RE: MS licensing???

2008-08-12 Thread Webster
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MS licensing??? I will have to play with this Very Nice! That is what Shook says to TVK! J Webster ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: MS licensing???

2008-08-12 Thread Kurt Buff
I thought it was much simpler than that - open wallet, empty on table, get loan for 10% more. On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Simon Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Remember the licensing rules... > > 1. Get three opinions, at least one must be from Microsoft. > 2. Get it in writing. > 3. The

RE: MS licensing???

2008-08-12 Thread gsweers
Exchange is tied to AD, so regardless you have to authenticate with a username and pw at the server level hence a Windows CAL + Exchange Cal. From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: MS licensing

RE: MS licensing???

2008-08-12 Thread Michael B. Smith
Yes. That's why I said "Windows" and not AD. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: R

Re: MS licensing???

2008-08-12 Thread Matt Plahtinsky
ne if you're on a "budget". > > > > Ehren J. Benson, MCSE > > *Windows Systems Administrator* > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 517-884-5469 > > > > *From:* Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:39 A

RE: MS licensing???

2008-08-12 Thread Ehren Benson
Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: MS licensing??? Hmm, Interesting. I would much rather keep all the mail on my server but if I can't get management to pay for it this might be an option.. The one

Re: MS licensing???

2008-08-12 Thread Matt Plahtinsky
A/MCSE/Exchange MVP > > http://TheEssentialExchange.com > > > > *From:* Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:28 AM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: MS licensing??? > > > > Remember the licensing rules... >

Re: MS licensing???

2008-08-12 Thread Matt Plahtinsky
Hmm, Interesting. I would much rather keep all the mail on my server but if I can't get management to pay for it this might be an option.. The one problem I see with this is when they send email it states its coming from @gmail.com instead of @mycompany.com Thanks On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10

RE: MS licensing???

2008-08-12 Thread Michael B. Smith
tever else. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MS licensing??? Remember the licensing rules... 1

RE: MS licensing???

2008-08-12 Thread Ehren Benson
My understanding is that you will have to buy both because in order to have an exchange mailbox regardless of how it is accessed you have to have an AD user to which the mailbox is linked. To have an AD user you need a core cal for each and also an exchange cal for each mailbox. The only other

RE: MS licensing???

2008-08-12 Thread Simon Butler
Remember the licensing rules... 1. Get three opinions, at least one must be from Microsoft. 2. Get it in writing. 3. The most expensive option will be the correct one. What I tell clients is that in most respects, the number of machines = number of CALs. You cannot have Exchange CALs only as the

RE: MS licensing

2002-02-26 Thread Allen Crawford
Speaking of licensing. I know this has been in here before, so I plan on searching the archives, but if anyone who hasn't talked about this recently feels like explaining to me how they've handled the threat letter from Microsoft regarding licensing, I'd appreciate it. Our 30 days are counting a