Kurt,
Speaking on the SEA side of things, it sounds like Exchange is housed at each
respective location?
If so, it might be best to have a SEA server at each location so that you don't
have to archive and retrieve over your WAN (which could cause some bandwidth
issues once everything is set
We have an Exchange 2003 server at each location.
No way we're going to spend more money on more infrastructure, though.
One instance of SEA is all we're going to get.
However, we are message journaling the foreign offices back to the US
office. I'm hoping that helps significantly.
Kurt
On
Hit send too soon...
Also, we've been manually archiving the message journaling mailbox for
years, and saving the daily PST files to disk and tape.
Kurt
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:17, Eric Hanna eri...@sunbelt-software.com wrote:
Kurt,
Speaking on the SEA side of things, it sounds like
PF replication will always take a lesser precedent to normal mail traffic, and
you can configure it to happen out of hours, if any such things exists in your
company.
You might also have the luxury - depending on costs and how much time you have
- of setting up an Exchange PF store on a new
That will probably prove useful. I'll make note of that during the
conversations we have.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 13:29, Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
PF replication will always take a lesser precedent to normal mail traffic,
and you can configure it to happen out of hours, if
