as DOD.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Jim Busick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:41 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
And we all know how secure uncle is:
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/01/11/09
We are running Exch 5.5 sp4 on a mix of 2k sp1 and nt4 sp6.
We have a couple of dual processor nt4 sp6 boxes in the DMZ with port 25
from outside open to them only. These servers have Trend InterScan Virus
Wall and Trend InterScan E-Manager for Virus protection and
content/attachment filtering.
Sending and receiving.
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
By SMPT relay do you mean sending outbound internet mail to the internet
Thank-you very much that helps.
Regards,
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
We are running Exch 5.5 sp4 on a mix of 2k sp1 and nt4 sp6.
We
Are you sure you want to put NT machines on the firewall? Shouldn't there be UNIX
machines there for better security?
--
Matt Lathrum
General Dynamics Decision Systems
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
-Original Message-
?StoryID=11597
-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
Are you sure you want to put NT machines on the firewall? Shouldn't there be
UNIX machines
I agree - without exception.
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
NT Servers can be just as secure as Unix servers, if you apply the proper
patches. You do
Title: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
We use NAV for gateways as a mail relay that sends to exchange running antigen and then to the desktops with nav CE
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer
Premiere Radio Networks
A Division of Clear Channel Communications
15260 Ventura
Paranoid?
--Andrew Duey, MCSE
-Original Message-
From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
We use NAV for gateways as a mail relay that sends to exchange running
antigen
.
-Original Message-
From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
I agree - without exception.
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
Paranoid?
--Andrew Duey, MCSE
-Original Message-
From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
We use NAV for gateways as a mail relay that sends
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
I agree - without exception.
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
That wasn't pre-ISA?
-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
If this is true, then why does Microsoft themselves use UNIX for their
SMTP firewalls
Plan:
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11766
-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
If this is true, then why does Microsoft themselves use
a Marshall Plan:
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11766
-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
If this is true, then why does Microsoft
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
If you want to show me documentation for that, I'll happily read it. It
won't change my opinion that NT is just as secure as UNIX, if you
administer it properly.
-- Drew
Visit http
That would depend which Unix server you set up.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
I concur. It is all about who is running it.
If I setup a Unix
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
If by administering you mean re-engineering vital components and
eliminating silly potential buffer overflow possibilities
Title: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
Exactly. Plus it gives me the ability to send mail to different servers via domain name without having to worry about MX records or DNS. Everything points to the gateway.
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer
Premiere Radio Networks
And we all know how secure uncle is:
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/01/11/09/011109hnflunk.xml
-Original Message-
From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange SMTP Routing
those folks don't follow the same rules as DOD.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Jim Busick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:41 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
And we all know how secure uncle is:
http
21 matches
Mail list logo
