If you can, allocate more log file space on the 2010 servers while you're doing
the migration, and monitor it, or turn on circular logging until you're done
migrating. Moving mailboxes generates lots of transactions and lots of logs.
Also be sure you don't have any backups of the 2010 servers
Thanks for the advice. I don't ask questions in this forum much but I do learn
alot from reading all the posts. You guys are a great resource.
Thanks again,
-Wayne
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbe
: 2010 migration
If you can, allocate more log file space on the 2010 servers while you're doing
the migration, and monitor it, or turn on circular logging until you're done
migrating. Moving mailboxes generates lots of transactions and lots of logs.
Also be sure you don't have any
From: bounce-9366658-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:
> bounce-9366658-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Campbell,
> Rob
> Sent: 01 July 2011 00:19
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: 2010 migration
>
> If you can, allocate more log file spa
hard
From: bounce-9367212-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9367212-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of David
Liu
Sent: 01 July 2011 16:00
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 2010 migration
Sorry to hijack the thread but conitnuing on the thread of backup, is it
s
With Windows backup I had to backup the Active DB in our CCR cluster. Our 2010
plan is to have 2 DB copies onsite and one in a DR site. All of our Exchange
2010 servers are on VMware and we snapshot them nightly. Also, we use Quest's
Archive Manager so we have a copy of all mail there. That's ou
a backup while it's going on. DAMHIKT.
From: David Liu [mailto:ganymed...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 10:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 2010 migration
Sorry to hijack the thread but conitnuing on the thread of backup, is it
suicidal to backup the active db?
P
The migration went very well. Would of been a non-event if I hadn't forgotten
about an internal firewall between our Oracle and Exchange servers but . . . .
today I am dismantling our 2007 systems and deleted the public folder because
it was only for Blackberry offline address book. Shortly afte
Just noticed that this issue is only with Outlook 2007. We do not get the error
with Outlook 2010. Unfortunately, all our users are on Outlook 2007.
-Wayne
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftwa
Created a new Public Folder, assigned it to the mailbox databases and the new
meeting requests now work. Exchange 2010 must still have a dependancy on public
folders. Don't know what a blank public folder has to do with booking a
resource but it works.
-Wayne
---
To manage subscriptions click he
Edge in the DMZ.
Everything else inside.
From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 2010 migration
My question is for the new 2010 design. My architect wants to put the 2 CAS
servers in the DMZ and 2 MBX/HT in t
It is NOT SUPPORTED to put CAS in the DMZ.
If you do not want to expose Exchange directly to the internet, then use a
firewall with DPI or a reverse proxy.
I don't know who your architect is, but I recommend you get someone who
understands Exchange 2010. :)
From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-so
Regarding the architect, what exactly is this person's actual title and role?
I can't believe the architect would suggest a thing.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 27, 2013, at 7:56 AM, "Michael B. Smith" wrote:
> It is NOT SUPPORTED to put CAS in the DMZ.
>
> If you do not want to expose Exchan
Change your architect obvious he does not know what he/ she is doing ,
sorry for coming staight like this but this is pretty exchange 101 , no
Exchange server to be placed in DMZ ( edge is exception
Classis configuration would be all inside
2 cas& hts combined
2 mbx in a DAG
Now there it depend
I think its time to twist the question. So perhaps we can say :-
“If you put your server CAS in a DMZ it will no longer be a DMZ…”
Dave Wade
0161 474 5456
From: Oz Casey Dedeal [mailto:telne...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 March 2013 15:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 2010 migration
Change
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 2010 migration
Change your architect obvious he does not know what he/ she is doing , sorry
for coming staight like this but this is pretty exchange 101 , no Exchange
server to be placed in DMZ ( edge is
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:30 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: 2010 migration
>
> ** **
>
> Change your architect obvious he does not know what he/ she is doing ,
> sorry for coming staight like this but this is pretty exchange 101
gt;>
>> *From:* Oz Casey Dedeal [mailto:telne...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:30 AM
>>
>> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* Re: 2010 migration
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Change your architect obvious he does not
chard Stovall [rich...@gmail.com]
Received: Wednesday, 27 Mar 2013, 12:13pm
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Subject: Re: 2010 migration
I think I misread your question. Are you saying firewall rules which direct
appropriate traffic from the Internet directly to
e firewall to the CAS work instead of an
> edge server?
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Oz Casey Dedeal [mailto:telne...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:30 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: 2010 migration
>
> ** **
>
> Change your
You might want to revoke the person’s System Admin license and put him to work
running clean-ups on a WSUS server.
From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2010 migration
Well the architect isn’t
Lol that’s a good one.
From: John Matteson [mailto:john.matte...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2010 migration
You might want to revoke the person’s System Admin license and put him to work
running clean-ups on a WSUS server.
From
ution.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:31 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: 2010 migration
>
> ** **
>
> Well the architect isn’t really an architect, just a system admin who is
> adamit about his design. The problem is, he d
clean-ups on a WSUS server.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:31 PM
>> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* RE: 2010 migration
>>
>> ** **
>>
>>
24 matches
Mail list logo
