both
do it though they are Linux solutions.
I
haven't messed with the MS SMTP service so can't say anything about
that.
Title: Message
You
could put an SMTP relay on a server in the DMZ and have it relay to your
Exchange server. ButI would avoid putting the Exchange server on the
DMZ. Relay such as NA WebShield SMTP (I can't believe I just suggested an
NAI product, use TREND's if you do this). You used to
35 matches
Mail list logo
